He did answer me. But he didn't answer what I asked. He talked about music on the sidelines near the end of the Penn St game. He was talking about what the team was doing near the end of the game. I replied, asking him if he was Adam Biggers. He then replied what they songs wer eon the sidelines.
I asked him directly if he is Adam Biggers, and instead of answering, he went on about some music on the sidelines after the Penn St game. Odd that he did that. Made me thinks he's Adam Biggers, avoiding to answer.
Honestly, I don't know how, and why, you have stayed so long at this blog. You are so very much unlike most commenters here. How have you been able to navigate through all the negativity for so long?
And to answer your question: if it was confirmed by him that he is Adam Biggers it would explain why his "insider" information is wrong so much, as Adam Biggers is only a reporter, and not an insider. I know he tries to give the impression he is an insider. But he is not. How many times has he said, "Let's wait and see"? Or, "There's information coming out soon about this or that"? While never saying what it is. He reads stuff from other guys, and repeats it here, without the full knowledge of those he reads or talk to, know. He even copies and pastes things of other people.
Recent Comments
If I'm wrong, I do apologize.
If I'm wrong. I apologize.
He did answer me. But he didn't answer what I asked. He talked about music on the sidelines near the end of the Penn St game. He was talking about what the team was doing near the end of the game. I replied, asking him if he was Adam Biggers. He then replied what they songs wer eon the sidelines.
That's all. It was an odd answer.
If he is not Adam Biggers, I do apologize.
How many accounts do you have?
I asked him directly if he is Adam Biggers, and instead of answering, he went on about some music on the sidelines after the Penn St game. Odd that he did that. Made me thinks he's Adam Biggers, avoiding to answer.
It's ok. Relax. I self reported me to the moderator Sticky. They'll block me, and you'll be safe again.
Hey, there's a guy talking about Adam Biggers again.
https://mgoblog.com/comment/243166682#comment-243166682
https://mgoblog.com/users/napkin-flavoring
Honestly…
lol, that's funny.
Honestly, I don't know how, and why, you have stayed so long at this blog. You are so very much unlike most commenters here. How have you been able to navigate through all the negativity for so long?
Tell me you don't want to know who umbig11 is.
And to answer your question: if it was confirmed by him that he is Adam Biggers it would explain why his "insider" information is wrong so much, as Adam Biggers is only a reporter, and not an insider. I know he tries to give the impression he is an insider. But he is not. How many times has he said, "Let's wait and see"? Or, "There's information coming out soon about this or that"? While never saying what it is. He reads stuff from other guys, and repeats it here, without the full knowledge of those he reads or talk to, know. He even copies and pastes things of other people.
It must matter, since he has been asked if he is Adam Biggers, and won't answer. That's pretty much a give away he is.
If he was not Adam Biggers he would immediately say so.
And don't lots of people on here want to know who umbig11 is? I'm sure many, if not all, want to know.
Don't you?
Ask him…
I don't think so.
Ask him if he is Adam Biggers.
umbigg11 has the same level of sports knowledge as Adam Biggers. Both wrong just as much as the other.
He is Adam Biggers
umbiggers11
He started writing on the blog at the same time as Adam Biggers started covering Michigan football.
What does Adam Biggers, aka, umbig11, have to say about this?
umbig11
What does insider umbig11/Adam Biggers have to say about this?
inh
who umbig11 is.
h'g
everyone.