The play Army's coach wants back

Submitted by PeteM on September 9th, 2019 at 9:51 PM

Watching the game at the stadium, and listening to the commentary afterwards, I pretty much shared the consensus view that Hill's interception was the play of the game for Michigan.  That said, it's interesting that Army coach Jeff Monken focused on the fake punt as the play he wanted back:  

https://www.michigandaily.com/section/football/fake-punt-game-changer-michigan

Both the interception and the fake punt changed the scoreboard (assuming Army would've at least gotten a field goal from the 5).  I do remember being surprised we would bring the fake punt out against Army, but it also made me think that the coaches already expected a dogfight.

Robbie Moore

September 9th, 2019 at 11:15 PM ^

So Monken has an offense that can run for 3 yards practically at will. His passing attack is nonexistent.  It's third and goal from the Michigan five. And he passes? That was his worst call by far. Run it on third down. If you don't score you can run again on fourth or go for three. At the critical moment he didn't believe in his offense. Screwing up punt coverage is a blunder but forgetting what your team is at a critical juncture is so much worse.

Logan88

September 10th, 2019 at 8:24 AM ^

Did Don Brown say that in reference to the missed fumble return call on Saturday or was that just a general statement by Brown about something entirely different?

If the former, I salute him for saying it but he will probably get in trouble with the Big 10 office for his candor. 

The Homie J

September 10th, 2019 at 11:42 AM ^

It is really funny to watch in hindsight.  We couldn't have been more blatant in calling that audible.  Punter stands there pointing at Dax for an eternity, the blocker suddenly shifts to the other side of the formation and Dax is over there clapping.  It was a giant neon sign signalling fake and Army never noticed lmao

Leaders And Best

September 9th, 2019 at 10:50 PM ^

My guess it was regret attempting a punt block in the first place. Army probably does not have the athletes to pull it off even if Michigan were to have punted and Army executed well. It was a dumb call, and I could see why a coach would regret that one more than the interception as some coaches may see the interception as partly a problem with execution.

MAN-AT-ARMS

September 9th, 2019 at 11:15 PM ^

He regrets doing it twice he said. Michigan saw it the first time, but had the penalty and had to re-kick.  That’s when Michigan coaches alerted players to watch for it again. He caught them off guard the first time. He didn’t the second time. That’s what he regrets. The gig was up at that point and he still tried it. 

ralphgoblue

September 10th, 2019 at 3:01 AM ^

That was 100% called by Harbaugh

Watch during the 5 yd penalty on the punt,just before the fake (maybe false start) the punter was pissed off because he thought Michigan had the perfect play call..... then Harbaugh sent in a sign and one of the OL slapped Dax a "low five" as they crossed paths and Hart pointed to his head and Dax just before the snap,im guessing to say "yes keep the fake on"     Ive seen Hart punt 100 times he has never done these things before... 100% Harbaughs call

1VaBlue1

September 9th, 2019 at 10:03 PM ^

I've no doubt they expected a dogfight, but the fake punt wasn't 'brought out' because of that.  It feels like that's an option the punt team has available.  Yeah, they probably saw something from Army that made them think it might be there.  But I think that's been planned as an option whenever the coverage is right, against whomever they're playing.  The personnel is perfect for it...

All that aside, I'm surprised that's the one Monken wants back, also.  I can think of several others that would be better for them...

WichitanWolverine

September 9th, 2019 at 10:10 PM ^

The Hill interception was about as big as Jupiter. I can't remember the last time a single play swung the outcome of a game that much. I think if Army even gets 3 there, Michigan is doomed. 

JetFuelForBreakfast

September 9th, 2019 at 11:14 PM ^

Rose Bowl 1998.  Charles Woodson saved that game with an interception in the endzone the same way as far as I'm concerned.  If WSU had scored again right there, I don't see us coming back or celebrating a National Championship.

And I agree...while we should have been up 14-7, being down 21-7 would likely have been a dagger.

geewhiz99

September 9th, 2019 at 10:13 PM ^

The interception was more critical from a game perspective but the Army coach was talking from a coaching perspective - the fake punt meant he did not prepare his team well for that possibility. 

LJ

September 9th, 2019 at 10:27 PM ^

Everyone talks about the interception, but they were down to the 1 on that drive and took a false start on second down, which led them down the path to having to throw and getting picked.  Obviously, their chance of scoring from 2nd and goal at the 1 is about 99%.  That one penalty completely shifted the game.

Valar Morghulis

September 9th, 2019 at 11:09 PM ^

I haven’t seen this mentioned, but when I watched the game a second time I noticed that there was a false start on their last touchdown as well.  The right tight end (83 if I recall correctly) flinched about a second before the snap. Can’t see it on the replay but it’s on the live play. Don’t recall what down it was when that happened, but that would have drastically decreased their chances of the third touchdown as well.

Bill22

September 10th, 2019 at 7:22 AM ^

Might have just been my perception, but that also seemed like the first penalty called against Army at a critical moment.  Every other call to that point seemed be going against Michigan I.e. the called back touchdown.  No question that penalty saved the game.

skegemogpoint

September 9th, 2019 at 11:06 PM ^

Actually, it was the illegal procedure penalty against Army just prior to Hill’s INT that was the key play. Without it, it’s 2nd and Goal at the 1 yd line and they score to make it 21-7.