Unverified Voracity Preps For A Road Test Comment Count

Brian

A little on the nose there, God. Let's check in with goings-on in West Lafayette:

Purdue Football is Literally Being Sucked Into The Earth

It is either a busted pipe or a hellmouth opening to end our misery

It is strongly implied that Hammer and Rails would prefer the latter.

What is your favorite color?. It's coming up: a visit to Cable Subscribers Stadium.

ANN ARBOR – Facing fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line, Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh kept his offense on the field.

He also provided an assist by waving his arms to quiet the Michigan Stadium crowd, and they obliged, just before Khalid Hill plunged into the end zone to cap the Wolverines' opening drive in a 49-10 win over Penn State two weeks ago.

Crowd control is just one benefit of playing at home, which the No. 4 Wolverines (5-0, 2-0 Big Ten) won't have for the first time this season when they travel to Rutgers (2-3, 0-2 Big Ten) for Saturday's 7 p.m. kickoff.

A valiant attempt to inject some interesting into a game with a four-touchdown spread, but that stadium will be half Michigan fans. Michigan won't get its first real road test until the Michigan State game, and, uh... I am not going to put some #disrespekt on it just yet. Suffice it to say that that doesn't seem like quite as high of a mountain five weeks into the season.

The gently rising foothills that will take us to The Game. S&P+ likes us. S&P+ does not like Michigan State and Iowa, and hoo boy did Bill Connelly hear a lot about that latter this offseason. With both those teams underperforming even the modest expectations placed on them by fancystats, Michigan's journey to Football Armageddon II looks downright likely. Absurdly so, in fact.

image

Michigan is a better than two-touchdown favorite and 87%+ to win all of those games except the trip to Iowa City. OSU has a near-identical closing stretch, with the part of potential spoiler played by Wisconsin.

MSU? Well, if those numbers hold they'll be striving for something all season.

Probability of finishing 11-1 or better: 0.0%

Probability of finishing 6-6 or better: 44.7%

Bowl eligibility.

This is going to go well. Immovable object, meet a breathy gasp:

Rutgers can't throw the football
And with Janarion Grant out for the year, there aren't many great options to catch it either. The Scarlet Knights have basically had a pitiful passing attack all year. But last week against Ohio State had to be rock bottom. Rutgers was just 3 of 16 for 33 yards. As a team, the Scarlet Knights are completing 47.4 percent of their passes.

I wonder if we'll see this at some point. Per a Harbaugh interview on 97.1 last week, Jabrill Peppers is inventing new ways to football:

"We put a different play in with him yesterday in practice. Then he got it in the meeting and he left, went back to the defensive meeting and came out to practice," Harbaugh said Thursday on 97.1-FM. "He was a running back and his assignment was to block. But he blocked and then he went out for a route. He got his blocking assignment done and then he continued out into a route. We threw it to him, which was not the design, but from now on -- and we've been running this play for 10 years -- (it will be).

"In 10 years, we've never had a back who got his blocking assignment done (on that play) and got into the route at the same time and he did it the first time like that was the way the play should've been run for the last 10 years. That's the kind of stuff he does. It breaks the mold darn near every time he does something."

We'd have to see Peppers actually get a touch to do so, grumble grumble.

An interesting thing on "team opens at X". Last week I told people that Michigan opened at –9 and moved to –10.5. This turns out to not be accurate. These days most people are hitting up Vegas Insider for their odds, and what happens is one obscure online sportsbook getting out in front of the pack:

Lots of people bet online even though it’s super illegal, and that’s probably where Vegas Insider is getting their info, and that’s what Joe Truthteller means by “Vegas.” You are kind of right:

vegasinsider2

It’s mostly blank spaces on that chart, too. The only major sports book offering anything is on-the-nose-named BetOnline, which rushes to get their lines out before anyone else each Sunday. ...

BetOnline knows they are taking a major risk by offering super early lines, which is why they ramp down the maximum bets until the other (sharper) line originators have a chance to chime in. ...

The main reason I object to referring to the BetOnline number as the opening line, however, is because every single week, the same annoying pattern plays out. BetOnline will release a relatively weak line on many games. A few hours later, the major Vegas originators will weigh in with sharper lines that differ by maybe as many as six points. Twitter people will then talk about how “sharps have pounded the line down to X” or “Vegas has moved the line already.”

A quick shift in the odds is an early line that is superseded by the heavy hitters. Michigan really opened at –10.5 and stuck there, but you could get a small bet in at a dubious online casino at –9. The end.

This week in targeting roulette. Penn State's Curtis Cothran got the boot for a hit almost identical to Branch on Morelli minus about half the force:

That was upheld despite an apparent lack of helmet to helmet contact. Meanwhile Malik McDowell was ejected for making sure his helmet was well out of the quarterback's strike zone:

Sometimes you can't win: Cothran hit with his eyes on the target and got booted. McDowell seemingly went out of his way to keep his head down and got booted.

I've seen some assertions that the McDowell hit was indeed targeting because McDowell lowered his head like that (and hit the guy with his shoulder), but the rule seems to specifically state that targeting requires a hit to the head:

No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below).

It then goes on to clarify what hits to the head are covered by this in note 1, where the crown of helmet thing comes in:

Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:

  • Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
  • A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
  • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
  • Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet

I guess the fourth bullet point here does not mention the head and neck, therefore any contact with the crown is targeting, and that's why McDowell got booted? If so that's some terrible wording. It should probably be a similar penalty with its own definition, because lumping what McDowell did in with a rule otherwise very specifically about whacking people in the head is bound to cause confusion.

Etc.: Early NHL draft rankings include four Michigan players and commits. The Supreme Court will not hear the O'Bannon case, leaving both sides disappointed. The NCAA has been declared in violation of anti-trust laws but the 9th Circuit decision leaves everyone in limbo. Trevor Siemian! Still happening! Trying to find OSU weaknesses. Indiana's win over MSU was not a fluke. Minnesota focused on taking out the most dangerous part of PSU's team. Basketball media day takeaways.

Comments

mGrowOld

October 4th, 2016 at 2:33 PM ^

Targeting for football refs = Charging for basketball officials

Rules are insanely confusing and none of them know what the hell they are suppose to call.

robpollard

October 4th, 2016 at 3:09 PM ^

As noted above, this is actually covered exactly in the rule book.

- Can't use the crown (top) of your helmet (McDowell did)
- Can't do it on a defenseless player (which a QB throwing a pass is)

The problem is football culture (particularly commentators) has internalized that "targeting" just means a hit to the head, and they haven't read the actual rule book.

mgoblue98

October 4th, 2016 at 3:24 PM ^

getting the heave ho for a great tackle is absurd.  I teach leverage based shoulder tackling to the football teams that I coach.  His tackle appears to be just that.  He didn't use the crown of the helmet to strike the QB.  The replay officials should be suspended or fired.

1VaBlue1

October 4th, 2016 at 10:01 PM ^

I agree with you - I have yet to see the crown (very top) of his helmet hit the QB.  The left side of his helmet hits, not the crown.

And yes, the replay officials should feel bad and have to explain their single game banishment to a spouse.

SwaggLikeUs

October 4th, 2016 at 3:26 PM ^

Wow! I'd heard about it but hadn't seen the footage until just now. Ridiculous calls. So gray area targeting's a no-no, but it's ok for a db to launch his body into the knees of an offensive lineman. Makes sense. I realize they're taught to do that but still... I don't like to see it being done by any team, regardless of rooting interests, college or pro. I think it's a cheap shot and that the rule should be changed

Clarence Beeks

October 4th, 2016 at 3:36 PM ^

On McDowell... the fourth bullet point is exactly what was called. The rule is NOT just designed to protect the person being hit, but also the person doing the hitting (from hurting themselves). It was exactly the right call.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jonock14

October 4th, 2016 at 5:08 PM ^

1) His helmet hits the QB in the left arm.  He uses his shoulder to hit the QB in the ribs.  The rule was not correctly applied.  Look at the gif closely.  The call is ridiculous.

2) It's a really bad rule.  I would use this particular hit as a good example of hot to properly hit a QB and avoid a hit to the head.  That's the goal of the rule.  Why would there need to be an addendum to address hits to other parts of the body with the helmet?  It's putting the referees in an impossible spot, and I fail to see how that hit in particular could have been executed differently.  Head up?  Well then he contacts the facemask, and that's targeting too.  It's legislating tackling form, which is silly.

Jeff

October 4th, 2016 at 5:35 PM ^

When you make a tackle you have to keep your head up and eyes on your target. Lowering your head increases the risk of injury to both you and the player you're tackling. I agree that making these targeting calls is very tough and a lot of them wind up being terrible calls (or no-calls) but any time you lower your helmet you are making a dangerous tackle.

viachicago

October 4th, 2016 at 5:48 PM ^

The targeting rule is completely out of control.  You can't be kicking people out of games for calls the officials/review officials only call correctly about 50% of the time.  
 

Clearly so many of these calls are borderline.  An ejection should be reserved for something that is blatant.  I think they need to remove the automatic ejection part of the rule and leave the ejection up to the discretion of the officials by having a Targeting 1 rule that only gets a penalty and a Targeting 2 rule that also results in ejection.  Hopefully the officials can at least learn to distinguish between a borderline infraction and a blatant one.

BlueManballGroup

October 4th, 2016 at 5:37 PM ^

Here's a gif I made of the McDowell hit from the better angle. Since there are still so many people who don't seem to understand what the referees are looking at. He runs straight at the QB and lowers his head right before contact. He does not turn his head to the side to hit with the shoulder. The helmet hits almost directly on Lagow's stomach and slides to the side due to the angle of his body from throwing.

mgoblue98

October 6th, 2016 at 12:56 AM ^

for that.  It actually advances my argument that he didn't strike with the crown of his helmet.  Even though the video gets blurry at the end, at no time does the crown of his helmet go out of view.  Lowering your head is very bad, but does happen when using leverage based shoulder tackling. 

"The helmet hits almost directly..."

The key word is almost.  You literally say that it wasn't a crown strike.  If he had wanted to bury the crown, he could have, regardless of the throwing motion.

CantRead-CantWrite

October 4th, 2016 at 10:00 PM ^

Given the fact that the rule in note 1 includes the wording "head or neck area" in each bullet except the last, it should be interpreted to mean that the last bullet point was intended to apply to situations without forcible contact to the head or neck of the player being tackled.  I agree that it shouldnt warrant an ejection, but it seems the drafters of the rule knew what the consequences of the note would be by excluding the language that they repeated above it.

Also, wasnt MSU supposed to be the poster-child of rugby tackling in order to make the game safer?  Seems like Malik missed that tutorial.