Unverified Voracity Is In Year Eight Of This Comment Count

Brian

36618398570_1ef2703fcc_z

run run run run run run run away oh oh oh [Christopher Cook]

We're #3.5. Spencer's top whatever:

Handing Florida two pick-sixes was only sportsmanlike, really. Without them, this is a 41-3 game or so, a complete wash, an elimination. Michigan’s chief concerns coming into the year were finding playmakers down the field. Tarik Black and Nick Eubanks did that serviceably enough, particularly so when you consider that Wilton Speight didn’t really have a great game and that the run game took a minute to lock in a stranglehold.

In sum, this Michigan team has great bones, is a handful along the defensive line, has two running backs capable of following an mean offensive line down the field, and has a quarterback who needs help from all that. But really, who doesn’t need a team? And who, among Michgan fans, will ever question the team? The team, the team, the team?

Alabama is a boring #1, as they always are.

Further Florida aftermath. I forgot to check Matt Hinton's weekly column on the SEC since usually it doesn't include extended treatises on a Big Ten team. This time it does:

It was, as McElwain said, a “plain and simple, take your whooping” kind of defeat. But the response from Florida fans was obvious too: Just how long do they have to keep taking it? Is Florida content to be a “take your whooping” kind of outfit? The Gators are nearly a decade removed from national relevance, or even from fielding a remotely competent quarterback for more than a week or two at a time. They’re no closer to filling that role after flip-flopping between Feleipe Franks and Malik Zaire on Saturday, to little effect, or to identifying a reliable playmaker among the skill players. The top two candidates, tailback Jordan Scarlett and receiver Antonio Callaway, were both among the late-breaking wave of suspensions before the game, but anyone who thinks either would have made a notable difference against the Wolverines hasn’t been paying close enough attention over the past two years.

Hinton also includes a long discussion of what the hell was going on with the illegal formation penalty—"dunno," more or less—and surveys the wreckage of the Florida offensive line:

That play — exactly the type of overwhelming debacle that used to unleash “S-E-C! S-E-C!” chants on beaten and broken-down Big Ten teams — was irrelevant to the outcome. But it was thoroughly emblematic of the line’s gradual deterioration over the course of the game. The play that preceded it was also a sack resulting in a fumble; in retrospect the Gators would have been better off if Michigan had recovered the first one just short of the goal line, or frankly if they’d just conceded at that point to taking an intentional safety. At least taking a knee in the end zone would have saved Zaire from a blindside hit everyone else in the building saw coming a mile away.

Every year you take up the banner of whatever P5 team you played in the nonconference. Last year Colorado worked out spectacularly well. This year... it's going to be weird and frustrating to be a proxy Florida fan this year. I fear I will understand the mindset all too well.

Also in aftermath, audio versions. Do you like goofily uninformed folks yellin'? Here you go:

How about the reasonably informed?

This was a bit of a comedown for a fanbase that was a wee bit optimistic headed into a game they were solid underdogs in.

They're not wrong though. Michigan's defensive performance was highly encouraging but it would be wise to pump the breaks at least a little. Florida's wasted more talent than anyone else in the country on that side of the ball:

That is incredible. Tim Tebow left eight years ago. Florida has endured eight years of Al Borges.

Is this the best sideline reporter moment of all time? Yes. Yes it is.

It's pushed over the top by Orgeron standing in the background of the shot. Congratulations to Allison Williams for surviving this stunt; going in there was a 50/50 chance Orgeron would overhear and turn her into gumbo.

I mean, okay, I guess you are Jim Harbaugh. Harbaugh on the first INT, which I still think is mostly on Crawford:

"Not throwing the ball high over the middle. Those balls get tipped and have a tendancy to go up in the air. During camp we played a lot against man-to-man defenses (vs. Don Brown), with a lot of pressure," Harbaugh said. "I take this onto myself coaching. There are times you throw high and you get away with it because it's zero coverage and there's no deep safeties back there. ... But when you're playing against (zone) safeties, you have to keep the ball below the shoulders.

"Shoulders down, so the arms of the receivers don't go up and tip the ball. We've made more of an emphasis on that."

Speight could have thrown it better; Crawford still had it hit him in the hands, and it looked like he wasn't even fully extended when the ball hit.

I don't really get the other bit of Harbaugh press conference Speight critique:

"Quarterbacks, they want to show that they're the one and they're the guy. And sometimes that leads to always trying to make a big play or always trying to make a play that proves that," he said. "We talked about that (with Speight). You have to let that come to you. Operate within the system, with the reads, be a disciple with mechanics and those big plays will come to you.

Speight's deep shots in this game:

  • completions to Tarik Black and Nick Eubanks
  • PI drawn by Crawford on accurate post
  • Fade route down sideline to Crawford is OOB
  • pick six on high-ish ball at open receiver
  • incompletion when Speight makes a killer check only to miss a wide open TD

I think that's it. The only one of those that was even a little forced was the PI. Speight's decisions against Florida were excellent. His execution was occasionally lacking. I imagine that's a response to a leading I-already-wrote-my-article question and not something Harbaugh's pulling out of thin air.

Wild thing. Yes, this occurred:

Harbaugh said he’s looking for “a season of increases.” That applies, he said, to everyone on the roster -- the coaching staff, the starting quarterback, players on both sides of the ball and even the rookie kicker who carved a zig-zag pattern into the back of his hair last week as an ode to the closer mentality of Rick Vaughn.

Yes, that would be Charlie Sheen’s heartthrob, fire-throwing, near-sighted ex-con character from "Major League" -- yet another reference that predates the referencer’s existence on this planet. Nordin said he had to show YouTube clips to a couple of his teammates for them to understand what he was going for. When asked Saturday if the similarities between him and Vaughn stretch beyond their hairstyles, Nordin smiled. “Yeah, I think so,” he said. Then he turned and walked back into the locker room.

Even the damn kicker on this team has some attitude.

Etc.: Georgia will be without Jacob Eason against ND this weekend; ND favored by almost a touchdown. Here's a new Michigan tumblr. Maryland's win over Texas came at high cost: torn ACL for Piggy, fractured ankle for Aniebonam.

Comments

bronxblue

September 5th, 2017 at 1:53 PM ^

I'm not going to disagree with the sentiment that Nuss is a mediocre OC, but Borges inherited a bunch of RRs players and rode them to decent offensive seasons. But by the time Borges was out, most of those guys were gone and there were few playmakers and a shell of an offensive line. It's not a fair comparison.

Hail Harbo

September 5th, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

The 2014 team was essentially the 2013 team but a year older.  True, Michigan had to replace both Taylor and Schoefield, but Mason Cole was a fair enough replacement at LT, so that left Braden at RT as the single greatest change from 2013 to 2014, save the OC.

Please, let's not play revisionist history.  Everyone that was anyone, to include here at MGoBlog, was eagerly anticipating what the young energetic Nussmeier could do with a seasoned offense.  And we were richly rewarded by the Appy State game, were we not?  Little did we know that would be the highlight of Nussmeier's career at Michigan.

Hail Harbo

September 5th, 2017 at 3:02 PM ^

Denard Robinson wasn't part of the 2013 team, a team which scored more points per game in his absence than they scored the previous year when he was on the team.  What hurt the 2013 season wasn't a lack of offense, it was a defense that gave up 90 more points season over season from 2012 to 2013.  If the 2013 defense was as stingy as the 2012 defense, Michigan easily has a 9-4 record instead of 7-6.  

Hail Harbo

September 5th, 2017 at 1:31 PM ^

A few years ago Notre Dame thought they had a stellar defense when they shutout the 2014 version of the Nussmeier offense.  The Notre Dame defense gave up around 370 points for the season, including that shutout.  This isn't to say that Michigan's defense will be anything like that, but Florida's offense is horrible and not an accurate measuring stick to predict one's future success.

The Oracle

September 5th, 2017 at 1:27 PM ^

Harbaugh's comment about Speight throwing high over the middle was significant. I live in the Bay Area, so for years I heard and read what he had to say while he was coaching Stanford and the 49ers. He NEVER says anything negative about a specific player. While he also said good things about Speight, I think his willingness to make that statement publicly makes it clear that he's not quite the Speight fan Brian is.

bronxblue

September 5th, 2017 at 1:47 PM ^

He also favorably compared Speight to Andrew Luck last year. So I don't think you can read too much into the comment except to point out things to work on. Also, and I'm not saying you're wrong per se, but i doubt this is the first time in his entire coaching tenure that he called out a player by name in a press conference.

The Man Down T…

September 5th, 2017 at 1:34 PM ^

fans in that Michigan tumblr.  They have that "are you fucking kidding me?  Another year of this?" look that we knew all too often over the last decade before Harbaugh.  I wouldn't wish that on anyone (other than buckeyes, spartans, irish and crimson tide fans)...

champswest

September 5th, 2017 at 1:37 PM ^

less impressive in the rear view mirror, but I am enjoying it just the same. An opening win against a non-cupcake away from home can do wonders for a young team. Got it rolling. Keep it rolling.

redjugador24

September 5th, 2017 at 1:47 PM ^

In regards to Harbaugh's quotes about Speight trying to make too many big plays instead of trusting his reads..... There were several times in this game where there was a RB or TE wide open in the flat, but Speight held the ball and threw to other receivers.  Obviously I'm not sure of his reads & progressions, but those safe little swing passes would have gone for 10+ yds each time and he never even seemed to look that way.  Me thinks those are an example of Speight playing hero ball and not taking the safe 10 yds.  

Hail Harbo

September 5th, 2017 at 1:50 PM ^

Given the two, just a bit outside, attempts, maybe Rickie Vaugn Nordin needs a pair of glasses.

On a related note, is it possible that The Troggs #1 hit from 1966 will not be played prior to Michigan's next FG attempt at Michigan Stadium?

G Strang

September 5th, 2017 at 2:12 PM ^

for that McElwain Out link. When the pitch of his voice nearly cracks a glass at 1:47 onward "11 rushing yards? 11! We had 11 rushing yards! Wut-a-what!?! Howdowa? How does this happen?!" I lost it.

G Strang

September 5th, 2017 at 2:13 PM ^

for that McElwain Out link. When the pitch of his voice nearly cracks a glass at 1:47 onward "11 rushing yards? 11! We had 11 rushing yards! Wut-a-what!?! Howdowa? How does this happen?!" I lost it.

G Strang

September 5th, 2017 at 2:13 PM ^

for that McElwain Out link. When the pitch of his voice nearly cracks a glass at 1:47 onward "11 rushing yards? 11! We had 11 rushing yards! Wut-a-what!?! Howdowa? How does this happen?!" I lost it.

SDCran

September 5th, 2017 at 2:21 PM ^

I firmly believe the line judge confused Wheatley and Hill. Hill was eligible, Wheatley was not. .

Presnap, the ref's checklist had him saying to himself, 'the TE (Wheatley) is covered', which he was. So he would be looking for it. Hill's motion put him right at Wheatley's shoulder at the snap

The ref simply confused who went out in the pattern.

Hail Harbo

September 5th, 2017 at 2:29 PM ^

It's a shame that in these types of calls the replay booth can see an obvious and glaringly wrong call but not be able to call the field refs to inform them of their errant call.  Judgement calls like holding or PI, I can understand, but procedure calls such as ineliglbe receiver there is no reasonable answer as to why that can't be corrected.

LKLIII

September 5th, 2017 at 3:24 PM ^

So how bad are those Maryland injuries going to damage their team?

I had the away game at Maryland as a sleeper problem game akin to our night game against Iowa last year.

TheCool

September 5th, 2017 at 3:42 PM ^

The thing about the first pick 6 is, aside from what Harbaugh pointed out, is that Crawford appeared to had just got out of his break and turned his head and the ball was on him and high. Yeah, he got his hands on it, but that's a very difficult catch.