So, this was pretty cool [Patrick Barron]

Michigan 31, Washington 10 Comment Count

Alex.Drain September 12th, 2021 at 12:16 AM

Michigan came out of the halftime intermission and received the opening kickoff of the third quarter. They promptly ran eight plays to gain 73 yards and scored a TD to go up by 17 points. They did not pass the ball once in those eight plays. That was the kind of the night it was for the Wolverines, who bullied the Washington Huskies all game long on the ground, showing a casual indifference towards the concept of moving the ball through the air. After Cade McNamara completed a back-shoulder pass to Cornelius Johnson on a third and long with 4:24 left in the first quarter, Michigan never seriously challenged through the air downfield again. It didn't matter.

Michigan mounted a bulldozer in this game and drove Washington right back to Seattle. Blake Corum and Hassan Haskins were driving that bulldozer. Behind those two monster RB's, both of whom gained over 150 yards on the ground in this one, the Wolverines paved the Washington Huskies en route to a 31-10 victory. The crowd was told to wear Maize— and they did. Most of the 108,345 person crowd was seated nearly an hour before kickoff, and the atmosphere for the first night game with fans since August 2019 was electric. They forced Washington into a delay of game penalty on the game's opening play and the feel of Michigan Stadium, with Maize pom-poms waving, could only make your author salivate from his Toronto couch.

Washington got the ball first but the teams traded punts on their opening possessions. A sack from Aidan Hutchinson put an end to Washington's second series and a good Caden Kolesar punt return gave the Wolverines stellar field position. That drive quickly stalled out, but within field goal range of the magnificent leg of Jake Moody, who split the uprights from 52 yards out and gave UM a 3-0 lead. The next time the Wolverines had the pigskin, they drove all the way to Washington's goal line with ease but then ran into the beefy bodies of Tuli and Taki, Washington's hulking defensive tackles who represent the teeth of the Husky defense. Two consecutive runs between the tackles stalled, puzzling playcalling given the vulnerability on the edge of the Washington defense, and Michigan turned it over on downs at the goal line.

Blake Corum had himself a night to remember under the lights [Patrick Barron]

They got it back soon enough, though, and after a gutsy decision to go for it on 4th & 1 at the Michigan 30 yard line paid off, Blake Corum answered a house call and ran it 67 yards for a touchdown. Washington wouldn't threaten again in the first half after their own 4th down attempt came up short in Michigan territory, as Richard Newton was mauled by Aidan Hutchinson and a swath of angry Wolverines defenders behind the line of scrimmage. The score was 10-0 at the half.

That's when the aforementioned grueling drive to begin the second half occurred: four Hassan Haskins runs followed by four Blake Corum runs and Michigan was in the end zone. Given Washington's publicized struggles at coming from behind, it felt like game over at that point. In the end, it was.

To UW's credit, they responded with a long drive, but Michigan's bend-not-break defense held them out of the end zone, and though a Peyton Henry FG got the Huskies on the board, it was too little too late. A Hassan Haskins six-yard TD carry on the next Michigan possession made it 24-3, and that's when you could mentally begin moving onto next week and Northern Illinois. The teams traded TD's after that, a Dylan Morris pass to Terrell Bynum over Rod Moore and a late-game Corum tally, to make the final score 31-10, but the game's victor was not in doubt at that juncture.

Gotta give some love to Haskins too [Bryan Fuller]

In the end, the box score tells a tale of two different strategies: Michigan rushed for 343 yards and passed for just 44. Washington passed for 293 and ran for just 50. Given that the Huskies were being stonewalled at the line of scrimmage and playing catch up the entirety of the game, the Washington distribution makes some sense. Michigan's distribution brought much discussion online. Cade McNamara didn't really show anything heinous to justify stuffing Michigan's entire passing attack in a locker the way that Gattis and Harbaugh did, but perhaps they were satisfied with the showing on the ground.

The Maize & Blue offensive line mauled the Husky front and when you have two backs as good as Corum and Haskins, and are playing with the lead, it's hard to argue with that. Still, many eyes will be on McNamara and the receivers next week in a tuneup game at the Big House against NIU. Corum finished with 171 yards and 3 TD's, perhaps kickstarting his Heisman campaign, while Hassan Haskins got more carries (27), rushing for 155 with one score. Hard to find a better RB tandem than those two anywhere in America right now.

Josh Ross led Michigan in tackles [Patrick Barron]

Defensively, Michigan allowed 343 yards, but it felt better than that. They held Washington to 122 yards in the first half and it wasn't until Washington fell down 17-0 that they began to move the ball. UW had just four drives in the second half, but they went for an average of 55.5 yards, with Dylan Morris finding holes in Michigan's zone defense and Michigan perhaps slinking back into a more preventative look. The run defense was excellent, though, and the Wolverines got plenty of pressure.

It was a standout day for Aidan Hutchinson, playing in front of a smorgasbord of NFL scouts, finishing with 2.5 sacks and 4 tackles. David Ojabo added a sack of his own, and Taylor Upshaw was credited with a half-sack. Josh Ross led the home team in tackling by a mile, finishing with 11. It was another day for heavy defensive rotation, as 22 different players are credited on the Stat Broadcast box score as having recorded a defensive event (a tackle, sack, PBU, or QB hit).

Michigan's defense is still learning the scheme and the offense is still trying to find a playcalling rhythm and an offensive identity. If tonight was any indication, that identity is probably on the ground. And most importantly, the team is still unbeaten, advancing to 2-0. They host Northern Illinois in what should be the easiest game on the schedule, at the Big House next Saturday at 12:00 pm EST.

[AFTER THE JUMP: Nothing]

Comments

stephenrjking

September 12th, 2021 at 3:51 PM ^

1. I mean, I want to beat OSU;

2. Suggesting that some of the protests are just people being upset about anything… well, that’s not true. At least not with many.

The issue is that Michigan has a history of being poor at certain aspects of offense that they need under Harbaugh. You can certainly defend “taking what the offense gives you” to some extent, but sometimes (say, 3rd and 10 last night, or trailing in the 4th quarter) the defense won’t give you what you need and you need to take it anyway. Last year’s MSU game saw Michigan respond to going down two scores with a loooong drive that voluntarily surrendered clock until a comeback was no longer possible. 2-minute drives have long been a weakness. Attacking zone defenses with the pass has long been a weakness.

So, when Michigan needs ten yards in a game that is not out of reach and declines to even try to gain those yards through the air, people suspect that the same problems revealed in previous seasons still exist. And they are rational to do so.  

MichAtl85

September 12th, 2021 at 4:31 PM ^

I don’t expect Michigan to win a national title. We aren’t bama, Clemson, Ohio State. It’s fine and I accept that with no issue. 
 

I do expect us to be able to compete with Wisconsin year in and year out. I expect us not to get blown off the field against the badgers. I’d expect us to win against Sparty more than 50%. I’d expect once in a blue moon to win a big ten title.

2019 was a pretty empty season besides MSU and ND. I understand I was irrational last night winning by 21 points against Washington. What happens when a team shuts down your run? Can we pass enough to win? Can we come from behind? These have not been answered yet but we should know more in the next 3 weeks. 

bluewave720

September 12th, 2021 at 8:37 AM ^

Agree completely, elm. 
I wanted to see a philosophical change in offensive philosophy.  Taking what the defense gives you IS a change from what we’ve seen in the past.  
I also agree that we can’t beat OSU throwing for 45 yards. But if they play 2 high safeties all game and dare us to run, I’ll ride with Corum/Haskins/this Oline all day. 

ERdocLSA2004

September 12th, 2021 at 8:15 AM ^

Really well said.  Great to win, enjoy watching our RBs make plays, absolutely hideous offensive football to watch.  Our rivals are licking their chops.  Games like this are a chance for a team to get better and do things in an actual game.  Absolutely no excuse not to throw the ball, even if to get some good practice.  Even a team with a terrible run defense can stop a team that runs on every play.  JH needs to go….still.

burtcomma

September 12th, 2021 at 8:52 AM ^

Nope, games against Western Michigan, Northern Illinois, and Rutgers are where you can work on our passing game.  Washington had two deep safeties and two highly rated CB’s.  The game plan worked well and brought out a 31-10 W.  Let’s see if we have a different game plan each week.  2-0 is a good place to start…

ak47

September 12th, 2021 at 9:40 AM ^

I think from a play calling perspective it’s important to note a lot of those screens were good play class with numbers that were a block away from massive gains. Like that first swing pass to corum on the opening drive was a mediocre block from I think sainristil from being a potential 70 yard touchdown. Our receivers just kept getting dominated in one on one blocking attempts. And if that’s the state of things then you have to take those out of the playbook, but the play call itself was fine in terms of attacking what the defense gives you.

the complete unwillingness to throw down field on the other hand just shows the coaches have no faith in the passing game 

 

BuckeyeChuck

September 12th, 2021 at 10:09 AM ^

Very good analysis as always, SRJK.

While reading I couldn't help but think that Washington might have the best pair of CBs (or at least among the short list of candidates) that Michigan will face all season. Perhaps this contributed to not challenge UW's secondary when Michigan didn't need to. There's no reason to give them a chance to make a play and potentially turn the tide of the game.

 

Brimley

September 12th, 2021 at 1:29 PM ^

Our friend Magnus does a great job of keeping up with visitors.  The answer to your question is 3 WR.  One, 4 star Tyler Morris, is a commit and probably a friend of JJ (same high school).  One is a five star with multiple offers because he's a five star so I doubt the ground pummel last night will be much of a factor for him one way or the other.  One is an ND commit who came by.  As for your dissuasion argument, I'm sure they'll base their football decision on more than one game's strategy.  However, the atmosphere was electric last night and I'm sure that part of it will resonate.

CoolNicePerson

September 12th, 2021 at 12:26 AM ^

Great recap Alex. I thought you were dead on with your assertion that Michigan should have tested the edges more and was surprised to see us smashing the ball to Tuli and Taki so much (and also was surprised with how successful it was). Does this bode well for our interior OL, or is it just a matter of grinding a team with a weak offense into dust?

CoolNicePerson

September 12th, 2021 at 12:26 AM ^

Great recap Alex. I thought you were dead on with your assertion that Michigan should have tested the edges more and was surprised to see us smashing the ball to Tuli and Taki so much (and also was surprised with how successful it was). Does this bode well for our interior OL, or is it just a matter of grinding a team with a weak offense into dust?

CoolNicePerson

September 12th, 2021 at 12:26 AM ^

Great recap Alex. I thought you were dead on with your assertion that Michigan should have tested the edges more and was surprised to see us smashing the ball to Tuli and Taki so much (and also was surprised with how successful it was). Does this bode well for our interior OL, or is it just a matter of grinding a team with a weak offense into dust?

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 12th, 2021 at 12:30 AM ^

Two things can be true. That was a good win, and an impressive showing by our running game. But, at the same time, we still don't look like a modern offense, or as if our coaches actually know how to set up a passing game. How can we not have had working play actions, at the very least? Not ... not any?

I have no doubt that Gattis will defend his play-calling by insisting he was taking what the defense was giving him, but surely a good offense, playing in front of 100,000+ fans and every high value recruit we could get, could get more than 50 yards in the air? 50???

sharklover

September 12th, 2021 at 3:16 AM ^

There was at least one non functional play action. A free rusher came through, who Haskins was assigned to pick up. Haskins got run over, and cade took a hit.

That's one big thing that we'll miss with the loss of Charbonnet, he was a great pass blocker, and he fulfilled his assignments in the play action much better than Haskins does. 

Double-D

September 12th, 2021 at 9:37 AM ^

We had zero RPO, limited play action, and WRs that were not really open.  We never attacked the edge.

The play of our OL and RBs was remarkable given the obvious and predictable formations and play calling. There was zero deception.

Yet they couldn’t stop us.  Harbaugh must have a hard on.

That game plan cannot be repeated successfully in every game.  One dimensional teams don’t win Championships.  

bsand2053

September 12th, 2021 at 12:36 AM ^

“We WonT bEat osU Or WIscOnsIN LikE ThiS”

No shit.  There’s a reason that 8-4 was the consensus prediction heading into this year.  Michigan is a good, not great team at the moment.  Teams with mediocre secondaries and dlines and inexperienced quarterbacks tend to struggle against better teams.  Let’s enjoy the obvious improvement and hope for the best.  I don’t understand the desire to be negative for it’s own sake 

jsquigg

September 12th, 2021 at 1:43 AM ^

Except that if they can continue to mash like this, it is precisely the advantage that would make them unique or tough to play against compared to the fancier spreads.

Wisconsin is going to come down to run defense (obviously) and that aspect of the defense has been much better than the Don Brown version. Our secondary scares the shit out of me.