Fee Fi Foe Film: Penn State Defense Comment Count

Ace

This is rather foreboding

Michigan's struggling, one-dimensional offense heads to Happy Valley to take on a top-ten defense coming off a bye week. This projects to go not well, believe it or not.

This week's depressing choice for which game to break down: Penn State vs. Iowa. The Hawkeyes have the 80th-ranked offense in the country, per S&P+. Michigan is 76th. These offenses function similarly, running MANBALL schemes behind iffy O-lines with passing attacks held back by a lack of standout receivers (Michigan has better TEs, Iowa the superior QB). The Hawkeyes couldn't establish a consistent passing attack, so PSU was able to cheat up against the run and play with reckless abandon. That's depressingly familiar, as is this drive chart:

  • five three-and-outs
  • two first-down-and-outs
  • two plays, -1 yards, safety after getting pinned deep by punt
  • five plays, 52 yards, lost fumble
  • five plays, 37 yards, missed field goal
  • one-play, 21-yard touchdown drive after an interception
  • three-play touchdown drives of 74 and 80 yards on their final two possessions when Akrum Wadley damn near singlehandedly won the game

When Wadley wasn't doing it all himself, Iowa had nothing. Michigan can scheme up some more creative stuff than Iowa, and despite the stuggling wideouts the Wolverines have more weapons across the board; unfortunately, they have a markedly worse quarterback and no Akrum Wadley. The Hawkeyes didn't record their second first down until less than five minutes remained in the first half.

Let's get this over with.

Personnel: Seth's diagram [click to embiggen]:

Penn State brought back a large portion of last year's 14th-ranked defense. The six returning starters displayed above undersells their experience. Senior corner Christian Campbell had six pass breakups last year while getting near-starter snaps; senior safety Troy Apke has appeared in every game since 2015 with a couple starts mixed in; SLB Koa Farmer played in every game last year with two starts, including the Rose Bowl; Shareef Miller and Ryan Buchholz combined for ten TFLs and five sacks in 2016 as rotation DEs.

Unsurprisingly, they're the 8th-ranked defense this year.

On the Michigan side, we've added a couple sore spots. You already know them. On the plus side, we've figured out who to put at running back.

Base Set? A versatile 4-3 with base personnel that generally stays on the field. Both outside linebackers, Koa Farmer and Manny Bowen, are capable in space (Farmer entered 2016 as a safety), so they'll usually slide over the slot instead of sitting for an extra defensive back. That's helped PSU make up for the offseason injury loss of slot corner John Reid.

When PSU does go nickel on obvious passing downs, they'll side Grant Haley into the slot and insert Amani Oruwariye at field corner.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown.]

Man or zone coverage? A healthy mix of both. PSU ran a lot of Cover 4 last year but they showed a lot of one-high looks (both Cover 1 and Cover 3) against Iowa, ostensibly to get run-stuffing safety Marcus Allen in the box, as well as a fair amount of Cover 2.

In addition to running a number of different coverages effectively, PSU is good at disguising them, especially when they can get exotic on third-and-longs. Here's one example:

PSU's alignment, with safety Marcus Allen all the way up at the line of scrimmage, makes it appear they'll run a three-deep blitz, and both inside linebackers show blitz at the snap. Instead, both linebackers back out into underneath zones, Allen takes the nearside flat, and the slot corner blitzes. The disguised Cover 2 blitz confused Iowa QB Nathan Stanley, who took a quick look downfield, didn't like his first read, and scrambled for a harmless gain of four.

Pressure: GERG or Greg? DC Brent Pry will dial up heat from all angles — six different non-linemen have been in on at least one sack this season even though PSU ranks just 78th in adjusted sack rate.

Dangerman: Well, damn. There's four and I was tempted to hand out a couple more.

Let's go front-to-back. Redshirt sophomore DE Shareef Miller had a monster game with two TFLs, including an impressive chasedown of Wadley for a safety:

That was, uh, not a good call, but also a very athletic play. Miller did a whole lot more than that; he put Stanley under pressure multiple times and was seemingly in on most of the blown-up runs at the line. The stats confirm Miller's run defense bona fides; his eight run stuffs are three more than any other PSU defender.

At the MIKE, leading tackler Jason Cabinda is rock-solid. He had one bad moment in this game when he turned Wadley loose on a wheel route that resulted in one of Iowa's late TDs. He was also largely responsible for holding Wadley down in the first place. Cabinda was able to aggressively play the run against Iowa, which let him put his best qualities on display—his ability to read-and-react, then fight through traffic to make tackles:

Penn State also boasts an impressive starting DT duo; moving the ball up the gut against them won't be easy.

I didn't pull any clips of cornerback Grant Haley because Iowa essentially refused to look in his direction. Given quarterbacks would be better off this year spiking the ball into the turf than throwing Haley's way, that wasn't a bad strategy:

While Haley's undersized, Michigan no longer has a starting wideout who's going to make that matter much, and PSU boasts another corner on that list, Christian Campbell, who at 6'1" is well-equipped to cover larger receivers.

Finally, Marcus Allen is one of the best box safeties in the country; PSU will line him up all over the place, sometimes as an overhang edge-rusher on the LOS or even as a straight-up OLB. He's a great run defender and forceful tackler; he forced a Wadley fumble in this game by getting his helmet directly on the football. While he can be beat in coverage, Michigan's offense looks like one he'll thrive against—if you can't make him respect the pass, he's going to spend much of the game making plays at or behind the line of scrimmage.

OVERVIEW

This is an excellent starting defense that has plenty of depth, too. They appear to have what Michigan had last year: a true two-deep along the defensive line. I'm a big fan of the confusingly named DT pairing of Curtis Cothran and Parker Cothren, who have complementary skill-sets—the former is more of a one-gap attacker, the latter a stronger space-eater. PSU ran a lot of line slants that gave Iowa's line a ton of trouble. Here's a play on which Cothran (#52, near-side DT) slants hard, takes out two linemen, and opens up a gap that Miller fills with aplomb:

The bench is strong, too. Iowa didn't have any more success running at 300-pounders Tyrell Chavis and Robert Windsor. On passing downs, Penn State often plugs in redshirt sophomore Kevin Givens, a cat-quick 287-pounder who had 4.5 sacks in limited time a year ago. While he doesn't have a sack yet this year, he dusted an Iowa guard one-on-one to get a pressure on Stanley.

While the loss of Torrence Brown has hurt the pass-rush some, Miller's breakout season has helped cover for his absence, as has the emergence of redshirt freshman pass-rush specialist Shaka Toney. Toney had two sacks in PSU's most recent game against Northwestern and they were not flukes; he turned the corner on a speed rush at eight yards on one, and the other featured him staving off the left tackle with one arm before forcing a fumble:

At strongside end, Ryan Buchholz is another who's better defending the run than generating a pass-rush on his own. He held up well aside from Iowa's final drive, when PSU got cute and tried to align him at DT; he got blown out to open the hole for Wadley's go-ahead touchdown.

As a group, this is literally a very strong D-line, one very capable of resetting the LOS in the backfield (see above). The PSU DL is third nationally in havoc rate despite a relative dearth of sacks.

That makes life easy on Cabinda, who doesn't often have to take on blockers when flowing to the play. The outside linebackers, Manny Bowen and Koa Farmer, are relatively interchangeable; Farmer is the bigger player despite being the former safety and both are comfortable in the box or in space. Going to the perimeter against this defense is difficult in large part because they're both fast to flow to the ball (and fast, period).

The secondary is tough to crack. Haley has been a lockdown corner this year. His counterpart, Campbell, has been nearly as good. Campbell also impressed against Iowa in run support; he held the edge very well and forced Wadley to find space between the tackles. While nickel Amani Oruwariye wasn't really needed in this game, I've liked what I've seen from him this year, too.

Both safeties are seniors, and while they're each a little limited in coverage—Allen is a little stiff while Troy Apke isn't the greatest athlete—they're usually in the right spots. Big passing plays against PSU have been very hard to come by. Iowa got two chunk plays on the defensive backs, one when Campbell was hit with a questionable DPI flag after running a streak into the sideline, the other when Apke got outjumped for a 21-yard touchdown. Those didn't come easy and the rest of the game they had zilch.

Unless the offense looks drastically different, they're going to have a very difficult time stringing together positive plays. That doesn't mean it's entirely hopeless, though. Iowa had that very problem but still nearly pulled out a win with a couple chunk plays, none bigger than when they caught PSU in a blitz and hit Wadley on a wheel: 

#4 is a backup, so he's probably irrelevant, unfortunately

Michigan is going to need similar plays to hit big; they're not going to be able to line up and out-execute PSU. I highly recommend watching this video from B/R's Michael Felder, who highlights five ways—most of them utilizing misdirection—that M can crack PSU's defense:

I'll add one more: PSU had some issues leaving receivers open on short passes over the middle, but Iowa had a couple ugly drops that prevented them from taking advantage. It's worth seeing if Michigan can spring someone on concepts like mesh.

Comments

stephenrjking

October 19th, 2017 at 2:42 PM ^

Man are those blue circles killer.

And people keep dismissing this, but it's a significant factor: Two of them are the result of injury. Tarik Black was on his way to fulfilling the hype before he got hurt, a target who could win balls in the air and get open on routes, and then he went down. And while Speight was a disappointment early on, he knows the offense better and is surely capable of providing more than O'Korn is providing right now. 

Speight may not be throwing for 300 yards with this offense, but could he throw for 185 with 0 tds and 0 picks? Yes. Would you take that kind of performance in a heartbeat if you were offered that from O'Korn right now? Absolutely yes. 

Let's not underrate the injury issue. The offense still isn't great without the injuries, but they hurt us at a time when there was no margin for hurt.

jgoblue11

October 19th, 2017 at 3:22 PM ^

Great post Rjking. I am also a firm believer that Speight just knows the offense better, and has more maturity than JOK. I looked at Wilton as more of a game manager than anything this year. Yes the two pick sixes were bad against Florida, but Speight was pretty darn good last year, and I don't think he had enough time to really find a groove this season. Too bad, as we will never know, but I hope JOK can make better reads and find more receivers to throw to.

DualThreat

October 19th, 2017 at 2:44 PM ^

I could look it up, but thought it might be a good discussion point anyway.  Weren't they deprived scholarships and all that?  Did they just get lucky with 3 starts to build what Ace is writing about in this review?

NittanyFan

October 19th, 2017 at 3:02 PM ^

but they've all become the leaders of this defense.  None of them have red-shirted, and all really needed to play early because of more depleted rosters in 2014.

Haley (like McSorley) was a Vanderbilt commit to Franklin but followed Franklin north.  Cabinda and Allen were original O'Brien recruits.

Perhaps a case where "on-field repetitions early in a college career" can make one overachieve their star rating.  Who knows exactly though.

Wolverine In Iowa 68

October 19th, 2017 at 2:44 PM ^

My daughter's favorite band is in concert in St. Louis Saturday night, and I got tickets to take her to the show several months back before we knew this would be a night game (and before the wheels fell off the offense). 

I was feeling a little bad about having to miss the game, but justified because spending quality time with the teenager is more important.

 

Now...I don't feel so bad.  I hope the team shows improvement and pulls the upset, but I have  a feeling it's not going to go well, and I don't feel bad about missing it.

 

And if they prove me wrong and bust a YUGE upset all over Pedophile State, even better.

Steves_Wolverines

October 19th, 2017 at 3:04 PM ^

I want to be optimistic about this game, but I just can't see Michigan scoring over 10 points in this game. 

I hate to say it, but we basically need a miracle to win. We need a fortunate bounce (or two), fortunate officiating, and luck. 

If Michigan wins, it'll have to be something like 13 - 9 or 10-7. 

My guess is we make too many mistakes, give PSU some short fields in the 2nd half, and lose 24 - 3, and we finish with 140 yards on offense. 

OkemosBlue

October 20th, 2017 at 3:27 AM ^

You're welcome, of course, to your pessism.  There are grounds for it, but there are grounds for some optimism too.  PSU has not proven they're great, although they're doing better than Michigan on offense so far.   They're defense really hasn't been tested, and . . .

 Michigan is not that bad on offense despite the doom and gloom of this and almost every blogger.  The OL is becoming above average as a run line--when was the last time that you saw a Michgian team successfully run against 8 or 9 men in the bos?  Not recently.  The problem, as everybody knows is the passing game.  Will the right side of the OL hold up on pssing downs.  Will the receivers do better?

 Which O'Korn will show up? He  had one game where he played right on the edge and had a great day (Purdue).  He played one game way over the edge, although it was a rain storm and he was mad when a late hit wasn't called.  He played one game too conservative and made a couple of very bad reads.  Michigan simply did not run its pass offense against Indiana after a few early misses

Why?  I think they thought they could beat Indiana by just relying on their defense (they did except as this blog has pointed out, they didn't call a grounding that looked pretty clear to my eyes).    

This means that we don't know the pass offense that Michigan will run against PSU, but probably the mesh will be important.  We don't know which O'Korn will show up, but he's developing.  It's only his 4th game.  There is some reason to hope that he can at least become competent.  The wide receivers are growing too.  Should we expect 45 points?  No, but 20 points is not out the realm of reasonable, and 20 points might win this game.

lilpenny1316

October 19th, 2017 at 3:05 PM ^

Akron, Pitt and Georgia State have zero Power 5 wins.  NW, Iowa and Indiana have one Power 5 win each (I refuse to consider Illinois a Power 5 team, rivalry and all).  I'm pretty sure that our numbers would be a lot better if we played the Murderer's Row that they played.

EDIT: And our only loss came in a hurricane when our coaches decided throwing the ball was a good idea.

Number 7

October 19th, 2017 at 3:14 PM ^

1. Michigan scored 49 points on these chumps a year ago.

2. "Penn State brought back a large portion of last year's . . .  defense"

I'm kind of shocked they're even making them play the game, right?  Am I missing something?(besides the loss of Darboh, Chesson, Braden, Kalis, and now Speight -- but hardly the 5 horseman, with all due respect).

(/half-serious)

 

 

 

bluepalooza

October 19th, 2017 at 3:19 PM ^

Look how embarrassingly bad MSU looked vs ND.  That wasn't the team Michigan played. Do some of you really think Michigan is just going to lay down at PSU?  I understand the consternation.  I seen the same anemic play on O as all of you.  I also seen a PSU team get crushed last year and come back and win the BIG.  Can it happen to Michigan? Sure, but it is unlikely.  I just don't get the "no chance", "never will happen" crowd.

Double-D

October 19th, 2017 at 3:26 PM ^

Watching our running game against IU you should see a base to build from. If we can get a good game plan from the coaches and and OKorn and the guys can click there is no reason we can't move the ball. OKorn has to step up. He knows it. Teams can and this one should improve over the course of a season. I am more concerned how we are going to protect our lead in the 4th qtr. in that environment.

PeterKlima

October 19th, 2017 at 3:37 PM ^

The author of this post is overly-worried and many of you are feeding off that bias.

Simply put, if we get the same offensive production as Iowa, then we likely win. 

You wouldn't know that from reading his post that makes PSU out to be an elite defense. 

It's all doom and gloom. It reads like a description of Alabama's defense.

HOWEVER.....

  1. Iowa gained over SIX YARDS a play.  That is a fine performance and easily enough for Michigan to win.
  2. Iowa's yards per play was the highest PSU has given up so far this year.  The similar offensive styles might bode well for us. Iowa only tried 45 offensive plays and let their (much, much worse than UM) defense almost win them the game.
  3. Iowa score THREE touchdowns on offense.  If we score 3 TDs with our simlarly ranked offense and much better defense, most of us think we either win or are in it to the end.
  4. Wadley and the Iowa rushing attack are not nearly as good as our rushing attack (of course they do have the passing game advantage).
  5. Iowa missed a 30 - 39 yard field goal and failed to kick two extra points. 5 points we are not likely to leave on the board.

Iowa got good production out of relatively few offensive plays. They scored 3 TDs with a worse rushing attack.  Their offensive gameplan worked wonders against PSU given the strategy of... you know.... winning the game.

A review of the PSU defense against Iowa should make us feel better, but Ace sees only doom and gloom.  Oh well. He fits in well with many here.  The glass is half empty.

In reply to by PeterKlima

RJWolvie

October 19th, 2017 at 3:38 PM ^

PSU is enormously overrated (as were we). This is going to be a tight, slugfest: our great D versus their great O, our crap O versus their good D = they should be favored, but come on, they’re not even close to second best team in the land.

You Only Live Twice

October 19th, 2017 at 9:47 PM ^

Way overrated.    Problem is they have a better more experienced team than us this year.  Will that be enough to get them the win....Our D will test them in ways they are not used to - again, enough to get a win?  Anything can happen

PeterKlima

October 19th, 2017 at 4:29 PM ^

That is because he writes them thinking about Michigan's offense being really really bad.  Not so much how good the defense of the other team is doing.

Read the Indian Fee FI Foe Film. Ace compared us to the worst offensive team Indiana played.  It sounded like we would be lucky to get some first downs.  While Indiana has a good defense, it seemed like Michigan was going to need a miracle to score on them.... let alone rush for nearly 275 yards.

 

Perkis-Size Me

October 19th, 2017 at 4:42 PM ^

Barring a complete offensive renaissance by Saturday night, I just don’t see this going very well. They need at least 1-2 defensive scores for me to feel like they can legitimately win. Because even if the defense recovers a fumble or picks McSorely off and sets the offense up with a short field, I have zero confidence the offense will be able to muster anything more than a field goal.

Defense will need to play the best game its played all year, force a few turnovers, offense will need to use some kind of misdirection to keep Penn State off balance (they’re not going to expect us to throw at all, so what the hell, why not air it out a little bit and maybe catch them off guard), Nordin is going to have to hit on every kick that he may get. And the offense has to have long, sustained drives. Whatever keeps Penn State’s offense and Saquon Barkley off the field.

L'Carpetron Do…

October 19th, 2017 at 4:57 PM ^

I watched every  minute of that Iowa game. Penn State's defense was good but Iowa's offense was horrendous - they really couldn't move the ball well and a plague of drops by open receivers plagued them in the first half.  In the second half they really were able to open it up and move on them. We shouldn't act like Iowa's offense was an unstoppable force that was shut down by Penn State's defense.

But, playcalling was horrible in this game. If Michigan continues its whack playcalling they won't get anything. 

I'll definitely be cheering for our defense and special teams to get some touchdowns though, that's for sure.

Bertello NC

October 19th, 2017 at 6:00 PM ^

Our O is going to have to string some drives together. If nothing else than to keep their O off the field, keep our D from getting gassed, and hopefully move it enough for some Nordin FG’s. It’s going to be taxing on the D to contain McSorley and especially Barkley for a ton of possessions. If we have a 3 n out party like we have been sooner or later we could crack. Rotating Dlinemen in will be key. I’d love to see a Nico Collins appearance.. if OKorn can get the ball to open receivers.

slblue

October 19th, 2017 at 6:14 PM ^

I don't get those who predict a win is impossible. Michigan has a very good record against PSU, does it not? And for some reason, it seems that some teams just have the numbers of other teams. And with all of the upsets - like Syracuse and Cal - shouldn't there be reason to be at least hopeful?