McCarthy launches "JJ for the kids" foundation to benefit children's hospitals

Submitted by Bo Schemheckler on January 21st, 2022 at 9:30 AM

Yet another reason to love JJ. He has a great story behind his logo as well for those interested in reading the article:

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/2022/01/21/michigan-wolverines-jj-mccarthy-foundation-children/6597519001/

King Tot

January 21st, 2022 at 10:19 AM ^

I was a huge Cade supporter this last season. He played the position well enough that we made the playoffs for the first time ever. It is hard to justify calling for a true freshman QB based on the limited action we get to see.

That all being said, I saw enough that I expect JJ to start. 

King Tot

January 21st, 2022 at 12:19 PM ^

Those are not JJs numbers. They are (I am guessing) Cades numbers from the OSU, Iowa, and Georgia. Guy has nothing better to do than shit on a QB who beat OSU and won the B1G...because he is smarter than Harbaugh.

JJs numbers for those games:

9/21 (JJ 43%, Cade 64%)

168 yards (JJ 8 YPA, Cade 7 YPA)

1 TD

1 Int (4% pick rate for JJ, 6% for Cade)

Limited sample size but very  comparable. So yes. JJ is probably the future but Cade was great this year and deserved his job.

Champeen

January 21st, 2022 at 11:28 AM ^

The best QB will start.  I predict JJ takes a big step forward into his sophomore season and rockets towards his ceiling and will be difficult for McNamara to beat out.  As long as he doesn't spend a ton of time perfecting his golf stroke instead (like someone else) then he should be the starter.

With that said, if he doesn't put in the work and/or doesn't improve, we still have a hell of an established starter.

Blau

January 21st, 2022 at 12:51 PM ^

Sooner or later we're going to have to pick a full year starter and ride it out. All of the top teams do this and inevitably it leads to talented QBs walking out the door. You just gotta hope you pick the right one. I think JJ gets the spot with a season full of razzle-dazzle sprinkled with a few oops moments. 

Unless Cade wants to accept the grizzled, veteran backup player-coaching role, I'd bet we see him transfer. Many P5 programs would welcome him with open arms. C'est la vie.

First And Shut…

January 21st, 2022 at 10:15 AM ^

20+ years ago, they had a great basketball player - Steve Smith - and he was the first player I remember who gave a large donation back to his college when he hit it big in the NBA. I remember thinking at the time "I wish this had been a Michigan player, but good on him anyway". Let's be thankful for all the athletes (and others) who make us proud.

Hab

January 21st, 2022 at 10:41 AM ^

I write this as I'm doing some self-reflection on the issue, so I'll ask for forgiveness in advance and knowingly accept what negs may come.

I find myself with one foot in the camp of the above referenced yet unidentified MSU fans, and another foot in the "good for him" camp.  My foot in the 'cynicism' camp is not directed at any one athlete or program in particular, but rather, is more broadly aimed at celebrities publicly attaching their names to philanthropic efforts focused on generating and donating money.  I do recognize that money makes the world go round and that financial donations to the organizations performing vital charitable services are needed to keep the lights on and so forth.  But in many cases, it appears to me, just as the MSU heathens, that many public personalities are in it, at least in part, for the clout or goodwill generated by the act of charity.    

I don't know JJ, and so I have no reason to question his motives.  And I have no problem believing that he's a great person looking to use the position that he's now in to make the world a better place.  On the other hand, the cynic in me can look at this and says, here's a young man looking to make a name for himself as a professional athlete who is checking the boxes to create a positive reputation for himself.  For me, I think it comes down to two things--the 'look at me and what I've done' aspect of the act and for whom the act is done. 

Having read the article and JJ's statement, he's created a foundation to give to two children's hospitals, which is outstanding.  But why does he need to tell us?  Is he soliciting matching donations?  To me, it reads like a PR piece.  I will admit that my opinion matters very little and I know even less about managing a public persona.  I applaud the sentiment of wanting to help others and to use a portion of what comes in through NIL to support that.  It's also a financial strategy to minimize tax liability.  But hey, win-win, our tax system is set up to encourage such philanthropy.  As to the second issue, I love that children are the beneficiary of our world's generosity.  It is easy to see ourselves as them, and they truly do light up with thanks and hope when a celebrity comes by to pay attention to them.  And I will never ever suggest that one charity is not deserving of donations based on the population it serves (if it wastes funds is another matter).  At the same time, sick children is low hanging fruit for someone seeking to enhance their reputation.  What about other charitable needs that are potentially more messy, like prisoner reentry programs, for example? 

Again, I applaud the effort and commend JJ for doing what he can with what he has.  My standing ovation would go instead to Corum delivering Thanksgiving dinners and becoming involved in that community or others coaching youth sports and spending time with the persons they are serving.  It isn't easy, and there is need everywhere.  But the one thing that shouldn't be part of the equation, in my opinion at this point, is the glory given to the giver.  

East German Judge

January 21st, 2022 at 11:10 AM ^

Well written and thoughtful post, however, I am happy to give you another angle.  When I was younger I did whatever philanthropic efforts I could privately and beleived all should do the same.  However, since these, and JH with is publicly telling people he is giving away his bonus, are all public figures / celebs, and maybe you are right they may want their ego stroked and the positive publicity.  On the other hand, maybe these "public" efforts will encourage / motivate / shame, etc., more other "public" figures to also do the same and give much needs monies to worthy causes.

So I am okay with public figures getting the positive publicity, because in the long run this type of "competition" will only benefit the charities. 

Hab

January 21st, 2022 at 11:52 AM ^

Thanks for your thoughts EGJ.  I appreciate the response.  I would agree with the idea that this kind of competition would increase the total number of dollars injected into charitable giving overall.  But wouldn't this lead to an inequitable distribution of those dollars as the competitors get to decide which charities are the preferred causes?  This could lead to some charities getting all the money where other, equally (or even more) worthy are left without?  Wouldn't the charities serving messy (my inartful term) populations be left out in the cold, while the pretty populations (those getting the celebrities the most clout/goodwill for their dollar) get a disproportionate share?  And do we really want participants in this kind of competition to decide what the pretty causes are?

MGlobules

January 21st, 2022 at 1:15 PM ^

You're right to be a little bit cynical. Charity is a structural feature of the system, and boosting your name with charities--using them to avoid taxes--is what lawyers advise people coming into money do. Often charities do work that the state once did (ending the welfare state was the work of both Ds and Rs so this is and isn't a partisan political issue). Read Dark Money and other recent reporting and you see that this has become a wildly twisted phenomenon. I've investigated the issue a little in my field, food ecology, because charity food banking is a huge business, puts lots of money in corporate hands, grows and grows as tougher things like well-paying jobs are harder to create or come by. It's a self-perpetuating system that would better be replaced by local food production and local food economies, but that's a slow build. 

That said, a lot a lot of people participate in good-hearted fashion, want to be a help. I know people who have created such charities; I am on the board of one--we feed about 500 families a month. And I see no reason to believe JJ isn't going at it with good intentions. But someone's anticipating large paydays for that young man down the road.  

I hope that his ends up doing lots of good and doesn't just become an institution with nice offices, top-heavy with well-paid officials. 

 

 

MadGatter

January 21st, 2022 at 1:24 PM ^

In regards to why make it public his donations: JJ started a foundation that is having all proceeds go to charitable enterprises (Motts children hospital, etc). It would then make sense for him to use his platform to get the word out of this foundation so others can contribute to the cause. More people that know about it donate or buy things from them (shirts, jerseys, slides, whatever) which is more money for the charities. Even if you have completely pure intensions, it makes sense to advertise something like this.

denardogasm

January 21st, 2022 at 10:10 AM ^

Was actually just thinking about this the other day.  ESPN and national outlets seem to make a huge deal out of small nice things players do and blow them way out of proportion, I guess because it's rare that young players do those things?  But I can remember several of those players turning out to be either criminals or just complete basketcases.  I remember specific articles and Gameday pieces about Dorial Green-Beckham basically being Mother Theresa as a high schooler for instance.  Fast forward and he was kicked off Mizzou's team for drug charges and assaulting a woman, flamed out of the NFL for similar reasons, and I think is in jail now.  I remember another piece making Dwayne Haskins out to be a saint just because he loved his sister.  Two years later he couldn't earn the trust of his coach or team because he kept breaking team rules and was cut.  I'm all for feel good stories about players doing good but it's a bit overblown.  That said, JJ is well on his way to curing cancer and ending world hunger.

BroadneckBlue21

January 21st, 2022 at 11:04 AM ^

Maybe, instead of being cynics or on the fence, you spend less time guessing which way a person’s heart means and just bleeping appreciate it, donate or not, and move on. It is quite easy to not do anything yourself but criticize others, so…maybe practice silence when it comes to motive speculation or using it for your own vicarious do nothing bragging rights.

Basically, the only important response should be: Young man used his clout to set up and advertise a charity. Awesome. More should do this. Donate if you have the means.