Conley to visit Ohio and Oregon - Scout's Bill Greene
Title says it all. Here we go again...
Gareon Conley tells me he will visit Ohio State and Oregon.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:01 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:02 PM ^
Conley is from Ohio
October 27th, 2012 at 6:04 PM ^
Yeah, I just remembered too. That's the beer talking, lol.
October 27th, 2012 at 10:01 PM ^
WOTS is that the staff already reached out to Pocic to see if he was still interested and he basically told them to "talk to the hand." Pocic ain't coming to UM and I very much doubt that McQuay ends up in Ann Arbor as well, unless FSU schedules a home-and-home with UM in the next few years.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:02 PM ^
Something tells me this staff wouldn't trust a kid if he decommitted and then wanted to recommit. Just a hunch on my part...hence the no visits thing. They put their trust in you to honor your word and once you go back on it I doubt they trust in it again.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:31 PM ^
This staff believes your word is your bond. It will pay dividends in the end.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:06 PM ^
does visiting other places mean they don't have the option to come here, or they aren't considered "committed", and their spot is up for grabs?
October 27th, 2012 at 6:10 PM ^
It means you are no longer committed. I don't think it means he can't ever possibly come back and recommit. Hoke keeps in touch with all kinds of kids he recruited, yet committed to other programs, so I wouldn't expect the door to be forever closed. Likely he'll end up someplace else, though.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:11 PM ^
Michigan's coaches stopped recruiting Pharaoh Brown and David Dawson, but both of those guys were shady about it.
We'll see what happens with Conley, since he seems to be fairly straight forward about it...
October 27th, 2012 at 6:07 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:08 PM ^
Landing Green or Treadwell would really turn my frown upside down
October 27th, 2012 at 6:56 PM ^
(treadwell and Greene would be great but tonight we have bigger issues)
October 27th, 2012 at 6:57 PM ^
I don't think we're going to win the Rose Bowl tonight.
Just a hunch.
October 27th, 2012 at 7:50 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 7:21 PM ^
They aren't mutually exclusive. In fact I would argue to at least a slight degree, they are linked.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:10 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:20 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 7:25 PM ^
This is not a matter of Hoke's policy being a "problem," it's a matter of 17-18 year old kids making one of the most important decisions of their lives and actually sticking to it. Hoke expects kids to honor their commitment and his policy is essentially like any committed relationship.
Take marriage, for example. How would you feel if your future wife/husband tells you about five months after you got engaged, "I'm not so sure about this marriage thing. I think I should've slept with a few more people first. I'm gonna go do that, okay?"
This is not far from the reality of this situation. Conley wants to test the waters again and Hoke has made it clear that he will do the same. I don't see a problem with anything that reinforces a philosophy of honoring your word and following through with your decisions.
Plus, who's to say that this policy would make a single difference on a kid like Conley, who's recruitment has ramped up significantly during this season? How do we know that not having this honor policy would really stop him or Dawson from taking visits or that Hoke will slam the door shut in his face, should he decided, once and for all, that Michigan is the right school and we still have an open spot? It seems to me that this policy actually PREVENTS more things like this happening.
Anyways, we can't blame Conley for wanting to take visits. He's killing it out there and schools are finally taking notice. We should instead be doing backflips on the coaching staff's talent evaluation skills.
October 27th, 2012 at 10:47 PM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 10:23 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:12 PM ^
...
Dammit.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:13 PM ^
Call up McQuay. Plays better against better competition.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:14 PM ^
I do not care about, nor care for, the young men that decide to leave this program. I stand by Hoke's visit policy 100%. This is about more than an individual. This is about Michigan and what this University stands for. I will not worry because for every Conley/Dawson/Brown, there are 10 Ferns/Morris/Kovacs/Robinson that know that this is the greatest school in the world and treat it as such.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:16 PM ^
Michael Ferns is about 16 months away from signing a NLI. Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:17 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:29 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:15 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:15 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:20 PM ^
Are we allowed to worry about Conley now that he's presumably gone, Ace?
October 27th, 2012 at 6:20 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:28 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:28 PM ^
Because it's happened twice. So it's obviously a trend.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:34 PM ^
And lines continue to infinity.
Therefore, a second decommit invariably leads to infinite decommits.
/Math
October 27th, 2012 at 6:28 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:48 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:31 PM ^
That a kid who's been a part of this recruiting class for months, skills are being belittled because he might not end up blue... If he decides to stick with this commitment or not he's a hell of a high school player and playmaker, could make a big difference on either side of the ball...
October 28th, 2012 at 1:05 AM ^
I know.. it is amazing to see the "oh well, we're loaded at that position" posts. Probably by the same people who 2 months ago said Conley will be the star of the class at DB. All of this recruiting is guesswork - you want to load up on as much talent as possible and hope 10-14 pan out for you out of every class. Conley could be a stud or a dud at the next level who knows - but everyone saying "well we're loaded anyhow" doesnt know that. Every guy we have recruited could be a NFL star in 8 years or someone who doesnt make it past JR yr in college.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:33 PM ^
We could lose more, we will definetely get a few more before NSD. It's just how it goes.
Maybe we wants to play offense?
October 27th, 2012 at 6:45 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 6:48 PM ^
Until next year when there are another group of players just like him. Don't get me wrong, I wish he would come here because I think he's a good player but some people are acting like this is a once-in-a-generation type player we're losing here. He's a borderline 4* recruit, he's not a program maker, he's not going to single handedly lead us back to glory. He's a damned good athlete and a damned good football player but yes, they kinda do grow on trees.
October 27th, 2012 at 7:03 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 7:09 PM ^
Again, he's a borderline 4* recruit. If we end up losing him then yeah, it really sucks. But stop acting like he's Charles Woodson Incarnate. We expected some attrition from this class given how early it filled up and now it's happening and people are freaking. I can't guarantee that we will get a player just like him next year or even the year after but I can guarantee you that Hoke will continue to bring in top flight talent and this team will continue to grow and progress and get back to what we expect and demand out of our program. Perhaps I overstepped in my previous post but this isn't a consensus 5* player that will shatter our class. We will be just fine with our without Mr. Conley.
October 27th, 2012 at 7:36 PM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 1:09 AM ^
Stars mean crap. Jake Ryan was a 3 star with no offers outside of MAC schools. Our starting interior D-lineman Will Campbell was a 5 star national recruit - he has bombed. I have no idea if Conley will bomb or be a stud. But to downplay it is silly. Do you know how many stars Woodson had? Curious. not that it MATTERS.
October 27th, 2012 at 6:49 PM ^
First World problems. Remember the recruiting famine of the Rich Rod years?
October 27th, 2012 at 6:50 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 7:51 PM ^
October 27th, 2012 at 7:53 PM ^