We are back

August 8th, 2020 at 7:08 PM ^

There’s rumors swirling that big will cancel and Penn st, OSU, Nebraska , and Michigan will play in big 12 for this season only if that happens. Its all over Twitter right now 

youfilthyanimal

August 8th, 2020 at 7:51 PM ^

To date, in the state of Ohio (State's own health website)

0-19 yo 2 deaths due to covid for 0%

20-29 yo 14 deaths 0%

30-39 yo 1%

 

Michigan (state's own health website)

 

5-14 1 death

15-24 7 deaths

25-34 41 deaths

 

Testing is going up...more cases are being reported but deaths as a whole are down dramatically. 

Test religiously, monitor players and enforce existing rules.

Now follow the science and play football! 

ndscott50

August 8th, 2020 at 9:13 PM ^

Does it? Do you care to share the clear science that says 18 to 22 year olds should not be playing football? Where is the CDC guidance saying no football or no school? I don’t think there is clear science the other way either but if you are waiting for clear science on this you will be waiting a very long time. 

ndscott50

August 8th, 2020 at 11:42 PM ^

Lots of down votes here but no answer on the science question.  I have generally been supportive of the take maximum precautions and keep a number of things locked down until conditions warrant reopening approach. Clearly many states down south moved to fast.  That being said holding the strongest possible view of maintaining lockdowns and closures does not mean you are following the science. Was Chicago following the science when the health director said the hybrid plan for part-time in-person instruction was safe only to be overruled by the mayor a day later? 

Were we following the science in my own school district when the superintendent was told by the Boulder County Health Director that current data supported in person learning but they decided to go to a full distance learning model anyway?

There is a line between caution based on science and fear mongering/hysteria.

mooseman

August 9th, 2020 at 1:06 AM ^

Are you looking for a randomized controlled study where they compared a football league in the midst of a pandemic from a novel virus to another that isn't? Good luck with that one. 

Following science would say that an admixture of 100+ individuals in close proximity traveling to various geographic locals to have close contact with multiple other individuals at current positivity rates is a bad idea. Particularly when there is no way to keep them in any sort of a "bubble". 

bacon1431

August 8th, 2020 at 8:11 PM ^

In order to test enough for teams to travel and play each other, you’d have to be testing at a rate that is unavailable to the general public. And you’d have to do it for most fall sports. It’s not going to happen at that level.