Michigan 40, Middle Tennessee State 21
It was far from a flawless debut. Two Michigan fumbles, including a Shea Patterson miscue on the season's first play from scrimmage, led directly to Middle Tennessee State touchdowns. The receivers couldn't haul in a handful of catchable passes. The offensive coaches repeatedly tried a two-quarterback package that produced little but confusion. The O-line couldn't get the needed push on a fourth-and-goal. The second-string secondary yakety saxed a late deep ball into MTSU's third touchdown.
The natural progression of the season should work out many of those problems, however, and what was left was exciting indeed. Examine Michigan's opening drive of the second quarter, for instance, if you want to understand the optimism surrounding first-year offensive coordinator Josh Gattis. After a Patterson keeper for five yards, Gattis called consecutive run-pass options to free up Tarik Black for big gains, then a conventional play-action bomb to Nico Collins for a leaping 28-yard touchdown. Four plays, 67 yards, no huddles, 1:14 off the clock, seven points. This isn't last year's Michigan offense.
There were other signs of a contender. Blue chip freshman running back Zach Charbonnet got the start, ripped off a 14-yard gain on his first career carry, later added a 41-yard dash through contact, and made multiple blitz-killing pickups. Christian Turner made some nifty cuts and displayed surprising power, while Dylan McCaffrey hardly had to use his arm to move the offense downfield. Michigan finished with 252 rushing yards at 5.9 a pop.
Deep fly to right-center. [Fuller]
The aerial attack didn't quite produce as much, though that had more to do with gameflow than anything else. Before the quarterback shuffling began, Patterson looked comfortable and confident; he began the game 15-for-20 for 188 yards and three scores before scuffling to a 2-for-9 finish in a choppy, frippery-filled second half. Collins and Black looked dominant, combining for 129 yards and two scores on nine targets and seven catches. Sean McKeon bulled through a safety to finish off a 28-yard touchdown up the seam. True freshman Cornelius Johnson reeled in a difficult catch when he plucked a comeback route out of the air that he appeared to expect over the other shoulder.
The defense also had a somewhat uneven performance, letting MTSU QB Asher O'Hara rip off some annoying runs, though they were relatively dominant statistically until the backups ceded a 59-yard touchdown pass deep into garbage time. That allowed the Blue Raiders to edge over 300 yards; unless Michigan's secondary depth is tested against a stronger opponent it shouldn't be too relevant. It felt like the defense could do more—perhaps because Lavert Hill not only muffed a punt but also let an easy pick-six slip through his fingers—but in reality they did about as much as they could.
Ambry Thomas stood tall in the secondary. [Patrick Barron]
We may have even seen a couple questions answered. While injuries held Donovan Peoples-Jones, Donovan Jeter, and Jon Runyan Jr. out of the game, cornerback Ambry Thomas took his place in the lineup after fighting off colitis. He made an impact, too, cutting off a throw to the flat for a leaping interception, then later coming up with a fumble recovery.
His cornerback counterpart, redshirt freshman Vincent Gray, was the biggest unknown in the starting lineup, and he passed his first test with flying colors. Gray looked adept in coverage and fought through traffic for a few jarring, no-YAC-allowed tackles in the flat. With Thomas evidently healthy, Gray looks like the third corner everyone hoped would emerge.
Not everything clicked tonight. That's a season opener for you. Even with the errors, you didn't have to squint much to see a very dangerous football team on the Michigan Stadium turf.
[After THE JUMP: the box score]
September 1st, 2019 at 12:55 AM ^
This is a quality take delivered by someone who knows what they’re seeing. Obviously there were issues, but anyone not excited by the offense, or worse still, who says “nothing has changed” is just flat out uninformed.
Obviously there were some issues with a couple of exchanges — a known downside to relying heavily on the mesh read — and a few drops (Nico’s first, unfortunately) and misses on some tough-but-should-have-catches.
We only got a small yet tantalizingly sweet glimpse of the RPO, and it looked to me like Gattis wanted to work on other aspects of the scheme. On defense, I don’t know why people are freaking out so. I thought almost every play MTSU made was kind of flukey and could have just as easily been a big play for the defense. They weren’t getting gashed, and it appears that several playmakers emerged where there was some uncertainty.
Take away the two lost fumbles (I think we had 3 all season last year) and it’s not even close.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:02 AM ^
Also, worth noting that MTSU got like 50 yards in the second half outside of that huge play against the backups.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:17 AM ^
It’s like that scene in Kingsmen when everyone goes berserk in the church — people are freaking the fuck out and I just don’t see it. I watched every play intently and saw a defense that, but for a couple of plays, completely shut down a decent offense. No long sustained drives, no continual gashing, nor death by slant. Just a couple of missed tackles and assignments after quick changes due to turnovers.
So many ready to fold the tent on the entire season. Baffling!
September 1st, 2019 at 8:54 AM ^
I am very much in agreement with you here. This was the perfect season opener for Michigan. I have enough "fan" in me to get anxious about the outcome of a game...here, I never felt an ounce of anxiety. The mistakes, and there were plenty of them, were frustrating on one hand but offer very teachable moments on the other-both for the players and the coaches. Can we at least agree that RB and CB are not areas of concern and that Michigan has at least two QBs with whom they can win-even an NC should this team ascend!!! My bottom-line take away is that this team, indeed, has a very high ceiling.
September 1st, 2019 at 3:05 PM ^
Well said. Vincent Gray is awesome, and Charbonnet, Turner, et al are as good as last year's RB batch, with perhaps higher upside. Not having a legitimate 2nd screen QB cost us dearly in Harbaugh's previous years, and that it is the biggest improvement.
It will be interesting to see how the various new linemen on both sides of the ball grade out.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:12 AM ^
Fell asleep. Wow, that sucked. Going to be a long shit season.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:19 AM ^
Case in point. Guy is Super fan, yet he falls asleep in the first game of the season and then says it’s a lost cause. You’re pathetic. How do you even function in life?
September 1st, 2019 at 1:24 AM ^
My snowflakes:
I think MTSU might actually be a decent team and thus a more useful all-around test than what our division rivals received (for sure MSU and PSU). There was still no point in the game that I felt M was in danger of losing.
I saw more changes and reasons for optimism on offense than our rivals in East Lansing who came into the season also touting a “new” style.
I know MTSU was almost constantly coming with pressure and I thought the line and (most of) the backs did a pretty good job in pass pro,....but I look forward to the analysis to explain if the lack of the lack of quick-hitters to punish this was a flaw in execution by the QB, play design, play calls, or possibly part of the playbook not used or ready. (They did seem to use Screens or RB flares but I don’t recall many slants etc.).
Less worried about the O performance in the second half now that we know Shea was banged up a bit. More worried about D line/ D tackle performance against Wisconsin —probably even if we get Dwumfour and Jeter back in the lineup.
September 1st, 2019 at 10:58 AM ^
Screens (no draw plays w/o an FB I guess) were the obvious antidote to constant blitzes, but M, despite several attempts, never seemed to set them up well. Nothing that can't be corrected with a little more practice, however.
September 2nd, 2019 at 2:19 AM ^
So, they ran a bunch of cover 0 blitz. Meaning there is no free safty playing deep because they are bringing 6+ on a blitz and he has to man up because of this.
You can beat this by slants and fades from the slots. They did the latter in the red zone and most fans hated the idea because it was not completed. You can also do deep if you feel your guys can get off the jams fast and beat their guys. Both long TDs were checked into by Shea after he recognized the cover 0 and checked into those plays.
You can also run screens, which they tried but didn't work to will.
They did also do some perimeter runs to counter them sending so much between the tackles.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:26 AM ^
This team could be 7-5 , sorry not impressed
September 1st, 2019 at 1:42 AM ^
That’s because you’re an uniformed idiot who, had it been a 75-0 blowout, would be right here telling everyone to pump the brakes and raining on the parade. You’re a miserable, self-loathing fan whose sole purpose in here seems to be to spread negativity.
September 1st, 2019 at 6:52 AM ^
Stop taking so personally what another fan thinks. Good lord dude.
September 1st, 2019 at 9:02 AM ^
Go back to sleep
September 1st, 2019 at 9:09 AM ^
Did you take another nap between comments?
September 1st, 2019 at 1:28 AM ^
I thought it looked like a normal first game. Plenty to work on for sure. Lots of freshmen got playing time and I was pleasantly surprised by most of what I saw.
I do think DT is a major concern. I don't see any way Mason holds up vs an oline like Wisconsin or probably any B1G team.
September 1st, 2019 at 7:28 AM ^
That's me. Everything was okay. Good stuff and rough edges and an opponent who threw an irritating style at a team who was just trying to take a test drive.
But I never thought Ben Mason would actually get snaps. That's terrifying. Great dude. Tough guy. That's not a DT, man. Also, please stop with the 2 QB bullshit. You're telling me we're better with McCaffrey catching screens and Patterson running jet motion than Sainristil or Jackson? Way too cute. Looked like pure hubris. Knock it off.
Otherwise, good. Beat Army.
September 1st, 2019 at 8:51 AM ^
I didn't see the game ... I listened to it (see my rant below). Brandstatter and Dierdorf were trying to play up the impact of Mason on the D line. If I'm reading between the lines here, the presence of Mason in the game is a bad sign. Let's hope those players more suited for DT get better soon.
September 1st, 2019 at 9:03 AM ^
Speaking of that, did Dwumfour return after hobbling off. I was watching to the degree a hyper 4 year old would let me watch but did not notice if he played after the biffed sack.
September 1st, 2019 at 9:14 AM ^
I think that was it. You can see him lying on the ground hurt after the QB escaped.
September 1st, 2019 at 10:21 AM ^
Dwumfour remained dressed but stood on the sideline the rest of the game.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:29 AM ^
I don’t know what to think anymore. Some stuff was first game issues that I think will get cleaned up. Some of the other stuff should not be happening in year 5 of Harbaugh being the head coach.
September 1st, 2019 at 1:44 AM ^
Some of the other stuff should not be happening in year 5 of Harbaugh being the head coach.
Such as? One confused sequence, one false start, couple of offsides, nothing out of the ordinary for a first game.
September 1st, 2019 at 2:01 AM ^
Clock management issues, for one.
September 1st, 2019 at 2:09 AM ^
There were no issues. It was a fairly well played 2:00 minute offense — something everyone said we didn’t have. The spike was on Shea, and it didn’t matter.
Everyone bitches about everything.
September 1st, 2019 at 8:29 AM ^
How do you know that the coaches didn’t call the spike?
September 1st, 2019 at 10:32 AM ^
Actually the spike matter a lot. Instead of 1st and 10 you have a 2nd and 10. He wasted a play to save a timeout when they had 2 left. Did you notice that we when to halftime with both timeouts left?
September 1st, 2019 at 5:44 PM ^
Actually the spike was used to keep the refs from reviewing what seemed to be an incomplete pass (from what others are saying). If that's true, had he called a time out, and the refs had time to review the play, it wouldn't have been 1st & 10 from the spot where it was, it would have 3rd down IIRC.
So, for all the bitching, it was actually a very heads up play.
September 1st, 2019 at 7:33 AM ^
All of the “two QB stuff.” That is going nowhere and should be left to die.
September 1st, 2019 at 8:30 AM ^
I agree with this. I don't see how taking an NFL WR off the field to insert a QB at WR could help the offense. I don't think we are fooling anyone with that package.
September 1st, 2019 at 8:52 AM ^
Maybe they're using it to establish some tendency that they'll break later in the season. Although I've thought that in the past, and it never materialized.
September 1st, 2019 at 9:08 AM ^
Yeah, the tendency has to “work” in order for breaking it to matter. It never has, not with Morris, not now with McCaffrey. In all honesty, McCaffrey has wheels, if you want to get him the ball that bad and are willing to risk injury to do it, just line him up at RB and pitch it to him. Kid can get to the edge better than any player we have had since Denard Robinson. Don’t use him as part of a “trick,” just give him the ball with blockers.
September 2nd, 2019 at 2:27 AM ^
Do people really not watch other teams? The two wb stuff has been run everywhere gattis has been. They do things like have him take a jet sweep and have a te do a dig 10 yards in front of him so the overhang defender has to defend both threats.
It's about having 2 guys out there who are capable of throwing really well but also a running threat.
It ain't going anywhere.
September 1st, 2019 at 8:41 AM ^
If they have some double pass plays thrown in, the 2 QB sequence could be a nightmare for opponents to game plan.
September 1st, 2019 at 10:16 AM ^
They probably don't. The one big potential trick play that might possibly emerge in week 10 isn't worth the dozen of bullshit downs you're setting on fire to set it up. It's nonsense.
Sincerely,
Pepcat
September 1st, 2019 at 1:30 AM ^
i can definitely see the bones of a dangerous offense. Get healthy and stay healthy. Black, dpj, nico healthy and ballin....whoa
September 1st, 2019 at 1:31 AM ^
Love the Ace writeups! Yeah, first game stuff?
Shea didn't need to take that first hit, Slide!!
September 1st, 2019 at 2:02 AM ^
The phenomenon of always miserable Michigan fan presented itself to me not even 4 minutes into the game when miserable fan number one told miserable fan number two Harbaugh should bench Shea for McCaffrey.
My God those two were insufferable the entire game
September 1st, 2019 at 2:06 AM ^
Michigan dropped a sure pick 6, failed on 4th and a yard at the goal line and gave up a garbage long touchdown against 2nd and 3rd string defenders late in the game.
54-14 would look and feel a lot better.
September 1st, 2019 at 8:10 AM ^
I'm sure MTSU feels the exact same way. If the DB doesn't literally fall down on the 1st TD, if they make a play or two on offense in the 3rd quarter to punch it in--they probably feel they could have been leading going into the 4th.
The game was what the game was.
September 1st, 2019 at 10:10 AM ^
I don't know about "the exact same way." Their only two non-garbage scores came off short fields following Michigan turnovers. Otherwise they were pretty much stifled until the last 2 minutes.
September 1st, 2019 at 12:57 PM ^
The point is that MTSU made mistakes also. They had turnovers. They missed some passes, some blocks, some tackles, etc.
I'm not saying Michigan didn't deserve to win the game. I'm saying only pointing out the mistakes by Michigan and saying if those get cleaned up, the score is different discounts that they weren't the only team who feels they could have played better.
September 2nd, 2019 at 2:36 AM ^
Mtsu basically had to try to drink and dunk down the field because trying anything that took longer than about 1.5 seconds ended with their QB taking a hit. They don't have the talent to do this to Michigan. The 14 points off short fields was pretty much best case for them.
They were also really outclassed when they were on defense. That's why they just kept running cover 0 despite Michigan doing things to exploit it. They simply had no other choice but blitz 6 all game.
They played very inspired and probably pretty close to their ceiling imo.
September 1st, 2019 at 2:06 AM ^
I’d like to welcome all of you Mlive hardcore, hot-take, commentators to this site. You suck and the anonymity of the internet is the only reason you have a voice in anything.
September 1st, 2019 at 4:29 PM ^
Says the guy voicing his opinion anonymously.
You know how I know you're unintelligent? Because you're on a message board complaining about people complaining on a message board without even a hint of self-awareness.
September 1st, 2019 at 2:08 AM ^
A big problem regarding perception is that half of the fan base is thinking about the OSU game and nothing else, which is just a total recipe for fandom disaster. Every time M doesn't play a perfect game a significant portion of the posters here are going to come out and say, "Well, OSU will beat us if we play like that."
September 1st, 2019 at 11:26 AM ^
Well you can’t blame them. The past 20 years of beat downs does that.
September 1st, 2019 at 2:23 AM ^
I'm happy. The offense is a work in progress, but they showed enough to impress. Big chunk plays! I saw plenty of speed in space. The one negative for me was the play of the dline, particularly the DTs. But overall, I loved it. Thomas and Charbonnet looked like stars. Grey was a man out there. Loved Turner's burst.
September 1st, 2019 at 9:16 AM ^
Agree with most of this.
On offense..
I thought Shea was looking for the chunk play too much in the second half. Clearly forced a few deep balls when he had guys running open underneath.
Didnt like the 2 QB plays & think Dylan kept the ball on a few reads he shouldn’t have. Overall thought there was some really good things but a work in progress for sure.
On Defense...
The Dline was quick off the ball but lost contain a bit too much. The interior didn’t provide much push but I’ll wait to see if that improves when Dwumfour & Jeter are back.
The secondary played better than I expected outside of a 14 point swing from Verts uncharacteristic struggles. Gray was really impressive & Ambry had the looks of someone who could be special. Stay healthy kid!
A lot to work on but also showed some promise.
September 1st, 2019 at 2:27 AM ^
I have a massive bponer
Comments