hidden dragon [Bryan Fuller]

Preview 2019: Cornerback Comment Count

Brian August 29th, 2019 at 11:29 AM

Previously: Podcast 11.0A, Podcast 11.0B, Podcast 11.0C. The Story. Quarterback. Running Back. Wide Receiver. Tight End. Offensive Tackle. Interior OL. Defensive End. Defensive Tackle. Linebacker.

Depth Chart

Boundary Corner Yr. Field Corner Yr. Nickelback Yr.
Ambry Thomas Jr. Lavert Hill Sr. Brad Hawkins Jr.
Vincent Gray Fr.* Jaylen Kelly-Powell Jr. Jaylen Kelly-Powell Jr.
Gemon Green Fr.* DJ Turner II Fr. Daxton Hill Fr.

Michigan's corners were incredible and deep until Brandon Watson got a nuke dropped on him in the OSU game, and now everyone's freaking out that Ambry Thomas's injury means Michigan might not have a second corner, let alone the third you'd better have in the modern game.

The program's talking up Brad Hawkins as the nickel, a move that's addressed more thoroughly in the safeties post. In the corners post that speaks to a lack of depth with or without Thomas. Zordich hasn't bombed this unit, either. There's not a lot to be nervous about on this year's team. Cornerback is something to be nervous about.

But, hey, Lavert Hill!

CORNERBACK: OUT OF SIGHT

RATING: 3

Well, here's a picture of Lavert Hill:

44606120664_82aabf31d4_k

it was the sort of pick six where you don't clip it for the DB [Patrick Barron]

Did you enjoy that? I hope you did, because that might be the last you see of him this season. Hill and David Long spent last season in excellent coverage that went untested because quarterbacks were on the ground or running away from someone terrifying or throwing it at Michigan's safeties. The number of outside WR targets in any particular game reached absurdly low levels even against teams with functional offenses, like Penn State:

Penn State receivers had three catches, total. Those were:

  • A dig from Hamler on which he flipped Kinnel around.
  • A slant to Dotson when Gil got out of position in zone.
  • The fourth and two conversion prayer to Dotson on the sidelines.

Long and Hill were almost literally not challenged. This defense is such an outlier it's sometimes hard to get meaningful grades because teams just abandon the thought of using their outside WRs.

Even when everything went to hell against Ohio State, everything was going to hell in immediate proximity to Brandon Watson.

[After THE JUMP: question marks]

Now Long is in the NFL, Ambry Thomas is out for an unspecified length of time with ulcerative colitis, and the top-ranked guy from what was supposed to be the next generation just got a transfer waiver at Georgia Tech. Hill is going to be last by a mile on opponents' "throw at this guy" lists.

There was one exception to this dearth of targets, and it was the very beginning of the season. ND went after Hill repeatedly, getting one PBU, one completed fade, and one really open Y-cross that Wimbush whiffed on. That was cause for a little early consternation, and then almost literally nobody threw at Hill the rest of the year. He played every meaningful down. He had twelve tackles. Twelve. One of those was behind the LOS; his PBU:downfield tackle ratio was 5:11.

And half the time the opponent targeted Hill did it was a mistake, like Brian Lewerke nearly throwing a pick after reading man coverage on a Michigan trap:

#24 corner over slot

The only other post ND targets I clipped were a slant PBU against Indiana…

…a piece of what looked like pretty good coverage that got flagged, and a ball that zinged past a guy Hill was in good coverage on. His UFR charting was similarly bereft. His average score was 2-1=+1. And his sophomore season was little different:

Hill's stats are great and get better when you drill down. He played almost 90% of Michigan snaps and was only targeted 29 times. Michigan's other corners were targeted about 50% more frequently on a per-snap basis. On those 29 targets Hill gave up 12 catches, had 7 PBUs, and 2 interceptions. His havoc rate (PBUs + INTs / targets) of 26% is second-best amongst returning CBs.  The passer rating stat above doesn't quite cover it; Hill was also studiously avoided by the opposition. And no wonder:

Hill actually had to deal with way more targets last year. Yes, I am going to borrow a couple clips.

So we think Lavert Hill is really good. But there's an unusual amount of wobble in our evaluation of a guy who's entering his third year as a starter. NFL draft evaluations are all over the place, from Mel Kiper and Gil Brandt placing him in their top five senior CBs to serious-seeming evaluation sites saying he's a third day pick. Pro Football Focus also oscillated wildly. As a sophomore he had a spectacular 88 grade, which was tops amongst returning D-I cornerbacks. He didn't make PFF's top five Michigan defenders as a junior. (Ambry Thomas did, which is nonsense since he got about 20 snaps on D.)

Are we going to get any clarity on whether Hill is an All American or just an All Big Ten sort? Probably not. I mean, we have a fair bit of data already, most of it pointing to All American. We have a lot of circumstantial evidence that Big Ten offensive coordinators wanted no part of him. We just don't quite know, you know?

Hill will be avoided at all costs again this year and land on an All Big Ten team; a lack of stats will submarine greater recognition.

31833967478_3832060bab_k

this minus 35 pounds would be bad [Bryan Fuller]

Michigan thought AMBRY THOMAS [recruiting profile] was going to slide in next to Hill as seamlessly as possible. Every Michigan fan's new least favorite disease, ulcerative colitis, has put the kibosh on that. Thomas reportedly dipped to 150 pounds at his nadir. For comparison, Ace weighs 150 pounds. Do you want to see Ace play football? Not unless you're a sadist.

Now back up to a reasonable playing weight of 185, Thomas is… doing stuff. Some stuff? Yep, definitely stuff. Practice? Well… sort of:

“Ambry has been back in meetings, position meetings,” Harbaugh said. “He is participating in portions of practice. And this week, in terms of whether he plays or or not, will be determined by him and the doctors.”

"He's back in meetings" is not particularly encouraging, but it seems like the worst timelines out there aren't all that bad. Lorenz says he's been hearing a bunch of different things "from being back for the season opener to sitting out 3 or 4 games." Webb ventured that the bye week—presumably the first one—is a "realistic expectation for his return to the two-deep." The two deep isn't starting; Thomas will have to work his way back in.

Thomas got locked behind Michigan's CB troika last year and was limited to garbage time. He had a nice interception against Rutger:

And a kind of chintzy PI call very late in the MSU game:

That kind of PI is fine. It doesn't get called all the time; you're step for step with the WR.

Michigan also used him on offense a tiny bit. He should have caught a bomb from McCaffrey late in the Nebraska game and got a jet sweep or two:

These events, along with his kick return touchdown against Notre Dame, confirm to us that Thomas is super fast. He wasn't able to prove much else last year. Neither did he generate much this spring. He and Gray were the starting corners with Hill out; press conference answers were limited to stuff like "Ambry is coming along" and "Ambry is a starting corner."

Last year Belleville head coach Jermain Crowell, who coached all of Michigan's recent instate star corners, compared Thomas to Hill and Jourdan Lewis:

“Lavert was faster than Jourdan and probably a little quicker than Jourdan, but Jourdan was a better playmaker. I think that [Thomas] has a combination of both. He’s almost just as fast if not a little faster than Lavert. He’s got JD’s type of playmaking ability. The sky is the limit for him.”

Thomas is another major X-factor. He could be anything from also Lavert Hill to a guy who doesn't get back until midseason and is clearly still suffering. Your guess is as good as anyone's.

47606959201_ca9170a7ea_k (1)

Gray is probably best daring people to throw fades [Patrick Barron]

Until Thomas is healthy again redshirt freshman VINCENT GRAY [recruiting profile] is the undisputed second cornerback. Gray was a late flip from Mizzou in the 2018 cycle with middling rankings and not a lot of hype. But Gray did start generating talk last year, when nobody needed to say word one about him:

[Gray] “has been balling” and “has shown a willingness to hit.” ... has been getting run with the twos lately over his higher-rated freshman position-mates.

That's step one.

He started in the spring game, which is another positive. Unfortunately the play which stood out was Gray getting torched by now-Iowa receiver Oliver Martin:

Can't miss a jam and give up an inside release if you're a press corner. This space is high on Martin and his ability to do that to people, but… not great.

That's just one play, though, and takes through fall have been reasonably positive. Much of the praise was garnered in the spring, when Hill was out, and seem reasonably likely to be accurate. Lorenz's folk say they're "clear believers" in Gray; Hole says he "continue[s] to be told that he's cementing himself as a viable option." Brown:

"The general play – Vincent Gray is a player. So that’s a real positive."

And he was second to Jeter when Josh Uche was giving his breakout takes:

"Oh, Vincent Gray, I’m telling you. You know what, just watch. That’s all I’m going to say about Vincent Gray. He’s extremely special. I feel like he could be out of here in three years if he truly put his mind to it, and that’s just from my observations and from working out with him and pushing him to the next level."

And Zordich was all about his upside:

"You just watch him move, physically he has—he’s a very gifted guy, and you just watch his movements and you’re like, ‘Wow.’ Now he’s putting it all together with his play. It’s pretty impressive. I mean, the sky’s the limit for that kid.”

Sears Praise vibes are holding at 40%.

Gray is a legit 6'2" and projects well as a jam-you-to-the-boundary press corner, Martin notwithstanding. His coach:

"When we needed him he really stepped up and locked guys down. He brings a lot of talent when it comes to covering guys especially in man to man and that’s exactly what Michigan does and that’s what they were looking for. …

"He’s a legit 6-2, not a program 6-2 if you know the difference," Patritto said with a laugh. "He’s probably in the high 170s or around 180 but his waist is tiny, tiny — he’s one of those guys. …He’s got the kind of frame that he could be in the 190s and not lose any of his speed or agility. He’s a long legged guy with high hips and that’s what everyone wants in cornerbacks.

The issue that held his rankings down was his speed, which was clocked in the 4.7 range at an Opening regional. Gray said he hadn't run a 40 in a couple years. Maybe that's true.

Gray had a late surge of offers and interest and seemed like a good swing late; given the rest of this DB recruiting class Michigan has to be thankful they took it. Gray has not been seriously challenged; in this circumstance the lack of challengers is probably good. Michigan appears to be riding with this guy and not scrambling to replace him. It's still the least confidence a Michigan cornerback starter has generated in a minute. The press man version of Blake Countess was a very bad corner but he was coming off an All Big Ten season. It's best not to dwell.

Best case scenario for Gray is that he's Jeremy Clark, a jumbo corner who can line up on outside receivers and dare them to throw a fade over his long-ass arms. That's not even that far-fetched. But it might be a solution that doesn't work against upper-echelon WRs.

BACKUPS

47553820442_61e90115e1_k

I guess? [Patrick Barron]

The other half of Gray not fielding a serious challenger is an ominous feeling about available backups. The only guy with experience is JAYLEN KELLY-POWELL [recruiting profile], who moved to corner after a couple years of limbo bouncing between nickel and safety. "Safety moves to corner" is not a move that inspires confidence unless the guy in question is a giant fade-whacker like Clark; Kelly-Powell is not.

Practice hype for JKP is extant but this space is increasingly skeptical of it after the last couple years of talk. And even the hype has become a little circumspect. Isaiah Hole said he'd been told Kelly-Powell is "on a similar trajectory to Brandon Watson and that he’s really coming along now"; Lorenz says he's heard Kelly-Powell "has impressed early on" in fall camp" but didn't follow up with that as he did a number of other fall takes. Rivals, unusually, admitted he'd "gotten mixed reviews" and then said "Kelly-Powell is going to have to get some run at corner." That is exceptionally dark in the Eurovision Denmark-ass world of preseason practice reports. (SO BAD! GO HOME DENMARK!)

It's tough for this space to shake Kelly-Powell getting torched by yards on a slot fade against Wisconsin's AJ Taylor in 2017. That's the only slot fade that got to have run after the catch. The move to corner seems like a last ditch effort to get him to contribute, because nickel and safety aren't likely to happen.

turner-commit-1

Turner's gray knees are gonna mess with some heads this fall

To the inexperienced, then. This space thinks freshman DJ TURNER II [recruiting profile] is Michigan's best bet for a mid-season riser who alleviates some concern. He hasn't generated a ton of talk since arriving this fall; he has generated more than the rest of the backups despite not enrolling early. He's the subject of a insider showdown. Per Isaiah Hole's guy:

Turner ‘is raw,’ but seems to be coming along.

Per Sam Webb's guy:

They’ve been really impressed with DJ Turner. A very technically sound youngster that picks things up quick. Based on what I’ve heard in the last week or so I think he stands a good chance of winning the fourth corner spot.

Turner's recruitment was one of the weirdest of the cycle. He fielded a ton of big offers, several of which seemed committable. He posted the #20 SPARQ at the Opening, which of course has a big swath (about 80) of the top recruits in the country. He played at North Gwinnett, a power in Georgia's largest class, and IMG. And he went virtually unscouted and ended up ranked as a middling three star by the two sites that bother to explain themselves.

Michigan recruited him like he was their top option, and it didn't take long for Turner to come to the same conclusion. It was inevitable, really:

“He’s going to a school that will play press man at corner and calls on him to do that,” Burrell said. “DJ is going to a press-man school. It won’t be a zone team. He will go play for a program that presses you and gets right in their face with their corners on defense. Every play. Whoever shows him they will use him like that the best, that place is going to get him.”

He's got a crappy 40, which is a primary reason his rankings don't match his recruitment. If that's a fluke or Herbert can fix it he'll be a fixture, as early as this year.

32660620717_25722c3bc4_k

For Green and Perry it's wait until next year [Bryan Fuller]

Redshirt freshman GEMON GREEN [recruiting profile] is the highest-rated guy left in his class after Myles Sims left. Early returns haven't been great. He was the guy getting posterized by Tarik Black in that spring game picture we've used a lot and practice takes have been tepid. Lorenz said he's a "possible fall riser" at the beginning of camp; Webb said that Gray's early ascendance "hasn't been a matter of athletic upside" and that it was more about picking up the system quickly.

It doesn't seem like Green has been a fall riser. The chatter gap between Green and Gray is large and getting larger daily.

Finally, freshman JALEN PERRY [recruiting profile] only draws mention in press conferences when literally everyone gets mentioned. He was a Georgia commit who likely got processed; his recruiting profile has a bunch of divergent takes about whether he can run. Despite enrolling early he's gotten zero insider talk. A redshirt is next.

Comments

Chiwolve

August 29th, 2019 at 11:32 AM ^

11:30 - I thought I was about to start going through withdrawal -- and then my sweet, sweet fix!!

Straight to the veins

church stomp GIF

jdemille9

August 29th, 2019 at 12:48 PM ^

I agree those a major concerns. But if the offense is what we think it can be, those concerns will be negated. The offense will carry this team despite a big drop off on D (still top 15ish but compared to top 5 that's a big drop).

Michigan was a slow, plodding team with little explosiveness that couldn't keep up in shootouts. Now, with an alleged no-huddle/spread 'em out/more passing offense, they should have no problem in shootouts and a less than stellar (compared to what we're used to) shouldn't be the reason they don't beat OSU and win the B1G Ten. 

If this was last year I'd be very concerned about the D, but with Patterson and his army of weapons in Gattis' system I am only slightly concerned about the D.

Mongo

August 29th, 2019 at 1:30 PM ^

Counting entirely on a more explosive offense is last year's OSU.  Some days the thing just doesn't click and you get torched by the likes of a Purdue.  Having to score 50 points every week to beat even the mid-tier teams (think Indiana) is a very scary thought.

And with the developing potential OT issue (Runyan's back injury plus Stueber's ACL) that offense might not be as potent as originally hoped for.  Having Ryan Hayes protecting Shea's blind-side is not ideal and has to be a big concern vs. the elite DEs from MSU, PSU, ND, and OSU.  We were all counting on a great OL, which could unravel at OT ... we may now be counting on redshirt frosh at both LT and RT to step up to be B1G-level starters.  Mayfield appears ready, but Hayes was a "next year" guy by all reports. 

I am hoping for the best, but am now taking down my expectations a notch after reading that our DL and CBs are rated only 3 by Brian ... last year I believe he rated those key position groups at 5.

 

jdemille9

August 29th, 2019 at 2:19 PM ^

We're not 'entirely' counting on the offense, but I do think the concerns at DL and CB are somewhat alleviated by the shift in offensive philosophy. Don Brown will still field a very good defense, it just won't be an elite defense like the past few years.

OSU's was S&P+ 26th rated defense last year, not bad but definitely not elite. Michigan will field an above average defense. Don't forget, Don Brown managed to field some damn good defenses at BC, with far less talent than we have even with Ambry being out and the interior DL being a sore spot. 

I've heard Runyan isn't supposed to be out long term and this new offense is predicated on getting the ball out quickly so there isn't the need to protect on those long developing pass plays like in the past. Besides, MTSU and Army are not defensive juggernauts. 

MGoBlue96

August 29th, 2019 at 2:24 PM ^

Runyan's injury by all the rumblings we have heard is short term and it sounds like he could go week 1 if it was a better opponent. Also you're out of your damn mind if you think a don brown defense that still has alot of talent regardless of any potential concerns is going to drop far enough off to the point of giving up 50+ to mid year teams. That is not at all what a drop from top 5 to top 20 means. There are very few teams on the schedule capable of fully exploiting those weaknesses.

SMart WolveFan

August 29th, 2019 at 4:33 PM ^

We have one questionable corner, mostly cuz of extreme bubble guts, and inexperienced depth behind plus, since our pass rush wasn't that great last year, ....it's got to be better this year right?

At least, that's what they say about OSUs D now that BennieMatt is in charge and, on the flip side, I think our Dline will be much better now that he isn't in charge.

 

ak47

August 29th, 2019 at 12:13 PM ^

1.5 solid options on a position group that should be playing 3 guys for 60-70% of snaps against a modern offense (i.e. the offense run by all the actually good teams we play) doesn't seem ideal. Hope we can get some surprises and some good pass rush to off set it but have to think zone is going to need to be run with the lack of speed this group has.

Also not that recruiting isn't shaping up to fix this issue when Hill is gone next year.

legalblue

August 29th, 2019 at 12:33 PM ^

Bone picking time.  So far the Defense has graded out overall around a 3.5 on the Mgoblog scale.  Last years a solid 4.5ish.  Last years defense until a particular game was one of the tops in the nation and featured a number of current NFL players in both the secondary and along the line.  

The defensive podcast preview this year included prediction of a top 15ish type of defense.  Where is the disconnect?  It seems like this years preview especially in the secondary and the line denotes a large step back. Top 15 defenses, which I get are not top 5 defenses, don't just materialize out of pretty good.  What am I missing here?  

Blue In NC

August 29th, 2019 at 12:55 PM ^

The way I see it in very rough terms is:

DL - less pass rush but overall play same or just small step down

LB - less star worthy but better depth so overall the same

CB/S - safety is fine but definite step back at CB from last year plus less depth.

Overall: Last year D was elite, this year is just very good and likely top 15-20.  Obviously CB is the big concern.  DL has no established stars but is solid at least.

We have to hope that the O more than compensates for that.

dragonchild

August 29th, 2019 at 1:00 PM ^

Scheme, probably.  It's hard to move up the rankings beyond a certain point, and Brown turned BC into a #1 defense.  So statistically, this defense probably won't move much.  8-10 games against bad to middling offenses should result in enough sub-200 yard games to ensure that.

However, it's a defense with very few dudes, which is a very big problem against elite offenses.

I'm not worried that on paper, this defense might go from allowing, say, 15ppg (or whatever it was last season) to 18ppg.  My worry is that it'll happen by getting rolled in the 2-3 games that will decide the conference.

ak47

August 29th, 2019 at 2:33 PM ^

Its going to go up by more, the defense is going to be on the field for way more plays and way longer this year. A downside of going fast is you can have a drive of 6 plays take less time than a 3 and out with huddling and bleeding clock. Generally as a team more snaps is going to be positive if you are the better team but if you have key positions with major depth issues, like DT and CB, lots of extra snaps is going to be a problem that makes the downgrade from last year look even worse.

MichiganTeacher

August 29th, 2019 at 1:01 PM ^

Could be there's a steep drop off in grades from top-5 to top-15, as in only the top-5 get grades 4 or above. Then spots 6-50 are all various shades of 3.

Could be that we're hoping Don Brown overcomes individual athletic limits to produce an amazing whole greater than the sum of its parts, as he did at BC.

MGoBlue96

August 29th, 2019 at 2:36 PM ^

Well one is we are giving Don Brown the benefit of the doubt against anybody not named OSU. He had a great defense at BC with far less talent than this defense still has left. Also just looking at the schedule there are not very many teams fully equipped to take advantage of the potential weaknesses this team has. Don't face a legimately threatening passing offense until Iowa and even that is a stretch, and Ambry should be back into the swing of things by then.

mgoblue861

August 29th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

How likely do we think Dax Hill playing as an outside corner? Heard people discuss it during his recruitment but nothing since he has been enrolled. He will be great wherever he plays but I am just curious if he is locked into being a safety. 

MichiganTeacher

August 29th, 2019 at 1:03 PM ^

To paraphrase Alexander (I think this was in an Opponent Preview last year too?), "I'm not confident in a defense of lions led by a sheep; I am confident in a defense of sheep led by a lion."

Let's hope Don Brown is that lion that he's always been. I think he will be.

(Also let's hope Alexander's aphorism applies to OSU this year.)

NowTameInThe603

August 29th, 2019 at 1:04 PM ^

wayyyyyy worse than DT. FUUUUUUUUUUCK.

 

This isnt a new take for me but how are there real college football guys picking Michigan to win the B1G with a position group like this.

Also has anyone seen the CB recruiting class this year? WTF

Reggie Dunlop

August 29th, 2019 at 2:14 PM ^

I'm not even convinced they won't be as good as last year. Read the Gray or JKP overview.  Paraphrased: "Praise, praise, praise, praise, praise, but I think they're full of shit and he sucks because look at this missed jam on half of a play from spring practice (that was whistled dead before the pass is even released)." Or in JKP's case, because he allowed a single completion by Wisconsin in his 2nd ever game at CB as a true freshman in fucking 2017. 

Brian does such a great job of documenting and recapping all of these players. The clips are great, the writing is excellent. All of it is top notch except the conclusions that are drawn from this avalanche of information consistently baffle me. 

KTisClutch

August 29th, 2019 at 2:19 PM ^

The praise is all coming from Michigan guys. If you took camp praise every year as gospel than Michigan would have made the playoffs 4 times in a row. I don't think it's fair to call Brian's conclusions baffling. Conservative, maybe. But nothing about Gray or JKP should have anyone saying they're confident CB2 will be a positive. Especially for JKP. I agree with Brian there. I think there's potential for Gray to exceed expectations.

Reggie Dunlop

August 29th, 2019 at 2:31 PM ^

I'm sorry, who else is the praise supposed to come from? Brian says Gray was complimented unprompted a year ago. If Lorenz hears Gray is excelling and Hole is hearing he's been good, and Brown is gushing about him and Zordich says he's putting it all together, how do we conclude that he's iffy? That's baffling.

They're not praising Green or Green or Turner (although that's started). Jalen Perry is nowhere to be found. If there's not much there, it's not hard to glean that there's not much there. 

I'm making no prediction that Gray will be All-anything. I'm just saying that discounting the overwhelming praise as Brian does here and Seth did before him (and one is probably feeding the other) based on one single missed jam in a practice is ludicrous. Oh, he ran a 4.7? Well, down below Brian gives DJ Turner a virtual H-J despite "a crappy 40". 

The JKP praise is softer for sure, but there are indications he can be a valuable contributor. There are no other negatives other than, again, one single play from 2017. I mean, that's it? Cut his ass? It's bonkers.

This isn't a Gray thing either. He did the same thing to Kwity Paye. "I'm doubtful he can pass rush from the WDE position, and here are two clips of him getting a sack as a DT and blowing by a Tackle from the Anchor spot to prove it."  Huh? The conclusions. I don't understand. He just posted a clip of Paye torching ND's left tackle. Why do we think he can't do that? You just posted a clip of him doing it. 

It's not coincidentally our biggest points of concern given the holes left by transfers and recent 'crootin. DT and CB. A pre-determined positional uncertainty seems to be fueling the player overviews instead of the other way around.

Reggie Dunlop

August 29th, 2019 at 2:43 PM ^

Exactly. Everybody says Gray is good. We have no evidence to the contrary. Why are we dragging these guys down a peg?

The answer that nobody will admit is it's all because of Recruiting Rankings. But I've said my piece. Thankfully, we'll get to watch actual football and not have to lean on these nonsensical conversations for entertainment. Michigan will lock down everybody and we'll all pretend we didn't piss our collective selves with fear all summer for no reason. 

KTisClutch

August 29th, 2019 at 3:33 PM ^

The fact that the hype is coming from those positions is exactly why it should be taken with a  grain of salt. Someone has to be playing 2nd best at CB, and whoever that is is going to get some praise. That may not mean they're any good. It's often the people coming up on those positions that get hyped, ala Dwumfour last year. 

 

I dont think Brian and Seth are discounting praise strictly from one spring practice clip.  In the write up Brian says "it's just one play" and says it's not far-fetched that he's Jeremy Clark-esque. I'd say that a perfectly fair conclusion. He's comparing him to an NFL draft pick as a redshirt freshman.

For JKP, Brian said nothing about cutting him. He mentioned that he's bounced around positions, and really hasn't gotten that much praise, and also mentioned the play he got burned on. Nothing is there that screams SOLID CONTRIBUTOR. 

 

As for Paye, you just said not to make huge conclusions based off one clip. But for Paye you're saying he's ignoring the one clip of him beating an ND LT. His whole point is that as far as pass rush, he was only a factor when he was playing DT.

Blue In NC

August 29th, 2019 at 3:55 PM ^

I think Brian makes his reasons clear for believing (e.g. no reason to hype this guy but he's still getting it) or not believing the practice hype (e.g. we need this guy to succeed and need him to be confident).  It's far from exact but I think he does a good job balancing his optimism and skepticism based on the things he hears or on the circumstances.  That is one of the things I really enjoy about these predictions.  We can get all sunshine from just the coaches' quotes.

jwfsouthpaw

August 29th, 2019 at 1:18 PM ^

Counterpoint:  Ohio State gave up 51 points to Maryland and 49 points to Purdue last year. A dominant offense can overcome one weak position group in college football. Especially when there are only so many teams that can truly take advantage of a second so-so corner.

I do wonder if it might be time to move on from Zordich. He is a great technical coach, but there are great technical coaches who can also recruit... 

KTisClutch

August 29th, 2019 at 1:08 PM ^

The drop off in CB recruiting has been startling to say the least. I suppose if Gray is legit, between him and Ambry we should have a solid 2 corners for a couple years. And Turner behind him.

 

But that still portends to be a drop off from JD-Long-Hill.

 

Partridge did say that Turner is one of the 4 fastest guys on the teams. Which I mean if that's true he should get an instant bump on Brian's Excitement Level scale.

Blue Middle

August 29th, 2019 at 1:27 PM ^

This is the first ranking I take serious issue with.  I think 3 is too low.  Vert is a 5; I think the other CB will be a 3, and depth is a 3.  It may sound like picking nits, but I think 3.5 at a minimum at this position.

MichiganTeacher

August 29th, 2019 at 1:30 PM ^

So this from Spath is really interesting.

Some really good stuff there (like the insider saying that Bell is amazing and the equal of the big three), but what's pertinent here is:

* Spath's guy claims that Gray is indeed fantastic.

*Spath's guy says the problem right now is that we have no capable slot corner until Dax is up to speed, so to speak. That doesn't sound great for Hawkins.

* Same guy expresses worry about the defense because they'll be seeing a lot more snaps now with the offense running at a higher tempo. Hints that Harbaugh might have to tell Gattis to eat clock, or the D will just give up more points because guys will get tired with 20 more snaps per game playing Don Brown's aggressive style.