Michigan football and unearned arrogance

Submitted by swdodgimus on November 8th, 2020 at 1:47 PM

Michigan football is a hive of unearned arrogance. It's replete with coaches/AD staff/etc. constantly cashing in on the recycled lore of old and producing a team with increasingly diminishing returns.

It's kind of like JJ Abrams Star Wars. Looking at Force Awakens to Rise of Skywalker, the focus has been less on the ideas/genres that inspired George Lucas (Westerns, samurai films, Joseph Campbell) to create a fresh, new product in 1977. Now, it's JJ Abrams recycling moments from the old movies without the same building blocks that made the originals legendary.

When he was developing the Mandalorian, Jon Favreau talked about how he didn't want to make a show that constantly referenced old Star Wars. He wanted to be inspired by Westerns or samurai films to explore different parts of the Universe. So far, it's a massive improvement in the franchise. Very entertaining, because it understands the building blocks of what made Star Wars what it was in the first place.

Switching the metaphor over to football, Michigan has been missing the building blocks that made the program special under Bo:

1) Beat Ohio State on the recruiting trail (Dan Dierdof, Billy Taylor, Thom Darden, Dennis Franklin, Ed Shuttlesworth, etc.)

2) Knowing that focusing on beating OSU on the field elevates the entire program (20-15-2 from 1969 to 2004, or the last time Michigan won the Big 10). This is despite some three/four-loss Michigan teams during that time beating OSU teams littered with NFL talent.

3) Make more talented teams uncomfortable with hard-hitting and disciplined play (Close losses to VERY talented USC, Oklahoma, Auburn teams in bowl games).

In the last two decades, the closest Michigan has been to toppling OSU has been when the recruiting in Ohio is at least competitive. Lloyd Carr was in close games with players like Prescott Burgess or Shawn Crable. The backbone of the 2011 team supporting Denard were Roy Roundtree, Fitz Toussaint and Patrick Omameh, with Jake Ryan and Frank Clark roaming the other side of the ball.

That 2016 defense (thanks Brady Hoke) featured such Ohioans as Mike McCray, Taco Charlton, Dymonte Thomas, Ben Gedeon, Chris Wormley. Obviously, that's the closest Michigan got to grabbing an Urban Meyer pelt.

The best Ohioan on the roster now? Erick All? Nolan Rumler??

The record against OSU doesn't need to be restated. The fact that Michigan couldn't even make them competitive the last two years despite recruiting classes ranked in the same range as Clemson is telling of bad preparation (Clemson's classes before 2018 were in the 5th-to-15th-best range, like M's).

As Ace pointed out in the game recap, the margin of losses (outside of the OSU game) is getting bad, too. 19 to Alabama. 26 to Florida. 21 to Wisconsin. 29 to Penn State. Many teams with either slightly worse to infinitely better talent are getting the jump on Michigan more and more.

This brings me to the original statement of unearned arrogance. Michigan's athletic department has hid behind the Michigan Man narrative for about a decade and a half to justify lazy decision-making that now only seems to exist to make the department money (pandemic obviously is changing things). Rich Rodriguez had his warts, but as John Bacon has documented, he was undermined by "Michigan Men" who didn't like the way he wanted to fix things.

Brady Hoke is the ONLY Lloyd Carr assistant with any sort of mild head coaching success. As Brian and Bacon have pointed out, he was the perfect coach for Dave Brandon to control and implement schemes to squeeze money out of the fanbase.

Harbaugh was supposed to a Michigan man with a Super Bowl resume. His first few punches were good, as he was probably unlucky to lose to OSU in 16 and 17. His early gameplans showed respect to his opponents (stopping the MSU A-gap blitz in 15, Don Brown forming a perfect defense to slow J.T. Barrett in 16).

Not adapting to OSU for two years running, or having some changeup for MSU or Indiana, is either stubborn stupidity or an arrogance of a once successful coach leaning on his past success to justify his strategy. Fittingly, there's few programs that lean on its past success more than Michigan (maybe Nebraska).

I suggest a focus on the past, but not on some guy tangentially related to Bo or Lloyd. Focus on the things that made Bo great, not just some guy that knew or played for him.

Bluesince89

November 8th, 2020 at 1:59 PM ^

OSU is recruiting the best of the best nationally.  We don't need to focus on Ohio recruiting - we need to do a better job across the board and getting these guys the coaching that they need.  Look at their best players of the last decade and how many were from Ohio? Not many.  Get the best guys - don't care if they're from Mars.  

Not sure where the unearned arrogance comes from.  We've been an average program post-WWII, so focus on that?  Bo was a good coach in a bad conference - not much to hang a hat on in the national stage.  Time to move on from the past and anything to do with it.  No one really cares about what happened during the inter-war years except for some good trivia.

UMxWolverines

November 8th, 2020 at 2:43 PM ^

Excpet a lot of our best players in 2015 and 2016 WERE from Ohio. If OSU isn't going to focus as much on Ohio then we absolutely have to make inroads there. Kentucky and Cincinnati are currently having a lot of success with that. 

Jake Butt

Chris Wormley

Ben Gedeon

Taco Charlton

Mike McCray

Dymonte Thomas and Jarrod Wilson were solid

wolve1972

November 8th, 2020 at 6:32 PM ^

Jesus H Christ.  National titles in the leather helmet era ?  And there lies the problem with our fanbase. None of us were alive for the majority of those titles.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 8th, 2020 at 2:18 PM ^

Cannot beat OSU on recruiting trail unless we get an Ohio sourced coaching staff, with all the contacts and influence that go with it.  Its our only way back... OSU is taking so many out of staters and alot of Ohio region players want to play in the game...  might need to get Fickell in this light.  Dantonio suffices but that ship sailed in 2005.

A good starting player from Ohio is worth 10X a guy from Connecticut... they have so much on the line personally...  they were spurned by OSU and have so much at stake, along with a massive chip.

Our downfall was when Treseel locked out the state to us... Hoke miraculously got us back in, Harbaugh didn't continue it, instead he hammered on the northeast and Georgia.   He had the opportunity to hire Ohio staffers and keep Hoke's excellent Ohio recruiting going, and he didn't.  Harbaugh had one chance, had we won in 2016, and only then attack the area.  He did try with our LB coach but then he flipped to OSU.. brilliant move by them to steal him....they understand how critical it is to keep us out of Ohio.  Yeah, yeah, many are gonna say that there are great players outside of Ohio.. there are, but that has poor perspective with our rivalry and history.

blueheron

November 8th, 2020 at 3:48 PM ^

"Hoke miraculously got us back in"

See my earlier post. It wasn't a miracle. Michigan had a very short time to take advantage of a short period of Ohio (and OSU) instability. That opportunity no longer exists. All we could do now is get the Cinci-level run-off. You aren't going to beat OSU with that no matter how big the "shoulder chips" are.

maquih

November 8th, 2020 at 2:30 PM ^

this is all bullshit man -- we hired the best coach available after hoke.  now it's time for a change, and yes we keep getting our butts kicked by ohio.  has nothing to do with arrogance

MgoHillbilly

November 8th, 2020 at 2:31 PM ^

Tldr.

Regardless of the football program's status, I'm extremely proud to be a Michigan alum.  How well the football program's doing doesn't change my feelings on that. That may be a significant departure from the feelings of those fans that never attended but still love the school primarily because of football.

The Barwis Effect

November 8th, 2020 at 2:49 PM ^

I agree with you on the whole Michigan Man thing, but Rich Rod is not without fault.  You can’t come in with crazy new ideas, proceed to go 3-9, and then get upset when you’re not handed the keys to the Ferrari. That was the magic of Bo. He was an outsider with new ideas.  The difference?  He won.  Your point about Michigan Men still stands though.  I’d be happy to never hear that phrase uttered again. 

uofmfan_13

November 8th, 2020 at 3:34 PM ^

Some good points about Ohio and recruiting in the region. Families and folks from Ohio simply come with more of a chip on the shoulder. We should be targeting half the state Dammit. Northeast and norhwest Ohio down to Columbus. Lock down Michigan. Go into Georgia and Cali etc but realize that your "leader" core is likely to come from the region. And dang, if we are going to take projects and 3-star "sleepers" or flyers from Massachusetts lets go with Ohio NOT the wall street corridor!

bama north

November 8th, 2020 at 3:44 PM ^

You don’t think we should limit our search to “Michigan Men.”  Got it.  Thanks for expanding that ^ sentence into a short book.

blueheron

November 8th, 2020 at 3:54 PM ^

OP, I honestly don't know where to start.

"It's replete with coaches/AD staff/etc. constantly cashing in on the recycled lore of old ..."

Yep. Agreed. I also agree with your later remarks about Michigan Men.

"... Michigan has been missing the building blocks that made the program special under Bo ..."

Wait. You just said we shouldn't do that.

"Beat Ohio State on the recruiting trail ..."

Good luck with that.

"Make more talented teams uncomfortable with hard-hitting and disciplined play (Close losses to VERY talented USC, Oklahoma, Auburn teams in bowl games)."

JFC. I'm not interested in "dignity in defeat" or "outhitting" (a la Frost and UCF) the opponent. The object is to WIN.

uofmfan_13

November 8th, 2020 at 4:16 PM ^

I'll take dignity of defeat at this point (when playing good opponents).

If Michigan was losing, close nailbiters to Alabama or Florida or Ohio State, even though we had slightly lower rated/scouted talent... The issue would likely be game management and scheme...not player development and questions about "heart". Is it the end goal? No. But dang I would take a dignified defeat over what I saw the last few weeks.

username03

November 8th, 2020 at 3:54 PM ^

The focus on ohio is part of the problem, it allows us to pretend we're better that we really are. We're like a middle school kid looking at the varsity team and thinking there's no way we'll ever compete with those guys. No shit, we're in middle school. Let's focus on making the JV team first, then we can worry about making varsity. We've just deluded ourselves into thinking we're already on the JV team.

manhattan wolverine

November 8th, 2020 at 4:28 PM ^

The entitlement mindset comes from our academics. We expect our program to be as good relative to the competition, as our academics relative to other colleges. 

Anyone who's gone to Michigan knows that almost every department is at the top of the field. Law, medicine, business and engineering are the 4 most lucrative careers, and Michigan is at or near the top for all of them. Outside of the Ivy league and elite privates (Duke) you're graduating with a better degree than 99% of people. The arrogance is well-deserved, because many alumni are very successful, and the name carries a lot of weight. This is true even in NYC. 

So of course we expect the same for our football program. At the very least we should be competing for NY6 bowls, which is not a high bar in 2020. USC, PSU and Florida are all similar programs with recent hires & resets that have had more success that us.

That's why there's always a big disconnect between fans who think we've returned to historical levels vs ones who think we could be doing much better. 

umumum

November 9th, 2020 at 5:13 PM ^

Don't tell that to the many highly successful Michigan alums in NYC that I personally know.  Though I guess it's true that they may have become successful DESPITE their U of M degree.  Weird too that so many New Yorkers send their children to Michigan for college.

TSimpson77

November 8th, 2020 at 4:32 PM ^

Notre Dame beat Clemson last night, albeit with Clemson down a few stars. Notre Dame has been in the National Championship game(maybe undeservingly) and made the playoffs with similar recruiting and similar academic restrictions. The point is, we can’t blame that stuff for not being able to win big games or beat Ohio State. That falls on coaching. I can’t stand Notre Dame or Brian Kelly and it’s very discouraging to see them be successful every few years especially when Michigan has put a hurt on them in recent years games. 

Go Blue in MN

November 8th, 2020 at 4:35 PM ^

We should take down the "Those Who Stay Will Be Champions" sign.  It's not correct.  Those who earn it will be champions.  

Obviously I'm not saying that a sign is the cause of our malaise, but it is symptomatic of the arrogance that seems to be an issue when we get outhustled and outcoached by teams with less talented players.  Don't expect to win just by showing up.   

Don

November 9th, 2020 at 9:27 AM ^

Dan Dierdof, Billy Taylor, Thom Darden

Ironically, those three guys weren't recruited by Schembechler—they were recruited by Bump Elliott.