qwop!

The Induction Of Qwop Comment Count

Brian March 1st, 2021 at 10:26 AM

2/27/2021 – Michigan 73, Indiana 57 – 18-1, 13-1 Big Ten

John Beilein's first team at Michigan was not one for the ages. Zack and Stu had not arrived. Ron Coleman and Kelvin Grady started. They took a ton of threes despite finishing 314th behind the line. But I had banged the table for Beilein's hire and spent much of that year looking for whatever molecules of hope oozed out of the morass. I doubled down on wanting Michigan's basketball team to be good by investing Professional Reputation in the new head coach, with inevitable results. I had not been and probably will not again be so invested in a team that was so bad.

Being invested in a bad team is waiting for the run. Your team will scrap out of the gate, hang tight against superior opposition (or, uh, Central Michigan), and provide a flicker of promise. This will feel sort of nice. It will also feel like an anvil is suspended over your head. Inevitably there will come a point where your team is possessed by the spirit of the Washington Generals. The basketball game will devolve into a cartoon fight, all limbs and people groaning "oof".

n1269382

When the dust clears the opposition is up double digits and ain't nobody climbing that staircase. This is what rooting for a 10-22 team is.

------------------------------------------

Even good teams eat runs. Basketball is proverbially a game of them. They're so integral to the idea of the sport that the gold standard of numbers about basketball, Kenpom, has a win probability page which calls them out:

image

The pictured run is Wisconsin separating from Michigan at the end of the first half of Michigan's first game post-COVID layoff. That first half stands out in my memory as a visit from a different basketball team, one far less polished and precise. I spent that first half trying to remain calm, trying to remember the other, beautiful basketball team. Then they became it again and have not stopped.

Michigan does not eat runs. The above is one of just four runs for the opposition called out by Kenpom in 14 Big Ten games. One of those absolutely does not count because it was Wisconsin punching back 12-2 after Michigan spent 15 minutes battering them 43-6. The others came in the Minnesota loss and in Michigan's Big Ten opener against Penn State. Michigan has faced a run of consequence not explained by a 22 day layoff once since December 13th.

Even John Beilein's best teams had holes you could poke a finger through, first on defense and then on offense. This isn't an attempt to dump on Beilein, he said unnecessarily, it is merely a bare fact that when you've got the #35 offense (as the 2017-18 Final Four team did) or the #37 defense (as the 2012-13 Final Four team did) sometimes things are going to get away from you for long stretches. Not often, but often enough that the disorienting feeling that nothing has ever gone right or will again go right is a semi-regular part of your basketball experience.

This does not happen in 2021. Michigan's defense is relentless. Its offense is a machine designed to create buckets of good shots. The sheer number of coinflips weighted in Michigan's favor that it would require for the opposition to have ten more points than Michigan in a short window of time is too daunting for math, except once against Minnesota of all teams.

This is what it's like to root for an 18-1 team. This is what it's like to root for what may be the best team in the country: like everyone you run across has separate buttons for their thighs and calves.

[After THE JUMP: Franz stays in his spot because it's working]

BULLETS

image

Franz pleads for continuation

If you want a column, Franz, KEEP DOING THIS. This space isn't above a bit of superstition so sure let's ignore the elephant putting up his third Kenpom MVP in the past four games above the fold and stick him right in the first bullet point. Wagner put up 21 points on 13 shooting possessions for the second consecutive game, and while he didn't have four assists like he did in the Iowa game he did return to his stat-sheet filling ways with a block and three assists. Also he could have had another point but was denied a continuation that even neutrals on Twitter thought was ridiculous.

Wagner was perfect inside the line and got 8 FTAs; he's now passed his absurd freshman year two-point shooting numbers (61%) at 63%. He demonstrated the go-and-catch approach Michigan has on a lot of perimeter passes that Hoop Vision detailed and Eric Shapiro turned into a meaty nugget of content:

Also this:

This play reminded me of the point in the Iowa game where Brown got crossmatched on Luka Garza. Wagner was aware of the likely outcome of this issue and when the entry pass came he left his guy to bat it out of bounds. My RAW TAKE on the podcast this week is that Hunter Dickinson is the DPOY in the Big Ten, and while you can make a case for him solely based on what he did to Garza I admit that it's Wagner and it's not particularly close.

Wagner snuck into the tail end of the KPOY rankings after this game, which is remarkable because he has 19% usage. KPOY has a team ingredient that helps him but also he's shooting 63/37 and does all the blocking and stealing stuff. He's probably the best two-way player Michigan's had since… God, I don't even know. Peak Mitch? But that was like ten games.

Also in themes. Trayce Jackson-Davis got crushed by Hunter Dickinson, going 3/12 from the floor and scoring 10 points on 16 shooting possessions. IIRC two of those buckets were against Austin Davis, including an and-one. Livers bodied up on TJD to force a miss early. The rest of it was Dickinson.

So that's back-to-back games against players in the KPOY top ten that Dickinson has obliterated without help. What's more, Luka Garza and Jackson-Davis present significantly different challenges. Garza is massive and crafty on the inside while also being able to step out and shoot; Jackson-Davis is a pogo-stick athlete whose quickness should have posed Dickinson significant issues.

Devolution of zone. I pity the Synergy charter trying to make sense of this game. Michigan had probably two dozen possessions where they were in that 2-3 zone that devolves into man to man as soon as the opposition breaches the perimeter. This resulted in a few weird crossmatches but was generally effective as a delaying tactic to prevent Indiana from getting into any real offense in the first half of the shot clock.

This is new to me. I have not been watching basketball for 50 years but I don't recall anyone else running this hybrid zone-to-man thing in my awareness. I would not be surprised to see this become something of a trend over the next couple years, as it combines a lot of positives about zone with man-to-man's advantages in rebounding. It also just seems like a pain to deal with.

image

SMARF. YES TWITTER IS GOOD AGAIN

Yes, Chaundee Brown is a ludicrous cat puppet that spills rainbows from his hands and has incredible wingspan. Yes. Yes I will embed that  yes.

I would like to expand on a point in the non-Smarf tweet. Holy hell, watching the MSU-Maryland game the day after a Michigan game really drove the "they only take good shots" point home. There was a possession right at the start of the game where Indiana did a great job recovering off a double on Dickinson, closing out on three consecutive shooters. Michigan drove again, kicked, and then found Eli Brooks in the corner for a wide open catch and shoot look.

I get a little testy when someone takes an early two-point jumper. I have not fully downloaded what other teams are doing into my mind and how bizarre and horrible their shot selection often is. I attribute it to Michigan's defense. That defense is admittedly excellent, but other teams playing worse defenses are just wandering pell-mell into contested midrange situations and thinking "eh, fine" before launching.

I took a look at Michigan's first eight three attempts; six were wide open. Smith had a semi-contested pull-up and Livers had a contested catch and shoot opportunity. Everything else was "take that." Those are a large majority of Michigan's threes, which are relatively rare—just 249th nationally in 3PA/FGA—but almost without fail excellent opportunities.

Meep meep. Mike Smith had some extra aggression in this one. Twice he sped down the court, drawing free throws as he drove against a defense that was not yet set. Twice he pulled up off of screens when Indiana went under them. The first one should not even count as an off the dribble make since Kristian Lander was so far under the screen that Smith was able to come to a complete stop and check Twitter before launching. The second one had much stricter time demands.

Also this doesn't really count as aggression because it was late clock but it is occasionally useful to have a guy who's used to putting up slop because he's got no other option.

This increased aggression was coupled with a reversion to his earlier turnover-prone ways—he had five—but I don't think the two were correlated. Smith had a couple of entry passes over fronting sail off court and didn't notice Al Durham cheating to the Wagner backscreen on a steal that ended up in an and-one. He also got in no-man's land in a late clock situation once. These aren't turnovers that come from driving the ball into bad situations.

The metaphorical dagger. This did not end the game but it ended the game:

Few things more demoralizing than getting thunderjammed on after giving up two wide open threes that just happened not to fall.

Rough bench outing. Chaundee Brown didn't shoot well—1/7, with 6 attempts from three—and that's one thing. Brown's shots were largely reasonable-to-good opportunities and he turned in his usual brand of Shiva six-arm defense. Brown's still shooting 40% from three on the season and none of his attempts in this game were particularly questionable.

Austin Davis was always going to have some issues against Jackson-Davis and gave up two of  TJD's three buckets, plus an and-one. The issue there is that he didn't respond on the offensive end, missing a couple short shots and going 0/2 on the hook-and-hold call on Glee Extra Whose Name I Could Look Up But Won't.

Brandon Johns probably had the most disappointing outing. He missed bunnies, got beat on a straight-line drive by Race Thompson that led to an and-one for Jackson-Davis that put a foul on Dickinson; he also fouled Thompson twice for FTs. This came immediately on the heels of fronting Luka Garza out of almost anything, so that's a trade you'll take any day. Johns's inconsistency separates him from his current role and so much more. 

Okay but still. It didn't come off because Smith slipped but Michigan again found themselves in a situation where they got a good shot with 45-50 seconds left and successfully got a 2-for-1. (A four second difference between shot and game clock is a two-for-one.) The consistency with which Michigan gets 2-for-1s is a small coaching point but it is a nice one.

Comments

njvictor

March 1st, 2021 at 10:39 AM ^

Michigan held Liddell, Garza, and Jackson-Davis to 35% shooting in the last 3 games. It's really a testament to Dickinson's defensive growth throughout this season.

Also, for better or worse, Michigan basketball has ruined my enjoyment of watching other teams this year. Every other team's defense is porous and their offense is sloppy and takes bad shots. We truly are privileged as a fanbase to watch such a well rounded and balanced team

Basketballschoolnow

March 1st, 2021 at 11:39 AM ^

It's true!  When watching other teams, after watching Michigan, it is so obvious the difference in shot selection.  

Think about what this takes: a great coach and unselfish players, of course. But also, every Michigan starter, and at least a couple others, has a very high basketball IQ.  Plus, above-average or better talent at every spot on the floor.

The result is the cumulative effect of those 'coin flips' in our favor, every time down the floor, a grad-level version of the Beilein shooting contests.

yossarians tree

March 1st, 2021 at 1:38 PM ^

Because three of the top six guys are new to the team, it's easy to forget that part of the high basketball IQ  is because this is a very veteran team. It depresses me to think that five of them are playing the last weeks of their Michigan careers (unless, please come back Mike Smith, please). Taking in three new guys and getting this kind of beautiful cohesion in less than one season is further testament to Juwan's coaching acumen. I will watch his current team with pleasure and eagerly await to see him piece it all together again next year with a different cast.

mooseman

March 1st, 2021 at 12:29 PM ^

Back in the old "black and blue division" days of the NFL, we would watch the Lions play and then for the 4 o'clock game catch some west coast matchup like the Air Coryell Chargers. It was like a refreshing, completely different game. That's the opposite of what it's like watching Michigan and then watching, let's say, MSU/Maryland.

Murder Wolv

March 1st, 2021 at 10:40 AM ^

I cannot describe the feeling watching this team. I’ve watched so many players (quarterbacks, primarily) of opposing football teams, and despairing, “Why can’t we have players like this?” “What can’t we call plays like this?” Now, we have those players. We call those plays. We have that team. Truly a delight. 

xtramelanin

March 1st, 2021 at 10:53 AM ^

TJD is a very good player and his 3/12 line was surprising.  he missed a few bunnies early on.  

PM

March 1st, 2021 at 11:13 AM ^

One thing not mentioned was Indiana’s seeming lack of interest in getting the ball to TJD.  It seemed like he gave up trying to work for position as a result although it could have been a chicken/egg thing. I am not sure which came first other than to say I point a finger at Archie Miller. 

njvictor

March 1st, 2021 at 11:22 AM ^

I do think TJD is maybe the most overrated player in the B1G, but holding him to 3/12 shooting was very impressive. Given the shots he takes, he should be hitting much higher than ~50% of them and a lot his points come at the foul line

The Homie J

March 1st, 2021 at 10:01 PM ^

Yeah I think that guy is overreacting to one game against a tough defender.  TJD (to my eyes) looked like the most talented big in the league in terms of raw talent.  He missed a lot of shots I thought should have gone in, but he looked very much capable of hanging with Dickinson on a good day.  

His problem is poor coaching (likely) and being the only decent player on his team.  I could see him blowing up in the NBA, much like the underutilized Jaren Jackson Jr. who looked all the part of an NBA player but wasn't translating all that potential to the court at Michigan State

1VaBlue1

March 1st, 2021 at 10:56 AM ^

With Smith getting more aggressive with both his shots and his drives, this team will be near-impossible to stop.  Not that it's been easy, so far, but jeez...  Smith finding his own pull-up 3's when guys go under a screen is devastating.  It means you can't give him an inch - a 5'3" guy now commands constant attention.  You cannot send anyone low to double up in the post, or even to guard against an entry pass.  Want to go under that screen?  You better do it really fast!  His driving means you either send some help down there, or you give him an easy layup.  It's what Franz is doing, only without the length!  Now Michigan has 6 players you just cannot leave alone on the court - they're all shooting above 36% from three, and they can all drive to the basket and eviscerate you.

Good luck with this, NCAA...

stephenrjking

March 1st, 2021 at 10:59 AM ^

Smith is not as good as Zavier Simpson was at most things that they did, but his ability to hit 3s is world-changing for this team both in spacing/ball-movement and in late-clock situations where it's important to make free throws. 

I can't call him an upgrade, but... the team has certainly upgraded as a whole. And it's not just a year of experience plus Hunter that is improved. 

B-Nut-GoBlue

March 1st, 2021 at 11:49 AM ^

I think he's an upgrade.  And I dont think twice about it.  The ability to hit 3s is sooooo crucial and can't be downplayed.  Zavier for all the good he did allowed defenses to play us a certain way and we saw last year how that could affect the offense (losing Livers also was an obvious issue).  Smith's ability to hit 3s and now maybe step back and rise up behind a screen.  Hoo boy.

IndyBlue

March 1st, 2021 at 12:19 PM ^

While I loved Simpson, Smith is definitely an upgrade overall.  Better shooter from 3 and FT line, quicker in penetration, and his shooting ability helps everyone else on the court because the D can't sag off of him.  Simpson was better at finishing around the rim due to his hook shot and was able to body guys up on D because he's stronger, but I'll take those tradeoffs any day of the week.

Needs

March 1st, 2021 at 1:43 PM ^

I think the biggest "team" upgrade is that Smith doesn't have the same desire to dominate the ball that Simpson did (there may be reasons for that, last year's team wasn't as good), but it means that the ball moves more early in possessions and Michigan can run additional actions if the first one gets stymied. Last year had a lot more of Simpson holding the ball on the perimeter before things started to move.

That's also another of the big differences between watching Michigan and other teams. It's just rare for Michigan to be in late clock situations, which means that when something does go less than optimally, they have time to try something else.

UMinSF

March 1st, 2021 at 2:05 PM ^

Smith is better IMO for one simple reason - the holes in his game are smaller than Simpson's. It was impossible not to love Simpson's leadership, dogged effort, and incredibly fun hook shot. His adventures at the FT line and 1950's push shot were liabilities. 

Smith is far more dynamic and consistent offensively, and forces opponents to respect his shot. They lay off him at their peril.

Both are short, but Simpson had longer arms and was stronger, so Smith is a bit more vulnerable on defense. Simpson was a hair more careful with the ball, I'd say. Those are small things compared to shooting and FT's.

I would take Smith's flaws over Simpson's every day.

stephenrjking

March 1st, 2021 at 10:57 AM ^

The mind-boggling consistency with which this team declines to do stupid things is amazing. 

I mentioned after the game that Michigan's consistent, lock-down defense seems to do a good job of precluding comeback opportunities in opponents. Teams down 15 or 16 can get two consecutive buckets, but never seem to get that third that really puts sweat on the forehead. And while there are times that Michigan's offense can scuffle, it seems less frequent. The results are so much more... predictable than I remember even under Beilein teams. Even the one bad game, Minnesota, was more of a whole-game shutdown, where the team basically never showed any change in behavior. 

Generally, it's a good thing. When we were coming back at Wisconsin, Michigan was chasing a high-single-digit deficit with significant time left but it seemed clear that if they could score at all the defense was just not going to let Wisconsin stay away. It was dominant and Wisconsin could not get shots, period. 

I'm waiting to hit the wall. We're riding high, passing Baylor in polls and advanced rankings and tapping Gonzaga on the shoulder; this is often when the bottom falls out, and we play a team in Illinois that is playing for a conference title and a #1 seed. Then we have two rivalry games against MSU and might see them again in the B1G tournament.

Sustaining this seems impossible. 

But then Michigan rolls out that defense and that ball movement and, well, maybe it isn't impossible. We won a tough, tough road game after 3 weeks off, beat an OSU team hitting multiple lucky shots in a shootout, and demolished a very good Iowa team. 

Why not win them all? It's not farfetched anymore. 

1VaBlue1

March 1st, 2021 at 11:06 AM ^

That occasional scuffling on offense lasts for two, maybe three, possessions before they score.  With this team, even when 'scuffling' they're amazingly consistent!  Wisconsin took that lead by hitting everything they threw up, yet still couldn't get to a back-breaker.  As the second half wore on, you knew Michigan wasn't firing on all cylinders, but you also knew UW was coming back to Earth...  If you don't stay in orbit, Michigan is going to win the game.

outsidethebox

March 1st, 2021 at 11:15 AM ^

Wonderfully stated-this is me...wondering when when the next, unsustainable shoe will fall...yet watching in joyous wander as they play this game so incredibly well. But they simply keep playing better an better and the winning seems effortless-like the UCLA powerhouse of old. 

Blue In NC

March 1st, 2021 at 12:30 PM ^

It does seem somewhat impossible.  And yet, as high as I was on the team, coming off the Covid break and then beating WI, OSU, Rutgers, Iowa and IN all in a row seemed almost impossible at the time.  So really nothing seems impossible for this team.

The odds generally say that team probably will not get to the final four.  And if they don't, it's a shame because I want everyone to see this team play.  But even going all the way does not seem impossible.

UMinSF

March 1st, 2021 at 2:11 PM ^

This is 100% correct, srjk.

Only thing  I'd add is that the whole team that can shoot FT's (ok, except Davis).

Livers and Brooks are absolutely deadly from the line, and you feel just fine if Smith, Brown, Franz or even Dickenson get fouled. 

BlockM

March 1st, 2021 at 11:00 AM ^

I love the fact that so much of the success of this team is predicated on attitude and coaching. Obviously the guys are smart and talented, but it doesn't seem like something that will be a one-off year and then back to making all kinds of inexplicable mistakes. Not every year will be like *this* but we're on track for a lot of sustained success.

L'Carpetron Do…

March 1st, 2021 at 11:03 AM ^

Had Smith not slipped, I think that would've been the 4th straight game in which Michigan got a bucket at the end of the half. Coach Howard is excellent at drawing those up. 

THat Livers dunk after what I think was 3 straight missed shots (I think Davis missed a close one and got his own board) was definitely my favorite sequence of this game. It only trails Chaundee Brown's Leroy Jenkins fast break dunk against Minnesota as my favorite play of the year.