Who Wants To Glitch Mutombo? Comment Count

Brian

2/21/2018 – Michigan 72, Penn State 63 – 23-7, 12-5 Big Ten

40228719792_c031f7817c_z

temporary demon [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Everyone just stood around, afterward, wondering what to do. The gobsmacked victim fell over and laid on the ground. A ball newly loosed into the world at large bounced, and bounced. By the time someone decided to acquire it and maybe continue on with the basketball game and the universe writ large, one of the refs had regained his senses sufficiently to bring a halt to proceedings.

For processing. For reflection. For meditation, and a resolve to continue.

The universe is a simulation and one of our minders spilled coffee on the very strange, very red, very unnecessary switch on subpanel 3F-B that reads DUNCAN ROBINSON on one end and DIKEMBE MUTOMBO on the other. Nobody in that universe knew what it did or who those people are. They refused to touch it, for good reason. Once they saw the nonsense that resulted from flipping it they swiftly restored things back to a known good state.

Such was the time in 2018 where Duncan Robinson blocked the soul out of one of his opponents. These were the events, and the proffered explanation. The explanation was clearly insane but since all other attempts were equally insane—if not more so—people let it slide.

We will not mention the part where Robinson calmly glides inside the line and knocks down three critical shots, because that glitch might be sufficiently non-obvious to get away with. It's like Stauskas! That's the ticket! Please leave Duncan Robinson in this known good state instead of some other known not-so-good states. He has always been like this, we promise. That is his line, and it works.

---------------------------------------------------

There was a point in the second half when Penn State tried to post Robinson up, again, and my reaction was relief. In part this is because Penn State's players post up with the elegance of a capsized hippopotamus, sure. But also Duncan Robinson is an average-ish post defender and post offense that doesn't demand a double team usually sucks.

Having these background facts coalesce into an honest-to-God feeling was the season's weirdest revelatory moment. Duncan Robinson is defending, and I feel fine. Duncan Robinson is lining up for a transition three dagger, and I feel better.

The thunderous matrix glitch later was only fitting. Michigan weathered one of their unfortunate-but-now-trademark scoring droughts because their defense gave it to Penn State all game, holding the hottest team in the country to under a point per possession.

At first this was largely Zavier Simpson putting his face in Tony Carr's chest, all but removing him from a half of basketball. Once it became clear that Penn State had made the requisite adjustments to get Carr some shots, Michigan moved to a 2-3 zone that started off goofy but morphed into a contested-jumper machine that protected the Robinson/Poole combination that Michigan needed to score any points. Carr only managed to scrape into the green very late when he banged in a couple of raise-up threes during the semi-competitive free throw shooting section of the contest.

That's a gameplan win, especially since Penn State's bizarre solution to the problem Michigan's defense poses was to have first Mike Watkins—who is a good player but gets 80% of his buckets at the rim thanks to someone tossing him an assist—and then his backups—who are jabronis—repeatedly post up. The only buckets that came off this action were a couple of heavily contested jumpers that looked about as likely to go in as a Zavier Simpson skyhook; like the skyhook they did go in. But not very frequently.

Michigan has a defense that causes pretty decent teams to go off script in odd ways in an attempt to deal with it, and no galactic six-eyed goggle beast appears to be on the verge of flipping Michigan back to their old reality. That gives them a shot against anyone.

BULLETS

39375885765_1af4e90ce4_z

if this was in the first five minutes it's worth ten points [Campredon]

First Wagner three theory: confirmed. Michigan's first possession was a Wagner corner three swish, which led to a 10 for 21 performance from deep. For his part Wagner was 4/5. I am not sure if I'm serious about this or not now.

A bit later people got frustrated because Wagner was turning open-ish threes into drives that didn't end well; I sort of shared that frustration but also thought that Penn State had some exceptional help defense blocks on drives that were otherwise easy buckets. They probably took 8 points off the board by coming out of nowhere to swat stuff that was about to be At Rim.

Free throws, our good and true friends. You and everyone else thought "here we go again" when MAAR, Michigan's best FT shooter who ever goes to the line, missed both on Michigan's first trip. Michigan was 16/17 the rest of the way. Matthews and Simpson combining for two FTAs was helpful there.

Michigan's all the way up to... uh... 329th in FT%. Movin' on up!

Shot volume... deficit? Yes. Michigan had 12 TOs to PSU's 10 and lost OREBS by 3. (Largely because PSU had 5 "team" OREBs that are almost always luck; also one of those looked like a horrendous call.) I think that's why the game felt like such a failure slog. At this point in my Michigan basketball observation career anything approximating a TO-heavy game feels like the end of the world.

Charles Matthews is broken. I don't know what else to say. You have to keep playing him because you need him to break out of his funk if at all possible. At this point he should probably get a quick hook if he starts off like he did in this game. When he is in he's got to slow it down. There's no way he should have 28, 25, 28, 24, 25, 27, and 27 usage numbers in his last seven games. It's one thing to have a struggling guy on the floor. It's another when he's your highest usage player. Downshift to sophomore GRIII and try to build back up from there.

In which I risk the wrath of Ace. Jordan Poole had another good game, and a desperately needed one what with the previous bullet point.

But, if I may lodge a slight protest: he's too much of a heat check dude right now. He gambled for a steal in the second half, missing it and opening up Michigan's defense for an easy Carr three; a bit later he and Duncan Robinson had a two on one break where Poole challenged a defender unsuccessfully instead of setting up his teammate for a layup. His decision making seems stuck on THIS WOULD BE AWESOME. This leads in equal parts to awesome things and freshman things.

In which I try to patch things up with Ace. ON THE OTHER HAND

I'd rather have a guy with too much swag trying to dial it back a little than a guy you have to swag up. Enswaggen. Fortify with Vitamin Swag. You get the idea.

Another reason to root for Penn State. Michigan gets the four seed and a double bye if they beat Maryland and Penn State wins in Lincoln. That is a good reason to root for Penn State.

Another one: I have been sloppy in my assumption that a top 25 Kenpom team is top 75 in RPI. Penn State is not. They were 76th before yesterday. They currently sit 85th, because RPI is mostly a SOS metric and Penn State's SOS is an abomination. This makes them a quadrant 2 team. A win over Nebraska and maybe a couple in the BTT would likely make them Q1, at least on the road. Nobody else on Michigan's schedule is particularly near the Q1 cliff, FWIW.

I'm going to assume the guy left out the caveat. The over/under on NCAA tournament games that are later vacated is 10, as the agent the FBI nailed was taking notes. Very much notes:

“There are spreadsheets detailing who got paid, how much they got paid and how much more they were planning to pay,” said a source familiar with the investigation. “The feds got everything they wanted and much more. Don’t think it will only be players who ended up signing with ASM that got paid. Those spreadsheets cast a wide net throughout college basketball. If your school produced a first-round pick in the past three years, be worried.”

I'm assuming "and your coach isn't John Beilein" was too obvious to mention.

Comments

Piston Blue

February 22nd, 2018 at 1:30 PM ^

and had the same reaction vis-a-vis Poole. If he really is going to take Matthews minutes, which offensively is in order, he needs to cut down on defensive 'freshman' mistakes. If he fixes those this offseason, hoo boy. He really gets the offense going on another level with his scoring and passing ability. If he had 10-1 odds to win B1G PoTY by the start of next season, I'd think about taking it.

In reply to by ijohnb

TrueBlue2003

February 22nd, 2018 at 4:57 PM ^

beating Maryland moves us up to 5 seed, bordering on 4.  Beating Nebraska in the quarters very likley gets us to the 4 line.  Even a loss there to MSU wouldn't move us off in all likelihood.

Mike Damone

February 22nd, 2018 at 1:35 PM ^

If Duncan Robinson can turn things around in amazing fashion after a few games - is it too much to think Matthews can as well by the start of March Madness?

If Robinson and Poole keep playing this way, and Matthews can go from bad to decent - wow!  Not saying we are a Final Four team - but as stated in this article, with this level of defense, we have the potential to beat anyone.

Might be a few fun weeks ahead...

BlueWon

February 22nd, 2018 at 3:02 PM ^

namely shooting and dribbling.

He compounds that by forcing it too much.

What he needs to do is to add value a la Dennis Rodman. Then he'd derve some minutes. Short of that I'd rather see Brooks and Poole take his minutes.

StephenRKass

February 22nd, 2018 at 3:13 PM ^

I'm not too upset about Matthews. Thing is, we should have 8 - 9 solid guys on the roster:

  • Matthews
  • Poole
  • Livers
  • Simpson
  • Robinson
  • Wagner
  • Teske
  • Abdur-Rahkman
  • (Simmons)

It is totally awesome to have that many guys who can play. This gives Matthews the time needed to step back, calm down, etc. What a great thing. Almost everyone needs a break and recalibration sometime. That's completely ok with me. If more time on the bench helps Matthews to work on his shortcomings and overcome them, well, that's a good thing too.

username

February 22nd, 2018 at 2:20 PM ^

School

1st Rd Picks
Kentucky 9
Duke 7
Arizona 3
UNC 3
Syracuse 3
UCLA 3
Utah 3
Washington 3
FSU 2
Gonzaga  2
Kansas 2
Louisville 2
LSU 2
Michigan 2
Texas 2
Vanderbilt 2
Wisconsin 2
Arkansas 1
Baylor 1
Cal 1
Colorado 1
Creighton 1
Georgia St 1
Indiana 1
Marquette  1
Michigan St 1
Murray St 1
NC State 1
New Mexico St 1
Notre Dame 1
Ohio St 1
Oklahoma 1
Providence 1
Purdue 1
St. Joes 1
UNLV 1
Villanova 1
Virginia 1
Wake Forest 1
Wyoming 1
Foreign 15
Total 90

 

Michigan Arrogance

February 22nd, 2018 at 6:38 PM ^

School

1st Rd Picks
Kentucky LOL YEP
Duke We'll see but could be suspiciously absent. Gun to head, yes
Arizona  no?
UNC yep
Syracuse oh yeah and the sad thing is they aren't even that good
UCLA yep
Utah nah?
Washington yep
FSU nah
Gonzaga  nah
Kansas oh yeah
Louisville LOLOLOL
LSU nah but maybe
Michigan hahahhahaha no
Texas yeah
Vanderbilt no
Wisconsin no
Arkansas nah
Baylor nah
Cal nah
Colorado yes
Creighton no
Georgia St no
Indiana ???
Marquette  nah
Michigan St yep
Murray St 1
NC State 1
New Mexico St 1
Notre Dame nah
Ohio St nah
Oklahoma yep
Providence nah
Purdue nah
St. Joes 1
UNLV 1
Villanova yep
Virginia nah
Wake Forest 1
Wyoming 1

 

Streetchemist

February 22nd, 2018 at 5:12 PM ^

Except this article is about college players taking money from agents the like, not recruits. We’ve got nothing to worry about when it comes to paying for recruits. I’m not worried about seeing Leverts name on the list as he was a senior but I wouldn’t be surprised to see DJ Wilson.

Hail-Storm

February 22nd, 2018 at 4:03 PM ^

plan on hacking him everytime when he goes up because of his poor free throw shooting.  Teams are playing the ol MSU/ Seattle Defensive back game, of not gonna call a foul on everycall.  

It's probably not as rampant as I think, but I feel like he is hacked a lot at the rim. 

TrueBlue2003

February 22nd, 2018 at 5:02 PM ^

which means they play him super aggressively which does two things:

1) Puts pressure on the refs to call it, which they only do half the time

2) makes him anticipate the contact so he's not focusing on just making his move, he's half thinking about where the contact is coming from and he's all out of his head.

ypsituckyboy

February 22nd, 2018 at 1:50 PM ^

With every mention of "but John Beilein definitely won't get in trouble", I get slightly more concerned that a UM player did take money behind Beilein's back and we'll get lumped in with everyone else when this whole thing shakes loose.

wile_e8

February 22nd, 2018 at 2:07 PM ^

Isn't the whole FBI scandal more about coaches using middle men to funnel money to players? There might be a player or three on the receiving end of some of those payments, but I thought the huge problem was that the FBI got documentation of communications between coaches and the middle men. IIRC that's what buried Pitino, and the chances of Beilein getting caught up in that are extremely low. 

bluesalt

February 22nd, 2018 at 3:57 PM ^

Here was his offer list (according to his Hello post) at the time of his commitment: “Auburn, Bradley, Drake, UW-Green Bay, Illinois, Indiana, Marquette, Memphis, UW-Milwaukee, Nebraska, and Virginia Tech, among a few others.” For the most part, that list doesn’t look like one you need to pay money to beat. The question is, how many kids and their friends/family were involved on average in a year? If it’s 25, there’s no one to worry about except Mitch. 50? Probably the same as if it’s 25. 100? Sure there could be a kid or two a year who wound up at Michigan who received something from someone during his recruitment, even if what they received wasn’t remotely connected to Michigan. If it’s 200, you’re probably going to find someone in every major conference program — and if it’s 200 a year, being financed by the shoe companies and agents, I really don’t understand the economics of it at all. But if you look at where the big payoffs come from, it’s largely from those kids who’ve been in the top 25 or so list for years, maybe top 50. Aside from Mitch, we haven’t gotten any of those players, and we’ve rarely been close. It’s really not something I worry about.

so bored at work

February 22nd, 2018 at 1:55 PM ^

One of the highlights for me was in the replay of Bostick (I think?) going up for the monster slam and chucking the ball straight out of bounds. A dude on the PSU bench leaps into the air in anticipation, only to have to dodge the ball as it sails toward him. Anyone by any chance have a gif?

remdog

February 22nd, 2018 at 1:56 PM ^

Ever since I saw him play in a high school all star game. Whether you call it swag or something else, he has a confidence and edge to his game along with elite all around offensive skills. Burke and Stauskas had it too. As for his mistakes, give him a break for pete's sake. He makes fewer mistakes than several of his teammates with much more experience. I think they are more obvious since we have started expecting magic every time he's around the ball. Wagner, for instance, had a very good game but had a few very ugly shots at the rim swatted away. Then there's Matthews who's a turnover machine and Simpson who's a nightmare from 3 or the free throw line and even had a late almost costly turnover. Even Robinson had a fugly air ball from 3 while having an epic game otherwise.