ESPN thinks we’re second tier football program

Submitted by MGK10 on January 25th, 2020 at 11:01 AM

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaafb/espn-michigan-is-a-second-tier-program/vi-BBZiTSJ

Gucci Mane

January 25th, 2020 at 12:48 PM ^

I have to disagree. The top tier is at most 6 teams (maybe less if we wanna be specific). But 7-30 is absolutely not in the same tier. 7-15 are what I would call very good teams, with a realistic chance to become elite if things go well. 15-30 have no chance ever. 

JonnyHintz

January 25th, 2020 at 1:31 PM ^

Assuming tier 1 is your 6 perennial playoff contenders, tier 2 would be your teams that are in the conversation most of the year and knocking on the door it would be 7-15. Michigan has finished ranked in that range three of Harbaugh’s five years. This year we finished just outside that range and had a schedule which featured 6 teams that finished in tier 1-2. The five year SP+ ranking has Michigan in the top 10. We’re also top 10 in wins over the past 5 years. 
 

Michigan is certainly in that 2nd tier, and the consistency of being there puts them near the top end of it. 
 

Now whether or not you’re content with being there is another conversation. But I really don’t see how anyone can say Michigan isn’t in that second tier.

Bob_Timberlake

January 25th, 2020 at 11:04 AM ^

If LSU, Clemson, Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia and Oklahoma are first tier then we are 2nd tier. Winning one conference title in 15 years certainly doesn't sound elite. Fans need to stop living in the past and accept reality.

A Lot of Milk

January 25th, 2020 at 11:22 AM ^

Georgia is first tier? Because they won one SEC title game that didn't have Bama in it and then proceeded to lose to Bama in the national title game? Georgia is the Wisconsin of the SEC. Is the 3rd or 4th best team in their conference in any given year but always goes to the conference title game and a high end bowl game because they play in the easier division

A Lot of Milk

January 25th, 2020 at 1:58 PM ^

I think everyone is in agreement that lsu is a flash in the pan. Lost all their players and coordinators. They had a great season, maybe the best ever, but they're not a tier 1 program if you look at the big picture. They lost to Troy like two years ago, FFS

They have 4 easy losses coming this fall

chunkums

January 25th, 2020 at 11:34 AM ^

Regarding LSU, they had one incredible year and have otherwise been similar to us IMO for more than a decade. After this season they lose their record-setting Heisman QB, 4 OL, seven starters on defense, most of their receiving yards, most of their rushing yards, their top two offensive coaches, and their DC. I think they'll fall hard back to earth this year. We may even be looking at a situation similar to when Chizik won a title with Cam Newton and Gus Malzahn. I would say that in terms of how good the teams are, the top tier is:

Clemson

Bama

OSU

And that's really it. Oklahoma gets to enjoy their company because they play in the Big 12. Maybe Oklahoma and Georgia would get their own category, but I don't think they fit in with the other three. We're probably in the next group.

SeattleWolverine

January 25th, 2020 at 1:00 PM ^

Agree with most of that but they still have an enormous in-state talent pool and now they can leverage a national championship in recruiting with a favorable perception of the program. Much better positioned than we are in both regards for the future given the local talent base and negative perception of Harbaugh as someone unable to beat quality teams. 

carolina blue

January 25th, 2020 at 12:11 PM ^

Without looking:

LSU, bama, Clemson, osu, Auburn, Michigan, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Miami, Florida, Florida state, Texas, usc 

I get 13 and off memory. There’s gotta be more. 
 

edit: Nebraska (fuck them) would be 14 and did Notre Dame win one in the 80s?

Don

January 25th, 2020 at 11:21 AM ^

Truth hurts.

And I wouldn't put us at the top of the second tier, either. Not with our craptastic record against top ten teams, or our pathetic bowl record, or our embarrassing uncompetitive asskickings by elite teams, or our inability to upset anybody.

bfeeavveerr

January 25th, 2020 at 11:28 AM ^

True. We are not 1st tier. Depending on the grouping of tiers .....we may fall closer to third tier rather than 1st tier.