UM possibly making the switch from Adidas to Nike?
Here's a Freep article discussing the possibility of Michigan realigning it's brand with that of Nike. Good news for those of us who have been alienated by Adidas's and their past offerings such as the horrid Bumble bee jersey fiasco... I still cringe when I see those things (scratches arms like a crack head).
I don't know how likely this transition is, but I can't help but to wonder whether or not this news will effect Michigan's standing with perennial 5 star bb recruit Jaylen Brown, who recently made a statement that he was definitely going to an Adidas school! I've had a few conversations with JB and happen to know for a fact Michigan is a legitimate front runner for this kid! However this news can't hurt Kentucky's chances who I believe is right there with Michigan.
I don't know how much stock these kids put into any particular athletic brands when making these decisions, although I would imagine that with the potential sponsorship dynamic at play it definitely factors. Who knows, maybe Michigan and the greatness of Beilein will win out!
Link: http://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/wolverine…
^ What this guy said.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
If you'd rather not click the freep, here is the Mlive link. But the tea leaves suggest Michigan will leave Addidas, and I would be completely shocked if they didn't go back to Nike.
/BOOM conspiracy theory'd
You may not like Oregon's attention-getting uniforms, but there is no question is helps them in recruiting young kids who do like attention-getting uniforms.
And it clearly hurts Alabama having boring, bland uniforms, right?
/s
I was just about to post something to this effect.
tradition, etc., advantage over Oregon, you've unwittingly proven that flashy uniforms don't matter at all in recruiting.
At least not for schools with real football tradition.
Which Michigan is.
Q.E.D.
This is MGoBlog, not GoDucksBlog.
As you stated, an Alabama doesn't need crazy uniformz to recruit, while an Oregon may.
After your statement, the only question that remains is whether Michigan is more of an Alabama, or more of an Oregon.
I think Michigan is more on the Alabama end of the spectrum (football tradition, etc.). So flashy uniforms, while perhaps relevant to an Oregon, are irrelevant here.
Michigan compares more to whom, Oregon or Alabama?
Say goodbye to awkward bumble bee jerseys and hello to metal patterns, half-&-half and chrome.
Michigan's uniforms ain't broke. Don't fix them.
Are the alternatives the result or Adidas or Dave Brandon? The AD has to approve of anything Michigan wears. It isn't like the day of the game they open a box and have jerseys that nobody at Michigan had ever seen before.
Chicken sandwiches from Zaxby's lol! Although I mostly did the eating while he had to go prepare and focus on a game!
of the Daily Hackett interview.
Don't care if we lose J. Brown. More elite prospects come from Nike-based AAU bball programs.
are the only one who would not care. He would be a McGary like get.
I believe this would be an even bigger recruiting coup as we were in on Jaylen very late in the process and he has risen up the rankings his senior year while McGary fell a bit during his.
But I get your point!
Of course I want him, but what I was trying to convey, albeit poorly, was that in the scheme of things, moving to Nike opens more doors than closes...in JB case, the likelyhood he comes here isn't guaranteed by any means
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
the hell out of me. Go back and take a look at our homes with black shoes/black socks in the mid 2000s. The look is so, so much better. That has been my biggest complaint with our football unis in the last 8 or so years. Need the black on black.
Can we get Adidas AND Nike so that ALL the recruits come to Michigan?
/s (unless that's possible.......)
Everyone does understand that nothing made it onto the field/court that was not approved by UM first.. right? The Ugly shit is not an adidas issue it was a UM marketing BS issue.
Can't wait for our first fugly ass pro combat unis. Yeah, and we won't even make nike break the bank to do it.
Nobody realizes that. I've said all along that the uniformz issue is more Dave Brandon than Adidas. Sure Adidas designers came up with those uniform designs but Dave Brandon had the final say on what we wore.
With the right AD the apparel company we are under contract with doesn't matter. Hopefully Hacket comes to his senses before July 31st and locks in another 5 years of the current Adidas deal because if he doesn't we stand to lose a significant amount of money.
So, you say that rumors of Michigan switching to Nike will hurt them with Jaylen Brown (totally plausible). But then you say it will help Kentucky (the second option) which is...a Nike school. If he's "definitely going to an Adidas school" then he's definitely not going to Kentucky.
Maybe that statement was premature and he actually will go to a Nike school, but your reasoning is internally inconsistent, and makes me doubt that you actually talked to him (or Beilein--not sure which one you meant with "JB").
Met the other JB too!!!
The fact that Jaylen Brown said that he is going to an Adidas school does not mean much for us. He will most likely go to Kansas, if not Kansas, then UCLA.
Just exactly how has the fanbase been alienated? My Michigan t-shirt is still blue, it still says "M-i-c-h-i-g-a-n", and in maize (mostly) letters.
It's has 3 stripes instead of a swoosh. Meh.
Neg for the freep link.
and go F@#$ yourself MgoBlog.... I immediately regret this decision.
Adidas:
Nike:
Under Armour:
The clothing company might matter for some crooked recruiting infrastructure, but each major company can (and does) make offensively ugly garbage. It's up to the school to make sure it maintains control over the final product. Gotta just trust Hackett on this one.
Wow. I'm guessing you miss the Halo as well...
...that we'll actually land a deal with Under Armor and not Nike. The only signal from the AD is that we may drop Adidas once the deal expires...I don't think there's been anything to suggest that the replacement will be Nike though.
At this point, it is probably safe to say that we know that we know nothing about what will happen next. I believe we're saddled with Adidas for another season, perhaps two (I forget precisely), but after that anything is definitely possible. As noted in other threads, there is a survey being given to the current population of student-athletes at Michigan, so I am very curious to know what their input is - there have been anecdotal stories here about complaints regarding Adidas gear, so I wonder if there's enough traction from that alone.
After the spring game Hackett is going to Portland with his team to visit with Nike and Adidas. I imagine that he'll make his decision then. The only question is how much less money will he be willing to take to make the switch to Nike. If Nike doesn't offer enough money (Nike's max deal in 2013-2014 was 4.4M to FSU) then I'll be we resign with Adidas. I don't know how low Hackett is willing to go to get Nike though.
I dont mean to sound rude or anything, but where did you get this info from?
couldn't wait a couple weeks for jaylen to decide.
we do everything wrong. even when we do something right.