Did Indiana make the 2 point conversion?

Submitted by UMxWolverines on October 25th, 2020 at 12:25 PM

Let's revisit something else to make us feel good about yesterday. As much as I dislike the Franklin bashing on the board most of the time, he absolutely earned Frames Janklin yesterday for not making sure the running back knew not to score. 

Besides that, what a ballsy call by Tom Alllen, and maybe the closest call I've ever seen. I think he got it by like an inch. Unbelievable. 

mfan_in_ohio

October 25th, 2020 at 2:08 PM ^

1. How do you link the sensor to the knee (or other body parts) of the ball carrier?  How do sensors determine whether you’ve hit the ground or another player?

2. in this case, the first thing to hit the ground was the ball itself, which we have a great view of. It’s almost impossible to imagine a better camera view of the play. I don’t think a set of sensors would dramatically improve things. 

Sensors and VAR work great in soccer because the ball is either over the line or it’s not. The problem is that football (American, that is) is more complicated.  I think a sensor would be great for a forward progress situation at the goal line or at a first down line, but that’s probably it.

 

HarBoSchem

October 25th, 2020 at 12:30 PM ^

It appeared that the ball hit the ground, out of bounds, before touching the pylon.  But, I'm no replay official.  I was glad they gave it to IU...'cause fuck PSU!

Jack Be Nimble

October 25th, 2020 at 1:00 PM ^

That's true, but the pylon isn't the only thing that's important. The ball could have broken the plane before it touched the ground, even without touching the pylon.

If I had to guess, I would guess that it didn't get there, but there was clearly nowhere near enough evidence to overturn the call on the field.

M-Dog

October 25th, 2020 at 12:32 PM ^

No.

But it was so micro-close you could not overturn what was called on the field.  So the play stands.

If the play was called the other way on the field, then the same thing . . . the call stands.

 

Bo Harbaugh

October 25th, 2020 at 12:33 PM ^

Probably not, but without location technology connected to the ball and goal line, it's impossible to know for sure.

JT was short.

Penix is just long enough.

Glorious PSU loss.

jmblue

October 25th, 2020 at 12:33 PM ^

The ball only needs to reach the front of the goal line - not cross it - to be considered in.  It did that, but was it out of bounds first?  

The call on the field had to stand, it's way too close to determine otherwise.

Re: game management, another thing I didn't understand was why Franklin attempted that super-long FG with 9 seconds left.  That's plenty of time to run another play.  We ran a play with 7 seconds in our game and still attempted a FG.

Indy Pete - Go Blue

October 25th, 2020 at 12:35 PM ^

The pylon is taller than the ball. The ball was at its furthest point forward as it touched the ground right on the sideline before hitting the pylon (exactly in the same longitude as the pylon). I think we can logically conclude that it did not cross the plane given that the ball was about a centimeter short of the pylon when it hit the ground. Anyways, justice was served because Frames did everything in his power to blow that game -  Just truly terrible situational coaching. 

Indy Pete - Go Blue

October 25th, 2020 at 1:07 PM ^

The most unbelievably terrible coaching decision I think I have ever seen is when penn state has the ball at midfield, first and 10 after a ridiculous kick off by Indiana with about 23 seconds left. Penn State has one time out and at least three plays to get themselves into field-goal range.  Franklin streaks down the sideline towards the referee desperately trying to call a timeout right before they run their first down play, which would probably be the only way that they would manage to run out of time without a chance at kicking a field goal. He had the entire time after the change of possession to dial-in the play that he wants for first down, and he has an upperclassman quarterback who could change the play at the line of scrimmage. But instead, he tries to get rid of their only time out, showing just an unbelievable lack of awareness. This is obviously only two minutes after he doesn’t take a knee three times and end the game on IU’s 10 yard line with 1:45 to go (and IU with only one timeout left). The lack of kneeling down was one of the worst coaching decisions I’ve ever seen, but the effort to eliminate your only timeout before your first down play after a change of possession was the most embarrassing coaching moment I think I have ever seen.

ChalmersE

October 25th, 2020 at 4:21 PM ^

Exactly!  I was shocked when they didn’t go into the victory formation, especially since they were deep in Indiana territory. If somehow there were 10 seconds left after four kneel downs, Indiana would have had to go 80 yards in one play to win.  I’m not sure Frames wasn’t thinking about running up the score until some said, but wait.  Then it was too late.

Blue in St Lou

October 25th, 2020 at 2:18 PM ^

That's what I thought, too. The tip of the ball crossed the line inside the pylon, then the wide part of the ball hit the ground out of bounds, then the ball hit the pylong. There's no way to say that that definitely is what happened, but I think it probably did, and that's more than enough to make the play stand.

Jack Be Nimble

October 25th, 2020 at 1:09 PM ^

Your logic is incorrect. Because the ball is oblong-shaped and held at an angle, the farthest point forward of the ball is clearly closer to the invisible plane of the end zone than the ball is to the pylon. The ball clearly could have crossed the plane before it hit the pylon, so the fact that it hit the ground before hitting the pylon does not prove it was short.

Indy Pete - Go Blue

October 25th, 2020 at 1:14 PM ^

Agreed - looking at the beautiful OP picture, the furthest point of the ball is slightly medial to the pylon (different longitude). You (jack) and jmblue corrected my inaccurate assertion because the furthest point of the ball was not exactly in plane with the pylon. Probably short, but cannot make the certain logical conclusion that it is short. Probably is not certain - call on the field correctly stands. And justice is served for frames and psu. 

ShadowStorm33

October 25th, 2020 at 12:37 PM ^

My initial thought from the hightlights was that he was short, as it seemed like he hit the ground before the ball hit the pylon. But looking at that picture makes it look like the ball crossed the plane before it hit the pylon, which makes it a closer call. Still not sure if it crossed the plane before he was down though, and I'd be pissed if I was a Penn St. fan. Regardless, really glad it wasn't our game.