Shuster Tweet: TRO issued after midnight would get us through OSU game.

Submitted by Maizinator on November 10th, 2023 at 9:14 PM
https://twitter.com/DavidShuster/status/1723160581501259971?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1723160581501259971%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=

 

M Ascending

November 10th, 2023 at 9:43 PM ^

Judge Connors will do the right thing.  I have been before him dozens of times and my confidence level is high. Even if he bends over backwards to not appear to be a homer, Michigan's case is so strong as to breach of contract and lack of due process that I can't see him denying the TRO.

bronxblue

November 10th, 2023 at 9:22 PM ^

He'd look no more biased than a conference that claimed it was punishing Michigan, not Jim Harbaugh, by only suspending Jim Harbaugh for games after making a big show about how they cared deeply about player safety and the huge advantage this sign stealing gained by Michigan despite the fact Stalions hasn't been on the staff going on 3 weeks now.

If the TRO request is anything like the letter UM sent the conference a couple days ago this is a super easy decision by the judge.

Njia

November 10th, 2023 at 9:24 PM ^

Not out of line, and not beyond the realm of possibility, but very unlikely. Even if Judge Connors believed that his TRO would get appealed immediately and/or the B1G would seek relief in, for example, the Eastern District of MI (i.e. Federal Court), it would not occur until after tomorrow's game. The legal motions and filings, hearings, etc., alone, would require several days to complete. 

YakAttack

November 10th, 2023 at 9:38 PM ^

My entire legal basis is from a WCC class I took. Criminal Evidence and Procedure. Taught by the ~reputible J. Cedric Simpson, Judge in 14A.

Our final grade was on a mock trial, held in his actual court room. I single handedly won my case, after which he told me that my side rarely wins. Then we smoked cigarettes right outside his chambers.

EDIT: I won by calling a Consumers Report article hearsay, as it was the basis of the defensive argument that the vehicle caused the death, not the driver.