November 22nd, 2013 at 1:11 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 1:43 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 1:43 PM ^
because
November 22nd, 2013 at 1:44 PM ^
On the other side, I just don't see Iowa's offense being able to do much at all against this defense. They're going to have a couple Norse saga drives, but that's it.
I'm thinking M 14 Iowa 13, with the 2nd touchdown coming on the last drive of the game when Borges decides that no huddle is a thing.
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:02 PM ^
I predict very cold hands.
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:04 PM ^
30: It’s the number of times Devin Gardner has been sacked. No Michigan quarterback in the BCS era has been sacked more times in a season.
Sorry - that is why we lose and continue to until rectifed.
Why? No one respects the run; Garner makes mistakes when its even a near sack; we freeking play action 2 out of every three plays it seems (opponents simply ignore that -- as you all know)
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:08 PM ^
I think GERGian principles keep Iowa from getting effective pressure on Gardner which will allow Michigan to dink and dunk and also open up the run game a bit. We'll likely struggle keeping drives alive against their bend, don't break defense with a few negative plays here and there getting us behind the sticks, but we'll put up some FGs and get a touchdown somewhere in there.
On the other side of the ball, we'll stop the run but give up frustrating 3rd and longs as Iowa also moves the ball but eventually falls victim to our own bend, don't break defense.
It'll be close and a critical turnover decides a low scoring game. Gun to my head, I predict Michigan coughs up an INT because you can't play with fire forever without getting burned.
Iowa 23 - Michigan 16
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:10 PM ^
A low scoring boring affair in which Mattison does a good job holding Iowa to almost nothing and Borges outsmarts himself into unproductive offensive oblivion. 10-9 Iowa.
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:18 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:32 PM ^
Michigan 31
Iowa 20
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:51 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:37 PM ^
Aren't we due for the out of nowhere well-called, well-planned Borges gameplan? You know, the one that explains his career longevity and begs the question why we don't see that more often? Haven't seen one of those since week 2 and we know it's not coming next week.
Accordingly: The sweet taste of victory against NW envigorates an offense newly energized by the thrill of (finally) successfully running the ball with two young bruising backs now beginning to find their groove in the college game. Borges observes this during the week and composes a brilliant gameplan balancing power & zone runs, short passing, play action and spreading the ball everywhere to Gallon, Funcess, Butt and even Chesson. Iowa tries some of the MSU and Nebraska defensive gameplan stuff but Borges has finally adjusted. We roll 27 - 13.
Borges is given credit for finally adapting his game plan, infuriating his detractors and giving hope to his supporters before another OSU stinker. Most confusing season ever concludes.
November 23rd, 2013 at 3:29 AM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 2:53 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 4:00 PM ^
Edit: disregard, put this in the wrong thread
November 22nd, 2013 at 3:29 PM ^
One of Sam Webb's locks of the week is the young backs combining for 100+ yards rushing, so there's that.
November 22nd, 2013 at 5:51 PM ^
if Gardner plays well, we win. Simple as that. My faith in that happening is very slim though
November 22nd, 2013 at 5:52 PM ^
Going out on a big ass limb to say Michigan plays surprisingly well and wins 35 to 17
November 22nd, 2013 at 7:50 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 9:43 PM ^
November 22nd, 2013 at 9:52 PM ^
I think we should play Northwestern again.
November 23rd, 2013 at 9:41 AM ^
Pretty skeptical, no 98 looks pretty bad under center. I can see iowa actually catching 5 of them picks northwestern left on the field, iowa 27 m10