Technical Flyover: Why Michigan lost to Michigan State (again) Comment Count

Ian Boyd November 2nd, 2021 at 4:05 PM

Which team out-rushes who is not as meaningful a statistic as it's often made out to be. In a rivalry game like Michigan vs Michigan State, when one team out-rushes the other 199-146, it's no more meaningful.

Michigan out-gained the Spartans 406-196 in the passing game, which would seem to seriously outweigh the run game deficit. They also matched the Spartans in the turnover department, each team had two and it appeared Michigan State should have had three.

None of those factors were the problem for Michigan in this game.

The problem was this:

  • Blake Corum and Hassan Haskins: 27 carries, 104 rushing yards, 3.9 ypc, ZERO rushing touchdowns
  • Kenneth Walker: 23 carries, 197 rushing yards, 8.6 ypc, FIVE rushing touchdowns

"Didn't you just say it doesn't matter so much who out-rushes who?"

What matters is that those three players happened to be the three best offensive players for these two teams. Cade McNamara was able to produce 383 passing yards at 8.7 ypa with two touchdowns and a single interception late when the game was already all but lost. None of this damage was enough, it couldn't stick. Michigan isn't built to beat teams throwing the ball with Cade McNamara to this Ronnie Bell-less cast of receivers and while they did a credible job, they couldn't do quite enough without Corum and Haskins doing the heavy lifting. In particular, they could pile up yards between the 20s but they couldn't find the end zone.

Meanwhile, Sparty routinely got big plays from their star running back Kenneth Walker who repeatedly found the end zone and converted several key downs.

You can out-gain an opponent and beat them up and down the box score but if they make a few key plays that virtually ALWAYS end with the running back in the end zone, you will still lose.

[HOW DID MICHIGAN STATE GAME THE MATCHUPS? MORE AFTER THE JUMP]

McNamara's big day

Michigan did have some good stuff rolling in the passing game they used to hammer away at the Spartan defense. The Spartans rolled with big Darius Snow at Sam linebacker in this game, their hybrid nickel backer spot, and his 6-foot-1, 220 pound frame was very useful in containing the Michigan run game.

Xavier Henderson also predictably played around the box to help stifle the Wolverine ground game. Consequently, Michigan was in 3rd-and-long an awful lot. This was okay early but ultimately doomed the Wolverines.

Between 3rd down and 4th down passing attempts, Cade McNamara was 9-16 for 212 yards at 13.3 ypa with eight conversions. Pretty fantastic.

Yet down the stretch, on the final seven attempts, he was 2-7 for 50 yards at 7.1 ypa with two conversions. In other words, they started scorching hot on passing downs and then cooled all the way down to freezing temperatures by the end of the game.

I'm including some of Michigan's early successful conversions, but first...

pic.twitter.com/WbvXVwwljs

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) November 2, 2021

...you gotta love it. Long winding, double A-gap and double B-gap zone blitzes of the Pat Narduzzi mold. Sparty wasn't up to their old standards on these and gave up this nonsense after a few bad ones early.

A good chunk of Michigan's early passing down success was the result of effective usage of a particular shallow cross passing concept.

pic.twitter.com/Hc96PzSale

— Asst to the Minister of Culture (@Ian_A_Boyd) November 2, 2021

Erick All did a lot of his 10 catches for 98 yards damage on these dig routes, they were routinely putting the Spartan linebackers and down safety in conflict trying to navigate the risk of letting a shallow run wide open underneath them to getting enough depth to stop the dig routes.

On the three GIF'd examples they caught Xavier Henderson either dropping deep and vacating the underneath hook zone the dig route would threaten or blitzing. They also beat him a few times dropping into the flat. Here's how it looked on the board against such a snap from State:

The linebackers for Michigan State simply aren't very good in coverage. They don't always get good depth, they don't change direction super well, and generally look like fish out of water trying to find and match patterns in the middle of the field. This was known going in and a reason I gave for confidence in a solid day from McNamara.

The over/under threat from Blake Corum on a shallow cross and Erick All running behind the linebackers on a dig was a bit too much for the Spartans. At least early on.

Later in the game the killer plays were 3rd-and-3 and then 4th-and-3 on the second to last drive. Michigan was driving with a chance to get down the field and score the game-winning touchdown with time expiring. On 3rd-and-3 they took a slot fade which McNamara barely over threw. Underneath Michigan had the tight end and the other slot (it was a 3x2 formation) run quick ins under the linebackers. A quick throw to either was a bit iffy on whether or not they'd secure the catch as Michigan State was doubling both of them with a linebacker and a safety.

Great play-call by Michigan State to squeeze those inside routes which had tortured them all day and forcing Michigan to make a play throwing down the field and outside against the much better defensive backs on the team.

On 4th-and-3 they ran a pick play against press-man coverage and McNamara rushed a throw Cornelius Johnson couldn't get to because he ran into the defender trailing the other slot receiver.

Ultimately, Michigan couldn't make a play throwing to their actual receivers when they needed it most and State was doubling All.

Walker's big runs

Walker had three scoring runs of 27, 23, and 58 yards in this game. Take them out of the average and he was 20-89 yards at 4.5 ypc and two rushing touchdowns. In other words, Michigan played pretty good run defense except when they didn't.

One of the other two touchdown runs came on a simple lead outside zone play where Michigan State hurried into the formation and ran the play quickly before the Wolverines were set. They repeated the trick later on at least two occasions.

The first was on a 3rd-and-4 in which they lined up quickly to run the play and the Wolverines didn't get outside linebacker Jaylen Harrell in proper position to set the edge. He seemed confused about whether he had to cover the slot receiver (he didn't, Daxon Hill spun down late) and was hesitant to set the edge, leading to getting kicked out by the tight end and opening a big crease for the 58-yard score by Walker.

The next time they hurried into the play Michigan stopped the run but still gave away a first down because of a substitution infraction. Tough day at the office for the Michigan defense, giving away two touchdown runs and another first down simply because they were caught out of position by tempo.

Some of the other big plays also came on coaching wrinkles from the Spartans which proved decisive.

Here was the coup de grace, the 23-yard score which occurred after the J.J. McCarthy fumble.

It's a zone-read play but the right tackle folds and the right guard blocks out on the defensive end. The read element is what beat Michigan.

The boundary outside linebacker (B here) is playing contain on the quarterback but the strong safety doesn't want to let the tight end run open and uncontested so he matches him, leaving two of the front seven defenders containing the backside with no one in the backside A-gap. Such are the perils of a 5-2 front with only one inside linebacker. Said linebacker fit the frontside and when the folding right tackle helped clear out the nose tackle it made a massive downhill lane for Walker.

The free safety, who was disguising a deep safety alignment, couldn't get over with a good angle and missed and then it was time for the fight song.

This was a nice wrinkle, as was the Wildcat formation for Walker which picked up a big conversion running "quarterback GT counter" with Walker as the quarterback and Payton Thorne flexed out wide, harmlessly by the sideline.

Michigan State landed the early 27-yard score and the 58-yarder on the 5-2 front as well. If you crease the front, there's not much behind it to fix the problem and a player like Walker is liable to find a crease and then explode through it for a big gain. Overall this was a weaker dimension to the Michigan gameplan, which was otherwise mostly effective at denying deep shots from Thorne and inflicted two (should have been three) turnovers.

With the game on the line, Michigan State had ammo for their best player while Michigan was counting on their quarterback to hit a less established wide receiver corps.

Is the season ruined?

There are two or three obvious complaints for Michigan in this game. I don't understand how the officials overturned the fumble they recovered in the end zone for a defensive touchdown which would have made the game 27-14. Truly a bizarre decision on the review.

J.J. McCarthy getting crucial "four minute offense" snaps makes sense to me. You really want to run the ball there in order to run clock and it was hard to run the ball against State without involving the mobile quarterback in the option game. He fumbled. Freshman make freshman mistakes on the road, such is life.

This was a game in which everyone wonders if the Wolverines' limitations at quarterback would ultimately come back to bite them, and they sort of did, McNamara's big early success notwithstanding. However, the outlook for the rest of the season depends heavily on how the matchups with Penn State and Ohio State go. Honestly, it's hard for me to imagine Michigan beating Ohio State and anyone seeing this season as anything other than a resounding success.

Whether or not Ohio State can successfully gum up the works for the run game, force McNamara to make throws to beat them, and then not give away the game against him as they nearly did against Penn State seems to be the question of the year.

In the meantime, on to Indiana and pursuit of the season's 8th win.

Comments

Gustavo Fring

November 2nd, 2021 at 4:59 PM ^

It’s tempo. We can talk about not running the ball as well, we can talk about not being able to hit WR’s…ultimately the game plan worked.

even the risky gambit of playing with fewer linebackers…without tempo Michigan larger contained Walker.  Michigan wins this game by multiple scores if they know how to handle tempo. 
Next four games are all against teams that play fast and know Michigan is susceptible to tempo and substitutes at bad times.  We’ll see if they can adjust.  If they can, I think they showed enough in the passing game to be able to attack OSU’s secondary, and enough in pass defense to maybe not get eviscerated against Stroud.  But if they also give up big plays because of tempo there’s no shot.  If they adjust…Andrel and All’s emergency make me more confident.

Mgoczar

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:05 PM ^

Good take and I 100% agree. Yea if Tempo is gonna get Michigan then no point, its gonna suck. If McDonald is a young genius, well sir, time to show it. 

Question though: why was MSU so succeseful in "guming up" the Michigan run game? Said another way, is the running QB really the only fix to have a good run game?

gruden

November 3rd, 2021 at 12:15 AM ^

Anything can happen once, but three times?  At some point Harbaugh needed to go over to him and say 'Stop it, just go with what you have on the field.' 

After three times you have to wonder what's going on in the coaches heads.  Despite some mistakes, I don't put this on the players.  The guys who get paid big $$$ to know how to handle tempo utterly failed. It's one thing to get beaten by a new concept, but tempo has been around for years.  Harbaugh seems to have a number of blind spots that opposing coaches can exploit.

That's what has me concerned about the remainder of the season.  You can bet Indiana and PSU will give this a shot.  OSU doesn't need to, but might just to mess with us.  I guess it depends if Day is still pissed at Harbaugh.

AlbanyBlue

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:51 PM ^

Yeah, maybe this will force them to adjust / learn. If I'm any of the last 4 teams in the regular season, I'm running tempo as a rule until our D shows it's not affecting them. 

Also, the obvious bit is if your D isn't set, especially after getting burned once, you call timeout. In college, saving TOs isn't as important, as first downs stop the clock. If the DC wasn't clued in enough to call TOs, then Harbaugh should have been. 

Tempo. Lack of red zone offense. Yes, to a degree we were outcoached. 

Eng1980

November 2nd, 2021 at 9:21 PM ^

What day in college football in the last 20 years gives you confidence that firing Harbaugh is the answer?  I told everyone in October of RichRod's last year that Hoke would probably be the next coach because he was the best coach available that would actually take the job.  Who is available that would come to Michigan?  Who do you want over Harbaugh?  Some say Matt Campbell is good and ISU's performance is much better than their record but how do you know it isn't his QB or his OC?  Campbell has been on the radar for a whole two years.  Do you want to be Miami, FSU, USC, TA&M, Auburn, Nebraska?  How is the USC search going.

On the other hand, if Michigan is going to lose could they at least look prepared and composed while doing it?

gruden

November 3rd, 2021 at 12:26 AM ^

I'll see your fear-based concerns and raise you OSU, Oklahoma, Georgia, and even MSU.

Yes, it could be worse, but it could also be better.  Every year Harbaugh gets out-coached a couple times.  He can't win the big games, and the possibility of beating OSU gets dimmer every year.

If you want to hold onto that because you're afraid it could be even worse, go ahead.  But it could also be much better.  MSU's second choice was able to take a team left with sparse talent, rebuild it quickly, and turn it into a contender.  He seems to understand the importance of certain games and is able to exploit observed weaknesses.  If MSU can find a coach like that, why can't we?

Warde seems to do OK finding new head coaches, plus he knows a thing or two about football, I'm willing to see what he can find.

Avery Queen

November 3rd, 2021 at 11:01 AM ^

Of the 4 examples you listed, only 1 of them (Georgia) actually entailed a coach being fired.  Both Oklahoma & OSU involved a successful, longstanding coach retiring and being replaced by the offensive coordinator.  Not sure what lessons what Michigan can draw from that.  

As for Tucker, yes, he's looked fantastic this year, but I'm far from convinced he's the real deal. You're talking about a coach who had a career record of 12-19 coming into this year. We've seen plenty of schools seem to catch lightening with new hires only for those guys to eventually fall down to earth.  Look at Ed Orgeron, or our first year with Brady Hoke.        

abertain

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:17 PM ^

I don’t think the defensive alignment wound up working out. They didn’t hold State to any field goals. By leaving the second level largely open, it made them susceptible to big runs. Also, Nailor was out when it was 30-14. 

trueblueintexas

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:28 PM ^

Michigan had to work hard for every yard they rushed for. I lost track of the number of times they were an ankle tackle away from breaking a huge run, but credit goes to MSU for having that one guy in position each time and the guy making the play. 

While the offense performed well, there are still things which can be improved this week.

  • Corum had a few hesitant runs. I'm sure he will learn to just get what he can against teams with like talent. 
  • Anthony will continue to get better with more game experience. 
  • Assuming All is healthy, his confidence will continue to increase. Schoonmaker as well. 
  • Barnhart will continue to get better with more experience if Keegan's injury continues to nag him. 

Defense is harder to see where the improvement comes. In the fourth quarter the camera lingered on Mazi Smith's face for a while near the goal line and you could see he was gassed.  Next play was Walker's 4th TD. Without the frequent substitutions, I'm not sure this defensive front can hold up. 

Most everyone on D is playing really well, they just don't have the difference makers beyond Aiden, Dax, and Ojabo. Against the better teams, it takes more than that. 

OldSchoolWolverine

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:35 PM ^

Anyone paying attention to earlier game substitution issues said that we better fix this.... Was so obvious that I was shocked when they did not.  This truly proved that coaches have tunnel vision in the submarine, and need to be better aware of their surroundings. A hundred fans here could have told the coaches something they did not know apparently, that MSU and OSU will plan to exploit the substitution issue, and it cost us the game plain and simple.  

WolverineMan1988

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:39 PM ^

I think our offense will perform against OSU about as well as PSU did. Limited rushing success and a very good/not spectacular performance from the QB position. Might get two-three TDs and a few field goals. That won’t be enough. 

jabberwock

November 3rd, 2021 at 9:35 AM ^

So even though MSU dared Cade to beat therm though the air (he ultimately didn't) and we had a pleasant surprise in the performance of a talented new freshman (which I think also surprised MSU)

You think that not being able to even beat MSU we're going to suddenly be able to put 40 on OSU?!!!  (while they are likely scoring every possession ?)

pass that monster bowl of weed around dude.

TrueBlue2003

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:41 PM ^

His final seven attempts were all in the two minute drill when MSU knew he had to pass.  Not at all comparable to normal game play.  Plus, MSU got away with a PI on one of those incompletions.

Had Cade been in for the four minute offense when MSU would have still be keying on the run, it likely would have kept being a bloodbath.

El Demonio

November 2nd, 2021 at 5:47 PM ^

I always appreciate the contributors to MGoBlog and they work they put in.  However, I fundamentally disagree with the premise here.  There were numerous opportunities to win this game.  Any one of those things occur and we're having a different conversation. 

charblue.

November 2nd, 2021 at 6:13 PM ^

Yeah, we all get it.

One point leads to another. So, if Michigan's end zone fumble recovery stood as called, even if Blake Corum's drop didn't lead on its own to a TD but to an eventual 14-0 margin early on, then momentum, score and MSU's reliance on Walker rushing changes dramatically altering the likely outcome.

In other words, the plays you don't make influence the ones you are forced to consider making later on altering the way you see the game unfolding and ending happily or not. In this case, not. 

 

TrueBlue2003

November 2nd, 2021 at 6:58 PM ^

They did set the table for their RB but he dropped a possible TD pass and then fumbled the game away. 

It's also pretty easy to take RBs out of a game if you want.  Two previous teams have done it to M's "best" players. In one the QB stepped up, in the other the team simply survived.

This is why RBs are rarely high leverage players and are mostly plug and play and get what the scheme and OL and defense give them (see: Minnesota or Wisconsin or pretty much any team that has a RB get hurt).

caup

November 2nd, 2021 at 6:18 PM ^

"This was a game in which everyone wonders if the Wolverines' limitations at quarterback would ultimately come back to bite them, and they sort of did, McNamara's big early success notwithstanding."

Duuuude.  Get that shit out of here. The defense lost this game.  Pinning it on Cade McNamara in any way shape or form is gross.

Do better.

Ian Boyd

November 3rd, 2021 at 10:26 AM ^

Michigan State loaded the box to stop the run and make Cade McNamara beat them.

They left the stadium with the trophy, so their approach worked. I don't care what the "overwhelming majority" thinks, I'm telling you what I think. What I think is that Michigan State's strategy was right.

Brainstorm93

November 2nd, 2021 at 6:22 PM ^

I typically don't like to blame the refs but I keep going back to the fumble recovery for a TD that was taken off the board. TD call on the field. Incontrovertible evidence needed to overturn. Call overturned. It wasn't evidence, incontrovertible or otherwise! Head-shaking. I also think two of Reed's so-called catches were not catches -- the sideline catch and the scoop off the field. And that was targeting against Haskins. He was defenseless and the dude went for him above the neck. 

Also, if McDonald is making more than, let's say, $25,000 to be Defensive Coordinator at Michigan, the substitution malfeasance cannot happen. I don't care how young or inexperienced he is. Unacceptable.

RJWolvie

November 2nd, 2021 at 8:31 PM ^

State defense has bent (like crazy) but not broken against everyone all season. 33 points with 550+ yards is more than solid against that unit, just not good enough given our D performance. Just surprised no one on site has mentioned it given how much emphasized in pregame analyses.

(Also: I still can’t understand why we were 4pt favorites. That seemed a 4pt spread in their favor, being at home, with all the bad matchups of tendencies for us. Said as much thu & fri and was negged. Seems I was wrong by 4pts given the TD strip sack repealed: shoulda been a pick’em.)

RJWolvie

November 2nd, 2021 at 8:48 PM ^

The receivers, outside of Anthony & All, should also be getting some of the blame for the 4pt loss. Drops were killers, as always. 

Been saying for a while that they should be getting some share of Cade’s negatives, at last a quarter: when a pass is a little behind or too much toward defender or some success, but nonetheless hits receiver in the hands without tip (as 2x in NW game, eg), that has to be caught! The drops in this game were worse. Fine throws hitting open receivers in the hands just dropped at corum's 1 and Johnson’s ?2? Weren’t as many bad routes that I noticed tho, so progress? Let’s hope. Anthony, eg, was amazing! Did they miss Edwards out of the backfield maybe? Hopefully that unit can continue to improve 

Eng1980

November 2nd, 2021 at 9:41 PM ^

Michigan was favored because they have more talent.  Past performance (this year, not  last year) indicated that Michigan would handle the MSU passing game and MSU would not do as well against Michigan's passing attack.  That much was predicted.  What was also predicted was that Michigan's rushing defense would match the performance of Indiana and Nebraska which held Walker to about 80 yards/game.  Walker running free was the difference and he ran free because Michigan couldn't tackle/cover the cut back.  More yards, more first downs, and more 3rd down conversions should tell you that Michigan should have won and is proof they should have been favored.  And that is why we are so disappointed.  

Or you could just go along with the experts in Vegas are experts even if there are upsets.

RJWolvie

November 2nd, 2021 at 10:33 PM ^

What about Michigan’s past performance against one semi functional passing attack, Nebraska, said UM should do as well as it did against MSU? Nothing. What about Michigan’s susceptibility to big play in every game so far said they would allow less than 4 big plays against the #1 big play team in CFB? Nothing. Our offense looked likely to do some damage against them, but MSU has bent but not broken to some decent offenses, not UM level, so we should score better than most of their opponents, and lo: we did. Their barn. Add that all up and you get only reason M was favored is because more money always plays on M. Vegas expert on radio this past week explained it as: there are few teams that fan money always skew: UM, USC, ND… Actually, M has covered every game this year except Rutger and now MSU (they also failed to cover or pushed Neb depending when you bet them), but that is extremely rare for us.

Carpetbagger

November 3rd, 2021 at 11:26 AM ^

Yep. There were two players (imho) who didn't play up to their expectations in this game, neither of them were McNamara. Corum and Johnson.

Corum not so much for the fumble, but he seemed off all day, pretty close to zero after contact yards. That drop was 6.

Johnson just doesn't fight for the ball. That 4th PI may have been called if Johnson does his level best to catch that. I half expect the officials didn't throw the flag because they thought it was uncatchable, when it was only uncatchable because Johnson made no effort to fight through the pick.

alum96

November 2nd, 2021 at 9:50 PM ^

Walker had three scoring runs of 27, 23, and 58 yards in this game. Take them out of the average and he was 20-89 yards at 4.5 ypc and two rushing touchdowns. 

 

This is mesmerizing logic

If you take our Braylon Edwards best 3 plays vs MSU, MSU had him all sort of contained!! MSU would have won easy!!  MOAR YARDS!!!

If for any big play maker you take away their best 4 plays of a game - can you imagine how amazing we did! 

 

One team is a trudge as you go offense built after Wisconsin.  Another is a big play offense that doesnt rely on 12 plays 81 yard drives.  Wow I wonder why things played out this way.  

newtopos

November 3rd, 2021 at 12:00 AM ^

Of course, the 58-yard gain also had this:

with the guilty ("I didn't do it") hands up and look back by the WR for the flag:

Anthony's "hold" get called in the red zone, and Michigan settles for a FG.  MSU's "hold" goes uncalled, and Walker gets a 58-yard TD run.

Not saying Michigan coaches and players didn't make mistakes, but the final result could have turned on so many of those.  MSU's coaches called a good game, but the idea that they and the MSU players played a mistake-free game is also a mirage.  For example, with 1:15 left in a one-score game, roughing the passer to put the other team at about mid-field is a pretty big mental error.  Again, all of that is lost in the overall result, but some of the narratives being thrown around (not saying you) about making mistakes in big games or MSU being tougher, etc., really do not play out.  They won a hard fought, close game.  Tip my cap to them.  We have things to work on.  Going into the season, we also recognized the limitations of this roster.  The earlier, much-better-than-expected results may have shifted the outlook for some people, but some perspective helps.  On to Indiana.

MGoStrength

November 3rd, 2021 at 8:19 AM ^

I have a few questions.

Great play-call by Michigan State

So, did MSU out-coach UM in this game?  I saw several times in your post MSU is not good at this or not good at that, but also they made some good decisions and maximized their strengths while minimizing their weaknesses.  Did UM do the same and just got out-executed in the 4th quarter or did we get out-coached?

Michigan isn't built to beat teams throwing the ball with Cade McNamara to this Ronnie Bell-less cast of receivers

I just don't get this.  I know it hurts to lose Bell.  And, I know JH wants to run the ball.  And, I know Cade is generally thought of as a game managing QB.  Maybe that's not good enough for OSU who has a bevy of 5-star WRs and a top 50 composite player at QB, but it sure seems like they have a heck of a lot more passing tools than most other teams.  We have a 4-star QB and two 4-star WRs in Johnson & Henning and that doesn't even include a 4-star freshman WR in Cristian Dixon, an explosive young Andrel Anthony, and a 5-star back up QB.  Who else other than OSU has that?  PSU probably has equal talent.  I'd guess UM has more than anyone else in the conference.

Ian Boyd

November 3rd, 2021 at 10:29 AM ^

I think Michigan State had the superior strategy, yes. Out-coached is fine, with the obvious caveat about that insane fumble call that could have erased their plan.

I don't know how all the recruiting rankings match up but what I watch on the field from Michigan's passing game is a solid, not great attack.