Michigan could possibly schedule Air Force in 2022

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on October 29th, 2019 at 10:34 AM

Doing some searching after the schedule changes recently on who could fill those remaining open dates in 2022 and 2023. I went through every single FBS team schedule for 2022 and found only FOUR teams that I believe Michigan would schedule for their only open date on September 17 2022.

Keep in mind, Warde has stressed his commitment to having 7 home games minimum every year. The makes a home and home with a Power 5 team unlikely and the Power 5 teams that have open dates on 9/17/2022 aren’t ones who are gonna come play here and not get a return game ala Colorado in 2016. For example, Florida State has an opening that date. 

Think Group of 5 opponents. Well it turns out there are only FOUR G5 teams with open dates on 9/17/2022. Michigan has never faced 3 of the 4-

Air Force

FIU

Kent State

Troy

 Our other scheduled non-conf games for 2022 are 9/3 vs Colorado State and 9/10 vs Hawaii. 

Perkis-Size Me

October 29th, 2019 at 11:29 AM ^

For god's sake, Warde, put anyone on the schedule BUT a service academy. 

It's just practical. You have nothing to gain by playing them, and everything to lose. No one but service academies plays the triple option now, so its not prepping you for anyone else on your schedule. If you win, whoop dee-doo, you beat a service academy. If you lose, you're a national laughingstock. 

J.

October 29th, 2019 at 11:29 AM ^

This is nonsense.

First of all, there's no conceivable reason to limit the search to teams that have an open date.  In case you haven't noticed, if the price is right, teams are willing to cancel their scheduled games even with only a couple of years' warning.

Second, are you really suggesting that Michigan will never play another non-conference road game?  If they need to do a home-and-home, they'll find a season that works.

FSU would be nice.  We owe them a couple.

DualThreat

October 29th, 2019 at 11:37 AM ^

Question:  What happens if no team agrees to fill the open date?  Does it just go unfilled and Michigan has one less game than usual?

Put to an extreme, what would happen if no-one wanted to schedule Michigan.  We'd have our Big Ten conference games and that's it?  Is that even "allowed" per NCAA rules?  If not, what would they do about it - mandate a team to play us?

Jon06

October 29th, 2019 at 11:48 AM ^

I think this never comes up because games = money, so why wouldn't a team want to play every game they can? You still make money even if you have to pay a tomato can (and I guess you would even if you had to pay off a different tomato can to free up the date). 

But sufficiently shitty programs do seem to go to extremes to fill their schedules, so maybe it's required? IDK.

Background: New Mexico State and Liberty had hard times filling their schedules, and came up with playing each other twice per year as a solution: https://www.si.com/college-football/2018/08/27/liberty-new-mexico-state-schedule-fbs-independents

Reggie Dunlop

October 29th, 2019 at 11:43 AM ^

The Fear Of Service Academy around here is consistently one of the absolute dumbest things about MGoBlog from the proprietor down to the lowliest poster.

Everybody on the planet is kicking Army's ass right now. If we weren't in the "dysfunctional" stage of the #SpeedInSpace transition, we'd have beat Army by 40. 

We've played both Army and Air Force in the past three years, and I'm pretty sure there have been a grand total of 0 defensive line knee injuries from their deadly chop blocking (which they don't actually do despite Brian and Seth's insistence). Not to mention we held both of these terrifying offenses to recent record lows. 

Stop being a weenie. It's a service academy. They have the lowest talent level of any FBS program. There is no evidence of increased injury risk. It's an auto-win for a program like Michigan. 

lhglrkwg

October 29th, 2019 at 11:58 AM ^

Tell that to Oklahoma who also nearly lost to Army last year.

You left out one key point: it wastes time preparing for the triple option. No reason to waste valuable practice time doing that when you could just paste a MAC school and do literally anything else

matty blue

October 29th, 2019 at 1:40 PM ^

could not agree more.

we've played service academies...let's see...three times in the last 37 years, all since 2012.  our struggles against them have had way, way more to do with our own mediocrity / general crappiness at those particular junctures than anything else. 

the triple option flat-out isn't that hard to defend.  put your facemask in the quarterback's chest every time, and you're fine.  it's not really any kind of different approach.  we scheduled run-and-shoot houston back in the day - that was much weirder than a triple option - and kicked the hell out of them because we were a much better team.  same thing.

might as well not schedule umass, or akron, or toledo, if weird outcomes are the reason we don't schedule particular opponents.

 

lhglrkwg

October 29th, 2019 at 11:57 AM ^

I'm not un-convinced that Michigan isn't intentionally scheduling service academies for some undisclosed reason. We didn't play any service academies from 1981-2011 and now they're showing up on the schedule again. If Air Force and Michigan have the same date open, I'm betting they'll schedule AFA over another cupcake despite ample reasons not to do that

LKLIII

October 29th, 2019 at 1:05 PM ^

The lost opportuity cost in preparation is not a false narrative.  

There are only so many hours available off-season to scout/prepare for teams for our staff. There are only so many hours available in-season for our players to study film & to practice the game plans the staff has developed.  The more unique schemes we play in the OOC schedule, the less prepared we are for the in-conference games.

As a result, the best approach is to--as much as possible--schedule OOC teams that have essentially similar (but usually watered down) versions of the schemes we will fact against tougher opponents in-conference.