Championship Sunday Open Thread

Submitted by MH20 on

Selection Sunday is finally here! A small slate of games today as most conference tourneys are complete. The American takes over the Big Ten's annual Time Slot That Is Too Late For The Committee To Care About The Result, tipping at 3:30 and finishing mere minutes before the selection show begins. Actually, can you imagine if the game went into OT or even double OT? It's too bad that Memphis lost yesterday because that could've led to some hilarity on the set of CBS TBS and in the committee's board room if the show had to begin but the game result was still in doubt.

Anyway, here are today's matchups:

 

MATCHUP   TIME  (ET) NAT TV TICKETS LOCATION
Pennsylvania
12:00 PM ESPN2
WatchESPN
Buy on Vivid Seats The Palestra, Philadelphia, PA  
Davidson
1:00 PM CBS 147 tickets as low as $38 Capital One Arena, Washington, DC  
Kentucky
1:00 PM ESPN
WatchESPN
658 tickets as low as $44 Scottrade Center, St. Louis, MO  
UT Arlington
2:00 PM ESPN2
WatchESPN
Buy on Vivid Seats Lakefront Arena, New Orleans, LA  
#21Houston
3:30 PM CBS 570 tickets as low as $6 Amway Center, Orlando, FL

 

Don't think it matters who wins in the SEC or the American -- Michigan isn't passing UT or UC and I think UK has too much ground to make up (Houston is pretty solidly a 6). A Davidson victory steals a bid from a bubble team so schools like Louisville, ASU, and St. Mary's are big Rhode Island fans today.

In reply to by CLion

corundum

March 11th, 2018 at 1:43 PM ^

The entire SEC is overrated outside of Kentucky. Florida's schedule was inflated due to perception of SEC. They should be a 6 seed at best. Auburn has seven scholarship players and no depth. They have like one player over 6'8" and live/die by the three ball. Tennessee is inconsistent and also has inflated perception. Alabama has Collin Sexton and that's it. Play them the same way everybody has figured out how to play Oklahoma and they will be done early. Mizzou got back thair lottery pick but have been decimated by suspensions and injuries. No depth.

M-Dog

March 11th, 2018 at 3:52 PM ^

Absolutely.

I'm sorry, what you do in February/March should carry much more weight than what you do in November/December.

Improvement should be rewarded.

 

ak47

March 11th, 2018 at 3:58 PM ^

Completely disagree. You get rewarded for improvement by having a better shot to win a title because you are playing better. But every game should count the same no matter when it happens in the season when it comes to tourney entry and seeding. Playing like shit early in the year should be punished. The ncaa tournament isn't the 68 best teams, and seeds aren't a listing of teams most likely to win. It is based on resumes and what you accomplished over the season and early games count as part of the season, especially since its the only time teams play across conferences.

ak47

March 11th, 2018 at 3:09 PM ^

You can make that argument about everybody. Tennesse beat Purdue and has 25 wins, they aren't that incosistent. Is Michigan incosistent by your metrics? Our losses to lsu, northwestern and nebraska would certainly suggest we are so we have a similar resume to Tennessee.. Is Michigan overrated? If MSU didn't have their name would they be ranked as highly? Are our wins over a team that has a suprisingly mediocre resume overrated due to perception?

Florida has beaten multiple top teams out of conference, something the big ten completely failed to do as an entire conference. 

Auburn lost a major player to injury which has impacted them but they still have more depth and a better resume than osu. 

In reply to by CLion

DeepBlueC

March 11th, 2018 at 6:13 PM ^

Lots of playground basketball.  One-on-one showing off, but crappy defense and crappy team play that will get blown up by a well-coached opponent.

Maize in Cincy

March 11th, 2018 at 1:42 PM ^

Whichever 1 seed ends up with Kentucky on their part of the bracket is not going to be happy.  I would hope they reward UVA and not stick a talented team like UK as their potential 4/5 matchup.

SagNasty

March 11th, 2018 at 2:05 PM ^

Why do the talking heads love Sparty so much? I understand they have a nice record but who did they beat? The tournament is usually about guard play and I just don’t think their guards are all that great. Maybe it’s just my Michigan homerism but I don’t really see them as much more than a sweet 16 team.

corundum

March 11th, 2018 at 2:09 PM ^

The talking heads value the early season too much, which is why they have such a boner for Oklahoma. MSU has shiny wins over ND before their injuries and UNC, but a lot has changed since then. Obviously their record is propping them up, but the committee will get it right and stick them on the three line, hopefully in the Kansas/Duke region.

Maize in Cincy

March 11th, 2018 at 2:28 PM ^

They have 2 top 10 picks.  If the continue to feed them they are almost impossible to beat.  Not sure why they tried to get into a 3 point shooting contest vs Michigan.  They shot horrible from 3 both games.  I hope you are right and they have another early exit but it's hard to pick against Izzo in the first 2 weekends of the tourney.

J.

March 11th, 2018 at 3:20 PM ^

Or they could just have passed Michigan on the S-Curve, which, as ridiculous as it sounds, wouldn't surprise me at all.  Ess-Eee-See and all that.

Edit: Kentucky just passed Michigan on the RPI, which would be the justification they'd use.

I find it amusing that people seem to think that Michigan should rocket up the S-Curve because they won the NCAA tournament, but that none of the other conference champions should be afforded the same courtesy.

Maize4Life

March 11th, 2018 at 4:31 PM ^

10 losses and a 2 Seed?  Yes I know you played a tough schedule but you also losts your fair share of those games and I remember when 10 losses meant you were nowhere getting a bid let alone Ark and Alalbama with 15 losses

Chitown Kev

March 11th, 2018 at 4:39 PM ^

Virginia, Villanova, Kansas, and either Cincy or Gonzaga..def. Cincy if they win today...or if Cincy loses and they think Gonzaga's RPI is too low...who...Xavier?

J.

March 11th, 2018 at 4:45 PM ^

This isn't last year's Gonzaga team.  Michigan has a more impressive Q1 record (6-5) than Gonzaga (4-3).  They're a 5 seed on the Bracket Matrix, with no better than a 3 by any of the brackets it includes.

Xavier is the consensus fourth #1 seed on the Bracket Matrix.  It's possible, but not likely IMO, that Cincinnati could pass them with a win.  Much like the Big Ten tournament last year, though, there's not a lot of time for the committee to take this result into account.