Open Letter from Kevin Warren

Submitted by Malarkey on August 19th, 2020 at 6:21 PM

https://bigten.org/news/2020/8/19/general-an-open-letter-to-the-big-ten-community.aspx

 

An Open Letter to the Big Ten Community



  • I write on this occasion to share with you additional information regarding the Big Ten Conference’s decision to postpone the 2020-21 fall sports season. We thoroughly understand and deeply value what sports mean to our student-athletes, their families, our coaches and our fans. The vote by the Big Ten Council of Presidents and Chancellors (COP/C) was overwhelmingly in support of postponing fall sports and will not be revisited. The decision was thorough and deliberative, and based on sound feedback, guidance and advice from medical experts. Despite the decision to postpone fall sports, we continue our work to find a path forward that creates a healthy and safe environment for all Big Ten student-athletes to compete in the sports they love in a manner that helps to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and protects both student-athletes and the surrounding communities.
     
    As you are well aware, we are facing a complicated global pandemic with the SARS-CoV-2 virus discovered in November 2019. The first medically confirmed cases did not appear in the United States until January 2020. Over the course of the past seven months, the U.S. has recorded more than 5.5 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 resulting in more than 170,000 deaths, with more than 22 million confirmed cases and 780,000 lives lost around the world.
     
    We understand the disappointment and questions surrounding the timing of our decision to postpone fall sports, especially in light of releasing a football schedule only six days prior to that decision. From the beginning, we consistently communicated our commitment to cautiously proceed one day at a time with the health, safety and wellness of our student-athletes at the center of our decision-making process. That is why we took simultaneous paths in releasing the football schedule, while also diligently monitoring the spread of the virus, testing, and medical concerns as student-athletes were transitioning to full-contact practice. 
     
    While several factors contributed to the decision to postpone the 2020-21 fall sports season, at the core of our decision was the knowledge that there was too much medical uncertainty and too many unknown health risks regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection and its impact on our student-athletes.
     
    Listed below are the primary factors that led to the Big Ten COP/C decision:
  • Transmission rates continue to rise at an alarming rate with little indication from medical experts that our campuses, communities or country could gain control of the spread of the virus prior to the start of competition.
    • As our teams were ramping up for more intense practices, many of our medical staffs did not think the interventions we had planned would be adequate to decrease the potential spread even with very regular testing.
    • As the general student body comes back to campus, spread to student-athletes could reintroduce infection into our athletics community.
  • There is simply too much we do not know about the virus, recovery from infection, and longer-term effects. While the data on cardiomyopathy is preliminary and incomplete, the uncertain risk was unacceptable at this time.
  • Concerns surrounding contact tracing still exist, including the inability to social distance in contact sports pursuant to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. While risk mitigation processes (e.g., physical distancing, face coverings, proper hygiene, etc.) can be implemented across campus for the student body population, it became clear those processes could not be fully implemented in contact sports.
    • With the start of full-contact practices and competitions, it became increasingly clear that contact tracing and quarantining would risk frequent and significant disruptions to the practice and competition calendar.
    • Accurate and widely available rapid testing may help mitigate those concerns, but access to accurate tests is currently limited.
    • Significant concerns also exist regarding the testing supply chain, generally, for many of our institutions.

Financial considerations did not influence the COP/C decision, as the postponement will have enormous adverse financial implications. We understand the passion of the many student-athletes and their families who were disappointed by the decision, but also know there are many who have a great deal of concern and anxiety regarding the pandemic.
 
Moving forward, we will continue to build upon the framework that our medical experts have developed over the past five months while we take the opportunity to learn more about the virus and its effects. As we expand upon a plan to allow our student-athletes to compete as soon as it is safe to do so, we will keep our focus on creating protocols and standards set forth and established by our medical advisors that are responsive to the medical concerns evaluated by our COP/C.
 
To that end, the Big Ten Conference has assembled a Return to Competition Task Force consisting of members from the COP/C, sports medicine and university medical personnel, Athletic Directors, Head Coaches, Faculty Athletic Representatives and Senior Women Administrators to plan for the return of fall sports competition as soon as possible. In evaluating winter/spring models, we will explore many factors including the number of football games that can reasonably be played from a health perspective in a full calendar year while maintaining a premier competitive experience for our student-athletes culminating in a Big Ten Championship. The Big Ten Conference will continue to collect feedback from student-athletes, families, and other constituents and remains in active discussions with its television partners regarding all future plans.
 
We have tremendous appreciation and understanding regarding what participation in sports means to our student-athletes, their families, our campus communities and our fans. We will continue to make the best decisions possible for the health, safety and wellness of our student-athletes. We appreciate the passion of the Big Ten community and will harness that energy towards providing the best possible experience for all Big Ten student-athletes.
 
 
Kevin Warren
Commissioner
Big Ten Conference

MaizeBlueA2

August 19th, 2020 at 11:27 PM ^

Especially because this is truly the only team I felt was better* than OSU (under Harbaugh)...outside of the 1 yard game in the Shoe.

 

*I'm assuming we get QB play that is as good or better than Shea Patterson last year. If not, then I take it back. If so, with Mayfield, Collins, Paye and Ambry Thomas (all of which will probably go pro)...I think Michigan was better. 

Big assumption at QB, I know...but again, everything else was there.

MGoStrength

August 20th, 2020 at 9:33 AM ^

As a player, absolutely.  As a fan, no way.  Nothing is worse than watching them beat us, talk about it all year, and watch them strut in all their glory of their dominance for the last 20 years and let Meyer sail off into the sunset never having lost to talk shit for eternity.

not TOM BRADY

August 19th, 2020 at 6:27 PM ^

This statement was a week late, shows they rushed this decision. It’s also incredibly weak on actual reasons why they canceled the season. Nothing concrete. 
 

The risk is minimal for young people. The heart issues have been mostly disproven. What is going to be so different in march, when they say they are going to play. They won’t. But his son is still playing. 

TrueBlue2003

August 19th, 2020 at 6:57 PM ^

In the SI article that interviewed Matthew Martinez, universally regarded as the foremost expert on the topic, "He acknowledges that the cases in athletes with COVID-related heart impacts are very small" and that "“It can be done. You can play football,” he says, “but resources must be utilized.”

There's no evidence that this virus causes heart issues at a higher rate or severity than any of many other viruses that also cause the same issues. Cite your sources if you think so.  There are just more people that have had this virus in a six month span than any of those viruses because it's  a novel virus and it's likely that's why we're seeing an uptick in those ailments.  Give them MRIs, utilize the resources and let the rest play.

https://www.si.com/college/2020/08/09/ncaa-cardiac-inflamation-coronavirus-myocarditis-concerns

Couzen Rick's

August 19th, 2020 at 7:04 PM ^

There's no evidence that this virus causes heart issues at a higher rate or severity than any of many other viruses that also cause the same issues.

That there are other viruses that also cause this condition is immaterial - it's no less serious because it can also be caused by other viruses. Regardless, we're in a pandemic as a result of this virus, and its rampant spread.

There are just more people that have had this virus in a six month span than any of those viruses because it's  a novel virus and it's likely that's why we're seeing an uptick in those ailments.

Forgive me for stating the obvious, but that's the point. 

TrueBlue2003

August 20th, 2020 at 12:49 AM ^

You're right, it's no less serious but it's also no more serious and we have the ability to identify those at risk.

So there are a couple dozen out of thousands that should be held out of the season instead of the handful that should be kept out in non-pandemic years.  That's the only difference.  As Martinez says, football can be played, we just need to utilize resources. 

And one could argue it's safer in this hyper vigilant climate.  2-5% of sports related deaths are caused by myocarditis, before covid.  That's because we don't give everyone with a cold an MRI.  But now the teams utilizing proper resources are giving everyone with covid MRIs and being cautious.  That means their players are probably at less risk than the conditions under which those 2-5% of deaths happened.

Jonesy

August 19th, 2020 at 7:09 PM ^

Nice cherry-picking:

"He acknowledges that the cases in athletes with COVID-related heart impacts are very small. Among professional, college and youth league athletes, he’s seen no more than a dozen in the US. However, there are likely many more. Some go undetected or have not been brought to his attention. Doctors aren’t exactly sure how common the condition is. Some have publicly stated that recovered COVID-19 patients have shown as much as a 50% impact on their heart, but with striking degrees in severity."

We know of more cases in the B1G alone. The entire tone of that article is in the no sports camp and it can be done....but probably shouldn't and probably won't.

TrueBlue2003

August 20th, 2020 at 1:22 AM ^

His acknowledgement takes into account the fact the some cases go undetected.  The vast majority of cases of this disease that's caused by lots of viruses go undetected.  

But now we're checking everyone with MRIs. That's why he and many others say it's perfectly fine to play if you're doing that.  The tone of the article was fear-based because that's what the author did to get clicks and shares but none of the actual quotes from the experts were anything but "it's rare, use the resources to identify it, and play ball". not at all in the no sports camp.  This guy oversees the MLS decisions and they were the first ones to come back.

Malarkey

August 19th, 2020 at 7:22 PM ^

 

Cardiac complications are as high as 23% in diagnosed COVID cases ("Myocardial injury is relatively common in patients with COVID-19, accounting for 7%-23% of cases, and is associated with a higher rate of morbidity and mortality" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X20300640), a MUCH higher rate than any virus known to mankind.

In addition to the MRI paper that we all know about:

 

That paper is hardly the only one citing alarmingly high rates of cardiac abnormalities:

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32556199/

"In those without pre-existing cardiac disease (n = 901), the echocardiogram was abnormal in 46%, and 13% had severe disease. "

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32763118/

"Fifteen patients (58%) had abnormal CMR findings on conventional CMR sequences: myocardial edema was found in 14 (54%) patients and LGE was found in 8 (31%) patient"

 

Again, this data is all preliminary, but as Warren said, is an UNCERTAIN risk that is unacceptable at this time

TrueBlue2003

August 20th, 2020 at 1:37 AM ^

Uh nope, sorry bud.

For one, "in diagnosed COVID cases" is not representative and makes no consideration for the many, many, many undiagnosed cases.  Those that have been diagnosed are very much on the severe end of the spectrum.

And to conclude that's higher than any other virus is 100% correct.  What are the numbers for other viruses?  You would need to know that to make any conclusion but we don't know that because we don't give people with colds MRIs. We don't even diagnose common colds!

When everyone was freaking out about lung abnormalities, NPR did a great piece that at least attempted to put it in proper context, which no one seems to care about with this disease.  From the piece:

Still, Taylor-Cousar cautions that researchers are studying the new coronavirus more intensively than they've studied other respiratory ailments. "Usually if someone is asymptomatic [with a common cold or flu virus], we would never even see them at all," she says, "and we would never think to get a CT scan on them." So there's no comparable data to say whether the lung abnormalities are specific to asymptomatic coronavirus carriers, or common among respiratory viruses.

Well, same thing with other respiratory diseases and heart conditions.  So no, you absolutely did not prove that it's higher than other viruses.  I don't understand why people insist on living in a world devoid of context and full of unfounded fear.

Source: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/06/23/864536258/we-still-dont-fully-understand-the-label-asymptomatic

SanDiegoWolverine

August 19th, 2020 at 8:27 PM ^

There's a reason there's been super spreading events in gyms, bars, house parties, churches, and other large gatherings. Spoiler Alert: it's not because sick people are hanging out sneezing and coughing all over everyone in the middle of a pandemic. If asymptomatic spread wasn't a big deal this would be like SARS and it would be practically done by done.

the fume

August 19th, 2020 at 8:29 PM ^

First of all, this article was before B1G found 10-12 cases. So that's double the cases he's seen in his lifetime.

Second, he says “This virus seems to have an affinity for causing damage to the heart.”

It is true that he says you can test for it to make sure anybody with it does not play. This lessens the risk for sudden cardiac death. It does nothing for long term heart effects.

The bottom line is, this virus can damage the heart, in people of all ages. Instead of concluding "We Can Diagnose This," the conclusion should be that young people as a whole are not as invulnerable as they think to COVID-19. I mean, Bryan Feeney had to go to the ER because he could barely breathe, and he is now dealing with heart issues. The odds say there's just going to be more and more of this reported in athletes, often less severe, but in a few maybe more severe.

Justibro

August 19th, 2020 at 6:44 PM ^

To say they have been disproven is a poorly chosen and incorrect statement, they are under question. There are questions about the data that was collected and presented in the recent paper that showed a significantly high percentage of people having myocarditis. So, like most things with this novel coronavirus, it's still a mystery the extent of the heart issues. 

bronxblue

August 19th, 2020 at 8:01 PM ^

This is why he didn't need to give a reason - the people disinclined to accept a season should be cancelled will just ignore anything he said or try to poke some hole in it with selective evidence.  

Honestly, the fact a bunch of people can look at the past 8 months and say, with a straight face, "where's the concrete evidence this is bad" is a large reason we're in this mess.

Logic.and.Zeal

August 19th, 2020 at 11:03 PM ^

It does not show they rushed the decision.  It is absolutely concrete on the reasons why the season is cancelled.  You don't know the risk is minimal for young people.  The heart issues have absolutely not been "mostly disproven." March is several months into the future, where we potentially stop the selfishness and political idiocy this country has shown since the pandemic and follow the recommended guidelines, thereby allowing a sliver of hope that games can be played.  And if you think his son will be playing, I'll point you to any number of school developing outbreaks in the south right now.  Overall, weak post.

the fume

August 19th, 2020 at 11:31 PM ^

Good point, most Americans have generally stopped risking their lives for work since the majority of us were born. Troops and coal workers still do, and I'm sure there's others.

But nobody directly impacted by the suspension of college football has knowingly risked their life for their job.

Altho college football players SHOULD get paid for the risks, but it's not their job.

IDKaGoodName

August 20th, 2020 at 8:12 AM ^

Just like to point out that many healthcare workers routinely risk their own health (lives as well, to a lesser degree and in a more roundabout way) and that there is an increase in that health risk not just for those directly caring for COVID patients, but also the people those workers interact with. Doing anything that isn’t necessary that will increase the spread of the virus has a large ripple effect spreading out way beyond the athletic teams and school campuses. Let’s not forget that if these kids start contracting this virus, just removing them from activity and quarantining them does not ensure that they will not have already spread the virus to multiple sources, and not just teammates or coaches. Those MRIs require staff, hospital visits require staff and check points. ER visits will see these patients coming into contact/close quarters with a dozen or more people. I get that we all want to be ignorant because football, and I get that many of us are arrogant because you are just arrogant, but grow up, please. Perhaps if you don’t work in healthcare you have a more difficult time grasping the severity of this situation, but the virus hasn’t been “controlled” and all we have found in the last 2 weeks of potential college fall semesters is that campuses are shutting down because they are coming to the realization that they are putting their students in harms way, and it is their right and duty (as a public or private institution that cares even a little bit about its student body) to make the safe decision and the smart decision for all of its students. Kids venturing off for college and contracting this virus is sad and scary, and these universities have the resources to prevent that as much as possible, and many have begun to take action. They do NOT, however, have the resources and capacity to PREVENT the spread, and neither does this country, nor the rest of the world (unless you believe in Russia’s vaccine). We fucked up by not being more hyper vigilant at the beginning and waiting it out, by allowing  so many people to choose for themselves (and actually for those around them) what safety measures should be adhered to.

If it is becoming more obvious that people can’t be on campus together, it should be glaringly obvious that there is no reason to be playing sports. Sure, the pool is smaller and you can bubble some of these kids for the season or whatever, but if you infect the bubble then you just made the biggest, easily preventable mistake in our lifetimes. I’m not sure when it became OK to jeopardize the health of our citizens and guests in this country, but we have a serious problem that extends far beyond this virus; all of these people that feel so entitled to what they desire that they are making it harder and more unsafe for everyone else in this country in one of its darkest hours to date. Again, please grow up. It’s vital to the safety of our peers and our children.

Wolverine Devotee

August 19th, 2020 at 6:30 PM ^

Spring football 

l o l 

I will eat lemons again if we play a down of football against another team in Spring 2021. See ya next Fall, maybe.

Bo Harbaugh

August 19th, 2020 at 6:45 PM ^

You must not have heard...

MyPillow guy had a friend call him with a miracle supplement and shared the info with POTUS and the administration.  We’ll be back to normal in no time.

Edit: Apparently Jesus had something to do with finding this cure, according to mypillow guy.  More evidence we are almost there gents.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/08/18/mypillow-ceo-lindell-says-white-house-asked-him-to-look-for-cures-for-covid-19/amp/

DoubleWolverin…

August 19th, 2020 at 7:38 PM ^

Interesting for a couple of reasons: 

1. It is hilarious and misleading that this website is called Just the News. Just the News is decidedly not just the news. Robert Solomon is very conservative and from my initial, albeit quick, review, his website is the same.

2. This Axios article (https://www.axios.com/trump-covid-oleandrin-9896f570-6cd8-4919-af3a-65ebad113d41.html), while carrying its own biases, includes the following tidbits: 

  • Caree Vander Linden, a spokesperson for the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, emailed the following statement to Axios: "In May 2020, USAMRIID performed some preliminary testing of oleandrin against SARS-CoV-2 [the virus that causes COVID-19]. Our results were inconclusive."
  • "Additionally, USAMRIID was contacted by University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, indicating that they were also testing it," Vander Linden added. "Given our inconclusive results, and having other high priority therapeutics to assess, we did not continue with this line of research."

DoubleWolverin…

August 20th, 2020 at 3:39 AM ^

I do not think you are dating these correctly. The article you linked, which is from April, relates to testing by the USAMRIID. The USAMRIID confirmed to Axios that this testing was completed in May, and due to inconclusive results, testing was stopped. I do not think the USAMRIID is currently looking into Oleandrin-based treatments.