Selection Sunday update on seeding/potential playing locations

Submitted by Mr. Elbel on

My apologies for the block of text. I won't be able to edit this post today but feel it's needed ahead of the fireworks tonight. Mods, if you want to throw some paragraphs into this thing for the sake of people's eyes, that'd be helpful...

Michigan is currently the 3rd 3 seed on bracketmatrix, but still have some outside chances of moving up. Our chances of getting a 2 seed come down to both Tennessee and Cincinnati losing today and falling behind us. Based on where they are now (UC 3rd 2 seed, UT 1st 3 seed), unless they both lose badly I don't know that it's possible. The 2 seed locations are Charlotte, Nashville, Pittsburgh and Detroit. Charlotte and Nashville will be swallowed up by Duke/UNC or if UNC gets a 1 seed then either Xavier or Kansas would get Nashville. That leaves Detroit and Pittsburgh, but to get Detroit we'd need to jump not only UC and UT, but MSU and Purdue as well. I doubt we make that sort of jump if we haven't already, but hopping MSU is possible if the committee does the right thing (lol).

If we get to a 2 seed, it's behind Purdue as the 4th 2 seed with us playing in Pittsburgh. Much more likely is staying where we are, but possibly jumping UT, maybe UC (I think this is possible with WSU losing yesterday, making a loss today much worse), or possibly MSU. 3 seed locations are Nashville, Wichita, and two Dallas slots. As the current 3rd 3 seed behind MSU and UT we're in one of those Dallas slots, which is the furthest location we could be in outside of dropping to a 4 seed (all 4 seed locations are out west). If we can pass UT, that gets us to Wichita at least. Nashville is hundreds of miles closer though.

To get there we'd need to either jump both UC and UT with MSU getting a 2 seed, or jump one of the teams playing today along with MSU. Nashville is also in the south regiom, which would include Virginia as the 1 and possibly Cincinnati as the 2 if they win and stay put. I'd prefer that to playing in Wichita, which right now would have Nova as 1 and Duke/UNC as 2. The team that could help even more would be Arizona.

The matrix hasn't updated since their win last night, so they could conceivably hop us, though they have a long way to go from the 4th 4 seed. Them jumping up could be to our benefit as they are closest to Dallas. So for rooting interests today, root for UT and UC to lose badly and the committee to put MSU below us, or if not AZ above us. Of course, I think our boys can beat anyone anywhere if they continue to play like they have been. The location will definitely matter though to us fans who want to see the first couple rounds.

Go Blue!

 

MOD EDIT - I am guessing at breaks here. Not sure what the OP intended for breaks. - LSA

Mike Damone

March 11th, 2018 at 10:35 AM ^

must heavily weigh record and/or no bad losses.  That is MSU's only real argument - 4 losses all year, all to Top 20 teams, and 3 to Top 10 Teams.

But man - I am with Matte.  We beat them twice by double digits, and did not have a home game to do it.  Sparty's BIG schedule was pathetic - no Michigan, Purdue, Nebraska or Penn State road games.  Their own tough BIG road game - Ohio State, where they were blown out.  In their BIG games v mediocre opponents, they had MANY close calls, and did not look dominant at any time over the past 15 games or so.

If the Selection Committee has been watching any real basketball - we are CLEARLY better than Sparty right now.

J.

March 11th, 2018 at 1:31 PM ^

KenPom uses opponent-adjusted efficiency margins.  Wins and losses literally don't matter.  With the exception of the Michigan games, MSU has been much better against their opponents than the average team.  That's fine -- it doesn't make Michigan's accomplishments any less valid.

I really wish people would stop obsessing over MSU's seed.  This isn't RCMB.  Michigan doesn't need validation from MSU.

Mgoscottie

March 11th, 2018 at 11:04 AM ^

they have much better losses than us.  For example we lost to LSU and Northwestern, while they lost to Michigan 82-72 and they lost to Michigan again 75-64.  If you go back to last year they had another great loss to Michigan 86-57.  

HireWayne

March 11th, 2018 at 9:41 AM ^

My optimistic hope is the selection committee will move Michigan and Sparty ahead of Purdue and Cincy on the S Curve to get a full Little Caesars Arena. Xavier and Tennessee will get Nashville. Probably not happening but you could make the case that Michigan-Sparty-Purdue-Cincy resume's are close enough to justify the action.

Sambojangles

March 11th, 2018 at 9:54 AM ^

The problem with the locations for top seeds this year is that 12 of the top 16 seeds are east of the Mississippi, but only 4 first round sites (room for 8 teams) are in the same area. So, at least 4 "protected seeds" have to be shipped out to Dallas or Boise. I don't remember if the sites are always like this but it seems weird that Charlotte is the only east coast first round location. Or if it's just a strange year where the top teams are mostly from the East because the Pac-12 and Big 12 are relatively down. Seems like in any given year you would still expect multiple ACC, B1G, and Big East teams in the top 16, so there should be at least 4 east/central sites, with a fifth in the middle (Chicago, Nashville, Minneapolis, etc.)

tlo2485

March 11th, 2018 at 10:25 AM ^

Boston hosts the overall East Regional, but other than that and Charlotte, it is really bizarre that no cities out of Providence, Philly, NY, Newark, DC, Baltimore, or anywhere in Florida, etc are hosting... especially with a ton of teams clearly making it from the ACC and Big East, (as well as A-10 usually with a good representation)--- not to mention cities that are friendly to B1G teams.

Arb lover

March 11th, 2018 at 10:26 AM ^

While I'm far from a basketball expert, after watching the UNC/Virginia game last night I'd say I Hope Michigan doesn't play in the same region as Virginia. I'd much rather have xavier/UC/Nova/UNC, etc. as the 1/2.

Mr. Elbel

March 11th, 2018 at 12:28 PM ^

I want no part of UVA right now either. One of the teams playing at our level. But we wouldn't see them until the elite 8 unless we're a 4 seed. I'll take the lesser of the 2 seeds and hope uva slips instead. But I can understand not wanting to meet them at all.

funkywolve

March 11th, 2018 at 10:46 AM ^

The committee is pretty much done with the bracket before the Sunday games start. Maybe they are waiting on the results of one of the games for seeding purposes but the results of today's games aren't going to create some domino effect for the seeding and/or location for a bunch of teams.

ohio

March 11th, 2018 at 10:55 AM ^

Being in Dallas I want the guarantee of going to the two games that would be here but if Mich ends up elsewhere..fate would dictate i just have to wait for them to end up in San Antonio. And while the sweet 16 and e8 games in 13 were my best sports memories probably ever, I wanna watch thwm cut down the final nets in person..and then probably die since we are a basketball school now and that would represent the apex of sports joy a Michigan title. (Still prefer it be on the gridiron)

Night_King

March 11th, 2018 at 11:07 AM ^

Will the bracket be leaked again this year?? Not sure why they have to wait until 6pm if these conference championship games barely affect the seeding anyways. 

ST3

March 11th, 2018 at 11:34 AM ^

I watched some of Zona-USC last night. I hope the committee gives us a Purdue-Zona matchup in round 3 or 4. Haas vs. Ayton would be like King Kong versus Godzilla.

Night_King

March 11th, 2018 at 11:44 AM ^

That would be a great matchup, although Haas couldn't stay in front of Ayton if he tried. I think Purdue has a deeper team but that would be a fascinating game. 

Mr poonsniffle

March 11th, 2018 at 11:54 AM ^

I want to see Michigan get a 2 seed in Detroit.

I mostly want this to happen so that I could see how many MSU fans go apeshit and say that they are boycotting Little Caesar’s.

Richard75

March 11th, 2018 at 12:20 PM ^

Why would Kansas land anywhere but Wichita? They’re a 2 seed at worst, and no one in the running for a 1 or 2 seed is remotely as close to Wichita as KU.

Mr. Elbel

March 11th, 2018 at 2:00 PM ^

There's no 2 seed location for Wichita. The closest is Nashville. If they're a 1 they'd play in Wichita. I don't see them dropping at all but if a 1 seed were to fall to 2 for UNC it's either Kansas or Nova. Not likely to happen.

J.

March 11th, 2018 at 3:26 PM ^

What? Seeds aren't assigned to locations.  They travel with the team to that location.  Kansas will absolutely be in Wichita.

They start at the top of the S-Curve and assign pods to teams in order.  The only way Kansas wouldn't get Wichita is if it were a more convenient location for two higher seeds.  That's not possible -- given that WSU is the host (and thus ineligible to play there), I doubt there are two D-I programs closer to Wichita than Kansas is.

umchicago

March 11th, 2018 at 1:09 PM ^

if the ncaa truly cared about protecting the top 16 teams  they could wait until after selection sunday to figure out where to play the games.

it's obvious that there are way more good teams fighting for the charlotte, detroit and nashville venues.  there's no reason to have those venues locked in before the selection.  they could easily just add several other venues for the first two rounds.

if the nit can make last minute decisions on venues, i would think the more important tournament could too.

J.

March 11th, 2018 at 3:31 PM ^

I don't even know where to begin.

They can make last-minute venue decisions for the NIT because they're held at campus sites, which means the gyms are often unused anyway, and nobody goes to the NIT except a skeleton ESPN crew and a few student season-ticket holders.

Expecting LCA, the United Center, Bankers' Life, etc. to all hold their schedule for a 5-6 day window on the off chance that the NCAA wants to host there is asinine.