Any news on when the Shoe Investigation (officially) wraps up

Submitted by Human Torpedo on October 2nd, 2018 at 2:20 PM

I haven't seen any kind of announcement yet. Would anyone care to enlightening me if it has already ended without me knowing or hearing? I'm just still kinda worried about it (even though it might not be warranted)

Brhino

October 2nd, 2018 at 2:33 PM ^

So here's a question.  You can't pay players or recruits, or give them benefits.  But after they expend all their eligibility all bets are off.  So what if some rich booster wanted to start paying for former player's shoes at a million bucks a pop?  He's not making an explicit promises to current players or recruits, he just keeps buying shoes.  Everybody sees it, recruits know if you come to Michigan, four years later somebody is apparently going to give you a million dollars for your shoes, but there's nothing official in writing.  Would that violate any rules?

ChiBlueBoy

October 2nd, 2018 at 2:46 PM ^

Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, "Hey, kid. We got the biggest alumni pool in the world. Someday, you know, one of those rich alumni might hire you because you got a great education and, you know, could provide a return on investment, if you know what I mean."

Clearly, our recruitment strategy of promoting UM for its good education and alumni base is a violation of improper benefit rules.

Section 1.8

October 2nd, 2018 at 3:46 PM ^

How about a webpage with simple writing and lots of graphics, on where NCAA's annual revenue goes?

HERE.

And you're right about one thing.  The first time anybody tries to do this in any sort of concerted way, I agree that the NCAA would do something about it.  And they would develop a rule or a new bylaw addition.  And they would do the best that they could, to write a carefully-crafted rule with the help of their lawyers.  And then, there would be a player who just graduated and whose mom was dying of cancer and the player sold some stuff to Stephen Ross, to pay for a bone marrow transplant and the whole world would wonder why the NCAA was so flamingly stupid as to ever enact such a rule.  And the answer would be, "We have to write some odd rules, because some people will do such odd and extreme things to gain a competitive advantage..."  Which is almost always the root cause analysis explanation when it comes to sportsfan criticisms of the NCAA bylaws.

 

njvictor

October 2nd, 2018 at 2:48 PM ^

I kinda thought the whole thing was wrapped up pretty fast to the point where compliance didn't even have to come out and say anything? Harbaugh I think addressed this in an interview

PopeLando

October 2nd, 2018 at 3:51 PM ^

Because at Michigan, extra stretching is a Hell-worthy sin.

While other schools' enablement of child rape, serial sexual assault, serial sexual assault, serial sexual assault, spousal abuse, academic fraud, academic fraud, criminal negligence, sexual assault, and littering...are all just annoyances and distractions to the real problem, which is Michigan's extra stretching. 

The rules are different for Michigan, as aptly demonstrated by the "holding calls" chart from earlier today.

lbpeley

October 2nd, 2018 at 3:43 PM ^

Anyone care to fill an ignorant MGoUser in on this? What shoe violation? I must have missed something. 

BrewCityBlue

October 2nd, 2018 at 3:52 PM ^

Shoes were sold but it was by a player without remaining eligibility so all is good.  Because we are Michigan and get the book thrown at us for stretching while other programs run rampant with abuse scandals, we had to get all the equipment together and prove it wasn't current players selling shoes in what undoubtedly would be a program-rocking scandal in this conference.