Hoops Preview: Loyola-Chicago, Final Four Comment Count

Brian

SPONSOR NOTE. HomeSure Lending is sponsoring our tourney coverage. If you need a home loan, you should probably get it from a guy whose Ted Valentine impression is just as thunderously sarcastic as yours. Matt will get you a good loan, fast. And call you for a charge while doing it. Unless it is actually a block.


Sister Jean GifTHE ESSENTIALS

WHAT #7 Michigan (32-7) vs
#30 Loyola-Chicago (32-5)
WHERE Alamodome
San Antonio, TX
WHEN 6:09 PM Saturday
LINE Michigan –5 (KenPom)
TV TBS

yes, you can purchase a Sister Jean bobblehead

THE US

Well, here we are. Again. Michigan rolls into the Final Four as the most fearsome defense left in the tourney by some distance. They can't shoot straight anymore, but it hasn't really mattered. Moe Wagner has had three off games, and it hasn't really mattered. The front end of a one and one is a turnover, and it hasn't really mattered.

It'll matter this weekend. Michigan has a shot at the national title. It'll either be a poor one if it's the first weekend; it'll be an outstanding one of it's Texas A&M. Here we go.

THE LINEUP CARD

Projected starters are in bold. Hover over headers for stat explanations. The "Should I Be Mad If He Hits A Three" methodology: we're mad if a guy who's not good at shooting somehow hits one. Yes, you're still allowed to be unhappy if a proven shooter is left open. It's a free country.

Pos. # Name Yr. Ht./Wt. %Min %Poss ORtg SIBMIHHAT
G 13 Clayton Custer Jr. 6'1, 185 86* 21 117 No
58/47 from floor, excellent at 2PJs. Main assist guy but 5:4 A:TO is bleah.
G 14 Ben Richardson Sr. 6'3, 195 81 14 111 No
Low usage combo is 39% from deep and has 1:1 A:TO. Barely shoots inside line.
G 5 Marques Townes Jr. 6'4, 210 71 22 106 No
Slasher a rarity on the roster w 60% of shots at rim. 40% on limited threes.
F 0 Donte Ingram Sr. 6'6 215 71 19 106 No
40% from 3 on 184 attempts, does fair amount of work inside line.
C 25 Cameron Krutwig Fr. 6'9, 260 52 23 120 Very
Beefy dude with mad YMCA game. Post-up only. Not a rim protector.
F 21 Aundre Jackson Sr. 6'5, 230 48 28 108 No
Undersized backup 5 does a lot of posting up vs MVC.
G 12 Lucas Williamson Fr. 6'4", 190 47 13 110 No
Does some inside work vs MVC, in this game projects as 43% Just A Shooter
G 2 Bruno Skokna So. 6'1, 195 16 15 111 No
Also a guy likely to be relegated to standing around perimeter; 36% from 3.
G 2 Cameron Satterwhite Fr. 6'4, 175 11 15 102 Yes
Fringe guy who might get a few minutes if there's foul trouble.

*[last five games minutes from Kenpom.]

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the preview.]

THE THEM

727

Krutwig needs a Stain Train worth nickname

Prepare to be the most hated team in college basketball for a night. Michigan's opponent is tourney Cinderella Loyola-Chicago, home to a 98-year-old nun with multiple burner accounts on your local message board of choice. C'est la vie.

Loyola is an 11-seed, but after their tourney run they rank more like an 8 in your preferred fancystat. This means they are an extraordinarily fortunate matchup in the Final Four but in no way a pushover. Kenpom gives Michigan a 66% shot at a victory, ranking them barely behind Penn State and Florida State. It's going to be a game.

The Ramblers are the platonic opposite of Florida State, a traditional big surrounded by a crew of virtually interchangeable snipers who all drive to the rack and kick it around the perimeter. Think MVC Purdue.

The center is 6'9" freshman Cameron Krutwig, who looks and plays exactly like a mid-major center named Cameron Krutwig should. He's beefy but not athletic, a little slow when pulled to the perimeter, and a filthy rec-specs-worthy post-up threat converting 61% from the field. Loyola surrounds him with shooters—the only Rambler who's under 36% from three is a little-used freshman—and frequently lets him go to work one-on-one. Synergy has him a 92nd percentile(!) post scorer, although that's not competition-adjusted. FWIW, he has not slowed down much against four high-major opponents in the tournament, hitting 15/27 from the field and posting solid ORTGs in 3 of 4 games.

Krutwig's main flaw is endurance. He only plays 20 minutes a game despite being the only post on the roster. Endurance, and probably his defense when asked to guard Michigan's pick and roll. But if that's a problem it's not one that's shown itself in the tourney to date—often because of the opposition. Would you believe me if I said Tennessee ran zero PNRs against Loyola? Well, it's true.

The rest of the team is a House of Cosbys: similar players with some clone-to-clone variation. Everyone can knock down threes, everyone shoots well from two, nobody gets to the line much, nobody fouls much, everyone chips in some assists, and everyone has a slightly too high TO rate. Nobody is much of a pull-up three shooter—good news for a Michigan team that is excellent at preventing threes.

Slasher Cosby is Marques Townes, a 6'4" driver who transferred in from Farleigh Dickinson after a couple years. Townes hits 39% from three but only has 71 attempts on the year; 60% of his shots are at the rim, with about half his makes assisted. He hits 56% inside the line, but has a 20 TO rate. He's the most Florida State player on the roster. He will attack downhill.

Hopped Up On Goofballs Cosby is 6'5" Aundre Jackson. Jackson is one of those extremely fun players who doesn't start but sucks up a ton of oxygen when he's on the court. Jackson gets about 20 MPG and puts up almost a third of Loyola's shots when he's in the game. Like Townes, he's shot well from three on just a few attempts and does most of his work inside. There he's a 63% shooter from two, but he's a lot more assist-dependent than Townes. Jackson's the burliest guy on the roster other than Krutwig and gets most of his minutes as the backup 5, though he and Krutwig will occasionally play together.

Perimeter Oriented Cosby is 6'6 senior Donte Ingram, the only high usage guy on the roster with more attempts from three than two. Even then it's not a huge discrepancy—Ingram has 137 twos and 184 threes on the year, shooting 50/40. His shots at the rim are mostly layups created by the rest of the offense giving him a straight-line drive to the basket.

Sniper Cosby is PG Clayton Custer, a 58/47 shooter who has a remarkable 56% hit rate on non-rim twos. He's the first among equals as a shot creator in Loyola's diverse offense, but turnover issues dog him. He torched Loyola's first three tourney opponents—9/14 from 2, 7/10 from three—before a rough game against KSU; turnovers held down his ORTG in the second and third rounds.

Custer's shooting is mostly spot up stuff with some action as a pick and roll ballhandler mixed in, but he will test Michigan's D in all aspects. He's an exceptional shooter at any range and is comfortable off the dribble. He creates almost all of his twos. Michigan will hope that Zavier Simpson can get in his shorts and shut him down, and he probably should at least hamper Custer. Michigan blew up Carsen Edwards in two of three games, including the two most recent ones; Simpson also blew up Rob Gray in the round of 32. It's hard to see a PG not named Jalen Brunson who survives Michigan's defense right now.

Ben Richardson, Lucas Williamson, and Bruno Skokna fill out the "limited roles" section of the roster and are collectively Background Cosby. All of them are three-or-rim sorts with a heavy emphasis on threes. Richardson gets about 20 minutes a game and chips in some assists but collectively they might put up three shots from inside the arc. They're mostly there to spread the floor and knock down kickout threes. Richardson and Williamson can't be left since they shoot 39 and 43 percent from two, but if they're covered they're not going to do much.

THE TEMPO-FREE

Screen Shot 2018-03-29 at 12.33.29 PM

In many ways this is a mirror matchup. Loyola places zero emphasis on offensive rebounding (#332) and keeps the opposition out of transition almost as well as Michigan. They shoot excellently from the floor, get a ton of assists, and don't get to the line much. The main distinctions between Loyola's offense and a typical Beilein one are turnovers—the Ramblers are outright poor at keeping the ball—and three point rate. Despite their excellent shooting, Loyola is a bit below average in 3PA/FGA. Michigan is 60th.

On defense… well. Loyola's top 20 defense seems impossible given the pieces they've got, but the Ramblers held Florida, Miami, Tennessee, Nevada, and Kansas State to around 1 PPP; the best performance by those five power conference foes was Tennessee scraping out 62 points in 58 possessions.

So: Loyola is somehow very good at eFG defense despite having a block rate around 300th, cleans up their own boards reasonably well, and forces a fair number of turnovers. They do give up an approximately average number of threes.

So there's good news and bad news. The bad news: Loyola is won't lose much efficiency when they're held out of transition. Their eFG drops from 62 to 57 when they hit the halfcourt, which is not much at all. Good news: Loyola's best aspect on D is their foul aversion, and Michigan doesn't shoot free throws much or well anyway. Also Michigan figures to have a fairly large shot gap in their favor.     

THE KEYS

Punish small ball. The most mid-major thing about Loyola is what happens when Krutwig heads to the bench, as he does for about 20 minutes a game. In his absence the Ramblers go all-out smallball, playing a 6'5" wing type at the 5. Michigan could react by going small themselves, but since they're so good in pick and roll defense and this is what happens when Krutwig leaves the floor against tourney-quality opposition…

Screen Shot 2018-03-26 at 7.10.04 PM

6 game sample including all tourney games, UF, and Boise

…Michigan should just roll with their bigs. The items to note in that chart above are a steep decline in 3P% paired with a decline in 3PA on offense and the big increase in FT rate and all varieties of shooting. These are necessarily small sample sizes; on the season Loyola's offense sees no dropoff when Krutwig leaves but there is a 0.1 PPP drop on defense. Michigan should seek to exploit the small-ball, not match it.

The other half of that…

Teske up. If Wagner isn't hitting from three early or gets in foul trouble, Michigan might explore having Teske swallow up Loyola's 5s.

It's worth noting that Loyola hasn't faced size like Michigan much during their run. Tennessee was missing a 6'11" post and spent most of the game playing a 6'7" guy at center. Nevada goes six deep with five 6'7" guys and a PG. Kansas State was missing its starting center and played a couple marginal 6'8"-6'9" guys for 28 minutes, going postless the other 12. Only Miami presented Loyola with a true post; he went 5/7 and had three blocks despite being Wagner-level in that department on the season.

Krutwig is a guy who Teske can D up on one-on-one. Despite the fact Jackson's 6'5" he, too, is almost strictly a post-up threat and roll man on offense. Meanwhile Teske brings almost double the OREB presence that Wagner does and could be a major source of extra possessions against the wee Ramblers.

Hello, rack. Loyola has virtually no shotblocking and has given up 61% at the rim on the season, where a third of opponent shots come from. Maybe they can stay in front of MAAR and Simpson… but probably not. Ban the words "two point jumper" from the vocabulary for this one.

Stay in front. Loyola's offense either runs through Krutwig or becomes a series of drives to the bucket that end in kickouts until they don't. Michigan will let Krutwig or Jackson go one on one whenever they want. When the drives happen Michigan will stay attached to shooters—a dangerous game against the country's #9 team at hitting twos. Matthews staying in front of Townes will go a long way towards getting Loyola to put up some bad shots.

THE SECTION WHERE I PREDICT THE SAME THING KENPOM DOES

Michigan by 5.

Comments

Durham Blue

March 29th, 2018 at 4:28 PM ^

You are absolutely correct.  So it sounds like you think wagering $50 of your own money on Michigan to cover is a solid bet.

Just looking for people's takes.  As soon as I saw that we were playing Loyola my first instinct was "they gon die".  Now that I've had five days to think about it I am not so sure any more.  Analysis leads to paralysis caveat may apply here.  I don't know, I really want to put big money on this game but the whole like teams analysis from Brian sorta scares me.  I wish Brian would make a real prediction beyond the Kenpom default.

TrueBlue2003

March 30th, 2018 at 2:23 AM ^

4-8 for Michigan is that our foul shooting really comes into play.  If we're up 8-10, we're going to keep Z in the game and we're going to play relatively soft defense (i.e. mostly give up twos) so it's easier for teams to get an 8-10 point lead down to 3-5 against us, I feel like.

I'd be curious to see that analyzed.

bronxblue

March 29th, 2018 at 4:12 PM ^

Loyola is good, but let's also note that they beat their first three opponents in the tourney by a combined 4 points. They are better than an 11, but they also feel a bit lucky and at some point, that runs out. This feels like a game where Simpson is so disruptive on defense that the Ramblers struggle to get into their offense, and then you wonder if they can hold up defensively. Michigan is the second-best offense they've seen this tournament after Nevada, and I wonder if their defensive rotations will be able to keep pace. I don't predict a win or anything, but "Mirror Michigan, but smaller and less athletic" feels like a recipe Beilein and Yaklich can work against pretty well.

J.

March 30th, 2018 at 12:08 AM ^

Nebraska was really only any good in Tim Miles's mind. :)

Nebraska peaked at #50, prior to the BTT game against Michigan.

Loyola was 51st with two games left in the regular season, then won at Southern Illinois to move to 45, and they haven't dropped since.

I think it's safe to say that they were approximately the same at the end of the regular season, though.

In reply to by J.

TrueBlue2003

March 30th, 2018 at 2:31 AM ^

has gone from 41st at the start of the tournament to 30th after beating four top 40 teams in the tourney.

They've been rising pretty much all of 2018 and per Torvik they've been the 17th best team in the country since January 5. 

They're good and have been for a while. But we've been the 5th best team in that time.  We're better.  Just need to be better Saturday.

autodrip4-1968

March 29th, 2018 at 4:19 PM ^

mentioned Moe going for thirty. Good choice. No mention of Charles Matthews. If he's driving to the bucket or stopping and popping mid range jumpers I could see another big game from him. 

Just hit your shots boy's.

Dome stadiums€*¿°^¥<>#:_. I know. It's about the money. 

Just put it in the bucket fellas.

If Big Jon with his enormous height advantage can hit those short jumpers he will have a impact. Interested in his play this game.

Go Blue!!

DT76

March 29th, 2018 at 5:03 PM ^

The last game where Coach B had a week to prepare? A&M. Game over at the half. Before that? Montana. Came back from 0-10 to win by 14. I like our chances.

Go Blue84

March 29th, 2018 at 5:05 PM ^

I'm a Loyola alumnus. The Ramblers are the only team I'd ever root for over Michigan, so it's been an odd week. It's been one hell of a run, but Sister Jean magic aside, I can't see any reasonable path to a Loyola victory unless Michigan unless they have an extremely rough night from behind the arc. Possible, but not likely. The good news is that either way after the final buzzer I won't have conflicting rooting interests anymore.

You Only Live Twice

March 29th, 2018 at 11:56 PM ^

there as well.  Yet I don't know anything about LUC athletic teams and was somewhat surprised to suddenly start hearing about BB.... maybe it's that our undergrad school is what stays with us emotionally, maybe that depends on other factors... anyway I have no conflict.

Great school and I thoroughly enjoyed my studies there.  If Michigan were not in the final four I'd be cheering for the Ramblers, however.....

GO BLUE !!!!!

jmblue

March 29th, 2018 at 5:34 PM ^

Basketball historians: what happened to Loyola after they won it all?  I know we beat them in the '64 tourney, but what happened after that to cause them to decline?

Jonesy

March 29th, 2018 at 7:32 PM ^

in 1963 there was a (racist) gentleman's agreement to not play more than 3 black players at a time, after losing with one of their best, black players on the bench the year before Loyola said fuck it, started 4, and won the whole thing. A few years later Texas Southern started 5 and won the whole thing. Can't start 6!

It's funny because their last championship was won playing an abnormally high amount of black players and this run they play an abnormally low amount of black players =P

stephenrjking

March 29th, 2018 at 7:56 PM ^

Not sure if it was a gentleman's agreement as opposed to "conventional wisdom" (I honestly have no idea) but I believe that the "limit" was 2 black players and Loyola was fielding 3, but that's just based upon a tv snippet from earlier this tournament. It was Texas Western rather than Southern, though.

There used to be a lot more "small" schools succeeding in college basketball for various reasons. Some of it certainly had to do with which schools were willing to recruit African American players (Bill Russell at... San Francisco?), and big schools (Kansas had Wilt) often succeeded for similar reasons. A player or two can make a huge difference. Things were different in football, where players would travel to different big schools (Bubba Smith to MSU, etc) to get playing time when SWC and SEC schools refused to recruit them.

 

Jonesy

March 30th, 2018 at 1:16 AM ^

I Just heard it a day or two ago when either rich eisen or sam webb (the two sports podcasts i listen to) interviewed the author of a book about it. The words 'gentlemans agreement' was definitely used many times and it was definitely 3 not 2. Misremembering the cardinal direction of a certain school was all on me though.

J.

March 30th, 2018 at 1:36 AM ^

On the first part, there was pretty definitely a "gentleman's agreement."  You wouldn't have more than two or three black players on the court at any time (I think that varied over time, actually), they'd play limited minutes, etc.  Still, integration in the southern conferences didn't even start until 1965:

https://theundefeated.com/features/perry-wallace-vanderbilt-basketball-…

ACC -- Maryland -- 1965; SWC -- TCU -- 1966; SEC -- Vandy -- 1967.

The '63 game wasn't so much an issue of Loyola playing more than two black players -- it was them playing any at all.  The state of Mississippi had an unwritten rule preventing Ole Miss or Mississippi State from playing against any black players at all.  Miss St. had won the (lily white) SEC title in '59, '61, and '62, but the SEC had appointed a different team to represent them in the NCAA tournament, as Miss. St. refused to participate.

Even after the '63 team snuck out to play against Loyola in East Lansing, and the '65 Texas Western championship sounded the death knell for segregated basketball, it wasn't until the 1972-73 (!) season that the Bulldogs integrated:

http://collegehoopedia.com/players/pioneers-who-broke-color-barrier

(As an aside: Michigan basketball integrated in 1951-52.  I can only guess as to why it would have taken that long when the football team had been integrated for decades)

And as for football -- while you're right, in part, and certainly right about Bubba Smith in particular, there were plenty of talented football players at small southern schools, who either didn't get scouted/recruited by the northern schools where they could play or didn't want to leave home.  (I don't know what Bo's recruiting budget was, but Don Canham wasn't exactly known to be loose with a dollar :).

As an example, the Steelers organization credits a large part of their success in the 70s to Bill Nunn, Jr. (aka Bill Nunn Sr -- it's complicated), who they hired as a scout in 1967 due to his experience with HBCUs.  On the Super Bowl IX roster alone, the Steelers starters included WR Frank Lewis (Grambling State), WR Ron Shanklin (North Texas), DE L.C. Greenwood (Arkansas-Pine Bluff), DT Mean Joe Greene* (North Texas), DT Ernie Holmes (Texas Southern), DE Dwight White (Texas A&M-Commerce), CB Mel Blount* (Southern), and FS Glen Edwards (Florida A&M), all of whom where drafted between '69 and '74.  Oh, and they had CB Donnie Shell (South Carolina State) as an undrafted rookie, along with rookie draftee John Stallworth* (Alabama A&M).

* Pro Football Hall of Fame inductee

But, you're right -- one guy can make a basketball team relevant, and football's definitely not the same.  Although, to be honest, I'm not sure it would have mattered -- North Texas could have been the best team in the country, but as a Missouri Valley Conference mid-major, they weren't going to get any national attention anyway.  Check out Hayden Fry's history there, complete with seemingly strong seasons ending without bowl berths.  And they weren't even an HBCU -- it would have been orders of magnitude more difficult for a school like Alabama A&M to get noticed.

That may actually be one of the major legacies of the NCAA basketball tournament -- by giving an automatic bid to every Division I conference, they give the smaller schools an opportunity to shine, as unlikely as success may have been.  The expansion of the field has diluted this, of course, as it's much harder now for a mid-major to make a run because they now have to make their way through so many more games.  As recently as 1974, the tournament was 25 teams, and you could get to the Final Four with two wins if you had the bye.  Still, Loyola couldn't make the College Football Playoff even if they fielded a team...

NittanyFan

March 29th, 2018 at 8:53 PM ^

in the later 60s and 70s --- there's only enough "oxygen" out there and DePaul's rise to national prominence may have crowded Loyola out.  Dropped the Ramblers to secondary status in the consciousness of Chicago sports fans.

That's only a theory.  But I think there are analogies in other major American cities, cities with multiple private Catholic schools playing D1 hoops. 

In Philadelphia, it's generally only one of Villanova, St. Joe's or La Salle that is very good.  NYC: similiar for St John's and Fordham, w/ Seton Hall also out there in Jersey.  

You mentioned Xavier and Marquette --- by this theory, they benefit as the ONLY private Catholic hoops school in a fairly big American city.  Also, a city that had only 1 (or 0, in Cincinnati's case once the Royals left for Kansas City) NBA/NHL team, which further increases the possible exposure for the program. 

Loyola certainly is a great school.  $750MM endowment, that's quite a lot (and 50% higher than DePaul).  I can easily see this as a "launching pad" for them --- not Final Fours every year, of course, but a considerably larger presence both locally in Chicago and nationally. 

Also - after I type all that out and re-read it - it's kind of sad that the Detroit Titans haven't done better.  They've definitely fallen behind ALL their peers.

Carcajou

March 29th, 2018 at 6:48 PM ^

Would Beilein dare start Teske on Krutwig?
Challenge him right away, and have Teske absorb a couple of those fouls Wagner often seems to pick up early and sometimes causes trouble down the stretch. Then as Krutwig starts to gets worn down pick up fouls, bring Wagner in to run wild no matter who they put at the 5.

That would also keep Wagner a bit fresher (and less exposed to injury) for the finals.

Bill22

March 29th, 2018 at 7:01 PM ^

I like Michigan by 10 or 12 pts. Not saying Loyola won’t put up a fight, but this is where their journey ends. Belien is a man on a mission and Zavier Simpson can not be stopped. He is a man possessed defensively. I like our shooters to make some threes, Wagner to have a nice game and most importantly, Robinson to score at least 6 pts. I also don’t care who the matchup is in the title game. If we play well we win. If we don’t, there’s still a chance. I love this team. Go fucking Blue!!!!!

Jonesy

March 29th, 2018 at 7:34 PM ^

We only lose if we go ice cold and they go red hot. Otherwise we blow them out with good shooting and win a montana-fsu'ish game if we have bad shooting.

Perkis-Size Me

March 29th, 2018 at 8:11 PM ^

While I really like Michigan's chances, I think this could go either way. Loyola has earned the right to be in San Antonio, but they haven't faced a defense quite as good as Michigan's yet. If the offense we saw against A&M comes out, Michigan could blow this game right out of the water and play on Monday night. If they stall like we've seen against Montana, Houston and FSU, Loyola can legitimately steal this one.