Fee Fi Foe Film: Penn State Defense Comment Count

Ace

This is rather foreboding

Michigan's struggling, one-dimensional offense heads to Happy Valley to take on a top-ten defense coming off a bye week. This projects to go not well, believe it or not.

This week's depressing choice for which game to break down: Penn State vs. Iowa. The Hawkeyes have the 80th-ranked offense in the country, per S&P+. Michigan is 76th. These offenses function similarly, running MANBALL schemes behind iffy O-lines with passing attacks held back by a lack of standout receivers (Michigan has better TEs, Iowa the superior QB). The Hawkeyes couldn't establish a consistent passing attack, so PSU was able to cheat up against the run and play with reckless abandon. That's depressingly familiar, as is this drive chart:

  • five three-and-outs
  • two first-down-and-outs
  • two plays, -1 yards, safety after getting pinned deep by punt
  • five plays, 52 yards, lost fumble
  • five plays, 37 yards, missed field goal
  • one-play, 21-yard touchdown drive after an interception
  • three-play touchdown drives of 74 and 80 yards on their final two possessions when Akrum Wadley damn near singlehandedly won the game

When Wadley wasn't doing it all himself, Iowa had nothing. Michigan can scheme up some more creative stuff than Iowa, and despite the stuggling wideouts the Wolverines have more weapons across the board; unfortunately, they have a markedly worse quarterback and no Akrum Wadley. The Hawkeyes didn't record their second first down until less than five minutes remained in the first half.

Let's get this over with.

Personnel: Seth's diagram [click to embiggen]:

Penn State brought back a large portion of last year's 14th-ranked defense. The six returning starters displayed above undersells their experience. Senior corner Christian Campbell had six pass breakups last year while getting near-starter snaps; senior safety Troy Apke has appeared in every game since 2015 with a couple starts mixed in; SLB Koa Farmer played in every game last year with two starts, including the Rose Bowl; Shareef Miller and Ryan Buchholz combined for ten TFLs and five sacks in 2016 as rotation DEs.

Unsurprisingly, they're the 8th-ranked defense this year.

On the Michigan side, we've added a couple sore spots. You already know them. On the plus side, we've figured out who to put at running back.

Base Set? A versatile 4-3 with base personnel that generally stays on the field. Both outside linebackers, Koa Farmer and Manny Bowen, are capable in space (Farmer entered 2016 as a safety), so they'll usually slide over the slot instead of sitting for an extra defensive back. That's helped PSU make up for the offseason injury loss of slot corner John Reid.

When PSU does go nickel on obvious passing downs, they'll side Grant Haley into the slot and insert Amani Oruwariye at field corner.

[Hit THE JUMP for the rest of the breakdown.]

Man or zone coverage? A healthy mix of both. PSU ran a lot of Cover 4 last year but they showed a lot of one-high looks (both Cover 1 and Cover 3) against Iowa, ostensibly to get run-stuffing safety Marcus Allen in the box, as well as a fair amount of Cover 2.

In addition to running a number of different coverages effectively, PSU is good at disguising them, especially when they can get exotic on third-and-longs. Here's one example:

PSU's alignment, with safety Marcus Allen all the way up at the line of scrimmage, makes it appear they'll run a three-deep blitz, and both inside linebackers show blitz at the snap. Instead, both linebackers back out into underneath zones, Allen takes the nearside flat, and the slot corner blitzes. The disguised Cover 2 blitz confused Iowa QB Nathan Stanley, who took a quick look downfield, didn't like his first read, and scrambled for a harmless gain of four.

Pressure: GERG or Greg? DC Brent Pry will dial up heat from all angles — six different non-linemen have been in on at least one sack this season even though PSU ranks just 78th in adjusted sack rate.

Dangerman: Well, damn. There's four and I was tempted to hand out a couple more.

Let's go front-to-back. Redshirt sophomore DE Shareef Miller had a monster game with two TFLs, including an impressive chasedown of Wadley for a safety:

That was, uh, not a good call, but also a very athletic play. Miller did a whole lot more than that; he put Stanley under pressure multiple times and was seemingly in on most of the blown-up runs at the line. The stats confirm Miller's run defense bona fides; his eight run stuffs are three more than any other PSU defender.

At the MIKE, leading tackler Jason Cabinda is rock-solid. He had one bad moment in this game when he turned Wadley loose on a wheel route that resulted in one of Iowa's late TDs. He was also largely responsible for holding Wadley down in the first place. Cabinda was able to aggressively play the run against Iowa, which let him put his best qualities on display—his ability to read-and-react, then fight through traffic to make tackles:

Penn State also boasts an impressive starting DT duo; moving the ball up the gut against them won't be easy.

I didn't pull any clips of cornerback Grant Haley because Iowa essentially refused to look in his direction. Given quarterbacks would be better off this year spiking the ball into the turf than throwing Haley's way, that wasn't a bad strategy:

While Haley's undersized, Michigan no longer has a starting wideout who's going to make that matter much, and PSU boasts another corner on that list, Christian Campbell, who at 6'1" is well-equipped to cover larger receivers.

Finally, Marcus Allen is one of the best box safeties in the country; PSU will line him up all over the place, sometimes as an overhang edge-rusher on the LOS or even as a straight-up OLB. He's a great run defender and forceful tackler; he forced a Wadley fumble in this game by getting his helmet directly on the football. While he can be beat in coverage, Michigan's offense looks like one he'll thrive against—if you can't make him respect the pass, he's going to spend much of the game making plays at or behind the line of scrimmage.

OVERVIEW

This is an excellent starting defense that has plenty of depth, too. They appear to have what Michigan had last year: a true two-deep along the defensive line. I'm a big fan of the confusingly named DT pairing of Curtis Cothran and Parker Cothren, who have complementary skill-sets—the former is more of a one-gap attacker, the latter a stronger space-eater. PSU ran a lot of line slants that gave Iowa's line a ton of trouble. Here's a play on which Cothran (#52, near-side DT) slants hard, takes out two linemen, and opens up a gap that Miller fills with aplomb:

The bench is strong, too. Iowa didn't have any more success running at 300-pounders Tyrell Chavis and Robert Windsor. On passing downs, Penn State often plugs in redshirt sophomore Kevin Givens, a cat-quick 287-pounder who had 4.5 sacks in limited time a year ago. While he doesn't have a sack yet this year, he dusted an Iowa guard one-on-one to get a pressure on Stanley.

While the loss of Torrence Brown has hurt the pass-rush some, Miller's breakout season has helped cover for his absence, as has the emergence of redshirt freshman pass-rush specialist Shaka Toney. Toney had two sacks in PSU's most recent game against Northwestern and they were not flukes; he turned the corner on a speed rush at eight yards on one, and the other featured him staving off the left tackle with one arm before forcing a fumble:

At strongside end, Ryan Buchholz is another who's better defending the run than generating a pass-rush on his own. He held up well aside from Iowa's final drive, when PSU got cute and tried to align him at DT; he got blown out to open the hole for Wadley's go-ahead touchdown.

As a group, this is literally a very strong D-line, one very capable of resetting the LOS in the backfield (see above). The PSU DL is third nationally in havoc rate despite a relative dearth of sacks.

That makes life easy on Cabinda, who doesn't often have to take on blockers when flowing to the play. The outside linebackers, Manny Bowen and Koa Farmer, are relatively interchangeable; Farmer is the bigger player despite being the former safety and both are comfortable in the box or in space. Going to the perimeter against this defense is difficult in large part because they're both fast to flow to the ball (and fast, period).

The secondary is tough to crack. Haley has been a lockdown corner this year. His counterpart, Campbell, has been nearly as good. Campbell also impressed against Iowa in run support; he held the edge very well and forced Wadley to find space between the tackles. While nickel Amani Oruwariye wasn't really needed in this game, I've liked what I've seen from him this year, too.

Both safeties are seniors, and while they're each a little limited in coverage—Allen is a little stiff while Troy Apke isn't the greatest athlete—they're usually in the right spots. Big passing plays against PSU have been very hard to come by. Iowa got two chunk plays on the defensive backs, one when Campbell was hit with a questionable DPI flag after running a streak into the sideline, the other when Apke got outjumped for a 21-yard touchdown. Those didn't come easy and the rest of the game they had zilch.

Unless the offense looks drastically different, they're going to have a very difficult time stringing together positive plays. That doesn't mean it's entirely hopeless, though. Iowa had that very problem but still nearly pulled out a win with a couple chunk plays, none bigger than when they caught PSU in a blitz and hit Wadley on a wheel: 

#4 is a backup, so he's probably irrelevant, unfortunately

Michigan is going to need similar plays to hit big; they're not going to be able to line up and out-execute PSU. I highly recommend watching this video from B/R's Michael Felder, who highlights five ways—most of them utilizing misdirection—that M can crack PSU's defense:

I'll add one more: PSU had some issues leaving receivers open on short passes over the middle, but Iowa had a couple ugly drops that prevented them from taking advantage. It's worth seeing if Michigan can spring someone on concepts like mesh.

Comments

ST3

October 19th, 2017 at 2:16 PM ^

Last week I asked about more teal/cyan on Michigan's offensive chart and Seth obliged. It's so weird to see a "trouble spot" circle around a top 250 recruit (that's the oxy-moron of the Seth Chart world) but it's warranted.

UgLi Eric

October 19th, 2017 at 2:24 PM ^

I mean last year we had harbaugh WTFing Franklin for waving the white flag in the 3rd quarter and this year Ace is giving the white flag right back to our side before a down has been played. I seriously don't know what to make of Penn State football...

Squash34

October 19th, 2017 at 3:08 PM ^

I believe the field goal was at the end of the first half, making it worse. But i culd be remembering it wrong.

To me Penn St defensive numbers are pretty scewed by the fact that they have ad a pretty easy schedrule. In fact, Michigan is the second highest rated offense they faced according to the Zack Shaw article looking into the numbers for both teams. 

Harbaugh has not really opened up the playbook and used the tricky misdirection/ wrinkles/ breaking tendancies stuff to much yet. But when they have called it it has worked. The lead counter from last week and the FB shovel (that would have been a chunk if not for the delay of game) are good examples of this.

Michigan has run the toss sweep so much that most teams fly up and over commit to it, hoever, outside of the counter to the back, harbaugh has only attacked that with pitch to Evans designed to go inside the tackles. Given that PSU sold out to stop Iowa at the first sign of toss, Michigan should break out some more wrinkles or counters to it. For instance, a fake toss with a naked boot by okorn with a TE drag, seems like something that would work really well.

ESNY

October 19th, 2017 at 3:33 PM ^

I really have no idea how good PSU is.  As you said, they haven't exactly faced a challenging schedule yet.  Is it all smoke and mirrors or are they actually good?  I mean 12 months ago Franklin's seat was getting awfully damn toasty and now they are almost as good as Bama?  Something has got to give

Squash34

October 19th, 2017 at 4:09 PM ^

Watching most of their games I think their stats and box scores are scewed because of playing bad opponents, getting luck with turnovers in their own side of the field, and opponents doing really stupid things like kicking off to barkley at the 1 to start the game.

I am just not buying them. Just like i did not buy Florida beating Michigan. Largely for the same reasons, actually. Coaching advantage, the other having a defense Michigan can take advantage of and having a offensive line that is not every good that will play against a pumped up dline that is elite.

jdemille9

October 19th, 2017 at 10:41 PM ^

First, they are absolutely not almost as good as Bama. No no no no.

To me, Franklin is Brady Hoke but with a better OC and an elite RB. Excellent recruiter, but a terrible in-game coach. Joe Moorhead is an excellent coordinator and Saquon Barkley is an NFL runningback already. ALL their success last year, and this year, is a direct result of both of those, with a lot of it being Moorhead. He'll be gone for a HC gig and Franklin will go back to his hot seat soon enough.

But yeah, for now they are a legit Big Ten and playoff contender and maybe even next year if Moorhead stays. I really don't expect this trend to continue though, Franklin isn't exactly an innovator of anything and Moorhead is too good to not get a solid HC job somewhere soon.

Space Coyote

October 19th, 2017 at 2:26 PM ^

But the game plan has to be similar to 2013 Michigan vs PSU (yes, 27 for 27). Michigan will bring more scheme to the table to improve the RB ypc and not get nearly as much out of the QB on the ground, but the overall gameplan has to be similar.

Michigan is a run based team right now, no doubt. They have to be able to pass just enough to either A) keep PSU honest, which when they are playing honest they are a generally average run defense; or B) take advantage through the air, with chunks, when PSU isn't playing honest.

That was the idea behind the 2013 game plan, and DG finished with 8.6 YPA and Funchess had 28 yards per catch. It was enough for 27 points in regulation on offense (7 more on a pick 6). DG also had some nice chunk runs on the ground as PSU focused on the RBs (this year, the idea needs to be getting other guys involved as they focus on the RBs). If Michigan could score 34 points (I don't expect them to), I would fully expect a win. 27 would even give them a good shot. But need enough out of the pass game to either get chunk plays or allow the run game to function.

stephenrjking

October 19th, 2017 at 2:38 PM ^

Michigan needs 21 (or, you know, 22 or 23) to win, IMO. We've got a great defense, but Penn State has a pretty good offense, plus the best gamebreaking player in the sport. I think our best-case scenario is holding them to 20. That still leaves Michigan needing some combination of TDs and FGs to beat that.

5 fgs and a td would do it, which is basically a score on half of our possessions. Forcing a couple of crucial TOs would be a big boost. So would an explosive TD on offense.

But I look at a number like 23 and I have a hard time seeing Michigan getting there.

funkywolve

October 19th, 2017 at 3:07 PM ^

The offense is definitely going to need some help.  Really need special teams and the defense to give the offense a few short fields and then the offense has to take advantage of them.  I don't see the offense stringing together 8, 9, 12 play TD drives that cover 60 or 70 yds.  If Michigan can get to 20+ points, I like there chances but the catch is getting 20+ points.

Kevin13

October 19th, 2017 at 4:50 PM ^

would struggle putting up 20 against an average defense. Against one as good as PSU I would be thrilled to reach 17. They also have a very good offense and even though our defense is top notch I think they can still put up over 20 on us.  Numbers are just not adding up and don't see how we can come out of Happy Valley with a W.

Hope I'm wrong, but our offense is too one dimensional and think leaves us waiting until next year, when hopefully one of the young QB's can step it up and our OL and WR's both take a step forward.

Amaznbluedoc

October 19th, 2017 at 2:50 PM ^

I really don't know how you can compare this O to the 2013 squad?  Funchess, Butt, Lewan, Glasgow, Dileon, Norfleet,  Gallon... As bad as we were, PSU was equally bad that year, 7-5 and back in its second year of CFB after the scandal.

Today they are finely coached with some decent talent on both ends of the ball.  I don't see how we win with this offense.  Hopefully our D keeps us in the game 17-3 or 20-7.  Irrespective of the score, I'll be in the stands cheering for the Maize and Blue and supporting the kids.

 

dragonchild

October 19th, 2017 at 3:16 PM ^

27 for 27 was more of a game management issue than anything; I did a breakdown of it and most of those runs to nowhere happened late when Hoke tried to bleed the clock.  'Til then we had been scoring; the problem was that PSU was clearly matching our pace.  We gave ourselves 3-and-outs and field goals in what 'til then had been a shootout.  Kind of different now in that not many teams can force a shootout against Doc Brown so going turtle actually works.  I doubt PSU is up to the task.

To your point, oh yeah, 34 in regulation would be plenty.  We won't get that much, but with this defense, 20 might do it.  The problem is that we don't have Devin Gardner; we have John O'Korn.  I felt Borges' MO was using the run to set up downfield pass haymakers whereas now we're just trying to get the safeties to back off.   Like Jake Rudock, until we actually burn them I doubt they'll care about DPJ running a go route.   Unlike Jake Rudock (who was correctly anticipated by Brian as a good QB atrophied at Iowa) I don't see a light going on in O'Korn's head at this late stage.

So, I disagree that pre-4th-quarter 27-for-27 will work.  Gardner-to-Funchess, you had to respect, at least.  With O'Korn, it's not even a given he'll throw to an open guy.  We may need to go full Maryland and see just how creative Harbaugh can get while not letting the ball ever go higher than 3 feet off the ground.

BuckeyeChuck

October 19th, 2017 at 3:10 PM ^

I acknowledge that Michigan has an elite defense. This game, however, is going to provide a tougher challenge than anything they've faced so far this year. Michigan has only played 1 game against an offense that ranks better than 70th in S&P+. And that's Air Force (44th).

Just like Ohio State's offense has looked elite the past 5 weeks because of playing vastly inferior opponents, Michigan's defense has garnered elite numbers because the opposing offenses have been mediocre at best.

Perhaps more chinks in the armor of Michigan's defense will be exposed @ Happy Valley? Or an impressive performance on Saturday will validate this defense as one of the nation's elite.

bronxblue

October 19th, 2017 at 3:24 PM ^

The problem is you could sort of say the same about PSU. They haven't been able to run consistently against the last couple defenses they've seen, and they've yet to play an offense with Michigan's potential, even if unrealized. Hell, Iowa nearly shocked them and they were terrible for most the day. I think PSU wins, but it's going to be closer than people outside of the Michigan sphere are predicting.

jgoblue11

October 19th, 2017 at 3:49 PM ^

Penn State has also faced inferior opponents as well. They struggled with the almighty Barkley rushing against IU and Iowa. How will he do against our D??? Their offense looks leaps and bounds better than ours, I get that, but I think this game will be closer than most think, simply because of their O line issues as well. Do I expect to win, and Harbaugh this and harbaugh that? No, but I do think there is a chance. Also, most Michigan fans won't admit, Ohio State looks scary good offensively this year. Props to the team you root for in Ohio.

814 East U

October 19th, 2017 at 2:47 PM ^

I agree. I think last year's victory and the fact that PSU didn't murder IU or NW on the ground is clouding rational judgment. Michigan could cover. They have no business winning this game. Stranger things have happened I suppose, but the confidence from the fan base (especially this site) is uncalled for.

grumbler

October 19th, 2017 at 7:23 PM ^

This times 1000.  I don't even understand why guys like East U come to this site if excessive optimism about Michigan's teams gets his panties all in a twist.   There are plenty of non-Michigan sites he can go to and get affirmation for his conviction that Michigan cannot win.

Squash34

October 19th, 2017 at 3:41 PM ^

PSU was out rushed 177 (or so) to 39 by indy. It is not that they did not murder Indy, it is that Indy murdered them in the rushing game.

They have been outgained several times in fact because ther offensive line is worse than Michigan's.

They are going to lose their next two teams because they are facign elite defensive lines that will destroy their line and Mcsorley is not good with a pass rush in his face.

bluepalooza

October 19th, 2017 at 3:12 PM ^

Many people had the same opinion of MSU.  PSU should be favored for many reasons, better offense, more experienced, at home.  All that said, don't count Michigan out. If anyone gets blown out in this game, it will be PSU.  Otherwise, it will be a close game for one team or the other.

P.S.  Iowa is NOT a good football team.  NOT even close. Not good on D or O.

bronxblue

October 19th, 2017 at 3:25 PM ^

I mean, I've watched both these teams play more than a couple times this year. They are not that far apart. PSU is better, but I'd imagine the difference between the two is similar to that between UM and MSU, and we saw how that game went. I'd love to hear a solid argument why Michigan pulling the upset is far-fetched.

Squash34

October 19th, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^

What I find to be funny is that people act as though PSU has this world beating offense. Yet, they have lived off of barkley doig crazy things, the other teams turning the ball over on their side of the field and getting points in garbage time verse a worn down/ defeated defense.  When they have to actually drive the field they have problems and they have a very high rate of 3 and outs verse decent defenses. Indiana made them go 3 and out like 5 or 6 times in a row to end the half.

Moreover, they are not a young offense, they are an experanced one. So, expacting their line to come together (which is for sure their biggest issue) is not realistic. Whereas, many have already counted the young michigan offense out, desite showing signs they are  startign to come together.  Like young offenses never stumble through the first half of the year acting like their own worst enemy before it coming together to end the year.

I mean, just last year that same situation happened with PSU and Clemson.

OwenGoBlue

October 19th, 2017 at 3:28 PM ^

They are the favorites and deservedly so but:
  • This defense might match up better than the one that beat the shit out of them last year.
  • Much crazier upsets than this have happened for two straight weeks.
  • Penn State ain't played nobody. They don't have an overwhelming athletic advantage for the first time all season. 
  • Harbaugh hasn't lost to Franklin yet. Why start now?

miCHIganman1

October 19th, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

At 1:54 you see O'Korn leave the pocket with a wide open TE running down the seam.  Even as he scrambles to his right, we have wide open players on the goalline to that side of the field.  However, he's locked on to Hill underneath and rifles it in to him.  I don't think he's going to magically start moving on to 2nd and 3rd reads so keeping the routes/options to a minimum seems to make sense.  However, we can probably expect to see 8 in the box pretty consistently.

VAWolverine

October 19th, 2017 at 2:34 PM ^

your own 1 yard line, calling a pitch to a RB six yards deep in your end zone is a play an offensive coordinator who is the coach's son would only call. That safety was the difference in the Iowa- PSU game.

That was the worst play call in the history of the world, in my opinion.