Line Stats, OL vs. DL: When Ohio State Has the Ball

Submitted by BuckeyeChuck on November 22nd, 2021 at 9:56 PM

This post analyzes the Line Stats provided by Football Outsiders when Ohio State has the ball. A similar prior post addressed the same stats when Michigan has the ball.

 

Average Line Yards – Rushing yards per play attributed to the OL

Ohio State offense 3rd vs. Michigan defense 73rd

Standard downs: Ohio State 2nd vs. Michigan 49th

Passing downs: Ohio State 23rd vs. Michigan 67th

Welp, I didn’t expect this. I did expect that Ohio State’s O-line would be ranked pretty high, but I did not expect that Michigan’s rush defense would rank this low. I suppose this is a product of Michigan’s DTs against the run?

OSU’s average line yards is 2nd in the nation on standard downs (3.21); their passing down line yards is slightly higher (3.24) but drops way down in the rankings to 23rd.

Ohio State rushes for 5.8 YPC (sacks incl.), tops in the nation. Removing sacks, they’re at 6.3 YPC. Michigan’s 3.7 YPC allowed (sacks incl.) ranks 37th; removing sacks, they give up 4.4 YPC.

Ohio State should have some success rushing the ball, to what extent will Michigan be able to limit their success?

 

Opportunity Rate - % of carries that gain 4+ yards

Ohio State offense 12th vs. Michigan defense 25th

This appears to be the key swing point in this matchup. Ohio State rushes for 4+ yards on 55% of their rushes. Michigan allows opponents to rush for 4+ yards only 43% of carries. Which side of 50/50 this falls on will have a huge impact on how well or not well OSU runs the ball.

 

Stuff Rate - % of carries by RBs stopped at or before line of scrimmage

Ohio State offense 2nd vs. Michigan defense 103rd

Those rankings look to be a huge advantage, but as was stated in the prior post the raw stats for Stuff Rate don’t really look to be terribly different. Ohio State gets stuffed 10.4% of their RB carries (~1 out of 9-10 carries) whereas Michigan’s defensive Stuff Rate is 14.8% (~1 out of 7 carries). That doesn’t look as significant a difference as the rankings would lead us to believe.

If we read between the lines of Stuff Rate & Opportunity Rate, Ohio State runs for between 1-3 yards roughly 35% of the time, lowest frequency of the four (OSU offense/defense & Michigan offense/defense…the other three are each in the 40-42% range):

  • 10% = no gain or TFL
  • 35% = between 1-3 yards
  • 55% = 4+ yards

Michigan’s defense similarly gives up runs of 1-3 yards roughly 42% of the time:

  • 15% = no gain or TFL
  • 42% = between 1-3 yards
  • 43% = 4+ yards

 

Power Success Rate - % of runs on 3rd or 4th down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a 1st down or TD

Ohio State offense 28th vs. Michigan defense 10th

Ohio State converts on 76% of their short-yardage situations. Michigan allows a conversion only 53%.

For all the talk about Michigan’s offense not being good in short-yardage situations (see prior post), they convert on 73% of situations...only 3 percentage points lower than OSU.

 

Sack Rate – excludes garbage time

Ohio State offense 4th vs. Michigan defense 33rd

Standard downs: Ohio State 20th vs. Michigan 61st

Passing downs: Ohio State 8th vs. Michigan 27th

This is the only line stat for passing plays, and one stat doesn’t do justice to the greatest head-to-head matchup of the game: Hutch/Ojabo vs. OSU’s OTs. You all know how much PFF loves Hutch & Ojabo…PFF also loves Ohio State’s offensive tackles. This will be the marquee matchup for NFL scouts to watch. (The 2nd biggest marquee head-to-head matchup will be Dax and whoever he’s covering [probably Wilson, but maybe Smith-Njigba?].)

Like Michigan’s offense, Ohio State rarely allows a sack (2.4%). And Michigan puts more pressure on the QB than what these sack rates show (7.7%). Getting to Stroud will be key for Michigan. Michigan cranks it up on passing downs: 5.6% on standard downs, 10.1% on passing downs.

If Ohio State gets away with ~45x2 uncalled holding penalties, they should be in great shape to protect Stroud. But if a couple holds get called, causing the OSU line to get tentative with their hands, and Hutch and/or Ojabo are able to get consistent pressure, that could make the difference in the game.

 

Cackle with knowing glee if…

  • Ohio State gets 4+ yards on a minority of carries.
  • Ohio State is successful on ~50% of their short-yardage situations.
  • Ohio State gets called for holding once or twice against Hutch/Ojabo.

Worry if…

  • Ohio State gets 4+ yards on a majority of carries
  • Ohio State is rushing for 6+ YPC.
  • Stroud stays clean.

Leonhall

November 22nd, 2021 at 10:09 PM ^

I don’t see Michigan’s end pressuring stroud as much as we think. Osu will plan accordingly and the ball out quick and try to take advantage of their pressures in a way that causes us to adjust. Key to our Dline will be interior imo. 

CityOfKlompton

November 23rd, 2021 at 11:03 AM ^

Ohio will pass the ball well. Maybe Michigan slows them down to some degree, but they are most likely going to be effective, so the key will be limiting big plays and shutting down the run to make them one-dimensional (lol.)

My big concern is the running game. I don't have a hard time seeing the Buckeyes running effectively up the middle, leaving the defense with too many holes to plug. They have a good offensive line, good RBs, and if they are able to keep the Michigan defense guessing, the game could become a shootout, which wouldn't bode well for the good guys.

DesertGoBlue

November 22nd, 2021 at 10:49 PM ^

I always appreciate your participation on this here blog, BC. Good content to comb through, both here and the prior post. You even got the direction of the cackle-if/worry-if correct. We’ll done. Thanks for being here. 

CityOfKlompton

November 23rd, 2021 at 11:36 AM ^

Very much this. Assuming our subpar DTs will be able to have a good day against a very good, subpar-by-OSU-standards-but-still-very-good-by-normal-team-standards interior OL is not a recipe for happiness. Michigan will have to do some interesting things to take advantage of the OSU OL.

This isn't the first time we've come into The Game with a crazy good pass rush anchored by some stellar DEs, and the previous few times we still struggled to get any adequate pressure with a better DT group than we have now.

I'm not saying Michigan won't get pressure on Saturday, but I am saying I've seen this movie before, more than once. It's not as simple as it sounds.

Don

November 23rd, 2021 at 9:17 AM ^

Our entire corps of interior DL have accumulated a grand total of 1.5 sacks through 11 games. Expecting that they’re going to have “good days” against the best OL we’re going to face is extreme optimism.

It's true that an interior DL can collapse the pocket without recording a sack, but I don't think our interior guys have shown any consistent ability to do even that.

1VaBlue1

November 23rd, 2021 at 8:31 AM ^

The thing that worries me is Michigan's tackling.  From my view, this is one of the worse tackling Michigan team's I've seen in recent memory.  It's not that guys get through them, or break tackles easily, it's that runners always manage to get another yard or two when they get hit.  Especially RB's - whenever a RB gets hit coming through the line, momentum takes them through the hit another couple of yards.

I see them hitting and bouncing off - rarely wrapping up.  When they do wrap, it seems like they often leave their feet instead of planting and using that leverage.  So the ball carrier can use mighty 'mo to get that little extra.

That MD WR that ran though Gray's hit last week is a perfect example - Gray merely bent over, turned his back, and bounced off.  Gray expected the guy to go down or OOB, but he hit back and carried through - for another 25 yards.  WRAP UP THE BALL CARRIER FER GODSAKES!!!

hajiblue

November 23rd, 2021 at 8:32 AM ^

I would like to see Michigan stack Ojabo and Hutch to one side of the formation and force OSU to adjust their blocking to mitigate it. Then blitz off the other side where you should then have a favorable one on one matchup. Either way you gain an advantage with Ojabo or Hutch facing a TE or RB instead of their other OT. I believe they could do this enough early on to cause some problems. 

Casanova

November 23rd, 2021 at 9:13 AM ^

OSUs running is very good running the ball. 

In that formation, OSU would call Duo and crease the middle of the defense.

If the blitzers don’t get Henderson off the edge, he will be gone because there wont be any defenders in position to tackle him once he reaches the second level.

I think twist and stunts will be more effective because are DT are not strong but they are athletic  

1VaBlue1

November 23rd, 2021 at 8:34 AM ^

Aside from the tackling issue I have...

PSU managed to limit big plays and make OSU work their way down the field, including into and through the condensed RZ area.  They were very successful at that.  I feel Michigan's defense can do the same, even if not as cleanly.  And if they do, I like the chances - because Michigan's offense is light years better than PSU's.

Perkis-Size Me

November 23rd, 2021 at 8:51 AM ^

The numbers tell us more or less what we already know. Its going to be an uphill battle pulling this off. Michigan can win, but a lot is going to have to go right. McDonald is going to have to earn his paycheck in this game, and I hope he's got a few things drawn up that we haven't seen yet.