Do we want MSU & OSU undefeated before we play them?

Submitted by mickblue on

I say absolutely not. As far as I'm concerned they can both be winless. I know some feel that would damage our playoff chances. Although that might be true, I'm thinking we need to return to Big Ten dominance before we think that big. We also need to bolster our instate and midwest recruiting like it once was. We've been down too long now to root for either of them to do well any time soon. As a fan, I've been humbled since '08 and want to rebuild in stages. Take over the state and the conference and then take over nationally.

Steves_Wolverines

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:09 PM ^

I would love it if OSU was undefeated, only so we could have the chance to ruin their perfect season, and playoff chances. 

I would like to see MSU have a <6 win season. Shoot them back to pre-2008 relevance in one season. 

somewittyname

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:10 PM ^

I used to always root for OSU to be undefeated when we were to play them to raise the stakes. At this point I'd prefer them to be winless.

TrueBlue2003

August 23rd, 2016 at 5:14 PM ^

our 2011 season is proof that one or two losses, even to a rival (s), does not crush one's dreams.  We had a great season and lots of good feelings despite a loss to Sparty.  And 2008-10 + 2014 seasons are proof that it is more painful and more demoralizing to lose to rivals AND lose lots of other games.

Max number of losses for opponents = max pain.

stephenrjking

August 23rd, 2016 at 5:35 PM ^

Your argument is persuasive from a schadenfreude perspective. But it is somewhat flawed, since it focuses on the emotions of our rival fans. 

Sport is a subjective experience, and I only care about my own feelings regarding the teams. What is best for me as a fan. I don't care what is good or bad for MSU fans. And it's a touch sparty-like to invest in what they feel when they're not playing us. So, while you are correct about what inflicts the most pain, I don't really care about their pain. Let them lose to us and respond however they feel, so long as I get to enjoy the W.

TrueBlue2003

August 23rd, 2016 at 10:29 PM ^

my response was to a schadenfreude based premise - that "crushing their dreams is the best" with no reference to our team's performance. That is why my argument only focused on the emotions of our rival fans.  So my only point was that ignoring any happy feelings for us, which was the context of the discussion: what is worse for them is to lose lots of games, to us and others, not just to us.

To your point though, what is best for us as fans is also arguably to have those teams be as bad as possible since we compete for many of the same recruits and if we get those recruits, all else equal, would win more games overall and more games against them, which is what matters the most - I agree with you.

Their pain is not independet of our enjoyment.  It is inversely correlated overall and for two games a year it is directly inversely correlated.  So more pain for them is likely to mean more awesome times for us.

father fisch

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:17 PM ^

I used to think beating an undefeated team is better.  Now, all I want is a win in dominating fashion.

Remember when we played Arkansas in the Citrus Bowl (1999? or 2000?).  We ran the same running play over and over with success.  The linemen told Arkansas "here it comes again" and they still couldn't stop it.  That's what I want from both the MSU and OSU games.  Like men playing a bunch of 6 year olds.

DenardGoHard16

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:17 PM ^

I think that the one and only thing that can damage our playoff chances is not winning the B1G. There is no way the playoff committee will leave Michigan (or OSU for that matter) out of the playoffs if we win the B1G



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

leftrare

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:19 PM ^

I want them to beat every team on their schedule that's not on Michigan's schedule.  Same for every other team in the conference.

Recruiting competition will take care of itself -- those schools suck, Columbus and East Lansing are sewers, Michigan is one of the best schools in the country and Ann Arbor is a total babe.

charblue.

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:20 PM ^

I think that non-sequitor applies. We owe them a bunch of lost weekends over the new milennium They are on the schedule. And they are therefore road kill waiting to happen.

Michology 101

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:29 PM ^

I don't know how this even sometimes becomes a serious debate. We've been down for years and most MSU and OSU fans have loved every moment of it. Why not root for them to have a down season or even some down years? OSU fans have said it many times, that they don't need Michigan to be good for them to stay in the National Championship picture. They've proven that fact over the years. We don't need for them to be good either. We just need to win the Big 10 either undefeated or with no more than one loss. It can also help us in recruiting if MSU and OSU start having some down years. The answer is no... let them lose early and often. Maybe after they've had some down years, I may change my mind about this question.

jdemille9

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:31 PM ^

I'd prefer them have good records, not for any playoff chances because I don't think that matters but because if MSU has 2/3 losses their fans will complain that this was a down year and that was why we won. Same will go for OSU fans. I lived in Ohio when we won in 2011 and most of their fans didn't acknowledge it as a true win for Michigan because it was Luke Fickell and it didn't count. 

Brendan71388

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:31 PM ^

The better those teams are, the sweeter it is to beat them and the better it looks on our playoff resume. I definitely want OSU to lose to Oklahoma though, and I'd be happy for ND to beat MSU.

What I really don't want is for MSU to beat OSU the week before we play OSU like last year. Circumstances won't the same a la "waking a sleeping" so to speak, but I don't want OSU to have any extra motivation following a loss going into The Game. So if both teams were 1-2 loss teams when we play that's ideal.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

gwkrlghl

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:32 PM ^

You want them both to be 10-2 or 11-1 so they would be quality wins at the end of the year. Really doesn't matter what they are when we play as long as we win

kevin holt

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:33 PM ^

Winless because it makes winning the big ten easier. If we went undefeated we'd be in the playoffs right? I mean I guess not if we only play crappy teams. Hmm. Maybe winless but have other teams we play end up surprising and being ranked. If MSU/OSU sucked but Wisconsin beat LSU and PSU/Indy/Iowa/Nebraska put up good seasons I'd be ecstatic (assuming we beat em).

UMxWolverines

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:35 PM ^

Fuck no. I don't understand the weiners that want them to win every game except against us. How has OSU winning the national title benefited us? Anything the other two win is bad for us. Neither team has needed us to be good in the rivalry to have success. Just fucking beat them.

Indonacious

August 23rd, 2016 at 4:39 PM ^

The whole argument about rivals needing to be really good is false...if anything we have proved that to not be the case by sucking for most of the last decade and having our main rivals still make the playoffs and have continued success. The fact is...if we win the big ten we will be making the playoffs.