You bring down a safety on a run blitz, you have your DTs filling both A gaps, you have your linebackers flying down at the first sign of Duo, and then this happens. [Bryan Fuller]

Neck Sharpies: The Other Outside Run Comment Count

Seth October 17th, 2023 at 9:00 AM

In Week 2 against UNLV Michigan tried to run Stretch (aka Outside Zone) as their primary counter to Duo, their base running play. It didn't work. The problem with that is if your base running play is inside the tackles you still need something you can run well that goes outside of the tackles. Otherwise your Duo runs are just going to get swallowed up.

This sounds pretty basic. But what kind of outside run could look like Duo/Inside Zone? And how can you spot it? Let's look.

[After THE JUMP: Wrappers]

Jamming Duo

Duo, as we've discussed ad nauseum, is the running play where you double both DTs to get so much movement on them that a linebacker has to pick one side to go to, at which point the RB can bounce to the other gap. In our base example the RB angles towards the frontside "A" gap between the center and guard, and once he gets the MLB to commit to that gap he bounces out to the C gap.

image

But he could just as well attack the nose tackle and WLB. The read for the running back is one of those doubles is likely going better than the other, so lock eyes with the linebacker behind it and get him to commit to the wrong gap.

The reason Duo works is because defenses usually align with one fewer defender in the box than there are gaps. If you're defending a six-man front with six guys in the box, and the ends are taking the edges, you're one gap short.

image

The defense would like their "a"-aligned linebacker to be able to hang back and get to the C gap they're leaving open by alignment, but he can't do that if the "B" tackle gets blown down into him. The LB is forced to pick a side. When the offense gives you an option, whichever one you choose is going to be wrong.

Every defense would love to defeat this by having tackles who won't get shoved out of the way with doubles, but with Michigan's blockers that's a tough ask. Finding a DT who's stronger than two FBS-caliber offensive linemen isn't easy. Even Mason Graham gets moved by doubles.

How do you cheat against this? There are three main ways:

1. Do it with DL: Where your linemen line up are hard nodes, places it's harder to run. Defenses move them to different gaps before and after the snap, and offenses seek soft nodes to widen and attack. Pay attention here where these DL align, and where they end up.

This is a basic Over front with hard nodes threatening the strongside D and B gaps, and the backside A and C gaps.

image

After the snap the assignments are a little different.

image

This is a "Pinch." Indiana moved a DT down a gap, jamming up both A gaps. This forces the soft nodes that the RB can threaten further apart, and puts the hardest nodes—those DTs—in adjacent gaps. If one double goes well the RB can't cut to the inside of it because there's another DT there.

2. Do it with LBs: Duo really causes problems for defenses because once you move the DT out of the way you get a linebacker who can't cover both sides of it (unless he gets a safety covering his backside). So if you want to jam up duo, tell your linebackers to shoot up into those doubles and stop them in their tracks.

Watch #44 Aaron Casey, the LB on the bottom hash.

Michigan is getting movement, but even before the ball is in Corum's hands Casey is coming down towards the line of scrimmage to help his DT.

image

Teams expecting a run up the gut will often slam their linebackers into the line of scrimmage as soon as they see those doubles forming, which not only relieves the DT getting doubled but creates another hard node in the defensive front at a crucial moment. The linebacker's running start gives his body the effect of a particularly strong DT. This should halt the offense's momentum downfield, and might even reverse it.

And since the linebacker here gets to choose which OL he attacks, he's going to take the outside shoulder of the blocker with the most advantageous position, squeezing him next to the guy he was doubling with—closing that gap—and allowing his DT to cover the one behind it. The result is usually a running back running up into the backs of his blockers, technically in an unprotected gap, but not one that he fit a body through.

image

3. Do it with DBs:

You probably already noticed by now that IU has a seventh guy at linebacker depth. That's #15, Nic Toomer, a cornerback who transferred in this year from Stanford.

image

Remember the reason Duo works is because defenses usually align one gap short.

image

If you bring down a safety, or in this case add a cornerback, you've got a guy for every gap.

image

As this all resolves, the pinching DTs and quick-slamming WLB have created a pileup inside with three defenders occupying four blockers, giving the RB a choice between two lanes outside of those double-teams that have defenders waiting in.

image

On this particular play the DE on the top actually came inside too late and might have given up a bounce to the outside, but you get the idea. Indiana is selling out on this three ways (and a fourth). It's time to make them boys pay.

DON'T PINCH ME

The best way to mess with a defense that's attacking inside is to run outside, obviously. This also works in the micro. When the defense pinches its DTs they're not just committing their strongest run defense to the A-gaps; they're shifting a linebacker responsibility out of the A-gap, IE they're taking a linebacker out of the middle.

Note how Michigan has a lot of blocking material on the right side of the offense, and Indiana's closest hard node is the frontside B gap.  (This is from the replay).

image

They're expecting to pass rush here, not defend an outside run. What they get is a jet sweep with the tight ends blocking down and the frontside guard and tackle pulling around. The defense is quickly outflanked and Corum picks up a chunk behind his escorts.

image

The Jet Sweep is a neat outside running trick, but it doesn't really look like the main thing Michigan runs, which limits its effectiveness. Here it was a gimmick on a passing down that took advantage of the defense relaxing while Corum motioned, apparently to his normal RB position, to hide the jet intentions.

But the Jet Sweep is really just a variation on the Crack Sweep--the play where they pitch it to the RB--and that should work on pinching DTs just as well. That looks like Duo before the snap at least. But what if I told you there's a way to run outside from a pure Duo look?

WINDBACK

Windback ("wind" as in what you do to a clock), also known as Counter Duo, attacks outside after committing the defense to trying to get upfield. It's usually run with a tight end wrapper but Wilson will do here:

Windback has three main components:

  1. Duo blocking inside that gets the last interior defender downblocked.
  2. Edge control from the last man on the line of scrimmage.
  3. A "wrapper"—basically some kind of long backside puller to handle the edge defender.

image

click makes big

Usually this also includes some kind of counter motion from the running back to really sell the Duo look before he bounces outside (I used to say always but I've learned not to). I also use "Edge control" instead of "kickout" because that's more of a zone block—if that SAM decides to go inside of Bredeson he has to downblock and the wrapper, in this case Roman Wilson, will know to head another gap outside, or become the kickout man if he meets an unblocked defender on the edge. Also if the SS in this graphic were to come down outside of Loveland, he'd have to kick him out and that would be the gap.

But this is what they're expecting. The safety hammered down to add himself to the front and Loveland put him inside. The SDE is responsible for the edge and accepts a kickout from Bredeson. The gap forms between the kickout and the next guy inside, who needs to be blocked down.

image

There are reasons both obvious and subtle that this works as such a great counter to a defense that's selling out for Duo. The obvious part is the defense is burying itself in the line of scrimmage, using up its linebackers for gaps that the offense has no intention of going through. Look at Casey (#44) on the bottom hash in the clip above. He came to help his DT getting doubled by Zinter and Nugent, and now he's in no position to get back to Corum until the midfield M at least. That's the obvious part.

The subtle part is how the DTs (and in this case, a DE on the top) end up beating themselves by trying to beat Duo blocking. The end on the side they're running is the crucial player who needs to be blocked down, else he can gum up the entire works. They need this guy put inside, and intend to double through him to the linebacker level if needed. AJ Barner and LaDarius Henderson are committed to the task.

image

But this guy thinks he's defending Duo, right? So when he gets that double he thinks the best thing he can do is occupy the gap while working across Henderson to close the B gap forming behind him.

image

This would be some great defense if it was Duo. That DE is feeling super proud at this moment I bet. He has the C gap between Henderson and Barner controlled, and he's winning the B gap between Henderson and Keegan as well. And with the linebackers crashing down to fill those gaps this Duo should be good and stuffed.

image

The point is our DT is fighting to get to the wrong side of Henderson. Henderson just has to let him. If the linebacker figures out what's up, Barner should be able to come off and seal him. After all, the linebackers are obsessing over inside gaps—it's not dangerous to let the outside guy release.

image

Barner didn't release. He just kept blocking down and blocking down. The MLB saw Henderson as the main threat and slammed into him.

The other thing I want to point out here is the strong safety, who filled the gap behind Barner. Remember how nosy DBs were one of the issues with the run game earlier? The Harbaugh response to that is to turn those DBs into true run defenders. If you wanna play the game, we'll give you a tight end. Step right up and play the game, or in this case, eat Potato man; you're now the inside of the gap.

image

We said the DTs were hard nodes; a safety is not, and Bredeson widens the kickout to make a nice lane. As Wilson and Corum approach it, it starts to dawn on Casey at the bottom that he maybe shouldn't completely bury himself in Nugent. He abandons the backside B gap and starts to work his way back. The safety is not built for this. The DE is still fighting to get himself washed away from the play.

image

The WLB, Casey, is able to track this down from behind after just a decent gain. But had he been stuck on the blocking—say, if Keegan had been able to release after his DT crossed his face, the WLB wouldn't have an angle to get back. Space Coyote did a nice breakdown of it just over a year ago when Michigan brought it out against Maryland that showed the efficacy of these vertical blocks.

Michigan ran windback again after the jet sweep got Corum down to the redzone. This time the windback was Bredeson. Case again made the stop, though not before Corum got a head of steam against a cornerback and gained most of the distance to the goal line.

If you're grading this, watch the blockdowns from Loveland and Barner on the top and notice how much they move their respective guys. Loveland blocked down instead of kicking out (like Bredeson) on the play we drew up.

Michigan ran this or things like it (like power where the backside guard is the windback) a few more times on the first drive of the second half. And Indiana learned their lesson. Because the next Michigan went to run Duo, rather than putting their hard nodes on the inside, IU had the DTs slanting frontside, and the linebackers picking sides.

 

Comments

dragonchild

October 17th, 2023 at 10:00 AM ^

The key thing about counters (no, not the play "counter" you pedants, I mean "counter to what the defense is doing") is that they have to look like the base play.

It seems obvious, right?  But it took Michigan way too long to learn this.  There's never a good time to mention it, but this is probably the best we'll get as far as going back to the Dark Times:  We here were infuriated that Michigan under Hoke was constantly running plays for which there were no constraints.  As in, the plays they ran looked nothing like each other.  Defenses -- and even fans -- could easily predict what Michigan was going to run based on the personnel and alignment.

This is a lesson I learned playing Tecmo Super Bowl as a kid, but millionaires who think they've earned every penny from their brilliance (namely Al Borges) would not only refuse to grasp the concept, when asked they would get openly indignant that their mastery was questioned by the unwashed masses.  And defenses continued to feast.

Anyone my age has learned to not take a good constraint for granted, unfortunately.

bighouseinmate

October 17th, 2023 at 10:20 AM ^

Agreed, but I’d say Al Borges has definitely earned my respect as far as breaking down plays goes. He might not be good at game planning, but he knows exactly where everyone should go, how they should get there, and why they should be doing what they are doing. 
 

As an aside, between the neck sharpies here and the Michigan insider YouTube’s with Devin Gardner, Al borges and Vance Bedford I’ve learned more about football in the past three years than in the previous 30+ from just watching it on tv.

dragonchild

October 17th, 2023 at 11:00 AM ^

I'm fine that Borges is a fine commentator.  Some people are good at some things and not others.  Nothing wrong with that.

But the way he handled himself as an OC was downright shameful.  Now, everyone's human and makes mistakes, but I'm wary of those who not only refuse to learn, but double down when confronted with the causes of their failures.  Heiko (former MGoBlogger) at a presser asked why he doesn't run a simple constraint play to exploit free yards defenses were giving him, and he reacted like a hormone-addled teenager.  And through it all he kept getting worse.  At one point OSU was literally keying on our plays based on which QB he rolled out, which to me is "should never happen" territory.

He's moved on where he can't do any more damage, so yay.  But in my experience, his stubborn rejection of critical feedback is a toxic trait that leads to bad behaviors in more than just football.  He seems to be a friendly fellow (he later accepted an invite for a public deep dive with Heiko), at least when he's not losing games, but his kind of arrogance has literally gotten people killed in other lines of work.

ca_prophet

October 17th, 2023 at 12:37 PM ^

2013 ND game plan was brilliant too.  There was one big pass play where they half-rolled away from the pressure and Gardner got to sit back in a huge, clean pocket while a receiver ran free for a big strike.

That sort of thing is why I think the "party line" on Borges is overstated.  "OSU keying on our QB" is lazy thinking if you're talking about 2012, when we had no choice due to Denard's elbow.  He couldn't throw, and he couldn't really play RB (couldn't pass protect, block for Gardner or catch out of the backfield).  Either Denard sat out the OSU game, or he played his limited role (run the ball, or be a decoy).

Asking Michigan to install a new position for Denard midseason also seems like a big ask (e.g. the Deebo Samuel role for SF); I would classify that failure to find a brilliant solution, rather than incompetence for not finding the obvious.

The bigger picture to my mind is that Borges followed RichRod, who seemed tailor-made to maximize Denard, and tried to install an offense which focused the QB on medium-complicated passing - decidedly not Denard's strength - and which preferred to block people rather than give them the chance to make a play - also not tailored to our strengths.

Did Borges get the most out of Denard and Devin?  No.  Was he dismissive of amateurs second-guessing his undoubtedly vast knowledge?  Yes, at times.  Did that play a role in infuriating a fanbase which thought we were heading back to our rightful place, only to continue falling?  Absolutely.

But none of that makes him the drooling incompetent that the aforementioned party line often seems to portray.

The Homie J

October 17th, 2023 at 1:41 PM ^

IIRC Borges' biggest issue was that he would overuse the base play to the point where teams were easily shutting it down.  And we knew there was a counter play to punish defenses for overplaying the base play, but Borges would never call the counter/constraint play until the end of the season, saving it for a what he hoped would be a big gain or a touchdown, rather than utilizing those counters throughout the season to keep defenses on their heels.  It was maddening to watch us lose game after game because we refused to counter teams until Ohio State showed up

AlbanyBlue

October 17th, 2023 at 3:05 PM ^

As far as Borges, it's not so much incompetence that people focus on. It was widely recognized that Al could design the hell out of a play. But he couldn't scheme his way out of a paper bag. IIRC, this is where the idea that execution above all came from. Yes, maybe the play was designed well, but it takes all 11 doing their job to work. AND when the opposing defense knows it's coming, they have a head start at making somebody screw up.

This is why keeping a defense off-balance and taking the easy yards with obvious counters is the way to go. Honestly, we STILL don't do enough of this, though post-2020 we are doing more of it. Since then, many of Harbaugh's counters to run plays are other run plays. A lot of teams focus on countering run plays with passes off of the same look, but Harbaugh clearly hasn't trusted his QBs enough -- until this year, and so far only somewhat more -- to do it that way. Thankfully it's starting to change -- okay, run PA, get the D to commit towards the line and inside and run dig routes behind them. Still super safe -- it is Harbaugh after all -- but very effective.

But yeah, Borges, convinced of his own genius in play design, would just run base after base, and then when everything got stuffed, the staff would carp about execution. Yes, we still have to execute, but it's better this way.

Carcajou

October 18th, 2023 at 9:29 PM ^

 The worst thing you can ever do to a defender is put him in a position of doubt regarding where the ball is going.

 

Which is why you want to have both zone (with OL responsible for playside gaps) and gap (where OL are responsible for backside gaps). Mix and match that with some fast flow, some counter flow action from the back(s), and the defense has to slow down and play honest and you have a chance.

 

bighouseinmate

October 17th, 2023 at 10:12 AM ^

Watching those I noticed Casey for Indiana played them all pretty good, from the first duos to the windbacks. On that first windback that was shown, if not for him Corum probably breaks the tackle from the cb and gains another 5-10 yards with a lone safety draped on him. He reads well, makes a decision and then goes hard. He is probably their best player overall, imo.

bighouseinmate

October 17th, 2023 at 12:28 PM ^

I don’t know if I’d say they’re heads and shoulders above him. How much do the PSU DTs free them up to take on other responsibilities? Casey was making plays all over the field, including a sack and a couple tackles for loss. He’s the best LB Michigan has faced so far this year, and could possibly be in the top three when the season is over. 
 

As for PSU’s LBs and overall defense, we’ll see just how good they are this weekend. 

El Jeffe

October 17th, 2023 at 11:59 AM ^

I forget, is it "you are the wind beneath my wings" back, or "take that and rewind it" back?

Assuming Ludacris got the flow that make your booty go smack, natch.

themostbrian

October 17th, 2023 at 12:47 PM ^

This is the exact type of post that makes MGoBlog the greatest sports blog of all time. Wonderful detail and clarity - but also moments of wry humor sprinkled in for good balance.

Also, as an Ohio State fan,... this breakdown gives me nightmares!

Wally Llama

October 17th, 2023 at 1:01 PM ^

As others have said, really good stuff here. I appreciated the embed of Space Coyote's video, too. I learned that it's pronounced "windback", not "windback" as I had been saying in my head all this time! Ha!

DonAZ

October 17th, 2023 at 2:11 PM ^

I was looking at the top picture for this article, and I saw this:

I'm genuinely curious ... I would think this is holding, but maybe there's a technical reason why it's not.  Or maybe it is, technically, but this is an example of holding that's almost always overlooked. 

Two things: (1) the Michigan player's arm around the defender's waist, and (2) what looks like a handful of jersey.

I'm asking because I honestly don't know the details of these things. Can someone help?

 

AlbanyBlue

October 17th, 2023 at 2:47 PM ^

Thanks for explaining this so clearly, Seth. I still can't follow it in real time -- while watching the game live, I mean -- but if I want to rewind to look at a specific play, these Neck Sharpies at least help me to know what to look for.

Great job, as always. You have earned a nap.

MadMatt

October 17th, 2023 at 3:17 PM ^

I just glad the offense had moved away from running repeatedly into stacked boxes. This season (finally!) the pull is active on the zone read (with JJ getting what he can get, then going out of bounds; two thumbs way up). Also, we now have a constraint play better than the sad trombone version of outside zone. Between that, and trusting JJ to make clutch throws when necessary, this is much better. We'll see if the team can still execute when facing an opponent as athletically talented as they are.

MaynardST

October 17th, 2023 at 5:12 PM ^

Wonderful! This couldn't be more clear.  What I also don't understand is how Michigan continually plays with such mistake-free discipline.  Contrast this with the sloppy pro football game last night decided by the referees, who really won the game.  How does Michigan, which much less practice time than the pros, play like it has better coaching?

micheal honcho

October 17th, 2023 at 11:04 PM ^

Old school guy here so forgive me. I recall being coached that the DT, once double team engages, drops his inside knee to the ground and gets his shoulder pads into the inside gap, hopefully creating a pile as you cross the hips of the inside man on the double team. Thereby eliminating, as quickly as possible, one of the 2 gaps, leaving only one choice for the free LB. We learned and taught this technique for defending the T formations and their single wing variants but as far as gap control don’t the same sort of rules apply? With the counter being crash the DE’s down on the Tackles trying to squeeze the gaps closed while the OLBs (4-3) take edge responsibility. Reading your great explanation just had me recalling what we did “back in the day” when faced with ultimately very similar issues. 

Seth

October 17th, 2023 at 11:30 PM ^

Yeah, players don't leave their feet anymore, probably because there are usually such light boxes and so much space that it's better to leak a few yards than be on one knee when the ballcarrier suddenly cuts back your way. Made more sense when there were typically 7-8 guys around the football per team. Bo used to coach players go to the ground, which is how he got away with 230 pound centers.

uminks

October 18th, 2023 at 1:11 AM ^

Interesting to learn about the windback. I forgot that Space Coyote posted about the windback last year. I don't see Space Coyote posting mgoblog much. 

PeteM

October 18th, 2023 at 8:50 PM ^

Well done. I've been a Michigan football fan all of my life. Growing up in the Bo era I used to think that the run game was simplistic -- essentially if your guys up front were bigger and stronger than theirs your run game would succeed and if they weren't it would fail. That feeling was exacerbated by Rose Bowls where Michigan's option offense would often stall. I also saw the pass game as more sophisticated, fun to watch and with the right QB a way to for a team with less overall talent to stay competitive.

I still have moments like after the first run above where Corum got stuffed when I feel like Michigan should pass more on 1st down, but posts like this, and many others over the years on this blog, have made me understand that the run game can be just as sophisticated (perhaps more so in terms of blocking) as the pass.

Carcajou

October 18th, 2023 at 9:40 PM ^

I believe on the WIndback, the linemen are responsible for their backside gaps, so in the diagram the LT is responsible for the M, and the Center is responsible for the W.

As far as "edge control" goes, it's known as a kickout/log block. Whoever has the kickout block does so, but if the defender crosses his face, the blocker "logs" him blocking down (trying to deny penetration); and the puller goes around and gets the next man who shows (kicking him out, or going upfield). These are practiced in drills for these two working in unison (2-on-2).