Harbaugh's value to the University of Michigan would be $1 billion
If this is true, the amount of money apparently offered to Harbaugh to coach at Michigan makes perfect sense. I think most of us realized that anyway.
UM regents were informed that Harbaugh's project value to the U over the term of the contract would be $1B. #Harbaugh #MerryChristmas
— dennis fithian (@dennisfithian) December 25, 2014
December 25th, 2014 at 12:07 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 12:13 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 25th, 2014 at 12:37 PM ^
Don't tell that to Dr. Evil....
December 25th, 2014 at 3:21 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 4:22 PM ^
We're getting into Fab Five shirt and pants sales figures.
December 25th, 2014 at 12:08 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 12:09 PM ^
Hunter Lochmann disagrees - this relationship with Harbaugh will be a fleeting 4/5 year endeavor, at most.
December 25th, 2014 at 3:22 PM ^
a typical Lochmannism would be "the M creates the value, not Harbaugh"
December 25th, 2014 at 3:36 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 4:04 PM ^
That someone must hate life
December 25th, 2014 at 4:37 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 7:50 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 10:06 PM ^
I can feel it down in mah plums.
December 25th, 2014 at 10:11 PM ^
Getting a nice, maize and blueish hue.
December 25th, 2014 at 12:10 PM ^
Thats the kind of thing that can flip management from 'Is this offer too high?' to 'Maybe we should double it to make sure'
December 25th, 2014 at 12:24 PM ^
I was hoping his offer would be in 8 digits, per year. Just to show the peasant programs that Michigan is going to take football seriously again.
December 25th, 2014 at 3:14 PM ^
Agreed!
December 25th, 2014 at 12:11 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 3:16 PM ^
Less $$$ than MOOSU
December 25th, 2014 at 12:20 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 12:49 PM ^
Maybe 1/10 of that would be true football related revenue (tickets, apparel, concessions), but the overwhelming majority would be in increased donations. I'm not sure how correlated giving is to football success, but I'm sure it's significant.
Now, if your baseline is a team that's 5-7 in perpetuity, vs a JH coached team that you are hoping is competing for Big Ten Championships, it's not out of the question. The better analysis would be JH vs your next best option (Miles, Mullen) which I would assume wouldn't be a $1B difference.
December 25th, 2014 at 4:21 PM ^
"5-7 in perpetuity"?
Michigan has had 18 head football coaches and only one of those 18 had a Michigan-career winning percentage that low, and he only coached three years, not "in perpetuity". Bump Elliott's the only coach of the ten that stayed four years or more to have a percentage < .600.
December 25th, 2014 at 6:27 PM ^
Sir, you don't have to go back to Bump Elliott to find an example of a coach with a 5-7 or worse average at Michigan.
You have carefully selected only those coaches who stayed four or more years, but that makes little sense--because those who coach poorly are likely to get the boot far sooner than those who coach successfully. You thereby conceal the worst coaching records.
Consider RR, who coached at Michigan only a few years ago--and won only 15 of 38 games (includes the bowl game). That's a 39% winning average.
There's plenty of reason to fear regression to a 5-7 average record. It's not just RR; that was the football team's record this very season. Hence, baseline.
December 25th, 2014 at 6:51 PM ^
Read it again. He's talking about RichRod in his second sentence.
December 26th, 2014 at 12:28 AM ^
One year does not a baseline make. Even if you take only the recent wandering-in-the-wilderness years post 2007, the average is still not as bad as your 5-7 "baseline."
December 25th, 2014 at 12:24 PM ^
#NeedMoarSearchbits!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 25th, 2014 at 12:29 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 1:02 PM ^
OTOH it could've been generated by the AD to convince the regents that spending $6-8MM/yr on Harbaugh is totally worth it compared to spending like $2-4MM/yr on some middling candidate. Its chump change compared to the benefits
December 25th, 2014 at 5:50 PM ^
of Harbaugh's value.
While I agree with the notion that spending $6-8MM/yr on Harbaugh is chump change compared to the benefits, the scale of the figure should at least pass the laugh test.
December 25th, 2014 at 12:35 PM ^
I'm sure the words were "could be", not "would be."
December 25th, 2014 at 12:43 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 12:44 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 25th, 2014 at 2:59 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 12:48 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 1:12 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 3:17 PM ^
add in some jalapeno pepper!
December 25th, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^
Even if it's only 10 percent of that estimate, that puts you at 100 million or double his salary. That would make sense with what Saban has done for Alabama although they're not really the academic powerhouse that we are. Harbaugh could probably take us to 50K students and closer to Stanford, Northwestern levels if he wins a national championship or 2.
December 25th, 2014 at 3:37 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 4:59 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 6:26 PM ^
The dreaded "converted triple." That's where they take a double dorm room and swap out one of the beds for a bunk bed and squeeze in a desk to the already limited floor space. Yeah, I'm still sore about my freshman year dorm room. My Festivus airing of grievances begins and ends with the converted triple.
December 25th, 2014 at 8:46 PM ^
That and the wonderful floor lounges turned into quads. Had a few friends that lived in those in East Quad, and good lord were those terrible.
December 25th, 2014 at 8:55 PM ^
Knew some guys who lived in a West Quad converted lounge that was huge. They had all their bunks on one side, put a curtain up in the middle, and I believe had a foosball table and beer pong table on the other side with room to spare
December 25th, 2014 at 12:52 PM ^
December 25th, 2014 at 4:25 PM ^
Saban is earning around $10M in State of Alabama adjusted dollars.
December 25th, 2014 at 12:58 PM ^
Do we get the Ark of the Covenant in return?
December 25th, 2014 at 12:59 PM ^