This Week’s Obsession: What’s Up With the Passing Game? Comment Count

Seth

Adam: This two-throw sequence has it all:

The throw to Gentry is basically a fadeaway, but it's a boggingly accurate one considering Speight's footwork. Frequent pressure is forcing him to move around in the pocket, and once he's moving around said pressure prevents him from making technically sound throws. The next throw is one of those grating OOB throws that have become common in and around the end zone; despite this, I place little blame on Speight. He's under siege from the drop and looks like he's trying to let the receiver get into his route as long as possible while also bracing for impact, hence the bad throw.  

Being able to find a receiver at all is commendable when you're under that kind of duress. The first throw can't be stepped into lest he get crushed, and yeah, there's maybe a half second on the second throw that he could have used to set but there's also a blitzing, snarling serviceman closing in quickly. I rewatched the game a couple of times and didn't see throws that were flat-out bad when Speight wasn't pressured. He's looking to get through his reads, and by the time he's through two or three there's rarely time to do anything but chuck it and hope for the best.

---------------------------

Seth: Speight isn't the only problem—we're going to talk about the receivers—but he is the least solvable. A quick timeline:

  • 2015: Dreadful except one magnificent Minnesota drive
  • Early 2016: Starts atrocious, receives Harbaugh pounding, fine
  • Colorado to bye 2016: Ear-holed, lost confidence
  • Bye Week until Iowa 2016: Lethal
  • Iowa: WTF
  • Post-Iowa 2016: Injured, constantly under siege, smart
  • 2017 to date: Smart but regularly targets tacopants

Since the Defenstratio Testudo game there was Jaleel Johnson, then Ohio State and Florida State turning Kalis into a turnstile, and three games behind this kid OL that still regularly screws up obvious twists. The narrative here is an all-too-familiar one: the less he can trust his pocket, the more Speight loses his footwork, and the crappier he gets. Devin Gardner's 2014, JT Barrett 2017, every NFL QB behind a bad OL: QED.

[After the JUMP: We wish we wish we wish]

---------------------------

Ace: Yeah, let’s get to those receivers. While the tight end group has held up well, the wideouts (other than Grant Perry) haven’t given Speight a ton of help. As it turns out, having a true sophomore as the de facto #1 receiver isn’t optimal. Kekoa Crawford hasn’t been reliable as the top option; the first Florida pick-six, not clearing out for Speight on the goal line scramble against Air Force, and the flat drop on third down later in the AF game are the first things that come to mind when thinking about how his season has gone.

It’s more than simply a matter of catching the ball, too. There have been more than a couple dropbacks this season in which Speight has surveyed the field and rightfully decided nobody was open. While Speight has certainly been scattershot, I have to imagine some of these off-target throws are due to freshmen running imprecise routes. It doesn’t seem like Speight fully trusts his receivers yet.

This should improve gradually over the course of the season, even with the Tarik Black injury, as the wideouts gain much-needed experience. I think we’re still going to notice the absence of two senior wideouts all year.

---------------------------

David: Other than Grant Perry, no one of the roster has much collegiate experience at all. Crawford and Bunting got some time last season...but not a ton.  Most everyone else is in their first season on the field. There have been drops, miscommunication, and lack of familiarity with how to ad lib play breakdowns (i.e. the Speight awkward pop pass attempt to Crawford...in which Kekoa should have conflicted the defender by releasing to the corner). These are definitely things that can and will be ironed out with more reps, time spent together, and just experience going through similar situations on the field. When will that happen? Ummmmm...hopefully soon?

---------------------------

Seth: It's a credit to Tarik Black that that injury is not nothing. He's a true freshmen when Michigan has plausible freshmen receivers coming out their ears, but this true freshman played like an upperclassman, and those are very precious indeed on this roster. Black already has a Darboh-as-a-junior-level feel for how a DB is playing him, and when he can cut off a route into a comeback. That's been a very valuable asset in our clunky, dodge-a-rusher-find-a-checkdown passing game. We hope DPJ is learning at double-time, and Oliver Martin's thing is healed soon. I think it was always going to be deep in the Big Ten season before either breaks out like Black has.

---------------------------

Ace: So this seems relevant, even though I’m a little skeptical of Bredeson’s grade:

Brian: I don't buy that at all. Cole has three pass pro minuses in UFR through three games, Bredeson has been fine, and I don't think the right side is pretty much the worst in college football. That site has failed basic sanity tests before. Michigan's pass pro has not been great, but if that was true there would be a blizzard of charted PRs. I have a reasonable number.

Ace: Yeah, Speight has seen a fair amount of pressure, but he hasn’t been constantly under siege like pre-Moorhead Penn State or the last couple Florida State squads.

BiSB: Those rankings seem qualitatively correct, but quantitatively nuts. Ulizio hasn't been fantastic, 0.5th percentile doesn't pass the smell test.

Brian: Yeah, if that was true Michigan would have three Paris Palmers.

BISB: Like, of the 260 starting tackles in college football, Ulizio is #259? Maybe #258 depending on how they math?

David: While Brian keeps alluding to Speight's lack of mental mistakes, Wilton has made his fare share of poor throws. There is plenty of talk about his mechanics/setting his feet/good-bad Speight...whatever. The point is that he has not been a Rescue QB. And that is basically what everyone had hoped he would be: a guy who could overcome the mistakes of the rest of his offense with good decisions and quality throws. Alas...not yet.

Seth: Speight hasn't faced Hackenberg pressure and also hasn't completely collapsed like Hackenberg. That clip Adam and I alluded to is notable because both are off his back foot with pressure coming. It's not like this is an every-throw occurrence. It's just a sometimes occurrence. The receivers dropping it is a sometimes thing too, as is the pressure. Four INs, four PRs and four drops a game and you've lit half the passing offense on fire.

Ace: Agreed. The passing offense has been bad via death by a thousand cuts.

Which… simultaneously makes me optimistic and pessimistic, I think? It seems like some of these issues should improve. It also seems unlikely they all will.

David: Yay Bye Week soon.

Seth: They still haven't passed to the backs much, and it's not like they haven't had the opportunity with Isaac and Evans out there so often. My optimism comes in visions of Speight learning to check to those guys and oodles of YAC.

Ace: Also, throw to the Ent.

image

[Eric Upchurch]

BiSB: How many have to improve, though? I feel like they can get by pretty well with RoboSpeight OR receivers helping out BorgeSpeight OR Speight and the receivers getting time to make something happen.

If they get two out of three, I'd feel fantastic.

David: Do we get to pick the 2?

Ace: Yeah, I’d feel the same way, especially since I’m more optimistic the running game will come together. But given some of the more optimistic preseason projections out there, mine included, even missing one phase might kill the higher hopes out there.

The Mathlete: The biggest reason for optimism is the youth/inexperience. Based on where the problems are, there is a very plausible path from Here to Much Better Than Here for the offense. It isn't guaranteed but all the fresh faces mean it's not just a pipe dream to think it's going to improve over the coming weeks.

Seth: Also if you've been watching our rivals, Michigan State's secondary is infested with open MAC receivers and Ohio State's isn't nearly as good as its last several.

The Mathlete: Based on listed starters through the first three weeks of the season, Michigan is 96th in average age for starting OL and last out of 130 teams in WR average age. Young and talented is still young.

Comments

MileHighWolverine

September 19th, 2017 at 4:33 PM ^

Uh...on Ulizio....isn't it him who lets the blitzer have a completely free run at Speight on the OOB endzone pass? It's a PA so Higdon moves from the right side of the play to the left and is waiting to help in pass pro. Ulizio moves to his right at the snap to double up the AF DE with Gentry (?) and leaves a gaping hole for the blitzer to come running through once he recognizes it's a pass. Had he just let the DE get handled by Gentry (?) and stayed in his lane, probably gives Speight enough time to make an accurate throw or see Black coming open to his left for a TD.

How is he beating out Runyun? WTF?

BananaRepublic

September 19th, 2017 at 4:40 PM ^

If you freeze the video when the free rusher is about 1.5 yards away (ie the time when speight has to have started his throwing motion to get the ball out in time), you'll see that Black is still fighting through press, Perry is running the short out route that would be tackled immediately that everyone hates, and Crawford's DB is in lock step with him. He makes the smart play and throws it away near Crawford. If he had more trust or rhythm with his WRs, he might have slung one towards Black for him to snag out of the break, but that chemistry just isn't there.

MileHighWolverine

September 19th, 2017 at 4:57 PM ^

That's the point I was trying to make...it seems like with Ulizio completely letting an LB have a free shot it made it impossible for Speight to do ANYTHING else than what he did. Hence my question on how can Ulizio be beating out more experienced OL? I don't think other OL just follow a DE knowing the have TE help on the edge and leave the LB's free to take a shot at the QB.

I could be very wrong, though.

Cali's Goin' Blue

September 19th, 2017 at 8:25 PM ^

But this off the backs of Hoke's shitty last 2 recruiting classes. There is 1 impact offensive lineman right now and one who is solid. Having 3 starters from Harbaugh's 2 1/2 years of recruiting is not a situation we will see again most likely. One of them(Ulizio) was a 2 1/2 star recruit. This will build, there is no reason to freak out about it now. At least not at the coaches. Ya, Ulizio will be a weak spot this entire year most likely, and so will Onwenu to a degree. That's what happens when you get super shitty recruiting and a new coach 2 1/2 years into his job. Some coaches get lucky with recruiting before they come, but Harbaugh and Drevno didn't get that gift. Drevno is a good offensive line coach(Look at Stanford's O-line play- vs recruiting rankings for proof). This year is gonna be frustrating on the OL, but not at WTF levels IMO. Give it 2 more years and we will consistently have one of the top OL's every year. It sucks to write that but it is backed by production from Harbaugh and Drevno in the past. 

Squash34

September 19th, 2017 at 10:31 PM ^

Home was a very good recruiter of the DL. He did a very good job at DB too. It pretty much falls off there for me. He got high star guys in other positions but they were largely unathletic. Particularly, at OL, RB, and LB. Out of those 3, the Oline was the worst, got big guys, but they were limited to say the least. And his last few classes were full of complete misses. So, he did very good on defense and had some good offensive guys like chesson, butt and darboh, but his last classes were very bad offensively

gbdub

September 19th, 2017 at 5:06 PM ^

I'd actually be okay with the short out route there, on first and goal. Probably gets enough yards to make running plausible, maybe even gets you to the Panda zone.

But hard to fault Speight too much for chucking it with an unblocked LB right in his face.

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

September 19th, 2017 at 9:12 PM ^

1st and goal from the 8 should turn into 2nd and 4 because it also changes the entire playchart for 2nd down - and brings a legitimate 3-play dive sequence into the equation. The backside read and throw to Black would require a top tier QB. That misread is very disappointing for a JB coached QB because it's the type of decision making discipline that he should instill. Rudock had it by game 7 or so. Speight has a good arm but far from a diverse or strong arm - maybe he gets even more conservative in the RZ because he knows his limitations.

Sopwith

September 19th, 2017 at 10:34 PM ^

when you have a fade route to a tall, athletic receiver, that's the whole point of the route: you don't expect them to get open, you expect that putting a ball high into their area gives them a chance to out-athlete the DB (especially with his back turned) and grab the ball.

If you watch the play, Crawford did exactly the right thing by leaving plenty of space in the back right endzone to loft it into. The play was there, but the trigger has to be pulled immediately after the snap, and for whatever reason Speight didn't trust it.

funkywolve

September 20th, 2017 at 12:19 AM ^

Not only was Speight late but it looks like the ball isn't placed where it should be.  He should be aiming for the back pylon - it makes it harder for the db to defend.  Instead as Crawford is running towards the back of the endzone he has to veer to the middle of the field.

UMLaker

September 19th, 2017 at 5:55 PM ^

The running back should have picked up the blitz. And Speight's fault for waiting too long to throw. Watch the replay, he sees the receiver is free one on one and instead of throwing he jumps TWICE in the air. Then throws. How about throwing to your receiver who's covered by an undersized db who doesn't know where the ball is. Watch the FSU game, the qb doesn't wait to throw the fade against Lewis.

Shop Smart Sho…

September 19th, 2017 at 4:41 PM ^

All of this and no comment on the play selection?
If a QB isn't getting a lot of time, wouldn't it make sense to have receivers run screens and shorter routes instead of what appears to be a lot of longer routes?

Erik_in_Dayton

September 19th, 2017 at 4:44 PM ^

I'm going purely on my shakey memory here, but I think some of Speight's passes out of bounds on fade routes have been purposely thrown out of bounds because the receiver wasn't open.  That seems possible to me on the pass to Crawford above.  But maybe I'm wrong. 

reshp1

September 19th, 2017 at 5:04 PM ^

The whole point of a fade is putting a ball up that your taller, jumpier receiver can make a play on. He's also got the advantage of seeing the pass the entire time, as well as the high arc of the ball naturally giving him a better shot of catching it than the defender. Fades to single covered receivers in the corner of the endzone should high but possible to bring down in bounds, never true throwaways. It's not an easy throw and the best miss it sometimes, but he (literally?) has thrown all of them where the receiver has no shot.

AnthonyThomas

September 19th, 2017 at 5:29 PM ^

If Speight doesn't trust his receivers on 50/50 balls then the coaches need to be yelling at him to rethink his assumptions. You have to give your receivers the chance to make a play.

I don't blame Speight for the above fade, but he has thrown plenty out of bounds when he was free from pressure.

M Ascending

September 19th, 2017 at 7:20 PM ^

Speight simply waits too long to throw the fade. It has to be released before the WR reached the goal line, to give the receiver room to run under it. Speight waits until the WR is 5 yards deep in the end zone, resulting in OB throws when he tries to lead the receiver. This is a trust issue. Speight has trouble throwing to a spot where the receiver WILL be, preferring to wait until the receiver makes his move and proves that he is open. But by then it's often too late.

MinWhisky

September 19th, 2017 at 5:04 PM ^

None of it is really impressive and there is a lot of blame to go around:

  • QB composure, accuracy, inability to read the 'D' and check into a different play
  • QB coaching - disappointing,expect to see more out of a QB who has started 16 games
  • OL - same old, same old
  • RBs - mediocre at best compared to RBs on most other Big 10 teams
  • Playcalling - questionable at best, where is the imagination & utilizing the TEs where there is depth and talent . 
  • Red Zone scoring - very bad for all of the above reasons

I think everyone is tired of the excuses and very disappointed, especially when fans see an Air Force team that was pretty impressive with undersized, but well-coached, 2 & 3 star players.  I understand the boos.  Very high expectations vs. substandard performance that was highlighted by comparison to a team that did more with less.

GotBlueOnMyMind

September 19th, 2017 at 5:24 PM ^

Response to your points, in no particular order:

First, Air Force did less with less, given that they scored fewer point and lost. Second, you can't send tight ends out on routes if they have to stay in to help the line block. Not sure what you want the coaches to do there when the options are let Speight get killed or send a tight end into a route. Third, Isaac has been good, better than the RBs on most other Big Ten teams. Fourth, QBs not named Brady or Rodgers lose composure when they are constantly getting pressured, it happens. Last, Air Force has a bunch of disciplined third and fourth year players out there, as opposed to first and second year players. Even if limited athletically, those extra years are important when it comes to technique and learning the system.

In conclusion, don't boo the players, support them as they work to get better.

gbdub

September 19th, 2017 at 7:01 PM ^

I feel like this might be like the Borgesian "Tackle Over" where in theory leaving extra men back helps you block, but in reality with a weak line just gives more potential gaps to screw up. Maybe you're better off just letting the TE run a route, at least then the LB has to account for his route rather than just pinning his ears back and picking a gap to rush.

MinWhisky

September 19th, 2017 at 6:41 PM ^

First, AF lost but it was a very close game, with a 3 point differential well into the 2nd half.  Their players played up to their potential.  UofM's offense did not.   

Second, if the OL can't protect, it's up to the coaches to design plays where the QB doesn't take much time to make a throw.  I'm not seeing that.

Third, you're delusional about Isaac.  He still goes down, usually on first contact, and rarely jukes anyone.  The RBs at PSU, OSU, MSU, Minnesota, etc. are all better than Isaac. 

Fourth, yours is a BS excuse for Speight.  No one expects him to be Rodgers or Brady but there are expections that he plays more like a seasoned veteran with 16 games and 2+ years of coaching under his belt.

I understand the booing.  It's frustration and disappointment.  I'm not supporting it, but It's the result of seeing big time spending and promotion fall well short of the expectations that go with it.

 

1VaBlue1

September 20th, 2017 at 9:53 AM ^

Everybody has an opinion, and they all smell the same.  But when you go around saying that it's acceptable to boo the players and coaches you are out of line.  Saying the coaches suck is fine, they get paid - but he (MinWisky) has no basis for saying it.  It's one thing when the coaches talk about toughness while apologizing for nails, or continue to throw players under the bus because the defense is non-existant.  But when the program has been performing like it has?  Bring something more than 'coaches suck because I don't like the play call' bullshit.

Homerism ends when you shit on unpaid players for thier performance, knowing full well that they want to do the best they can.

Fezzik

September 21st, 2017 at 3:11 AM ^

Read better. He never said its acceptable to boo. He said he understands why its happening, huge difference.

According to your last sentence no one is allowed to have a negative opinion on any college player ever. This is football, not tee ball. We keep score. We have winners AND losers. Our head coach is one of the most competitive people in the world. He grades everything and teaches you to win at everything. Life is about overcoming challenges, not receiving ribbons just for trying or showing up.