I'mTheStig

February 3rd, 2019 at 9:08 PM ^

People should care.

If you were to graph the rise of diabetes in this country with when the FDA approved HFCS, and overlay the trend lines, they match.

HFCS is evil stuff.  It's refined with hydrocarbons.  Your body processes it like alcohol.  

teldar

February 3rd, 2019 at 10:43 PM ^

Links? Data? Proof?

It's converted with an enzyme. It's a carbohydrate, not a petroleum derivative. Sugar is sucrose and fructose. Fructose isn't killing people. Ingesting 12000 calories a day of packaged junk food is killing them. As far as making it into alcohol, the point is that the sugar is gone. And yes, being an alcoholic will give you cirrhosis and kill you.

Did you also know water can kill you if you drink too much? Oxygen can kill you if you breath too much of it. It can make babies blind. Overdoing things can kill you.

I'mTheStig

February 3rd, 2019 at 11:04 PM ^

Sigh... doing other people's research for them gets old... assuming you can type g-o-o-g-l-e just as easily as anyone else on the web that is. 

https://www.pulsus.com/scholarly-articles/high-fructose-corn-syrup-hfcs-plays-a-dominant-role-in-the-pathogenesis-of-nafldassociated-cirrhosis-3889.html

If the words in the previous link are too big for you, maybe this is more your speed:

https://drhyman.com/blog/2011/05/13/5-reasons-high-fructose-corn-syrup-will-kill-you/

https://jenniferskitchen.com/health-information/how-is-high-fructose-corn-syrup-made

 

 

Gameboy

February 4th, 2019 at 12:41 AM ^

Oh come on. This study is far from conclusive. Just look at the abstract's results:

When mice were fed with excessive trans fat, they developed NASH, however cirrhosis formation was not observed. When the mice were fed a combination of trans fat and HFCS, cirrhosis formation was completed.

You cannot concluded anything on this study alone. It is about mouse, many many experiments on mouse do not lead to anything when it is transposed on humans. This goes double in experiments like this where doses are overwhelming.

This is the kind of study you should read and say "oh, that's interesting' and ignore it until a similar experiments are done with humans, with actual realistic ingestion amounts.

You can ignore almost every diet-related studies out there. Dietary studies with actual reliable results are far and few in between.

 

 

chunkums

February 4th, 2019 at 12:57 AM ^

Can you try not being so condescending with your super awesome research skills if you're going to cite a single article in a dubious publication that's been labeled as predatory, a blog post from a physician who practices "functional medicine" quackery, and "Jennifer's Kitchen" as your iron-clad scientific evidence? There are plenty of recent articles in PubMed on this topic, including several meta-analyses that do not draw the definitive conclusions that you state with such certainty. HFCS is not good for you, but neither is any other kind of excess sugar. 

Gatekeeper

February 4th, 2019 at 9:35 AM ^

Yes. I care about Corn Syrup. I have a food reaction anytime I ingest it. It can be pretty severe. I used to drink Miller Lite before they put it in. They didn't tell anyone they added it obviously and I had a pretty severe reaction.

A small % of the population has reactions to it like mine

Then all of the other stuff that was already posted.

 

Funny thing, Bud Light used to have it. I knew, because I'd have a reaction. They must've stopped recently.

ijohnb

February 3rd, 2019 at 7:43 PM ^

I think Super Bowl ads were a little bit of a fad that has died out.  At the end of the day they are just commercials, they can only be so good.

The Fan in Fargo

February 3rd, 2019 at 10:17 PM ^

UMProud, pretty sure you never had a chance with her on your best day with a million cash in your pocket there chump. That even means when she is ten years older from this current day. Most men with any testosterone yet still find her sexy. You obviously have nothing down there. She's still hot and you probably fancy the same sex. Maybe you are a woman though? I don't know. 

M Ascending

February 4th, 2019 at 8:23 AM ^

The Hyundai ad with Bateman was right up there.  With each descending floor, I could personally relate to the trauma that was about to be inflicted on the unwitting victim.  I vote that a tie with "The Dude Abides" as top ads of the evening.  Even SJP couldn't ruin The Dude Abides ad for "Stella Artose."

Worst ad was easily the Verizon ad with the soppy "First Responders" tribute.  I am sick of corporations using fake empathy to sell their products.  And, I wonder how many "takes" it took to get this "reality" story just right, tears and all.  Disgusting.  Yes -- First Responders are heroes.  Companies that seek to take advantage of that for profit are not.

 

bronxblue

February 3rd, 2019 at 9:14 PM ^

it seems to track with a lot of people saying "if we weren't such a PC/SJW culture, they'd be great!"  Because apparently "look at these two women wrestle in a fountain arguing over Miller Light" was pure art.

They're ads.  Some of them are good.  Some are bad.  People expecting a masterpiece from a company trying to sell you corn chips or a KIA are probably barking up the wrong tree.

Wendyk5

February 3rd, 2019 at 9:58 PM ^

I was an advertising copywriter in the 90's. I worked on Bud Light when they had the best SB ads, year after year. I was in a group of about 8 really talented teams, and we all competed to get our SB spots produced. There was no guarantee it would air, even if you produced a spot. August Busch was the decider. It was HIGH pressure stuff. The agency's reputation depended on the USA Today poll, and the client expected top tens every year. I got one in around 1996, and it was fantastic seeing it on the SB. But if I had to endure all that pressure today, no way I could do it. I wasn't married yet; my whole life was my career. Finding the elusive sweet spot -- that balance between entertainment and selling -- was so challenging, I thought about it 24 hours a day. And I burned out.