BlueRob

September 2nd, 2020 at 5:37 PM ^

Maybe this source is a little better...  NYPost with Duke research:

https://nypost.com/2020/08/09/scientists-tested-14-types-of-masks-in-preventing-spread-of-covid-19/

N95 masks, often used by health care professionals, worked best to stop the transmission of respiratory droplets during regular speech.

Other good performers at stopping leakage were three-layer surgical masks and cotton masks, which can be made at home, the researchers with Duke’s physics department found.

But while bandannas and knitted face coverings may be a unique look, they did not offer much protection, according to the study.

The scientists also discovered that neck fleeces, or neck gaiters, often worn by runners, were the least effective and actually allowed more respiratory droplets to escape than not wearing a mask at all.

That’s because they were shown to break down larger droplets into smaller particles, allowing them to slip out the sides of the covering more easily.

 

Yes on the first post...  it kind of hit home for me because I have a nurse for a wife.  She has explained to me to the point of exhaustion that N95's are the only mask that 'really' works.  The rest just stop larger droplets. 

Thanks for the welcome to the board :).

crom80

September 3rd, 2020 at 1:15 AM ^

"The authors found that N95 respirators filtered out 97% of a test aerosol while surgical masks did almost as well, filtering out 95% of the aerosol."

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/cbn/2007/cbnreport_02152007.html

"we have measured the filtration efficiencies of various commonly available fabrics for use as cloth masks in filtering particles in the significant (for aerosol-based virus transmission) size range of ∼10 nm to ∼6 μm and have presented filtration efficiency data as a function of aerosol particle size. We find that cotton, natural silk, and chiffon can provide good protection, typically above 50% in the entire 10 nm to 6.0 μm range, provided they have a tight weave... ...In summary, we find that the use of cloth masks can potentially provide significant protection against the transmission of particles in the aerosol size range."

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c03252

 

N95 masks themselves do not provide 100% protection. The 95 in N95 means that it filters at least 95% of airborne particles. non N95 masks such as surgical masks and cloth masks can also filter aerosols to varying degrees.

I would say majority of medical opinions consistently say masks work.

BlueRob

September 3rd, 2020 at 10:13 AM ^

Go back and take a look at the studies I posted and your study.  The main difference between them are the particle sizes they are testing against.  Your study is testing against much larger particle sizes and therefore is saying cloth masks provide protection.  i.e. protection against coughing and sneezing sized droplets, not virus sized aerosols.

I know N95's are rated at 95% efficiencies against small aerosols if they are properly fitted, on a clean shaven face, and only worn once. I basically have stated that in every post.

My point all along is that non N95 masks are not very effective against small aerosol sized particles especially when you take into account they are often not worn properly, not sealed to face, and worn multiple times.  They will help against large particles (coughing) but provide very little protection against particles in the air thru normal breathing.

Masks are an easy and efficient way to ensure people are coughing sneezing into their elbows.  Do not get comfortable for one second thinking you are safe by wearing one indoors in poorly ventilated rooms.  That is not what non N95 masks were meant to protect against.

So yes - wear masks but also understand where you are protected and where you aren't.

crom80

September 3rd, 2020 at 11:23 AM ^

The study i posted says they looked at aerosol sized (0.01um) particles.

That is smaller than the 0.02 um one of your posted study used.

 

No one ever said they, including N94 masks, make anybody completely safe from the virus.

The overall medical opinion always was they greatly reduced the risk to spread the virus. There is no differing of opinions regarding the masks in the medical field.

 

BlueRob

September 3rd, 2020 at 2:34 PM ^

Directly from your article link:

Surgical masks have long been the recommended respiratory protection for diseases transmitted by large droplets (>5µ) such as plague or meningococcal meningitis. For diseases such as TB that are transmitted by small droplet aerosols, an N95 (or better) respirator or powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) with high efficiency particulate absorbing (HEPA) filter is recommended. It has been generally assumed that a surgical mask provided little protection from aerosols. With SARS and influenza, both droplet and aerosol transmission may occur, although the relative importance of each is debated.

Stephen Y

September 2nd, 2020 at 3:25 PM ^

I believe the term you’re looking for is “canceled.” Stop being a fool. I will fight for someone’s right to free speech, even if I don’t agree with it... that is until they try to oppress others’ right to free speech. Then they can kiss my butt.

nowicki2005

September 2nd, 2020 at 5:27 PM ^

What are you talking about? He didnt give medical advice. He was asked a question and said he doesn't fear for himself. If he gets it he gets it. If he dies he dies, but out of respect for others thinking and health, he wears one. You can think he has a dumb train of thought but he is still respecting everyone else

Cam

September 2nd, 2020 at 1:37 PM ^

"Disagreement while being in compliance is a completely legitimate response."

What if your "disagreement" encourages other people to be out of compliance?

Cousins was asked the following statement about masks:

“If 1 is the person who says, ‘Masks are stupid, you’re all a bunch of lemmings’ and 10 is, ‘I’m not leaving my master bathroom for the next 10 years,’ where do you land?”

Here was Cousins’ response: “I’m not gonna call anybody stupid, for the trouble it would get me in. But I’m about a .000001.”

That's a pretty irresponsible statement from a public figure. 

Stuck in Lansing

September 2nd, 2020 at 1:41 PM ^

What does this even mean? The example he is setting is 'listen to the authorities and care for other people even if you are personally unconcerned or disagree'.

It's not like he is leading a protest on this. He is 32, is constantly tested, and seems to be in good health. Why should he be overly concerned?

yossarians tree

September 2nd, 2020 at 2:21 PM ^

I wear one indoors in public places. I'm not sure how well it works but I'm not a medical expert so if I'm going to defer on the side of caution I will wear one, especially out of respect to others.

But make no mistake: I fucking hate the masks. It just makes me sick to my stomach, everyone darting away from each other, not seeing the personality and the smile on people's faces, and especially when I see little children with their beautiful faces all covered up. I will never accept it as normal, and I'm worried that now they are mandated it will be very difficult for the powers that be to lift the mandate. 

DTOW

September 2nd, 2020 at 1:20 PM ^

Which in this case and most other cases is in fact not what’s happening. Nothing he said is out of line in any way. It’s just a bunch of people pounding the table and screaming about how good of a person they are and calling other people terrible things because they can type it on a keyboard but would never say face to face. 

Qmatic

September 2nd, 2020 at 1:03 PM ^

I mean by like all available accounts, aside from being kind of a tool in the way he conducts himself; Cousins seems like a pretty good person to others and a decent member of society. As far as gigantic pieces of shit in the NFL, it would take quite a long time before Kirk Cousins came up.