[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

The Thousand-Yard Stare Comment Count

Brian September 27th, 2021 at 1:57 PM

9/18/2021 – Michigan 20, Rutgers 13 – 4-0, 1-0 Big Ten

Well, at least it took 3.5 games to get back to the same old feeling. The grim one, where you're staring grimly at the grim field where grim things are happening and then Michigan and its steamroller of a run game takes a delay of game penalty instead of attempting a fourth and one. After that there's another penalty before Michigan can finally punt. The color drains out of the world until you forget where you are and momentarily think you're at Eastern's stadium, which is now gray—not just gray, but gray-gray, ultragray—in some sort of marketing stunt turned guerilla art installation.

Grey-Field-at-Rynearson-Stadium

Say what you want about the Eastern Michigan Eagles' proficiency at football, but never slander their perspective on the fatalistic trudge we call life. Football is healthy and good to have influence your thoughts.

At times like these the man with the mustache arrives in my head.

screen-shot-2016-09-05-at-10-31-53-pm

You can find him by googling for "sad Florida State fan," and you will discover that this is now a bustling corner of the image search internet populated by folks in glitter and surrender cobras from sea to shining sea. But mustache man is still first, because he is a perfect distillation of the emptiness of a bad football game where your team gets to do the fun parts three plays, and only three plays, at a time while the opposition dunks on you.

He is also a tribute to the human ability to read nuance into facial expressions. What makes Sad Mustache Man so compelling? He merely stares ahead, stoic. His brow furrows slightly. The way he communicates the existential angst of Ole Miss punching your face in is mysterious. Blindingly clear, and somehow impossible to define. He stares into the middle distance and attempts to keep all his atoms in the same place.

--------------------------------------------

Since Michigan was playing Rutgers, "dunks on you" means "scores ten points in a half and still loses." The feeling is still the same. Michigan's second half didn't lose this game; it felt like it lost future games. At some point down the road when Michigan gets conked everyone watching will think about how the second half of Rutgers foretold this woeful fate.

Which, I guess, fine, okay, yeah. I predicted this team would go 7-5 and so did everyone else. Even after… that, a reversion to that level of pessimism is not reasonable. A reversion to the same old thing—9-3 or thereabouts, losing most of the exciting games, not being particularly competitive against Ohio State—is, and here we're in the same treadmill it seems like we've always been on.

Michigan can exceed expectations this year and still put up something entirely unsatisfying. Too good to fire, not good enough to enjoy. That's not fate, of course: maybe Greg Schiano is pretty good at this and Michigan will receive a wake-up call and actually bomb someone worth bombing on the road. One half doesn't erase the other halves.

But when you keep walking down the same road year after year it's hard to expect that something's different until it actually is. Until then, a steady stare into the middle distance is always a good option. Doesn't usually get you put on TV unless you're a perfect distillation of sadness, and even then there's usually someone just as sad but dressed more outlandishly.

AWARDS

Known Friends and Trusted Agents Of The Week

51521193190_75842bcb79_k

I AM DETECTING AN ILLEGALITY [Barron]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Aidan Hutchinson. Didn't have a massive game statistically but is likely to check in with a monster UFR number. Had a sack, bowled over an OL on the direct snap to Pacheco, probably should have drawn multiple holding flags. Making up for meh performances otherwise.

#2 Nikhai Hill-Green. Shuffled through traffic on the second to last Rutgers drive to stick folks short of the sticks on critical plays. Led team in tackles, a fair few of which were important. Preseason hype seems not crazy.

#3 Brad Robbins. Ok he had a bad one but the one he dropped at the three that took a right turn out of bounds was important, and he limited the dangerous Cruicshank to just one punt return attempt.

Honorable mention: Josh Ross turned in a good performance with one thunderous TFL before leaving; Chris Hinton got off a block on one of the key Hill-Green stuffs to help; Dax Hill was a bit up and down but did stuff some perimeter stuff.

KFaTAotW Standings.

(points: #1: 8, #2: 5, #3: 3, HMs one each. Ties result in somewhat arbitrary assignments.)

16: The OL (#1 Wash, #1 NIU)
14: Aidan Hutchinson (HM WMU, #2 Wash, #1 Rutgers)
11: Blake Corum (#2 WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
8: Ronnie Bell (#1 WMU)
7: Hassan Haskins (HM WMU, T3 Wash, T2 NIU)
6: Nikhai Hill-Green(HM NIU, #2 Rutgers)
5: Dax Hill (#3 WMU, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
4: AJ Henning (HM WMU, #3 NIU),
3: Donovan Edwards(T2 NIU), Josh Ross (HM Wash, HM NIU, HM Rutgers)
1: Andrew Vastardis (HM WMU),Mike Sainristil (HM WMU), Brad Robbins (HM Wash), Jake Moody (HM Wash), Mazi Smith (HM Wash), Gemon Green(HM NIU), Cornelius Johnson(HM NIU), Chris Hinton (HM Rutgers)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Michigan's opening drive is a 17-play marathon featuring two passes, a touchdown, and the absorption of half a quarter.

Honorable mention: Hill-Green gets back to back sticks to functionally end the game; bonafide RPO gets Roman Wilson a chunk on Michigan's second efficient TD drive to start; ditto the Sainristil catch; officials ignore a blatant block in the back on Henning's return.

image​MARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Can I say the entire second half? No? Okay, uh, McNamara missing three straight open receivers on one of the three-and-outs. (Sainristil could have caught the first one, yes; still low.)

Honorable mention: The rest of the second half.

[After THE JUMP: up up up up nope nope nope nope]

OFFENSE

A cliff, visualized. Via Seth:

image (45)

Many people have already noted that the flattening out exactly correlates with McNamara being on the receiving end of a targeting penalty. The big jump at play ~32 is the strike to Sainristil and the ensuing ejection, and after that it was a slow drip of disaster. McNamara went from 8/9 to start to 1/7 to finish. The possibilities there:

  • coincidence,
  • McNamara was hurt and either nobody noticed or he successfully concealed some mild concussion symptoms, or
  • McNamara wasn't hurt but was rattled.

I think coincidence is the most likely, especially because the amount of data we have on him is so limited. But we're again in a spot where we're wondering if this guy is actually the guy and glancing at the five-star freshman. One negative of the monster run game is that Michigan's called fewer passes than anyone outside of service academies, so we have a tiny amount of data.

The coaches have more and their reticence to open things up may be an indicator.

Jeremy Gallon graduated. McNamara's lone incompletion before the cliff was this:

51520264581_e320c41d6b_k

[Barron]

That's a perfect corner route that got broken up by an excellent no-look play from the DB, but also maybe this should be someone other than Sainristil. (I saw some back and forth online about whether Sainristil should have brought this in. My opinion is no, there's really no opportunity to out-beast a guy who punches the ball the instant you touch it.)

A frustrating contrast. Rutgers does not have Michigan's talent level but stuck in this game and significantly outrushed Michigan with a bunch of janky college crap. Swing it to the flat, run the quarterback, run with some WRs, use a lot of misdirection, etc. It felt like Michigan did almost none of that. There was a significant amount of variation in the between-the-tackles ground game, but once Rutgers adjusted and started dispensing a bunch of two-yard runs Michigan did not have a plan B. Nor did they make any attempts to get janky college yards until very late.

WR screens? 0. AJ Henning touches? 0. Perimeter run plays of any description? 1, that coming on a bash play to Corum deep in the fourth quarter. QB runs? 1, which Rutgers predicted and blitzed right into.

It's mystifying. Seems like we have one out of every three games where the Speed In Space has arrived and then it goes back in the bin. Shades of the Army game from a couple years ago.

Reads: scanty. Michigan got a couple of chunks off of RPO action, which are the first of the year IIRC. Otherwise it did not feel like the QB was live in the mesh point until the very end of the game, when Rutgers correctly anticipated Michigan would go to the QB run well and shot a LB directly at McNamara:

You have to wonder how live that read is or if it's just a pull with the expectation that the LB will go after the RB. We've been through this with QB after QB after QB and I have no expectations this will change going forward.

51516787246_e10db49579_k

that guy's never going to catch you [Barron]

Running back détente is always temporary. Seth's likely to have a fair number of negatives from this game for Haskins and Corum; on my rewatch I caught a number of plays where gaps did open up but RBs did not hit them, and I thought Corum in particular had at least a few opportunities for a bounce as Rutgers overplayed the interior.

In one sense this is a testament to Corum's RB instincts. It's unusual for little fast guys to not try to Mike Shaw it a bunch, usually to their detriment. On the other hand, I mean try it a few times? Fast, you are fast.

DEFENSE

51519473867_08590130fa_k

unsettling [Barron]

That was more in line with expectations. This was not a good run game—to say the least—entering the game but Michigan ended up having a lot of problems because the defensive tackles were largely a non-factor. Grinding up the middle with Vedral as Pacheco took linebacker attention outside was effective for Rutgers because Michigan's DLs could not win one on one battles and Hutchinson was being followed around by a posse of dudes*.

I don't think there's much to do about this. At certain spots you are who you are, and Michigan is pretty meh at DT.

*[One notable instance of this was on the last Rutgers drive, where they spent a slot WR to blindside him and knock him down on a pass rush.]

Endurance. Michigan rotated heavily, which on the one hand was somewhat alarming. On the podcast I suggested that if you have eight defensive tackles you don't really have any. On the other hand that did seem to come in handy late when Michigan's defense stiffened—not at all what you would expect when Rutgers is the only team staying on the field. Having eight meh defensive tackles is better than having two, I guess.

Jordan Whittley did not play, which feels like it was a bigger loss than you might expect for a guy who's only going to get a dozen snaps.

51516732896_00a418f4c2_k

this is not going far [Campredon]

WHAT ARE WE DOING? Takes a special kind of baffling thing reoccurring repeatedly for me to start swearing in the stands at this late date, but Michigan's defense accomplished that by repeatedly offering Rutgers a free eight yards on simple hitches on the outside. Completely bizarre. You are playing Noah Vedral!

Rutgers has two long passing plays against FBS opposition this year; they were a TE seam and a five yard hitch. I find it difficult to believe that Vedral hitting a back shoulder throw on the first Rutgers third down threw Michigan's pregame planning into a tizzy. Covering the flats was a problem early against NIU, and then Michigan adjusted. It was baffling, frustrating, and inexplicable that Michigan was handing easy yardage chunks to Rutgers deep into the second half.

Vedral's other attempted shots at the sideline both went OOB. [shakes hands violently]

Slow your roll. Dax Hill had two different clean shots at Vedral on slot blitzes RU did not pick up and whiffed both. This tends to happen when really fast guys come off the corner—I am currently thinking about Brandon Harrison and his remarkable ability to get dodge by quarterbacks—and hopefully he'll be able to gear down a bit and finish those plays.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Got away with one. Entertaining sequence on the AJ Henning punt return where I saw an obvious block in the back, the officials threw a flag, then picked it up, then got to watch the stadium scoreboard demonstrate that the obvious block in the back was very very obvious.  I was shocked when the next play did not have a holding call; one dollar says the extremely weak roughing the passer call a few minutes later was related to picking that flag up.

Orin Incandenza business. This ball done be remote controlled.

Robbins celebrated like he'd birthed the savior of the world and fair enough.

Noped out. Rutgers tried a couple kickoffs to Corum and while he didn't break one he was close enough that Rutgers decided pop-up kicks were the better part of valor. Michael Barrett had a nice catch and return on one of them to get out to the 35.

MISCELLANEOUS

Oh no baby. Greg Schiano's decision to go for it on fourth and ten with 29 seconds left in the half was completely bizarre. The score was 17-3, which means okay yeah scoring at the end of the half would be an important boost. But 1) fourth and ten, 2) you are Rutgers, 3) you're probably giving Michigan another possession.

The ensuing slant was both broken up and short of the sticks, and then Michigan immediately hit a big RPO to get down to the Rutgers 5. Only a post-targeting McNamara miss on to an open Schoonmaker prevented the worst case scenario.

Shortly after. Michigan elected to kick a field goal on third down with five seconds left in the half. This I'm not too ticked off about that because the thing they probably should have done—throw a goal-line fade—is not likely to convert. But it's coming down before five seconds run off the clock.

We are the premiere Crean Documenting Service in the Midwest. Puttin' a lot of weird guys on the sideline:

51516382306_8bdc4bf32e_k

[Barron]

This gives me an excuse to put this here.

Thanks, Tom.

HERE

The State of our Open Threads:

So, how did we feel about as it was happening? I will just say that there were fewer fucks given than I would have actually thought - only 176 of them, to be exact. Still, when you consider that we only generated 18 of them last week, that's 9.8 times the fucks and probably a corresponding overall increase in fan stress. It's charted in comparison to "fire" here:

In the Harbaugh era, and in the Hoke era when this collection effort began, there has always been at least a mild correlation between our use of "fuck" and our wanting of heads, and while four games isn't telling, you can see they do trail each other somewhat. Normally, this relationship will solidify by the time the OSU rolls around. I can only imagine why that is.

Stephen King on the eternalness of Michigan's offense:

What is telling, to me, about these analyses is that if you change some details, they could be written about Saturday's win over Rutgers. This, despite a complete overhaul in the offensive staff in that time. We've seen the OL coach change twice, the OC change once, different attempts at WR coaches, and now a new RB coach as well. The offensive personnel is completely different as well. The only things those offenses have in common with this team is the uniforms and the head coach.

Best and Worst:

And so with every 3-and-out by the offense and every interminable odyssey by the defensive series it felt like the game was not so much slipping away as getting unnecessarily close.  It’s difficult to describe and probably comes across as homer-ish, but this game never felt quite like last year’s contest in NJ, where Rutgers raced out to a big lead behind superior play.  I’m not saying you should but if you so inclined, go back and re-watch even just the highlights of that game.  Rutgers put up nearly 6 ypp in that game and had 486 yards of total offense while also committing 12 (!) penalties on offense for 99 (!!) yards.  Their defense struggled in the second half but they were consistently getting pressure early on and Michigan barely had 100 yards of total offense before McNamara came in.  Rutgers looked like the better team in that game and Michigan was lucky they were able to stay close enough.  Those were two equal-ish teams in terms of talent and execution playing a defensively-challenged game of chicken, with Rutgers finally blinking in overtime.  It felt not unlike a lot of Big 12 games in that respect.

Comments

unWavering

September 27th, 2021 at 3:34 PM ^

Yeah he even mentions how Michigan is on track to exceed expectations this year. And yet, nothing but negativity about the program.

Most advanced stats have Michigan in the top 5, ffs. No, I don't think they are "real" yet but I do think they are closer to that than all of this feelingsball bullcrap around here. So we had a bad half and won. Happens to good teams all the time. Let's see if it's a blip or a trend.

Reader71

September 27th, 2021 at 3:53 PM ^

Yeah but if it’s a blip, you can feel good at the end of the season and poke fun at yourself for being such a downer, man.

If it’s a trend, you’ll feel bad at the end of the season, but just a little bit better because they couldn’t fool you, man.

I actually like that about Brian. It’s pathetic in the original sense of arousing pity, and it makes for powerful writing. But from the average fan it strikes me as the other kind of pathetic because there is no useful output.

MichAtl85

September 27th, 2021 at 4:31 PM ^

The team could exceed many peoples preseason expectations by going 8-4 but those expectations were brought about after 2020’s 2-4. Would anybody feel good if they dropped games to Wisconsin, PSU, MSU and OSU?

If Harbaugh can go into Madison and win that’s going to be an improvement. Wisconsin is flawed this year but their run defense is impressive. Will you run into a stacked box the entire game or do you show improvement with the gameplan and passing game? I think if you could pull out 2 out of 4 of Wisconsin, PSU, MSU, OSU it’s a really good season. ESP after last year. 
 

 

MgerBlerg

September 27th, 2021 at 5:45 PM ^

It's all about frame of reference right?  I see it the same as Brian (I think... don't want to put words in his mouth), which is Michigan should be competing for a championship every year or at least doing its best to make progress toward that goal.  Anything short of that is disappointing.  Things that fall into that category - chronic issues resurfacing like non-sensical playcalling and inability to adjust.  Sure if you're coming at it relative to expectations, it's a thumbs up so far, and I can see how fans on the other side who talk more about the negatives would be annoying.

And as for Brian's BPONE... give the man a break.  Most fans have been frustrated with the results for however many years, and we mostly just watch the games.  I can't even imagine having to chart every play and write daily content when our hopes get crushed so often.

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 27th, 2021 at 7:28 PM ^

It's not the score. It's the way we're playing. It's inexplicable. We're not playing modern football, and nobody knows why. Harbaugh/Gattis are literally putting handcuffs on our offense and then somehow taking credit for "gritty" wins. 

And as for our "negativity," bull-shit. People were delighted after the NIU game. But this is the forum for people who try to enjoy the game on a level beyond "yay we won, where's the beer," and acting all superior because you don't share our anxiety is weird. 

Fine. You're delighted with the results of the Rutgers game. I'm happy for you -- really. But this is damned frustrating for some of us, and we're venting. 

unWavering

September 27th, 2021 at 7:43 PM ^

It's the way we're playing. It's inexplicable. We're not playing modern football, and nobody knows why

Holy fuck are you even listening to yourself?  We are ranked 6th in offensive FEI.  6th!!!  You know why we aren't passing the ball all that much?  THAT'S WHY.  Not playing modern football?  Idk, depends on if you think passing 60% of the time is what constitutes modern football.  We are running the ball a lot BECAUSE IT WORKS.  We had a bad half.  I guess it's time to blow up the offense.

And yeah, I think there's a large gap between blowing sunshine up people's asses and BPONE.  There's a lot of room to be in the middle, but many of you just like to be miserable. 

Fine. You're delighted with the results of the Rutgers game.

Nope, but I am delighted at 4-0, and the way the team has played for 3.5 games of that so far.  And I'm hopeful that they'll continue playing well most of the time, which should be good enough for 9-10 wins if it happens.  Sorry you're frustrated that we aren't running an air raid offense I guess. 

DennisFranklinDaMan

September 27th, 2021 at 9:41 PM ^

Yeah, we're throwing less than any other non-service academy, and because I get frustrated at gaining -- sorry, I can't remember, exactly -- fifty yards against Rutgers, I'm now calling for an air raid offense.

I'm not worried at all about how the "team plays." I think the kids are busting their asses. I just want coaches who know how to coach. You seem confident they do. I don't share that confidence.

ahw1982

September 27th, 2021 at 6:10 PM ^

Didn't have NC aspirations, but watching the second half offense game plan was like watching one of those videos where a dumb dog is trying its hardest to run through a gate to get to the other side, trying to squeeze through a hole that's not big enough, trying to jump over the gate, trying to push against the gate with all its might. 

Then the camera pans back a bit and you see the gate isn't connected to anything, the dog could've run around the gate to get the other side.

TrueBlue2003

September 27th, 2021 at 3:31 PM ^

Yeah, Dax seems very far behind in some basic fundamentals that are a bit alarming for a third year guy.  In addition to the sack misses, he also took a terrible angle on an outside run in which he kind of tried to take a direct route by splitting blockers instead of coming more parallel to the line of scrimmage to meet Pacheco where he inevitably had to go.

Up and down was certainly how his game went.  Hopefully, the lack of safety coach last year is the reason for the mental mistakes and that it gets cleaned up.

joeismyname

September 27th, 2021 at 8:43 PM ^

This….I’ve got a lot of faith in Clinkscale. Being in Lexington, I was amazed at how many good DB’s they seemed to have for several years and wondered who was coaching them up (although didn’t care enough about UK football to actually look up the coach). Glad we got him and the rest of the staff we have.

Cam

September 27th, 2021 at 2:19 PM ^

"never slander their perspective on the fatalistic trudge we call life"

Man I love Brian's writing. With respect to our other excellent contributors, nobody does it like him.

Carpetbagger

September 28th, 2021 at 9:50 AM ^

I don't know who Cormac McCarthy is, but if he's one of those authors who is so morose and negative you want to kill yourself after reading their stuff, that'd be why I don't know who he is.

I think Brian is a great writer. But this article is why sometimes I don't bother reading his posts. Yes, the second half stunk. But you would think the football team just got beat by App St by 40 from the tone of his post.

If we lose to Wisconsin I know I won't bother reading anything from Brian, that's for sure.

matty blue

September 27th, 2021 at 2:20 PM ^

i've seen the "henning never touched the ball on offense" thing a couple of times.

while i'm in full agreement with the gist (that gist being something to the effect of "for the love of all that his holy, can we PLEASE get a.j. the ball?") i do think he was targeted by mcnamara at least once (the completely valid non-interference call), and possibly twice.  am i misremembering that?

Sambojangles

September 27th, 2021 at 2:45 PM ^

I think the most inaccurate of McNamara's second half incompletions was an out to Henning. On the board there was some debate as to the quality of his route on that play, it seemed to me and others that he rounded it off and drifted further down field than McNamara expected which is maybe why the throw was short. Even if that's the case, they're not using Henning correctly. If he can't run decent routes, he should continue being the end around and screen pass receiver to utilize his speed in space talents. He got none of those type of touches on Saturday. 

bronxblue

September 27th, 2021 at 3:08 PM ^

I agree that Henning needed to touch the ball but it is an indictment of a receiver that the two times they threw the ball to him he seemingly ran the wrong route.  He has to be a real receiving threat for those end-arounds and screens to work; otherwise defenses will just Calvin Bell him and he'll be toast.

bronxblue

September 27th, 2021 at 9:18 PM ^

It's also up to the playmakers to make plays beyond a single use case if they want to be featured in games.  Henning's end-arounds work because he's perceived as a credible WR.  If he just becomes a trick play it'll stop working.  Gattis has given him the ball quite a bit this year in ways that maximize his abilities, but him failing to run routes, block, or catch a ball aren't on the OC.

andrewgr

September 27th, 2021 at 3:18 PM ^

Brian's writing is the entire reason I'm here.  Around eight years ago, I did some sort of web search for "David Foster Wallace", and one of the links was to an article written by Brian on this site.  I enjoyed the hell out of it, and started reading through his past articles.  I decided he was in my top 5 list of people I'd like to have a beer with.

I think his writing was more fun then, because he was more optimistic and less jaded; but it's still very, very good.  I sometimes wonder if he'd be happier making a living writing about something else, and following Michigan sports as a fan; but obviously I am in no position to say one way or the other-- it's just an idle thought.