Migos on Harbaugh: He's a player from the Himalayas
TMZ asked Migos about Jim Harbaugh.
1. Jim Harbaugh is a player from the Himalayas.
2. He has a hood pass.
There's also the James Harden cooking crack celebration too.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Had no clue.
Like you, I'm glad Harbaugh has this program trending up. Hopefully gone are the days of losing to the likes of Rutgers and barely escaping Akron. We're not a joke anymore, but but if he doesn't beat MSU or OSU on a regular basis, I couldn't care less if he wins every other game on the schedule. That season would be a complete, unmitigated failure.
Losing to both of those teams on a regular basis, as we've been doing, would make Harbaugh's antics wear thin very quickly.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
all you people that keep using that term for harbaugh are lost. and last time i checked he was not responsible for last seasons msu loss or any loss that came against msu or osu in previous years.
but yeah, he's the head coach of Michigan football so every loss actually IS on him.
I'm pretty fucking sure he'd tell you the same thing.
April 24th, 2016 at 10:24 PM ^
for having 2 gunners against no return man?
Do you not remember where this team was before this past season? Let me remind you: they were 5-7 with no QB, no O-Line, and no running game. That team was held to NEGATIVE rushing yards in 2 SEPARATE games. There was so much talk about how there was NO talent on the roster. When Harbaugh was hired, there was talk about how he would turn things around, but it would take 2 - 3 years to rebuild a talented roster.
It's perfectly acceptable to have high expectations for this season; the reason we HAVE those high expectations is because of the job Harbaugh did this past season. We know the team is talented because he SHOWED US HOW TALENTED THEY WERE. But, that being said, those 2 rivalry games are extremely intense, and ANYTHING can happen, as we found out this past year. We are more talented on paper, but that doesn't mean we'll automatically win those games. Remember the 90s? How many times did OSU come into the Game with an undefeated/top 5 record for a chance to play in the National Title? And Michigan crushed those hopes annually. Similarly, we had some GREAT teams in the 2000s, but they kept getting beat by OSU.
At the end of the day, the defense is all kinds of stacked, but the QB is still a question mark, the O-Line is still average at best, and the defense is learning its 3rd system is 3 years. We fully expect Harbaugh and Co. to get all of this right and bring out the best. But they are still working through the growing pains of starting a regime at Michigan. So, to say that Harbaugh should essentially start being on the hot seat should they lose to OSU and MSU this year is just absurd. Not with the talent at QB and O-Line that he has coming in/is developing. Hell a big reason that those 90s Michigan teams kept winning was because they had great QBs (Grbac - Pro Bowler, Collins - 2nd Rd pick, Griese - Pro Bowler, Brady - 'Nuff Said, Henson - Consensus Top 5 pick if he stuck with football) and an embarrasment of riches in the offensive trenches.
So in conclusion, take a chill pill. Harbaugh should be guaranteed 5 years minimum to get this monster going, and I highly doubt it will take nearly that long.
that Ohio State has inferior talent, but you would be wrong.
Coach Harbaugh lives like a person who has very little fear. I believe his sense of integrity will provide him with a good moral compass.
Rich Rodriguez and Brady Hoke both have coaching ability and good qualities. Neither one has the complete set of coaching and leadership skills to win a National Championship. Jim Harbaugh is more complete.
April 24th, 2016 at 11:11 PM ^
To all the people who are worried about Harbaugh not beating MSU and OSU, don't be.
He's the coach of Michigan. He'll have to beat them whether he hangs out with rappers or nuns. Or both. It's self-solving.
He knows this. In the meantime, he's just being himself.
Have fun with it. He is.
Could have avoided some Hoke v RR discussions