Army Snowflakes - The Defense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on September 8th, 2019 at 3:00 PM

This will be your thread for hot takes and snowflakes regarding the defense against Army.

turtleboy

September 7th, 2019 at 3:43 PM ^

The defense, despite getting zero help, and the offense putting the ball on the ground more than they put it in the end zone, still held army to 14 points in regulation, and limited the damage as much as possible. Credit to them.

TVG_2.0

September 7th, 2019 at 3:43 PM ^

Defense did the job we hoped it would pre season. Bend not break. Can't really bitch about anything outside of the absolutely terrible 3 man fronts on fourth down vs obvious FB dives.

stephenrjking

September 7th, 2019 at 4:05 PM ^

Nothing obvious. You have to have a base defense that works against everything and run it at all times, or they’ll edge you. If Michigan loads up against the FB dice, Army will edge them outside for huge yardage. 

Theres really nothing to learn from, defensively. Michigan isn’t playing an offense like this again. They weren’t spectacular, but they were fine. The Ross injury is the only significant news. 

Live to play another day. 

ppToilet

September 7th, 2019 at 9:51 PM ^

I respectfully disagree. To me, the most obvious and egregious error was having Ben Mason at DT for so long. He was run over, and over, and over, and over again. I am very grateful that mercifully that was patched over by, I believe, sliding Danna inside.

What was learned? Well, perhaps nothing new to us but to the rest of NCAA it shows Michigan has a soft underbelly in the D-line. Wisconsin and Iowa will almost assuredly be licking their chops as they make their living exploiting weak D-lines and out of position linebackers. We know the game plan - run up the middle a few times until the linebackers bite to help support and that's the time they throw the play action pass to the TE across the middle where the LBs vacated.

The defense won this game, though, with the crucial plays of Hill (INT) and Hutchinson (forced fumble). Army's inconceivable decisions to throw the ball helped. And I'm going to say a prayer for Zach Charbonnet to stay healthy as he is really the next big thing.

lawlright

September 7th, 2019 at 5:21 PM ^

It's pretty clear that if Michigan had the personnel to run a different D that they would. They don't have any D linemen. What's frustrating as hell is why? Hurt? Too young? 

Carlo is ok. Hutchinson is going to be good. The ends are good. Then... Who you got? Jeter is not good. Vilain is... Still hurt? Chris Hinton is... Not ready? Hurt? Mazie Smith is... Not ready? Hurt? Dwumfour hurt. 

Fact is, the offense can pull it together and turnovers should come around, but this team has no interior DL due to who knows?

Reggie Dunlop

September 7th, 2019 at 7:35 PM ^

No, this is how Don Brown plays the option. It's how he did it 2 years ago. It's not new. 

https://mgoblog.com/content/upon-further-review-2017-offense-vs-air-force

And once again, it worked really well. Mouth breathers complain about dives. They gave up 14 points and under 250 total yards. If that happens every game we'll be 15-0.

lhglrkwg

September 7th, 2019 at 3:46 PM ^

Not sure how much you can take away from playing a triple option team other than that interior DL is still a problem. Most of Army's damage was right up the gut. Not sure if that was Kemp or scheme

UMfan21

September 7th, 2019 at 4:15 PM ^

I really dont understand that offsides.

 

You are one of the premier athletes in college sports.  Someone with fantastic body control, fast decision making, and all the intangibles....but you cant look over and notice you are beyond the nose of the ball?

 

I dont understand how ANYONE lines up offsides.  

Solecismic

September 7th, 2019 at 3:48 PM ^

There is so much to worry about today, but the defense overall did as well as I could have hoped, and the performance in the second overtime was obviously huge.

If there's one thing I take away from this game - one we've all been dreading for years - it's that they went out in that second overtime and did something positive that really could give them a boost the rest of the year.

It makes the rest of this mess worth it (unless, of course, they've lost Patterson with the knee).

DonBrownsMustache

September 7th, 2019 at 3:48 PM ^

Defense did their job for the most part.  The offense let them down big time.  We were four yards away from losing until Hill came up with an interception.

UMinSF

September 7th, 2019 at 4:37 PM ^

Was also Army's dumbest call. When they called TO, I thought they might try to get greedy and pass. 

That team simply cannot pass. 

Didn't it look like Hill bobbled that a bit - I'm sure he (and all of us) were having flashbacks to last week. Fortunately he held on this time; that was a game-changer.

agp

September 7th, 2019 at 3:48 PM ^

Pretty solid B+ outing. 14 points against a bizarre offense that targets the weakest point of the defense. Pretty sure we would've taken that at 11:59 AM no questions asked.

enlightenedbum

September 7th, 2019 at 3:52 PM ^

There was nothing about it from the beat writers, but did it seem like Ross missed a lot of the game to anyone else?

EDIT: Friend tells me banged up, was questionable for the second half.

andrewgr

September 7th, 2019 at 3:53 PM ^

Although the Army QB arguably cost them the game with his horrific decision to throw the ball directly to Hill on the goal line rather than taking the chip-shot field goal, I still thing the Defense deserves major props on that play.  3rd and 6 on the goal is a running play for Army like 95% of the time, it took discipline and execution to to not get suckered in and leave a receiver wide open.