As you can guess from my points, I don't post much. I clicked on this just to thank you for excluding an "s" from the end of Lego. But now that I see your work, I would be remiss not to comment on it. Very impressive!!
My wife broke her ankle last year. The stadium did a great job of accommodating her, her wheelchair and me. I stopped by the ticket office a few days beforehand and swapped out my regular pair of tickets for a “wheelchair plus companion” pair. They even asked us which section we’d like – and we upgraded from sec. 16 to sec. 24! That was the icing on the cake as it allowed us to sit a few rows above several friends of mine who were in town for the game. We had a steady stream of “guests” stop by to see the concourse level.
I’d be surprised if you don’t get similar treatment, including trading in your crutches for a wheelchair. But definitely call the ticket office ASAP. The game in question last year was Bowling Green. If you are going to the Ohio game, availability may be a totally different matter.
I've read comments in this and other posts that vacated wins for tsio don't equate to added wins for their opponents. And as jmblue points out above, simply pretending like the game didn't happen penalizes the players on tsio's opponents by removing their participation and stats. So the argument is made that opponents' losses will stay on the books.
But if this is the case, it means that our all-time record against tsio will be different than their record against us (or more accurately, than the reverse of their record).
Doesn't it make more sense to vacate tsio's wins, vacate their opponents' losses, but still keep players' stats on the books?
And of course, regardless of what makes sense, does anyone know what the actual rule is?
Recent Comments
How was Witty still eligible in 2014? He went to Deerfield with a somewhat more prominent player and they both enrolled at Michigan in 2009.
Anyway... if all of Rich Rod's defensive recruits had come with a Denard Robinson, things would have worked out much better.
As you can guess from my points, I don't post much. I clicked on this just to thank you for excluding an "s" from the end of Lego. But now that I see your work, I would be remiss not to comment on it. Very impressive!!
In the entire 2nd half, Florida ran two plays which started in Michigan territory. The results? Two sacks.
24-20
My wife broke her ankle last year. The stadium did a great job of accommodating her, her wheelchair and me. I stopped by the ticket office a few days beforehand and swapped out my regular pair of tickets for a “wheelchair plus companion” pair. They even asked us which section we’d like – and we upgraded from sec. 16 to sec. 24! That was the icing on the cake as it allowed us to sit a few rows above several friends of mine who were in town for the game. We had a steady stream of “guests” stop by to see the concourse level.
I’d be surprised if you don’t get similar treatment, including trading in your crutches for a wheelchair. But definitely call the ticket office ASAP. The game in question last year was Bowling Green. If you are going to the Ohio game, availability may be a totally different matter.
Here’s a link to the MGoBlue page with more info:
http://www.mgoblue.com/genrel/060509aaa.html
Good luck. Go Blue! And Beat Ohio!
I've read comments in this and other posts that vacated wins for tsio don't equate to added wins for their opponents. And as jmblue points out above, simply pretending like the game didn't happen penalizes the players on tsio's opponents by removing their participation and stats. So the argument is made that opponents' losses will stay on the books.
But if this is the case, it means that our all-time record against tsio will be different than their record against us (or more accurately, than the reverse of their record).
Doesn't it make more sense to vacate tsio's wins, vacate their opponents' losses, but still keep players' stats on the books?
And of course, regardless of what makes sense, does anyone know what the actual rule is?