The Snowflake Thread: Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

This will be the snowflake thread for your collective thoughts on the offense and the offensive playcalling. 

Beans

November 16th, 2013 at 7:36 PM ^

I missed a few parts of the game. Can someone explain why the box score says Terry Richardson was 3/3 passing for -28 yards. I can't make sense of it.

Bocheezu

November 17th, 2013 at 10:23 AM ^

if you look at the play-by-play in OT, after the Butt TD, it says U-M still had the ball for 2 plays even though Northwestern had the ball there. All those plays were added up as negative offense even though it was the defense on the field Terry Richardson is #13 -- #13 for Northwestern is their QB, Trevor Simian Josh Furman is #14 -- #14 for Northwestern is their WR, Christian Jones De'Veon Smith is #32 -- #32 for Northwestern is the RB, Mike Trumpy So the two plays where it's Terry RIcharson passing for -21 should be Simian passing for 21; one pass to Jones for 14 and one to Trumpy for 7. http://espn.go.com/ncf/playbyplay?gameId=333200077&period=5

LSAClassOf2000

November 16th, 2013 at 7:37 PM ^

There's some good and not quite so good in here:

 
 
MICH
1st Downs 26
3rd down efficiency
11.11%
4th down efficiency
50.00%
Total Yards 337
Passing 200
Comp-Att
27-46
Yards per pass
4.30
Rushing 137
Rushing Attempts
45
Yards per rush
3.00
Yards Per Play 3.70

So, the passing numbers on a yards per completion and yards per attempt basis are 7.41 yards and 4.35 yards respectively. Shorter than Devin's normal numbers, but it worked. 

3.70 yards per play is skewed a little perhaps because of overtimes, but it is a better performance than lately.

JayMo4

November 16th, 2013 at 7:44 PM ^

These stats look decent only in relation to the past couple weeks.  45 rush attempts to get to 137 is not good.  4.3 yards per pass is not good.  11.11% on third down is not even close to good.  Nothing about this was good except converting a couple OT possessions into TDs against an exhausted, injury-riddled defense.

 

Our defense was good tonight, and it's nice to get any kind of win after the last couple outings.  But anyone that wants to turn this game into even the most modest defense of Borges is trying way too hard.

WolverineFanatic6

November 16th, 2013 at 7:42 PM ^

I've already resigned to the fact that Borges will never be let go and we will continue our consistent pain.

MGoBlue24

November 16th, 2013 at 7:48 PM ^

warts and all. We're just armchair critics; they have to play the game. I imagine it's a lot more fun riding back to Ann Arbor after any win than a loss. Go Blue!

BlueinLansing

November 16th, 2013 at 7:49 PM ^

was a great and terrible offensive coordinator all in one game, sometimes in one series.  It maddening watching these formations and play calls.  I have no god damn idea what this man is thinking 90% of the time.

Jhow

November 16th, 2013 at 7:55 PM ^

We may have seen the last of him in the Michigan backfield. Let's not forget all the great runs he's had in his career. Hopefully he sees a few snaps on senior day. He deserves it.

On the flipside, Green and Smith looked great. Looking forward to watching that tandem.

swalburn

November 16th, 2013 at 7:55 PM ^

I thought the offense was pretty terrible.  I thought Borges called a better game but it was still awful.  The fourth down call was terrible and he always seems to play action on obvious pass downs.  It makes no sense to me and never works.  That being said, Gardner played his heart out but he has regressed as a QB. It is as if he is broken now.  He doesn't look anything like the kid who beat Notre Dame.  He has tunnel vision and happy feet.  I have no idea what the fix is for the offense but it seems like the ND game was a lifetime ago.  It was nice to win though.

missoulawolverine

November 16th, 2013 at 7:58 PM ^

I think he said screw it and dug into the play book..option? And other plays? Will it sink in or what..more plays..i know our plays in and out and packages and i even blog while watching..devin will feel better and so will some confidence again for everyone...hell we won..!!!stop bitching for another straight week jesus..onwords to iowa...and fux ohio!!!go blue..we lost three games..there done..if we cant enjoy a win then wtf..

Bigku22

November 16th, 2013 at 8:02 PM ^

- the rollouts on 4th and short were a disgrace, they worked 6 weeks ago when Devin wasn't beat to hell, they had no shot today - play action on 2nd and 3rd and long makes me want to blow my brains out - Gardner is not accurate throwing on the run, which makes rolling the pocket futile. - is a fade to Funchess in the play book??? - Our line cannot hold up in 7 step drops and deep route pass pro, the offense needs to be predicated on quick passing with occasional fades and draws to keep the D honest, I think we're still way to have I-form and under center. - I'll give credit where credit is due...the option call on the game winning TD was genius, NW never saw it coming.

SituationSoap

November 17th, 2013 at 1:30 AM ^

They didn't, which is shocking, because Michigan only has one audible out of that formation (Ace 2TE Pistol), which is the speed option to the field side. I saw the audible as it was happening, saw Gardner step back into the Pistol and told everyone I was with "This is a speed option right" and well, you know the rest. 

 

Literally knowing exactly what play the offense is going to run before they run it is...not great.

UMfan21

November 16th, 2013 at 8:08 PM ^

Hats off to Gardner who has been a warrior.  Yes, he makes mistakes, but he has also carried this team at times.  He is beat to hell, and yet he came up huge when it counted.

Offensive playcalling was "meh".  Looked like Borges was finally calling some of the things we've wanted, and it must have been difficult with that weather.  Still, many calls were baffling and that play action with 3rd and goal at the ten still boggles my mind. 

Green and Smith looked much better at RB and I hope the OL can gel around that a bit.

Still disappointing that we don't see more Funch and Chesson.

mschol17

November 16th, 2013 at 8:20 PM ^

Offense would have looked a lot better if Gardner hadn't flat out missed several 15-20 yard passes up the seam.  Gallon dropped the one in OT, but there were at least 4 others that Devin missed.

SDCran

November 16th, 2013 at 8:24 PM ^

do know the weather was miserable today, right? Taking too much from today either way is a bad idea. The whole first half the plays were there and execution was terrible. Weather? Hard to say.

I thought Borges was pretty good in the play calling. Not close to perfect, but good. But I still won't take too much away from today other than very happy that we won!!!

Uper73

November 16th, 2013 at 8:25 PM ^

Green and Smith showed beast potential today. I was impressed. Thought Smith looked like the A train on a play or two. Green showed a glimpse of his potential. Also noticed Hayes out there quite a bit, must have the best hands of all the backs. Agree with previous posts that blocking still has to improve but you had to be impressed with burst and power of Green and Smith.

Hotroute06

November 16th, 2013 at 9:02 PM ^

i see people supporting Gardner and i sit here wondering if we watched the same game.  Gardner has been terrible all season with exception to what he did against that amazing Indiana defense.  This game was terrible,  Ive really lost a lot of trust in Hoke.  We got lucky as hell.  We were practicly giving NW the game and we still squeaked by.  Gardner is a good kid but im sorry hes a terrible quarterback.  Anyone who cant see that doesnt know much about football in my opinion.  " If he only had proper coaching bla bla bla "  .  Its not about coaching anymore,  the kid makes terrible in game decisions.