Michigan 36, Cincinnati 14 Comment Count

Ace


[Bryan Fuller]

Michigan's home opener was supposed to look a lot like last year's Rutgers game. Instead, it more closely resembled last week's Florida game. While that was perfectly fine against a talented UF squad, it was far less so against an overmatched Cincinnati team that barely squeaked by Austin Peay last week.

The game began as expected. Ty Isaac churned out yards with ease, setting up a 43-yard Wilton Speight touchdown bomb to a wide open Kekoa Crawford on the opening drive. The defense held up its end, booting Cincinnati off the field in three plays. While the Wolverines went three-and-out on their ensuing drive, Tyree Kinnel got them back on track, picking off an overthrow from UC's Hayden Moore and diving into the end zone for a 28-yard pick-six.

Then things started going sideways. A short punt by the Bearcats bounced off Nate Johnson's leg, giving Cincinnati a first down on the Michigan 38-yard line. After a penalty kept the drive alive, Mike Boone squeezed his way in from a yard out for the first touchdown scored against the M defense this season. The next Wolverine drive stalled in the red zone, and Quinn Nordin's 28-yard field goal opened one of the uglier quarters Michigan has played under Jim Harbaugh.

Seemingly nothing could go right on offense in the second quarter. Speight fumbled a jet sweep handoff to Crawford to kill a promising drive. Tarik Black ran what, on review, turned out to be an 11-yard route on third-and-12 to end the next one. Speight winged a couple passes high, evoking bad memories of last week's second quarter.

Michigan didn't get a first-half point after Nordin's field goal with 14:03 left. The defense didn't give up any, either, but only after an interminable final drive by Cincinnati resulted in a 51-yard field goal sailing wide right. As the team ran into the tunnel, the fans were audibly displeased with the 17-7 halftime lead.


[Eric Upchurch]

The grumbling continued into the third quarter as Cincinnati took the kickoff and marched 85 yards in ten plays to cut the lead to three points. Michigan's next two drives went nowhere. What had been an annoyingly close game was becoming a potential nightmare.

Thankfully, Michigan woke up. With 3:01 left in the third quarter, Speight hit Grant Perry in stride on a crossing route, and Perry jetted through the Bearcats secondary and dove in for a 33-yard touchdown. Cincinnati could only threaten to score after that. Michigan's offense, meanwhile, piggybacked off some excellent running by Isaac to drive for a short Quinn Nordin field goal midway through the fourth quarter.

Luke Fickell handled the rest. On fourth-and-two from the Cincinnati 33, down two scores with seven minutes remaining, he called for the punt team. One yakety snap later, Michigan had a safety and the ball back, and the potential nightmare was over. The next UC drive ended after one play when Lavert Hill cut off a Moore pass, reversed field, and slipped inside the pylon for M's second defensive touchdown of the afternoon.

By pure box score standards, this game turned out well. Michigan outgained Cincinnati 414-200, dominated the ground game, and kept Moore under constant pressure. Speight, for all the complaining, completed 17-of-29 passes for 221 yards, two touchdowns, and no picks. Isaac seemingly cemented himself as the lead back with a 20-carry, 137-yard performance.

Still, it's difficult to shake the feeling of the middle two quarters, which were indisputably ugly. The offense has some issues to work out, especially in the red zone, where they haven't scored a touchdown since the wrongfully negated Crawford catch to open the Florida game. Next week, Air Force presents another overmatched opponent, but one that's tricky to prepare for because of their unusual schemes on both sides of the ball. If Michigan doesn't bounce back with a more authoratative win, the good feeling from the Florida game won't carry over to Big Ten play.

Comments

Jalm

September 9th, 2017 at 7:49 PM ^

Im getting fed up with these 1 yard drag routes or underneath passes on 3rd and medium (4-6yds) that end up 3-4 yards short of the first down. The curl was better at attacking the FD but the young receiver ran the route short, it happens. Id rather compete for the FD on 3rd down pass plays than not coming close or just run the ball.

PurpleBeaverEater

September 9th, 2017 at 9:12 PM ^

I literally said this same thing to a classmate at the end of the game. I don't really understand it, but I also know that I am not nearly as savvy as the coaching staff so maybe they think they see things, or are expecting the RPS to win out, but it gets old really quickly. Catching the ball at the LOS with defenders already in your face on 3rd and medium will always be a source of frustration for me, save for the screen play. I also think they should work to get Evans the ball in space more. Clear out and get him a swing pass, set him up for a screen, use him in the slot. It just doesn't look like he is running low enough and with enough balance to be able to grind yards between the tackles. That being said, I am on the Isaac train

Jalm

September 9th, 2017 at 7:52 PM ^

Im getting fed up with these 1 yard drag routes or underneath passes on 3rd and medium (4-6yds) that end up 3-4 yards short of the first down. The curl was better at attacking the FD but the young receiver ran the route short, it happens. Id rather compete for the FD on 3rd down pass plays than not coming close or just run the ball.

brianntb

September 9th, 2017 at 8:08 PM ^

in Year 3. 

Neg away, but you know it's true. 

Well, mostly true. They may finish FOURTH in the Big Ten East. 

brianntb

September 9th, 2017 at 9:25 PM ^

If Harbaugh were to ever bring up Hoke as to why this team won't do better than 3rd place in the Big Ten East in Harbaugh's third year, there'd be a long line outside Bo's offices demanding he be fired. 

G. Gulo of the Dale

September 10th, 2017 at 10:37 AM ^

Three years ago this weekend, Brady Hoke's squad was getting shut out by Notre Dame.

Harbaugh's first real quarterback recruit is, as we all know, Brandon Peters, who is two games into his second year in the program.  How in the world is it completely baffling that Peters is playing behind a fourth-year player who turns 23 later this year?  The "problem" is that Speight is our best option amongst upperclassmen QBs.  And it's not Wilton Speight's own fault that he is that best option and that junior-year Chad Henne is not currently on the roster.

I don't mean to criticize you in particular but I'm getting a bit tired of Michigan's own fans getting sucked into this "year three" of Harbaugh talk without acknowledging that Hoke's fourth recruiting class was not particularly strong and the transition class in 2015 was only top 40.  Moreover, we are all painfully aware of the fact that OL recruiting under Hoke was either poor or unlucky, and the QB recruiting was imprudent, to say the least.  I know that "time in the system" is a mitigating factor--and I'm not trying to blame Hoke--but people seem to be overlooking pretty obvious shortcomings in our current roster.    

KC Wolve

September 9th, 2017 at 8:20 PM ^

I was never a Hoke fan, but it's time to stop blaming him. It's year 3 and we are still running out a Hoke QB with the "QB whisperer" as the head coach. I fully trust Harbaugh, but I am shocked they are running out WS every game. This team needs an upgrade at the QB position and bad.

Apureidiot

September 9th, 2017 at 8:18 PM ^

Seriously, it's one game. Look at Washington vs. Rutgers, Indiana vs. Ohio State, etc. Just look. I was looking for this team to make mistakes and come away with a win. I guess I got what I expected. A lot of coaching to do will fix the mistakes and this will humble the team significantly. Seriously, I want this win to pump some humility into this team before MSU, Ped State, Wisky, or C*CK**CKER pumps that humility into our team in an ugly fashion.

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 8:30 PM ^

So let's look at the IU v. ohio game. IU came out hot for the first half and then ohio started playing. In the end it was a rout by talented athletes who put up nearly 600 yards of offense while looking forward to OK. After an impressive performance by a young squad on the road at a national venue, we had a lackluster performance. The best we can hope for is that this was a yip game. Unlike ohio we're hampered by a qb who scores more for the opponents than he does for his own team.

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 8:41 PM ^

Pete Carroll won a SB without a stellar qb but he had Lynch and a D of beasts. Wilson's job was not to screw up and he made completions when he had too. M has some good young players and a qb who screws up a lot. It's not a formula for success by any measure. And as others have observed... why are we stuck with Sp8? One would think that every kid playing qb in HS would want to play for a program whose HC was an NFL qb, proven winner, and whose bro coaches in the NFL.

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 9:36 PM ^

I wasn't trying to diss Russell- enjoyed watching him at wisky. He wasn't an all pro, NFL qb like Brady or Big Ben. The point being that if all of the other measures are in place, having an an all star qb isn't necessary. Heck, Look what we did in '97 with griese. Clearly, we have a lot of issues but Sp8 is glaringly awful.

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 8:20 PM ^

Fickell had these kids well prepared and they were well coached. They didn't give up and had a greater top, first downs, and almost as much offense production as M for most of the game. They had nothing to be ashamed of.

Amaznbluedoc

September 9th, 2017 at 8:59 PM ^

1) A win! 2) Dancing dinosaurs at halftime show. 3) Loudest applause was for a 91 yo vet who fought in WWII and then came back to A2 for undergrad and a graduate degree. (He walked out on the field)

gbdub

September 9th, 2017 at 9:15 PM ^

Passing Stat lines for winning B1G QBs today, so far: 13/16, 163 yds, 2 TD 13/21, 161 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT 16/28, 201 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT 16/20, 173 yds, 2 TD 17/29, 221 yds, 2 TD 15/28, 164 yds, 3 TD, 1 INT 27/41, 333 yds, 5 TD 11/13, 235 yds, 3 TD For losing QBs B1G so far today: 11/29, 120 yds, 2 INT 17/37, 198 yds, 2 INT 19/41, 252 yds, 3 TD, 4 INT So do Speight's numbers stand out as "terrible", "awful", or "unacceptable"? Because to me they look reasonably solid. Back off the ledge guys.