[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

The Thousand-Yard Stare Comment Count

Brian September 27th, 2021 at 1:57 PM

9/18/2021 – Michigan 20, Rutgers 13 – 4-0, 1-0 Big Ten

Well, at least it took 3.5 games to get back to the same old feeling. The grim one, where you're staring grimly at the grim field where grim things are happening and then Michigan and its steamroller of a run game takes a delay of game penalty instead of attempting a fourth and one. After that there's another penalty before Michigan can finally punt. The color drains out of the world until you forget where you are and momentarily think you're at Eastern's stadium, which is now gray—not just gray, but gray-gray, ultragray—in some sort of marketing stunt turned guerilla art installation.

Grey-Field-at-Rynearson-Stadium

Say what you want about the Eastern Michigan Eagles' proficiency at football, but never slander their perspective on the fatalistic trudge we call life. Football is healthy and good to have influence your thoughts.

At times like these the man with the mustache arrives in my head.

screen-shot-2016-09-05-at-10-31-53-pm

You can find him by googling for "sad Florida State fan," and you will discover that this is now a bustling corner of the image search internet populated by folks in glitter and surrender cobras from sea to shining sea. But mustache man is still first, because he is a perfect distillation of the emptiness of a bad football game where your team gets to do the fun parts three plays, and only three plays, at a time while the opposition dunks on you.

He is also a tribute to the human ability to read nuance into facial expressions. What makes Sad Mustache Man so compelling? He merely stares ahead, stoic. His brow furrows slightly. The way he communicates the existential angst of Ole Miss punching your face in is mysterious. Blindingly clear, and somehow impossible to define. He stares into the middle distance and attempts to keep all his atoms in the same place.

--------------------------------------------

Since Michigan was playing Rutgers, "dunks on you" means "scores ten points in a half and still loses." The feeling is still the same. Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games. At some point down the road when Michigan gets conked everyone watching will think about how the second half of Rutgers foretold this woeful fate.

Which, I guess, fine, okay, yeah. I predicted this team would go 7-5 and so did everyone else. Even after… that, a reversion to that level of pessimism is not reasonable. A reversion to the same old thing—9-3 or thereabouts, losing most of the exciting games, not being particularly competitive against Ohio State—is, and here we're in the same treadmill it seems like we've always been on.

Michigan can exceed expectations this year and still put up something entirely unsatisfying. Too good to fire, not good enough to enjoy. That's not fate, of course: maybe Greg Schiano is pretty good at this and Michigan will receive a wake-up call and actually bomb someone worth bombing on the road. One half doesn't erase the other halves.

But when you keep walking down the same road year after year it's hard to expect that something's different until it actually is. Until then, a steady stare into the middle distance is always a good option. Doesn't usually get you put on TV unless you're a perfect distillation of sadness, and even then there's usually someone just as sad but dressed more outlandishly.

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

51521193190_75842bcb79_k

I AM DETECTING AN ILLEGALITY [Barron]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Aidan Hutchinson. Didn't have a massive game statistically but is likely to check in with a monster UFR number. Had a sack, bowled over an OL on the direct snap to Pacheco, probably should have drawn multiple holding flags. Making up for meh performances otherwise.

#2 Nikhai Hill-Green. Shuffled through traffic on the second to last Rutgers drive to stick folks short of the sticks on critical plays. Led team in tackles, a fair few of which were important. Preseason hype seems not crazy.

#3 Brad Robbins. Ok he had a bad one but the one he dropped at the three that took a right turn out of bounds was important, and he limited the dangerous Cruicshank to just one punt return attempt.

Honorable mention: Josh Ross turned in a good performance with one thunderous TFL before leaving; Chris Hinton got off a block on one of the key Hill-Green stuffs to help; Dax Hill was a bit up and down but did stuff some perimeter stuff.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

16: The OL (#1 Wash, #1 NIU)
14: Aidan Hutchinson (HM WMU, #2 Wash, #1 Rutgers)
11: Blake Corum (#2 WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
8: Ronnie Bell (#1 WMU)
7: Hassan Haskins (HM WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
6: Nikhai Hill-Green(HM NIU, #2 Rutgers)
5: Dax Hill (#3 WMU, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
4: AJ Henning (HM WMU, #3 NIU),
3: Donovan Edwards(T2 NIU), Josh Ross (HM Wash, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
1: Andrew Vastardis (HM WMU),Mike Sainristil (HM WMU), Brad Robbins (HM Wash), Jake Moody (HM Wash), Mazi Smith (HM Wash), Gemon Green(HM NIU), Cornelius Johnson(HM NIU), Chris Hinton (HM Rutgers)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Michigan's opening drive is a 17-play marathon featuring two passes, a touchdown, and the absorption of half a quarter.

Honorable mention: Hill-Green gets back to back sticks to functionally end the game; bonafide RPO gets Roman Wilson a chunk on Michigan's second efficient TD drive to start; ditto the Sainristil catch; officials ignore a blatant block in the back on Henning's return.

image​MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Can I say the entire second half? No? Okay, uh, McNamara missing three straight open receivers on one of the three-and-outs. (Sainristil could have caught the first one, yes; still low.)

Honorable mention: The rest of the second half.

[After THE JUMP: up up up up nope nope nope nope]

OFFENSE

A cliff, visualized. Via Seth:

image (45)

Many people have already noted that the flattening out exactly correlates with McNamara being on the receiving end of a targeting penalty. The big jump at play ~32 is the strike to Sainristil and the ensuing ejection, and after that it was a slow drip of disaster. McNamara went from 8/9 to start to 1/7 to finish. The possibilities there:

  • coincidence,
  • McNamara was hurt and either nobody noticed or he successfully concealed some mild concussion symptoms, or
  • McNamara wasn't hurt but was rattled.

I think coincidence is the most likely, especially because the amount of data we have on him is so limited. But we're again in a spot where we're wondering if this guy is actually the guy and glancing at the five-star freshman. One negative of the monster run game is that Michigan's called fewer passes than anyone outside of service academies, so we have a tiny amount of data.

The coaches have more and their reticence to open things up may be an indicator.

Jeremy Gallon graduated. McNamara's lone incompletion before the cliff was this:

51520264581_e320c41d6b_k

[Barron]

That's a perfect corner route that got broken up by an excellent no-look play from the DB, but also maybe this should be someone other than Sainristil. (I saw some back and forth online about whether Sainristil should have brought this in. My opinion is no, there's really no opportunity to out-beast a guy who punches the ball the instant you touch it.)

A frustrating contrast. Rutgers does not have Michigan's talent level but stuck in this game and significantly outrushed Michigan with a bunch of janky college crap. Swing it to the flat, run the quarterback, run with some WRs, use a lot of misdirection, etc. It felt like Michigan did almost none of that. There was a significant amount of variation in the between-the-tackles ground game, but once Rutgers adjusted and started dispensing a bunch of two-yard runs Michigan did not have a plan B. Nor did they make any attempts to get janky college yards until very late.

WR screens? 0. AJ Henning touches? 0. Perimeter run plays of any description? 1, that coming on a bash play to Corum deep in the fourth quarter. QB runs? 1, which Rutgers predicted and blitzed right into.

It's mystifying. Seems like we have one out of every three games where the Speed In Space has arrived and then it goes back in the bin. Shades of the Army game from a couple years ago.

Reads: scanty. Michigan got a couple of chunks off of RPO action, which are the first of the year IIRC. Otherwise it did not feel like the QB was live in the mesh point until the very end of the game, when Rutgers correctly anticipated Michigan would go to the QB run well and shot a LB directly at McNamara:

You have to wonder how live that read is or if it's just a pull with the expectation that the LB will go after the RB. We've been through this with QB after QB after QB and I have no expectations this will change going forward.

51516787246_e10db49579_k

that guy's never going to catch you [Barron]

Running back détente is always temporary. Seth's likely to have a fair number of negatives from this game for Haskins and Corum; on my rewatch I caught a number of plays where gaps did open up but RBs did not hit them, and I thought Corum in particular had at least a few opportunities for a bounce as Rutgers overplayed the interior.

In one sense this is a testament to Corum's RB instincts. It's unusual for little fast guys to not try to Mike Shaw it a bunch, usually to their detriment. On the other hand, I mean try it a few times? Fast, you are fast.

DEFENSE

51519473867_08590130fa_k

unsettling [Barron]

That was more in line with expectations. This was not a good run game—to say the least—entering the game but Michigan ended up having a lot of problems because the defensive tackles were largely a non-factor. Grinding up the middle with Vedral as Pacheco took linebacker attention outside was effective for Rutgers because Michigan's DLs could not win one on one battles and Hutchinson was being followed around by a posse of dudes*.

I don't think there's much to do about this. At certain spots you are who you are, and Michigan is pretty meh at DT.

*[One notable instance of this was on the last Rutgers drive, where they spent a slot WR to blindside him and knock him down on a pass rush.]

Endurance. Michigan rotated heavily, which on the one hand was somewhat alarming. On the podcast I suggested that if you have eight defensive tackles you don't really have any. On the other hand that did seem to come in handy late when Michigan's defense stiffened—not at all what you would expect when Rutgers is the only team staying on the field. Having eight meh defensive tackles is better than having two, I guess.

Jordan Whittley did not play, which feels like it was a bigger loss than you might expect for a guy who's only going to get a dozen snaps.

51516732896_00a418f4c2_k

this is not going far [Campredon]

WHAT ARE WE DOING? Takes a special kind of baffling thing reoccurring repeatedly for me to start swearing in the stands at this late date, but Michigan's defense accomplished that by repeatedly offering Rutgers a free eight yards on simple hitches on the outside. Completely bizarre. You are playing Noah Vedral!

Rutgers has two long passing plays against FBS opposition this year; they were a TE seam and a five yard hitch. I find it difficult to believe that Vedral hitting a back shoulder throw on the first Rutgers third down threw Michigan's pregame planning into a tizzy. Covering the flats was a problem early against NIU, and then Michigan adjusted. It was baffling, frustrating, and inexplicable that Michigan was handing easy yardage chunks to Rutgers deep into the second half.

Vedral's other attempted shots at the sideline both went OOB. [shakes hands violently]

Slow your roll. Dax Hill had two different clean shots at Vedral on slot blitzes RU did not pick up and whiffed both. This tends to happen when really fast guys come off the corner—I am currently thinking about Brandon Harrison and his remarkable ability to get dodge by quarterbacks—and hopefully he'll be able to gear down a bit and finish those plays.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Got away with one. Entertaining sequence on the AJ Henning punt return where I saw an obvious block in the back, the officials threw a flag, then picked it up, then got to watch the stadium scoreboard demonstrate that the obvious block in the back was very very obvious.  I was shocked when the next play did not have a holding call; one dollar says the extremely weak roughing the passer call a few minutes later was related to picking that flag up.

Orin Incandenza business. This ball done be remote controlled.

Robbins celebrated like he'd birthed the savior of the world and fair enough.

Noped out. Rutgers tried a couple kickoffs to Corum and while he didn't break one he was close enough that Rutgers decided pop-up kicks were the better part of valor. Michael Barrett had a nice catch and return on one of them to get out to the 35.

MISCELLANEOUS

Oh no baby. Greg Schiano's decision to go for it on fourth and ten with 29 seconds left in the half was completely bizarre. The score was 17-3, which means okay yeah scoring at the end of the half would be an important boost. But 1) fourth and ten, 2) you are Rutgers, 3) you're probably giving Michigan another possession.

The ensuing slant was both broken up and short of the sticks, and then Michigan immediately hit a big RPO to get down to the Rutgers 5. Only a post-targeting McNamara miss on to an open Schoonmaker prevented the worst case scenario.

Shortly after. Michigan elected to kick a field goal on third down with five seconds left in the half. This I'm not too ticked off about that because the thing they probably should have done—throw a goal-line fade—is not likely to convert. But it's coming down before five seconds run off the clock.

We are the premiere Crean Documenting Service in the Midwest. Puttin' a lot of weird guys on the sideline:

51516382306_8bdc4bf32e_k

[Barron]

This gives me an excuse to put this here.

Thanks, Tom.

HERE

The State of our Open Threads:

So, how did we feel about as it was happening? I will just say that there were fewer fucks given than I would have actually thought - only 176 of them, to be exact. Still, when you consider that we only generated 18 of them last week, that's 9.8 times the fucks and probably a corresponding overall increase in fan stress. It's charted in comparison to "fire" here:

In the Harbaugh era, and in the Hoke era when this collection effort began, there has always been at least a mild correlation between our use of "fuck" and our wanting of heads, and while four games isn't telling, you can see they do trail each other somewhat. Normally, this relationship will solidify by the time the OSU rolls around. I can only imagine why that is.

Stephen King on the eternalness of Michigan's offense:

What is telling, to me, about these analyses is that if you change some details, they could be written about Saturday's win over Rutgers. This, despite a complete overhaul in the offensive staff in that time. We've seen the OL coach change twice, the OC change once, different attempts at WR coaches, and now a new RB coach as well. The offensive personnel is completely different as well. The only things those offenses have in common with this team is the uniforms and the head coach.

Best and Worst:

And so with every 3-and-out by the offense and every interminable odyssey by the defensive series it felt like the game was not so much slipping away as getting unnecessarily close.  It’s difficult to describe and probably comes across as homer-ish, but this game never felt quite like last year’s contest in NJ, where Rutgers raced out to a big lead behind superior play.  I’m not saying you should but if you so inclined, go back and re-watch even just the highlights of that game.  Rutgers put up nearly 6 ypp in that game and had 486 yards of total offense while also committing 12 (!) penalties on offense for 99 (!!) yards.  Their defense struggled in the second half but they were consistently getting pressure early on and Michigan barely had 100 yards of total offense before McNamara came in.  Rutgers looked like the better team in that game and Michigan was lucky they were able to stay close enough.  Those were two equal-ish teams in terms of talent and execution playing a defensively-challenged game of chicken, with Rutgers finally blinking in overtime.  It felt not unlike a lot of Big 12 games in that respect.

Comments

lhglrkwg

September 27th, 2021 at 3:35 PM ^

It feels like the coaching staff never has any consistency or memory of anything. Like they'll have a decent, coherent gameplan one week and then the next it's like they lose their mind and go into a shell. I don't know how you have all these clever end around and misdirection plays queued up vs NIU and then do precisely none of that in a game vs Rutgers that seems to be sleeping through your fingers

and like you said

A reversion to the same old thing—9-3 or thereabouts, losing most of the exciting games, not being particularly competitive against Ohio State—is, and here we're in the same treadmill it seems like we've always been on.

People aren't freaking out because the Rutgers game was close-ish, its because the coaching looks exactly as inept as it has been for much of the last 7 years and that means bad times are ahead

 

bronxblue

September 27th, 2021 at 3:41 PM ^

So the gameplan that got Michigan 250 yards of total offense and 20 points in 30 minutes of gameplay doesn't count, but the one that only mustered about 25 yards in the second half is the REAL gameplan?  Oh, also not the past 3 games where Michigan blitzed teams that are a combined 8-2 against anyone not named UM?  Nope, there's no way this coaching staff (which is largely different than the one they had last year, let alone during most of Harbaugh's tenure) did anything right this week.  

Again, people can be mad about this game and how it was handled in the second half but not every game is some intricate web of inter-connected failings of the head coach.

ERdocLSA2004

September 27th, 2021 at 3:35 PM ^

But when you keep walking down the same road year after year it's hard to expect that something's different until it actually is.

We've been through this with QB after QB after QB and I have no expectations this will change going forward.

Well, Brian’s whole article could’ve been a summary of every single frustrating game of the Harbaugh era.  We can keep shuffling all of the pieces around Harbaugh, but for some reason nothing ever changes.  Go figure.  

SFBlue

September 27th, 2021 at 3:45 PM ^

The Michigan Defense played an excellent fourth quarter without their signal caller. Every good season has a game where Michigan, e.g., falls behind Iowa 21-7 at halftime. 

Vasav

September 27th, 2021 at 4:55 PM ^

I'm not in BPONE mode, I still am excited about this team. I didn't feel great during the second half or afterwards but overall they're still exceeding my expectations and have been fun to watch. As for Harbaugh's overall tenure - other than a really weird 2020, he has been very good - yes, too good to fire. He needs to beat Ohio State - yes, that part has not been enjoyable. I am sure we'll drop games before then, but I'm going to enjoy the ride until then, and I feel better about that game than I have at any point since 2018.

I'm not polyannish, I don't think this is a championship team, but the Big Ten (and CFB as a whole) looks to be as wild a ride as we've had in a long while. Always root for Chaos. Chaos is a ladder. I'm going to enjoy the climb.

RJWolvie

September 27th, 2021 at 7:31 PM ^

Right with you. It’s been 7/8ths fun so far this year, and that’s pretty great. I have the same foreboding as everyone else that it isn’t going to keep up that rate of fun, but still: what sense does it make to be miserable over 7 dominating quarters rather than enjoying them? Or letting the 8th piss on those 7 too like they didn’t happen? They did. And they were fun

HooverStreetRage

September 27th, 2021 at 5:29 PM ^

I just got back from a jog on a route that took me along the pathway between the football practice field and the railroad tracks. There on the path by the practice field was a half-consumed bottle of Pepto-Bismol. Having already read Brian's post before I went jogging, the scene captured in the most perfect way possible our collective disquiet.  

bluegoinggray

September 27th, 2021 at 5:29 PM ^

Brian's ability to encapsulate and beautifully verbalize my opinions and attitudes about Michigan football without knowing me at all is uncanny. Reading this feels like affirmation from a kindred spirit.

RJWolvie

September 27th, 2021 at 5:54 PM ^

Yeah, so for sure that second half was deflating, looked like mode sure the shine has come off, the weaknesses exposed, and we’ve been here before: September promise would fade to another disappointing year by the end.

 

But I’m trying to do both: enjoy the improvement to date from last couple years, enjoy the 7 of 8 fun halves of football so far, even while realizing that the most likely ending of the year is disappointment. I think I can do both. Helps that I’ve increasingly disinvested over last 16+ years. So if team plays some good football, I can enjoy. If they rot like 2nd half Saturday, I can tune back by investment. That’s what I’m trying anyway.

so far this year has been 7/8ths fun! And that’s pretty good

Dr. Funkenstein

September 27th, 2021 at 6:02 PM ^

If you kept the teams the same and just swapped coaching staffs, what's the score of the game? I'm not a huge Schiano fan either, but where's one result in the Harbaugh era where we beat a more talented team with a superior gameplan?

skegemogpoint

September 27th, 2021 at 6:18 PM ^

Brian is a wordsmith, to be sure. It’s equally true that he’s not now and has never been an athlete. Uneven performances are a hallmark in sport - but there’s no way to know that if you’ve never set foot on the field or court. 

CLord

September 27th, 2021 at 7:35 PM ^

Dude, it's the exact same script year after year.  Hot start, followed by foreboding mediocrity, followed by horrible endings to every season.  I wish this notion of uneven performances applied, because it would assume the occasional disruption of the same, tired, mediocre script.  There is nothing uneven about what we saw.  It's exactly what we've seen year after year.

snarling wolverine

September 27th, 2021 at 8:05 PM ^

What “hot start” did we get off to in 2020?  We lost to Sparty in week 2.

2019?  OT against Army in week 2 and a blowout loss in week 3.

2018?  Lost to ND in week 1.

This is the first time since 1973 that we haven’t trailed at all in our first four games.  So no, we don’t actually see this every year, or even every decade.

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 27th, 2021 at 10:37 PM ^

You're right (sort of) about uneven performance. But I haven't really heard many people (including Brian) complain about the performance. It's the coaching. I have no doubt at all that Cade McNamara, Blake Corum, and everyone else are trying as hard as humanly possible. 

Hope we can start putting them in the position to succeed.

CLord

September 27th, 2021 at 6:33 PM ^

Great write up.  "Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games." is one of the best statements in years. 

It defines the wise prism through which seasoned Michigan fans process games like this, succinctly describing the root of most forum battles on this site over the last decade, given that this perspective consistently abuts against the naive, "be positive and root for the team guys!", "Michigan fans are insufferable guys!" crowd. 

7-5 or 8-4 sounds about right.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me 7 times now, I'm a fucking idiot, but in the immortal words of Roger Daltrey, we won't be fooled again.

But hey at least we're not Florida State.

Eye of the Tiger

September 27th, 2021 at 7:34 PM ^

I'm as frustrated with the state of the program as anyone, but if we discount the weird COVID year, Harbaugh has never gone 7-5 at Michigan and only went 8-4 once. He's gone 9-3 twice and 10-2 twice for an average of 9.2 wins per season. 

Not what we hired Harbaugh for, obviously, but 9 wins has been the norm during his tenure. 

Eye of the Tiger

September 27th, 2021 at 11:25 PM ^

I mean, we only played 6 games, there was no non-conf slate, kids missed a lot of camp and lots of other teams (eg PSU, MSU) had weird results too. I don't think it's worth wasting time or energy on. 

The fact is that Harbaugh has gotten us back to an average (mean or median) or 9-win seasons. Not better, unfortunately - but also not worse. 

Another way to think of it is, we are back to where Carr had the program in the 2000s: winning ~9 games a year, losing to OSU. But without the benefit of a recent national championship year to make it feel like we are/were close to being back. 

WolverineHistorian

September 27th, 2021 at 7:31 PM ^

"At some point down the road when Michigan gets conked everyone watching will think about how the second half of Rutgers foretold this woeful fate."

*sigh*  This is the not so invisible elephant in the room that won't get the f*ck out.  I remember these exact moments under RichRod and Hoke...

2009: We started out 4-0, lopsided wins over Eastern and Western.  A thrilling last minute win over Notre Dame (who went on to have a crappy season) but then in game 4, we had a battle with Indiana that went down to the final minute and we barely avoided the upset.  Indiana was horrid.  They would go on to be winless in conference play yet they destroyed our defense both on the ground and through the air.  I was scared as hell after the game.  Despite being 4-0, I wanted the season over with.  If a crappy Indiana team played us that tough, how is everyone else going to do?  Michigan lost 7 of their last 8 games.  The only victory coming against Delaware State.  

2010:  Almost the exact same script as the year before.  Thrilling win over Notre Dame.  Surprising defensive struggle against UMass but we're 5-0.  Then, once again, a crappy Indiana team destroys our defense and we need Denard heroics to pull out the last minute win.  Michigan then goes on to lose 6 of our last 8 games, setting defensive records for futility and getting RichRod fired.  

2013:  Two weeks in, we're 2-0 and we look like the only good team in the Big Ten.  A thrilling victory over Notre Dame for UTL Part II with lots of offense...I was literally too happy to sleep that night after the game.  Then exactly one week later, Akron comes to the Big House and throws up bomb after bomb after bomb on our secondary.  They're literally 5 yards away from beating us at the end of the game.  A week later, we travel to UConn and we're trailing 14-7 at halftime.  I was speechless over how awful we looked. 5-0 start ends with us losing 6 of our last 8. 

This is not something I remember from the Lloyd Carr years.  Sure, we had ugly wins here and there but they were more like isolated incidents.  They didn't give me a sense of doom for the rest of the season like the examples above. 

On the bright side, this Rutgers game, while certainly a horrible second half, wasn't as ugly as some of those Indiana games or the UConn/Akron games.  But it already feels like an omen to many folks that spells doom for the rest of the season.  I guess all we can do is wait and hope we don't go down this road again.   

gbdub

September 27th, 2021 at 8:01 PM ^

Good teams have down games. Hell, if we're talking about false hope, how many times has OSU looked like crap for at least one game a season only to be an absolute death star by the last weekend of November? 

Michigan has a chance to prove whether this is "good team's down game" or "first indication of a bad team". We may as well wait for it to go down one way or the other. 

As for the Carr years - maybe there should have been more foreboding? Remember how we all hated DeBord? There were plenty of Carr-led "good teams that fail to beat OSU" from 2000-2007. Thing was, back then we didn't have nearly the disparity in talent we do now relative to OSU, so the losses are probably even more to blame on hidebound coaching. 

RJWolvie

September 27th, 2021 at 7:58 PM ^

A question: so if it’s been 17 years of frustration (one win vs a .500 OSU team on sanctions coached by Fickles who is ?where? now, and one 11-2 season of flukiest flukeness), 17 years of football almost entirely worse in the previous 10 than the last 7… what makes anyone think the current HC is the problem and if only we get a new one it will be better than the last 7 and not more like the 10 previous to that? I don’t. 9-3 +/- 1 is who we are. And if you look at the history before 17 years ago, it’s pretty much who we’ve always been, excepting 1997. Used to beat osu more regularly than not once in 17 years (.500 sanctioned fickles don’t count: tho I damn sure celebrated it), and used to win a little more than 1 in 4 bowl games, but otherwise*, sadly, we _are_ back.
 

*that’s a big otherwise, I agree, but this “problem” is not a last 6-7 years thing, is what I am saying.

M-jed

September 27th, 2021 at 9:39 PM ^

Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games.“. Poetry,  I tell you. 
 

I also left that Army game early. I can’t sit in the stands watching such shit. Glad UM won but I got better things to do than watch second rate coaching lead us to a half of 3 and outs. 

HollywoodHokeHogan

September 27th, 2021 at 10:18 PM ^

If they knew they wanted to kick a field goal with 5 second left, then you kneel and call the timeout so that the half ends on the kick.  It’s totally minor, but it’s what you should do if you wanted to play it safe.  Of course, Harbaugh can’t decide what he wants to do until he has to call a timeout on a deadball.  He still has no clue how to manage the clock. 

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

September 27th, 2021 at 11:07 PM ^

Welp, it was more depressing to read than watch the 2nd half. 4-0 and there are no positives?  
There are clearly struggles on O and some key areas with talent questions, but teams can improve just as much between games as regress between halves. UM will lose a game or games this season - that doesn’t make the pessimism correct. If the sole hope is a coaching change, moping about a 20-13 win won’t make it happen.

uminks

September 27th, 2021 at 11:08 PM ^

LOL, I still have friends that say M was just saving all their offensive plays for WI and went total vanilla in the 2nd half. I don't think this is true. But I do think that Harbaugh running up the middle was the game plan for the 2nd half. But Cade showed that  he lost complete confidence as our QB in the 2nd half and could not hit the side of a barn. Damn, we will probably get another drubbing by the Badgers! Sucks!

ca_prophet

September 28th, 2021 at 3:41 AM ^

"Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games."

"Michigan can exceed expectations this year and still put up something entirely unsatisfying. Too good to fire, not good enough to enjoy."

This is both a brilliant summary, and the twin poles of our fanbase's despair.  Without beating OSU, there's a chunk of us that will never move past this position.  Every good stretch is fate setting us up for the fall, and every bad stretch is the harbinger of our latest doom.

I choose to reject that despair.  I will be moderately pleased with 9-3 this year given where they started.  Really, what I'm looking for is something to build on, so that when OSU does come back to the pack we can be in a position to take advantage.

 

WolverineLVR

September 28th, 2021 at 8:47 AM ^

Excellent analysis.  I found myself agreeing to everything the author wrote.  

Especially this...

"It was baffling, frustrating, and inexplicable that Michigan was handing easy yardage chunks to Rutgers deep into the second half."

 

 

markusr2007

September 28th, 2021 at 11:00 AM ^

What does this all mean?

a. We didn't get Joe Moorhead Jr. as OC - so the spread option offense ain't happening, no QB zone read keeps, no split backs zone read, no verts, so the whole Oregon offense thing ain't never happening because....

b. Harbaugh still wants to Harbaughffense, i.e. run-run-pass-punt.  

c. McNamara has some significant issues, and his underwhelming WRs corps is merely amplifying this fact.

d. Oh yeah? Well, UMs special teams is still lethal!  So, just you wait until our OC refuses to call a screen pass on 3rd down, or until we punt, you kickoff, you punt or you let us in FG range. Then you'll be sorry.

Wendyk5

September 28th, 2021 at 7:18 PM ^

"Michigan's second half didn't lose the game; it felt like it lost future games." 

 

Only an accurate statement because there is a pathology in being a Michigan fan which has crystallized this year in a way it hasn't before. It's a sort of self-pitying clairvoyance. Many fans seem to have the ability to see the future but only when it's bad and disappointing and causes them pain. I would say this is more of a defense mechanism to protect them from the past but what do I know? I've only seen this in fans on this board and family members who are Michigan fans for the past 25 years. I saw a Twitter post from Atlantic writer Tim Alberta, who's a Michigan State fan. They had a similar game last Saturday. You know what his response was? 

"The second half of that Spartan game took six months off my life. 

It's rare in sports to be humbled AND walk away with a huge win. Here's hoping Tuck and his staff, who got a little heady after last week (deep water, etc..) own that putrid second half and adjust accordingly." 

 

That's a rational response to a bad second half.