Picture Pages: Snag Package Comment Count

Brian

Earlier in the year Chris Brown of Smart Football offered up some clarification of a route package Michigan's running, and now I'm spotting it in key situations so I might as well Picture Page it. This will please people who complain about the relentlessly negative PPs in past weeks that are all about explaining why Michigan gave up a touchdown.

It's third and four from the 29 on Michigan's second drive of the day. Michigan comes out in a standard formation:

 snaghq-1

Smith, Hemingway, and tight end Kevin Koger are going to run a snag concept. This consists of three parts:

  1. The #1 (outside) receiver runs a slant and then sits down about five yards downfield.
  2. The #2 receiver, in this case the TE, runs a corner route.
  3. The tailback runs a flare.

This is what it looks like on a diagram. It's on the right:

snag-concept

Chris Brown on the point of this package:

The snag is a variant of the smash, where one point is to get a high-low with the corner route and the flat route (except now the flat is controlled by the runningback), with the added dimension of an outside receiver running the “snag” route — a one-step slant where he settles inside at 5-6 yards. This gives you a “triangle” stretch, where you have both a high/low read (corner to RB in the flat) and a horizontal read from inside to outside (snag route to the RB in the flat).

In previous games when Michigan's run this the opponent was in three deep and the read was simply reading the playside linebacker: throw it where he's not. Here Illinois runs what looks like a combo coverage. Just after the snap:

snaghq-2

Illinois has a hard corner to the bottom of the screen and a soft one to the top. Robinson's reading the snag package all the way. Here he's starting at the playside LB, who's figuring out what to do with Koger.

It turns out he goes with Koger:

snaghq-3

The hard corner is taking away the flare and this linebacker is turning his hips, so the snag route itself (Hemingway's) will come open. Denard should probably be throwing the ball now.

snaghq-4

He should definitely be throwing the ball now.

snaghq-5

THROW THE BALL AAAIAIGH

snaghq-6

Okay.

snaghq-7

Hemingway's about a half yard short of the first down and is fortunate that Martez Wilson read the route package about as fast as Denard did. He's still two steps away from Hemingway, allowing Hemingway to take that orbit step wide receivers to do evade overpursuing tacklers…

snaghq-8

…which gets him past the sticks for a first down.

snaghq-9

Object lessons:

  • Maybe Michigan's passing game isn't as unsophisticated as the spread n shred used to be? This is a favored package around the NCAA right now, which is why Smart Football could bring it to my attention—he'd seen it in the Rose Bowl. Meanwhile, despite having a quarterback who's going to break the all-time rushing record for his position and possibly Tim Biakabutuka's Michigan rushing record, this is not the West Virginia offense. Disclaimers about Tate cameos and catchup ball apply, but Michigan's running 61% of the time this year. That's not far off from Carr's last three years, which were 56% rush (2007), 61% (2006), and 55% (2005) and it's a far cry from Rodriguez's Pat White offenses that ran 75% of the time.

    Despite missing a game and a half, Denard already has more attempts than White did as a sophomore and needs just 22 attempts per game to match White's 274 attempts as a senior (which wasn't even an RR offense anymore). Michigan's 14th in passer efficiency, which says a lot more when you're throwing it around at a semi-normal rate.
  • But maybe so, or maybe not. Previously in this series we've broken down the curl/flat combo (twice) and frequently mentioned the snag. Here Illinois runs a combo coverage that blankets the curl/flat to the top of the screen and probably should do the same to the snag but for Wilson's tardiness. They're prepared for this play. On the other hand, they were completely unprepared for the all-hitch routes that Roundtree kept dropping, and Michigan got their bomb on. So maybe nevermind.
  • The game is still slowing down for Denard. This is the euphemistic way to say "he's not reading defenses fast enough yet." (For a given definition of "enough," anyway. He's 11th in passer efficiency.) He's late here and I think he was late a couple other times. It's hard to tell whether certain balls are inaccurate or thrown in the right zone window, but thrown too late. I think the fourth and nine Roundtree touchdown may be an example of this. He couldn't hit Roundtree in the numbers because of the safety coming over and forced a moderately difficult catch out of him.
  • Great protection. This happened all day. Robinson sat back there like John Navarre, most prominently on the second(!) 75-yard completion to Roundtree where Michigan slid the line and he re-enacted his throw to Roundtree from the spring game except without the guy coming into his face.
  • Maybe this is why he never scrambles? He seems uncertain about his reads still so he sits in the pocket wondering if he's missing something when he should just run, Forrest, run. For a guy with his ability on the ground he's got a weird antipathy for taking off. I've got him for four scrambles on the year.

Comments

Beegs

November 9th, 2010 at 5:18 PM ^

Does anyone think that sometimes Denard/Tate are choosing (or have been taught to) look for the deeper stuff first? I wouldn't be surprised if on this particular play, Denard is actually waiting just a bit for the deeper sideline route to get open and then, decides to bail shorter to Junior (hence the slight pause - which as pointed out above is very, very slight).

In rewatching the game with sound (instead of live in the noisy bar i was in) I heard Griese (TV color commentator) mention that on several plays he thought our QBs were being a bit "greedy" in not taking the easy, open short route for an easy first down.

Makes me think we are teaching our QBs to prioritize the deep route as a first optiion, then check down if not open.

Gene

November 9th, 2010 at 7:05 PM ^

There were a few times the last game I was screaming at Denard/Tate to take the easy first down. I think Tate did once or twice, but they both seemed a bit eager to sling it downfield. It's great if they have it, of course, but since the only thing that can seem to stop this offense is itself, I'd rather they take the percentages.

WalterMitty

November 9th, 2010 at 6:38 PM ^

Absolutely want Denard to take off on some of those and unleash havoc but 2 things come to mind. First, I'm not sure I can remeber a crazy good scrambler sitting as long as he does reading and looking. I will take that over all those running qbs who get the happy feet and are just attempting to look like they were trying to find somebody before they take off. I would assume it will be easier to coach him to pull it down and take off rather than coach him to hang in there longer? Also, I may be crazy, but I think him being so unselfish and eager to please lends itself to him trying to spread the wealth and handoff on the read option too much and also take that extra moment looking for someone to fire a pass too...Impossible to follow him and not love him.

the_dude

November 9th, 2010 at 9:33 PM ^

Regarding Denard's antipathy for scrambling on pass plays you could notice that in his high school highlight clip on You Tube.  It was composed entirely of him sitting in the pocket making throws with very few scrambles.  One way to look at it was that it was his way of showing "look, I'm a QB, I sit in the pocket and make throws!" but I agree that he seems really committed to making the reads and trying to find an open receiver.  He doesn't just tuck and run if his first option isn't open.  My sense is the Illinois game was the first game where he truly became a passing threat that could torch a defense that over-committed to stopping him from gashing them with his legs.

It's a beautiful thing. 

srudman09

November 10th, 2010 at 9:54 AM ^

The diagram shows two slant routes on the other side of the formation. This makes sense because it would hold wilson, the other linebacker, closer to the other hash.

But the pictures clearly show they are running smash on the backside, which doesn't make any sense because it puts no pressure on the back side linebacker.

If you are ONLY reading the snag, which already has a snatch concept, why not run the slants on the back side and hold the LB??

Jeff

November 10th, 2010 at 2:31 PM ^

The diagram is not the diagram of that specific play.  It's probably taken from the smartfootball website to illustrate the snag concept.  What you're saying makes sense, that pairing the snag package with double slants would work out well.

There might be a pre-snap read that would determine whether Denard's primary route is the smash or the snag.

srudman09

November 10th, 2010 at 10:00 AM ^

The diagram shows that we run slants on the backside of the snag route. This makes sense because it would hold the backside linebacker, wilson in this case.

 

But the pictures show we are running a smash route on the back side. Which leaves Wilson free to make the play on the slant and sit.  This doesnt make any sense, why not run a slant and sit, or a skinny post, on the backside, to turn Wilson's hips??

kman23

November 10th, 2010 at 6:43 PM ^

Does anyone else remember the screen/run options we ran 4-5 times against ND? A RB would run a flare route and the WRs on that side would set up to block. Early in the game ND's linebackers were so scared of Denard running that they left this open and we hit Smith & Shaw (I think) with big gains. Then when ND saw this play again they had their LBs run over there leaving the middle of the field open for Denard to run. In response of this happening twice ND countered again and kept their LBs in place and brought down their safety to cover the RB so Michigan countered and had Roundtree fake block and then run deep, where Robinson hit him for an easy TD.

I really felt that this play killed ND since it really let our offense play to our strengths.