Do 2018/2019 games cloud our memory of how this game has been largely competitive many years?

Submitted by umfan83 on November 24th, 2022 at 2:16 PM

I've been digesting as much info about this game all week, but even though we won last year I still see some of the fan base that's hoping for a win but bracing to get easily handled by Ohio State this weekend.  It's a minority but its there.  And thinking back on recent games I wonder if 2018 and 2019 damaged UM fans psyche regarding our competitiveness in the rivalry.

2021 - Won

2017 - Had a 14-0 lead and were down by 4 until less than 2 minutes left in the game

2016 - Bad spot costs win

2015 - Legitimate spanking

2014 - Within 1 score until 5 mins left in the 4th

2013 - Lost due to a failed 2 point conversion

2012 - Lost by 5

2011 - Won

From my own perspective, it felt like most of 2012-2017 was full of competitive games that OSU pulled out late.  We were competitive and probably should have won 1-2 of them.  I thought we had a legitimate chance to win most years even though most years we were the obvious underdog.  Then Don Brown's defense got torched in back-to-back years and suddenly the narrative was how far apart the 2 programs were, and how OSU obsesses over The Game 365 days a year, and Day is going to hang 100 on Michigan, etc.  From my own perspective, those 2 games psychologically messed me up.  I started getting very defeatist to the point where I turned on last year's game with no expectations.  The win was extremely cathartic and snapped me back into reality.  And that reality is that Michigan can beat Ohio State and I think this year's team has an excellent chance to win on Saturday.

raleighwood

November 24th, 2022 at 7:29 PM ^

Really?  I know that OSU dominated the series for 20 years....but Michigan had a real chance to win several of those years ('05, '13, '16.....).  I typically thought that Michigan could compete but then 2018 and 2019 gave me PTSD.  It's been hard go recover....but 2021 restored much of my confidence in Michigan as a program.

M-Dog

November 25th, 2022 at 1:27 AM ^

I used to say the same thing about John Cooper's 2-10-1 record against Michigan.  It could have easily been 9-4-0.

Ohio State could have easily won in '88, '90, '92, '95, '96, '97, and '99.  They were within striking distance late in all of those games.

Sometimes a streak of wins looks more dominant than it is.  This applies to us as well as them.

MGlobules

November 24th, 2022 at 2:23 PM ^

I've been watching this game since I was a kid, listening to my cousins and grandparents talk it up. That takes us back to the 60s. They pantsed us once, IIRC. But the rest of the time, either it was a tight contest or we whipped 'em. 

Don't let anybody tell you different. 

Commie_High96

November 24th, 2022 at 7:34 PM ^

There is an alternate universe where a certain former UM player and assistant coach who may have been a little promiscuous doesn’t sleep with a fellow coaches wife and Lloyd turns the program over to him in 2005 and this would all have been a bad dream. 
 

of course, one could also say that the past 20 years would be a useful education in humility and appreciating the good times even more but that certainly is also an alternative universe given the neurotic game threads.

JHumich

November 24th, 2022 at 2:24 PM ^

I honestly haven't seen anything to suggest that the dynamics are much different from last year and fully expect to win. Maybe/probably even to pave them again.

We responded to the "Don Brown specials" by building an entirely new program identity from the coaches, to the recruiting, to the on-field product and strategy.

I don't think we'll be fielding undersized men with a one-trick pony approach any time soon. Those years don't factor in for me at all now.

Gustavo Fring

November 24th, 2022 at 4:01 PM ^

Yeah not having Hutchinson and Ojabo seems to be the big swing from last year.  It wasn't just organic pass rush, it was also matching OSU on elite talent.  We had two guys go in the first round on defense last year (and Ojabo would have been a third if he didn't get hurt). 

So we don't have the same top-end talent at premium positions as last year, whereas OSU still is loaded with first round picks.  We have more guys who will go in rounds like 3-7.  That said, Michigan is more balanced last year (DT in particular went from being pretty meh last year to arguably the biggest strength on the team besides Corum).  How often can they get OSU into 3rd and long and how often can they pay it off without Ojabo and Hutch?  That's what the game will come down to

gbdub

November 24th, 2022 at 4:21 PM ^

If Corum and Edwards are at least 75%, game is a coin flip. If not, OSU wins. 

It’s in the toilet bowl and we don’t have Hutchjabo. That’s probably worth 10 points for OSU vs last year. Their run game is worse and Michigan is probably a little better on defense outside of the edge position. Call that 6 points for OSU. 

Let’s say, optimistically, Michigan 34-31. 

LakeWylieBlue

November 25th, 2022 at 7:15 AM ^

Like your pick of Michigan. I see 31-26 Michigan. I don’t post here often but very surprised to see how many act like Michigan needs a feeding of the 5000 for Michigan to win. I don’t buy  into Corum and Edwards not being at almost 💯 I think both will be ready to go. Corum wouldn’t have been out delivering turkeys, running in some instances, had he been limited. Jim Harbaugh further enhances his legacy tomorrow! F*CK Ohio! 

Eng1980

November 24th, 2022 at 5:06 PM ^

And if the offense didn't drop the ball 4 times and allow a blocked punt there wouldn't be so much pressure on the defense.  It was much more than DB losing those games although you are right in that if your inability to defend the crossing route was exposed by Indiana you might adjust for that before playing the next team.

LeCheezus

November 24th, 2022 at 9:35 PM ^

I’m not really buying it.  OSU had our number that day, and at least 80% of that was on defense.  They knew exactly what we were going to do on D and what adjustments we were going to make to some of the crossing routes.  We also got gifted a TD when they dropped a kickoff, so in terms of freebies that cancels out the blocked punt.

Now, 2019, I can squint and say maybe we could have made that a game deep into the fourth, where anything could happen.  2018 was just a destruction, OSU could have put up 70 but took a knee at the end.  I’m pretty sure they had some second string guys in for some of the late M TD’s as well.

My biggest PTSD OSU moments are more the post season after the losses in 2016, 2018 and 2019.  Guys sitting out the bowl games, massive coaching staff turnover as coaching carousel starts turning.  For an upper tier but not consistently elite program like Michigan, losing this game and just missing the playoffs is a much bigger setback than it would be to an OSU/Bama/UGA.

RobM_24

November 24th, 2022 at 2:34 PM ^

I think college football hit a stretch where Ohio State and Clemson got lumped in with Alabama (and Georgia recently). Now people assume Ohio State is better than Michigan just because they are Ohio State. Just like people thought Clemson would beat Notre Dame bc they're Clemson. The recruiting rankings definitely factor into it, and rightfully so, but I don't think there's a big gap from OSU to Michigan. The big gap is between Georgia and everyone else right now.

Amazinblu

November 24th, 2022 at 2:53 PM ^

Rob,  respectfully, Georgia is very good - no question about that.  But, Georgia’s D doesn’t appear as strong as last year.  Is their D good?  Yes, for sure - but, not quite as strong as last year, IMO.

Depending on the teams and day - anything can happen.  I like where Michigan is.

Go Blue!

VikingDiet

November 24th, 2022 at 8:28 PM ^

There might be a point that it was a cat and mouse situation when you consider how many borderline guys were kept on the sideline. We will see who returns, but I've had the idea that losing that game would be fine so long as we win out. Not all losses are the same. It was noted in the UFR our defense looked like it was practicing for this week.

But then again, it might just be a fun conspiracy theory my lizard brain concocted ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

jhayes1189

November 24th, 2022 at 11:45 PM ^

I don’t know, it seemed like they really wanted to prove they could win with 4th and 5th stringers against that stout defense, and get them some valuable reps, and not really put anything fancy on film. All of this especially after Corum was cleared to play second half, and never getting Schoony or Morris a go even though they could have come in as they were dressed. 
 

Part of me feels like the whole game plan for Illinois was….”ram it down their throats no matter which back is playing, practice our screen game, make just enough plays, Moody, win”. 

1974

November 24th, 2022 at 3:03 PM ^

I think they got lumped with the best of the S-E-C for one reason.

Here's how Michigan and OSU look the last five years by recruiting class ranking (source: 247):

2018: OSU: 2; UM: 22
2019: OSU: 14; UM: 8
2020: OSU: 5; UM: 10
2021: OSU: 2; UM: 13
2022: OSU: 4; UM: 9

OSU's average player ranking was higher than Michigan's every year, so 2019 is a little deceiving. In other years they're pretty clearly in the top tier (along with Alabama, etc.) and Michigan is clearly in the next tier.

As 2018 (not really significant here, as several key players have moved on the NFL) has shown, recruiting rankings aren't destiny. Still, they've been shown to be positively correlated with future player success.

Coaching and motivation matter, but better players give you a margin. Hopefully we'll have another good outcome Saturday.

bamf_16

November 24th, 2022 at 2:37 PM ^

100%
 

Had this very same conversation with an OSU fan earlier today who ended up agreeing.

 

Don “We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Zone Defense!” Brown called a nice game in 2017, but those two ass kickings in ‘18 and ‘19 were traumatizing. 

umfan83

November 24th, 2022 at 3:11 PM ^

Nothing has been confirmed and there is a lot of gamesmanship going on right now.  And yes clearly several of those guys were rested as a precaution. I think Harbaugh took a calculated gamble. If Michigan lost to Illinois they’d still be in a position to make the Big Ten title game and CFP. Not saying he was throwing the game or didn’t care if we won, he just calculated it was more valuable to have them closer to 100% against OSU than to risk reinjury by playing them against Illinois. 

jhayes1189

November 24th, 2022 at 11:53 PM ^

This 100%….Harbaugh looked happier after that win than probably any I’ve seen (minus OSU last year)…enough so where people were questioning why he was so stoked that he just barely beat an okay/decent Illinois team. And then the twitter video of them singing the victors, it’s like everyone was in on the “just barely do enough” game plan.