What happened in 1997?

Submitted by LLG on October 17th, 2022 at 8:09 PM

Serious question:  What happened in 1997 that allowed us to win the national championship?  To be clear, I'm not asking something as simple as we had a dominating defense and we won every game.  

Rather, I am more focused on the fact that the undefeated season just seemed to come out of nowhere.

Here is what I remember going into the season:  We we coming off four seasons with 4 losses ever season.  Even 1992 was so weird with 3 ties.  Lloyd Carr was in his third season (which meant he had records of 8-4 & 8-4). What made those last two years good was beating Ohio State. 

I remember that Michigan was pretty low in rankings.  I looked it up and we were ranked #14.  https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/years/1997-polls.html

The main two things that I think happened were (1) Charles Woodson fulfilled all of his potential, and (2) Brian Griese became a NFL (draft worthy) quarterback.  Both of these were a bit unexpected, although to be fair there had been rumblings about Woodson when he was a freshman and Griese is the son of a Hall of Fame quarterback (which I think gives some advantages).  

But what else was it that people didn't predict about Michigan in 1997 when they ranked us #14?  

P.S. What I did not remember was that Penn State was ranked first in the pre-season.  Penn State finished #16 that year (after losing to Michigan State (14-49) in the last game and then Florida in the bowl game), which still makes me happy.  

For some reason, I've always had a distaste for them because after they joined the Big Ten, someone kept putting up "Penn State is coming" stickers all over Ann Arbor and then they made a huge deal of how their 1,000th football game would be a first-ever matchup with Michigan (link).  Even Keith Jackson was saying stuff like ""Penn State represents what I like to call the fabric of collegiate football."

Michigan won 21-13 (link).

Chalky White

October 17th, 2022 at 11:51 PM ^

Michigan always had top talent back then. It was strange back then if they took the equivalent of a 3*. Back then the fans expected to win all of the games. They were already beating OSU. There was really no excuse for it. My theory was after the first loss, it was always such a shock that resulted in more losses because one loss back then was a death sentence to a Big Ten school. 

Vote_Crisler_1937

October 17th, 2022 at 9:31 PM ^

This is a big part of it. M had young talent in an era when younger players probably didn’t play as much. On the O line two RS freshman. On the defense, Dhani Jones and Ian Gold were sophomores. 
 

Chris Howard talks about how divided the locker room was in 95 and 96 and that the players worked amongst themselves to fix that. Lloyd also introduced the mountain climber guy to bring a new level of motivation. 
 

I remember reading in the newspaper, “The Wolverine” that Ben Mast was an injured lineman who worked out extremely hard trying to come back and the team really rallied around his dedication to the weight room and athletic training. 

Frank Chuck

October 17th, 2022 at 8:39 PM ^

"there were no dynasties back then"

This is false.

- Nebraska won 3 times (94, 95, 97) in 4 years and played for another (in 1993) but lost to FSU in the 1994 Orange Bowl. That said, 1994 12-0 PSU not getting a share of the national championship is a legitimate gripe for Paterno/PSU. And 1997 should've never happened because of the Flea Kicker at Mizzou.

- FSU was absolutely a dynasty. The problem was that back then 1 regular season loss (especially late in the season) could doom a national contender. There was no playoff. Think of how many mulligans Saban has gotten despite not winning his own division (SEC West) much less the conference (SEC Championship); I can think of 2011 Bama and 2017 Bama. Meanwhile, Bobby Bowden's FSU didn't get that benefit of the doubt until 2000 (when FSU got picked over Miami).

FSU played for a NC in 1993, 96, 98, 99, and 2000 but won "only" 2 (1993, 1999).

Many fans don't remember that Steve Spurrier did us (and Nebraska) a solid favor by beating 10-0 1997 FSU in the Swamp.

 

Buy Bushwood

October 18th, 2022 at 8:48 AM ^

Isn't that what "dynasties" is referring to, National Championships?  Sure, if "dynasties" meant 11-1 seasons with a loss to your biggest rival, then FSU had a dynasty.  By championships, they did not.  Neither did Nebraska.  NU won two in a row, with a very good team, and a great team.  Their 97 share was a fluke and a pity party for their retiring coach in the Coach's Poll.  I wouldn't clock that as a dynasty.  In the 90's, Colorado, Nebraska, Georgia Tech, Miami, Washington, Michigan, Florida State, Alabama, Florida, all won or shared titles- 10 teams in 10 years.  Nebraska, with their uncalled, cheating fluke, won 2.5, and with FSU are the only team to win more than one.  So, I believe the OP is correct about lack of dynasties when comparing to the landscape of college football lately.  If you consider other teams that were in the hunt for titles in the 90's, ND, OSU, ASU, PSU, the list gets even longer.  Presently, there are hardly any teams who realistically had a shot at the title in the last decade and didn't win one.  Oregon once, and maybe Oklahoma (though hopefully no one took them seriously)

UMfan21

October 17th, 2022 at 9:55 PM ^

This is the answer.  He shut down half the field on defense, wreacked havoc on offense, and was a pretty good special teams player too.  Been awhile since I watched games from that season, but I bet he single handedly won us @Iowa and vs OSU and probably at least 1 other game.

barebain

October 17th, 2022 at 10:25 PM ^

All true... Towards the end of that season, you just knew the guy would make a huge play at the exact right moment to flip the script in the game.  In the OSU game he made two. (INT in the endzone and punt return)

In the Rose Bowl, things did not feel so good for a minute.  I recall being there and thinking, "time for Woodson to make a play," and he DID!  INT in the endzone right in front of the student section. 

All this in addition to the regular amazing stuff he did throughout the season, despite the fact that opposing teams avoided him at all costs on defense and knew he would touch the ball when in on offense.  He was the kind of player who could elevate a pretty good team to a great team, and that's what he did in 1997. (at least in my opinion)

RobM_24

October 18th, 2022 at 2:21 AM ^

Also, the change to running QBs who could throw hadn't taken off fully yet (Nebraska had the running QB part down, but not the passing) -- as well as the spread offense. It was a pretty quick transition after 1997 to get to getting baffled by guys like McNabb and Dennis Dixon. Then eventually Troy Smith and the Ohio State evolution that we couldn't keep up with. But in 1997, we had a modern team. Pro style offense with a run game and good play action. Beefy linebackers with huge pads. And most importantly, and dominating line on both sides. 

Rhino77

October 17th, 2022 at 8:18 PM ^

They had a ton of NFL guys on both sides of the ball. The mid 90’a recruiting classes payed off. #2 was the best player in the country. The stars aligned for sure. 

jmblue

October 17th, 2022 at 9:28 PM ^

Nine starters.  We lost Woodson and Glen Steele - our two All-Americans in '97.    

We weren't able to replace them.  Steele and James Hall had been a fantastic pass rushing duo, but then in '98, Hall had to face double-teams all year, as a second stud pass rusher didn't emerge.

Similarly, while Andre Weathers was a really good #2 corner opposite Woodson, he wasn't nearly as dominant when he had to cover the opponent's top WR - and the spot opposite him was a weak link.

willirwin1778

October 17th, 2022 at 9:13 PM ^

Here you go.  Roster says it all.  These 1997 players were either All Big Ten, All American and/or NFL.  Two players went to Canton too.  I probably missed a few, my apologies.  31 total NFL players.  Very hard schedule.  Nobody could score on them, only one opponent put up over 16 points.  Offense was good.  Coaches used Woodson very well as a two way player.   

Glen Steele

Sam Sword

Andre Weathers

Rob Renes

Marcus Ray

Jerame Tuman

Jon Jansen 

Zach Adami

Chris Howard

Jeff Backus

Steve Hutchinson

Tai Streets

James Hall

Dhani Jones

Brian Griese

Charles Woodson

Magnum P.I.

October 17th, 2022 at 8:22 PM ^

Woodson was obviously a generational talent, but the bigger difference that year is that we (a) won all the games we were supposed to win and (b) won the coinflip games, too. Michigan during that era was expected to win or, at least, be neck-in-neck in every game we played. We were never really underdogs then. Everything just fell our way in '97. Shame it didn't happen more than once. 

barebain

October 17th, 2022 at 10:35 PM ^

Team was down big at halftime after Iowa scored on some UM errors and fluky stuff, leaving the field with shoulders down.  UM crowd rose up loud (I'll never forget it...) when they returned from the tunnel in the second half, almost willing them back into the game, which they did.  Defense was utterly dominant despite the final score, and the offense perked up in the second half. It was the turning point in the season when it all suddenly seemed plausible.  A total team win.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

October 17th, 2022 at 8:26 PM ^

Well, you can't take the dominant defense out of the equation.  Not everyone on the defense was a rock star but there was real talent everywhere from back to front and you couldn't scheme around any particular player.

True for the offense too with three future NFLers on the line and plenty of depth all around.

Also important: health.  The only serious injury that year was Daydrion Taylor.  Good player and gave the team solid depth, but not a starter.  Other than that the team stayed healthy and played most of the season as the same unit that started it.

Also figure that that kind of thing was just more likely to happen back than than it would now.  Recruiting was so different and the hype machine was mostly not spun up yet, so recruiting wasn't a pastime all its own.  Meaning that teams were a little more dependent on the talent in their region and talent didn't cluster as much.

1WhoStayed

October 17th, 2022 at 8:30 PM ^

You’re forgetting another key injury. Captain Mayes!

How about this gem from Wiki:

The offensive line was further weakened when left tackle, Jeff Backus, suffered a ruptured appendix. In spring practice, offensive line coach Terry Malone made a plea for help during a staff meeting, searching for talent to fill in on the line.[16] To fill the holes on the offensive line, two defensive linemen, Steve Hutchinson and Chris Ziemann were moved to the offensive line.

Steve Hutchinson went on to be an NFL HOF player!

Victor70

October 17th, 2022 at 8:34 PM ^

I think it was all about Brady Hoke getting the most out of the defensive line.  That in turn, helped the O line able to find opponents easy after practicing against the best.