2020 Depth Chart

Submitted by northernmich on October 20th, 2019 at 11:53 AM

QB- Dylan McCaffery, Cade McNarma, JD Johnson

RB- Zach Charbonnet, Hassan Haskins, Blake Corum

WR- Tarik Black, Cornelius Johnson

WR- Ronnie Bell, Cornelius Johnson

WR- Giles Jackson, Mike Sainristil

TE- Nick Eubanks, Erick All, Schoonmaker

LT- Ryan Hayes or Andrew Stueber, Trente Jones

LG- Chuck Filiaga, Karsen Barnhart

C- Cesar Ruiz, Nolan Rumler

RG- Nolan Rumler, Vastardis

RT- Jalen Mayfield, Andrew Stueber

 

Leave early for NFL: Collins, Peoples-Jones

Transfers: Christian Turner, Joe Milton, a OL buried on the depth chart

 

DE- Hutch, Luigi Vilian

DT- Micheal Dwumfor, Chris Hinton

DT- Donovan Jeter or Chris Hinton or Mazi Smith

DE- Kwity Paye, Josh Uche

LB- Cam McGrone, Jordan Anthony

LB- Josh Ross, Jordan Anthony 

Viper- Micheal Barrett, Anthony Solomon

SAM- Josh Uche,

CB- Ambry Thomas, Gemon Green

CB- Vince Gray, DJ Turner

S- Dax Hill or Brad Hawkins (both will play at the same time a lot)

K- Jake Moody

P- Grad Transfer

 

Not expecting anybody to leave early for NFL, no impact transfers.

Will continue to watch the rest of the year and hope for 10-2/9-3, but let’s be honest, this season’s goals are over. Just a look into next year. Any thing you see different?

M-Dog

October 20th, 2019 at 1:13 PM ^

This might be our earliest Wait Until Next Year! ever.

We haven't even played ND, MSU, OSU yet, and we've had to bail already.  The leaves are still on the trees.

Let's save some time here, shall we?:

Wait Until the Year After Next Year! 

 

Gondolin

October 20th, 2019 at 12:09 PM ^

Right, but this post seems to imply that since this season is over we might as well talk about next season and forget this season ever existed despite there still being very important games left on the schedule. Games that are admittedly meaningless in the sense that Michigan can no longer realistically make the big ten championship game or playoff; but very meaningful in that all of us fans are nominally in this to have fun and cheer our favorite team to victory (especially over hated rivals)

Newton Gimmick

October 20th, 2019 at 12:32 PM ^

...no...  

Excoriating?  I am just tired of people announcing they are "done" and "season's over" and so on, then they are back the next week with the same hair-on-fire hot takes.

And BTW, it's not about being positive or negative, it's about being thoughtful and insightful.  There are some good criticisms of the team and coach in here. 

Ham

October 20th, 2019 at 12:00 PM ^

Why in the world would Milton transfer? Even if he feels he could never beat out McCaffrey, he’s just one hit away from starting. And it’s not like McCaffrey is made from vibranium.

Ham

October 20th, 2019 at 12:24 PM ^

How else would I express disapproval in you making a thread not only pointlessly looking ahead considering all of the assumptions you have to make, while we’re just over the halfway point of this season, but also in you making a couple pretty stupid assumptions?

Ham

October 20th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

It’s just insane to think, let alone assume, that Milton is gone after this year. He’s a competitor. He’s not just going to run away from competition. If McCaffrey turns into lightbringer, then maybe he transfers after next season. But until then, Milton will compete and be ready to go in if he doesn’t get the job and DMac gets hurt. There’s just no reason for him to leave now after his RS Fr season. 

corundum

October 20th, 2019 at 12:06 PM ^

Do you even watch CFB games other than Michigan? Washington lost to Cal and has gotten smashed by a hapless Stanford team this season. Then they are going to lose a first round QB from an already overrated squad. Washington will likely be a 7-5 type team next season in an already weaker P5 conference.

andrewgr

October 20th, 2019 at 1:00 PM ^

I live in Seattle, I go to see the Huskies once or twice a year in person, and I watch them on TV most weeks.

They are not a great team, and will not be a great team next year.  Michigan has, and will have, a significant talent advantage over them.  Not just a small advantage-- a big one.

Husky stadium is not an intimidating place to play.  It's not large (seats around 72,000), and it's open at one end (to see the beautiful lake).  The crowd has a lot of older alumni in it; this is a Seahawks town more than a Huskies town.

I have no idea how Michigan will play or if they will win, but if you're chalking this game up as a loss already, then it doesn't really matter whether they win it or not, because if the team is bad enough to make this an automatic loss, that means they'll lose a minimum of three other games during the year anyway.

SD Larry

October 20th, 2019 at 1:56 PM ^

With apologies for going off topic, Andrewgr,  my family is planning on attending the Michigan opener at Husky stadium next year.  My oldest daughter moved to Seattle earlier this year and has committed to getting us tix but has not secured them yet.  I already have my hotel reservations.  Do you have any suggestions for how we/she gets us good seats ?  Any friendly advice will be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

Squad16

October 20th, 2019 at 2:03 PM ^

There will also be a large amount of U of M fans in the audience:

  • Holiday weekend so more time to travel
  • Great destination
  • Compelling matchup
  • Unique stadium experience
  • And, most importantly, Michigan has a very large West Coast alumni base, largest of the Big Ten schools for sure. 

I plan to head up from California for that one and know a fair amount of others in the same boat.

raleighwood

October 20th, 2019 at 3:03 PM ^

Michigan has lost its last road games against UCLA, Washington, Oregon and Utah.  I realize that past results don't predict future returns (and some of the players may not have been born at the time of the losses).....but Michigan has a long history of not performing well on the West Coast.

andrewgr

October 20th, 2019 at 1:06 PM ^

I thought last night it was painfully obvious that DPJ is playing not to get hurt.  I truly believe he's just counting down the days until he can announce he's going pro without hurting his draft stock or earning a reputation as a quitter; if he can do that during the season, I think he will, but most likely he'll just sit out the bowl game.

I could be wrong of course, but he seemed awfully comfortable stepping out of bounds rather than getting some sure extra yards; and I think his early drops were likely due to losing concentration worrying about if he was about to get hit, rather than butter fingers.

As for his NFL readiness: if he performs well at the combine, he'll get drafted.  Just look at Gary last year.  Of course players like Bush can get highly evaluated based on in-game performance rather than just measurables, but measurables on their own will get you drafted, too.

Umich19

October 20th, 2019 at 12:29 PM ^

Assuming Paye and Ruiz stay...  I think our defense will be more talented as a whole, especially in the front four. The loss of Levert will be very tough, but Zordich gets those guys ready. I think replacing Metellus is plausible, and we don’t know anything about the vipers after Hudson, so that’ll be interesting. On offense it’ll be tough.  Only silver lining I can think of is a second year in Gattis system should pay off.  Replacing a starting QB is always tough especially with 3 new OL starters.  We should be better at RB, and we still will have solid WR and TE talent.  Hopefully the 2019 OL class lives up to the hype next year, and Dylan/Joe don’t have much growing pains...

Jimmyisgod

October 20th, 2019 at 12:47 PM ^

I know people don’t think so, but Metalus is very good and not easy to replace. Also, Glasgow has been great this season, arguably one of our top 2 or 3 defenders.  Kemp has been solid, asking a young DT to be as good is a stretch. Uche is a big loss. If Paye stays though we are good up front. 
McGrone, Thomas, and Hutchinson are bussing stars though that should lead a very good defense. 
Offense is a big question if the receivers leave. Could be a rebuild year on offense.