Webb Crystal Ball to LB Deuce Spurlock
Deuce is on a visit this weekend and Sam just put in a CB with high probability.
Great name and also a very good LB prospect who should fit well in the Macdonald system.
Will put highlight linkin comment below as it will not take here.
https://247sports.com/Player/Deuce-Spurlock-46101976/
September 24th, 2021 at 7:35 PM ^
Kinda violent!
September 24th, 2021 at 1:45 PM ^
Cool name
September 24th, 2021 at 5:29 PM ^
After his Michigan career hopefully he'll start a private investigation firm.
Deuce Spurlock, Private Eye.
September 24th, 2021 at 11:16 PM ^
Or a European Gigalow
September 24th, 2021 at 1:48 PM ^
Your link to his profile page is hyperlinked wrong. This gets you where you want to go: https://247sports.com/Player/Deuce-Spurlock-46101976/
Also, can you explain why you referred to him as a very good LB prospect? I'm not saying he isn't, but the profile doesn't support that. Kind of a low 3-star, and his best offer is from ... Mississippi State? South Carolina? Maybe there's been some noise about him being under estimated, like we sometimes here for other recruits?
September 24th, 2021 at 1:59 PM ^
Mason Graham was a low 3 star when he committed to Michigan from Boise State, now USC offered and his rating shot up to borderline 4 star.
Edit:
Deuce's P5 offers include:
Boston College (Jeff Hafley)
Pitt (Narduzzi)
Syracuse
South Carolina
Mississippi State (I recall a lot of people on here wanted to hire Zach Arnett to replace Brown while he was still at SDSU)
September 24th, 2021 at 3:32 PM ^
Looks like he has offers from Army and Vanderbilt. I'm assuming this guy is underrated, but he's also a smart kid. Smart doesn't always translate to football smart, but it beats being a knucklehead. I've know a few guys with NFL size and speed who didn't make it through college because they had rocks for brains. One dude was 6'9" 300 pounds and ran a 4.8 40. I saw him bench 300+ pounds 15-20 reps. He threw the shot almost 60'. He got kicked off our HS team his senior year for discipline issues. He got kicked off of two Big Ten teams and one MAC team for disciplinary issues as well. Crying shame.
It's good to have smart dudes on your team.
September 24th, 2021 at 7:27 PM ^
There are a LOT of dumb 5 star players making a ton of money in the NFL. I don’t care how many AP course they scored a “5” in. Just give me the best football players.
September 24th, 2021 at 3:58 PM ^
I don't think you need to defend the offer here, BUT there is a reason we were chasing a few others before him - The kid from Chicago, the kid from TX etc.
I think this young man has some nice upside - and if you are going to take an upside kid its not bad to do it in an area you want to grow recruiting. i.e. Spurlock in AL, Alexander at Belleville
Side note on the LB from TX mentioned above (Jeremy Patton - looked it up..) Was listening to the Rivals recruiting podcast and EJ Holland said that the rumor was that Patton had recently reached out to both Texas and M for a possible flip from Baylor. It seems M is no longer interested -- don't blame them when the kid was apparently a silent to M, UT, and Baylor at the same time before he announced for Baylor. I actually think his "silent" was what caused M to slow down their pursuit of Deuce in the first place.
September 24th, 2021 at 2:32 PM ^
Thanks for correcting the link. I tried to link both the 247 and Hudl pages but it would not take them, I guess when I tried to link Hudl it over-rode the 247 link.
As for his ratings: We all know that stars are more meaningless this year than ever before due to covid. The staff had this kid at a camp; looked him over; worked him out; liked what they saw.
They liked Jeremy Patton, a very similar player, a tad better. Jeremy was a silent commit, but his mom told him to stay home so he committed to Baylor.
September 24th, 2021 at 4:20 PM ^
He silent committed to 3 schools and has recently been reaching out to schools to decommit from Baylor.
Also, God told him, not his mom
September 24th, 2021 at 2:47 PM ^
Yeah, this is a plan c guy after we didn't get our other targets. I wasn't all that impressed with his film. Oh well, can't get them all.
September 24th, 2021 at 3:23 PM ^
Yea seriously. He’s ranked 1274 in his class. That’s like borderline 2 star. He may turn out fine but yea not a “very good prospect”
September 24th, 2021 at 6:14 PM ^
It's three weeks into the season. The rankings will change dramatically between now and the end of the season/signing day.
Our best WR this year was a 3 star recruit. Rankings matter, but they aren't everything.
September 24th, 2021 at 4:18 PM ^
Raw talent like Kevontae Henry and Aaron Alexander. Spurlock has all the physical gifts needed to be a phenomenal player in this defense. Quickness at the point of attack, down hill from the snap, speed, good frame to support SnC, likes to hit and is good at it. He is a good LB prospect. Literally. He needs plenty of work that a kid like him would hope to get in college. He's not beyond his age in mentality or technique or anything like that. He is good and needs coaching and thus is a good LB prospect, but not in the same way that Walter Nolen is a "good DL prospect" or Travis Hunter is a "good DB prospect"
September 24th, 2021 at 8:39 PM ^
Looking at his size I’m guessing they might be thinking safety
September 24th, 2021 at 1:55 PM ^
The 247 recruiting guys spoke at decent length on him on the pod the released today.
Brief highlights:
Steve still has a CB on him from before. Steve believes Michigan to have been very high on him, but it was a matter of whether or not Lander Barton would work out. It looks like now they're ready for him.
However, the question is now, whether or not Spurlock is ready for Michigan. He was ready to go earlier, grandma had a winter jacket ready.
Steve - Not going to take off his CB, but maybe there will be some luck if the ball works out.
Brice - They've seen him in person, worked him out, esp. with the new defensive staff they know he is what he is. Michigan looks good for him. Plus athlete. Better than ranking, like Dent. And a kid they can't pass up on.
Sam - Lander Barton for them was a guy they take whenever (regardless of what the rankings say). Esp based on the post visit vibe, and the team feels good. Sam is still skeptical,Utah kid with strong Utah ties. In the end, Michigan doesn't want to be left holding the bag without a LB who can't contribute soon, like Spurlock.
Steve - Confirms Barton as their #1 who they would find room for. Junior and NHG's development may mean that LB isn't as dire as it once appeared, and 2023 has a ton of elite LBs in it.
September 24th, 2021 at 1:56 PM ^
Not the greatest offer list but maybe that's because of covid that he's undervalued. It is a great name!
September 24th, 2021 at 2:05 PM ^
Appears to be a deep sleeper to the recruiting sites. Looks like his other P5 suitors consist of lower-level to meddling programs: BC, Miss St., Syracuse, Pitt., Washington St. etc.
For those with scouting chops on the board, does his film look like that of an under-recruited prospect, or is this a reach on Michigan's part?
September 24th, 2021 at 2:31 PM ^
I mean, he looks better than you’d expect of a kid ranked #1274 in the composite. I wouldn’t say he looks like he’s going to be an All-American either though. So it depends on your definition of “reach.”
Looks like he’s a very solid football player, one that you’d typically see ranked as a high three star. Not a “star” by any means but a solid contributor and late career starter.
September 24th, 2021 at 4:22 PM ^
+1 proper take
September 24th, 2021 at 2:29 PM ^
So Sam just dropped info about a Deuce?
September 24th, 2021 at 2:39 PM ^
Yea, he was really trying to push this (info) out. He said he needed to have his morning coffee first before he decide pinched this little loaf on information.
September 24th, 2021 at 2:48 PM ^
Ummm... poop?!
September 24th, 2021 at 3:31 PM ^
That's disgusting! WTF is your problem?!
September 24th, 2021 at 3:13 PM ^
Then he backed the RV out of the garage for tailgating
September 24th, 2021 at 6:16 PM ^
After having a gut feeling, most likely.
September 24th, 2021 at 2:56 PM ^
At first i didn't like this due to his offers sheet. Then i watched film... He's a demon. Watch him chuck himself coming around the edge at the runner. Like this.
This though means that Barton ain't coming. And we need a big LB inside.
I'll say it again, i love this new staff. What sucks is that MacDonald won't be here more than two years, and by the time these players play. NFL will be coming after him... Maybe college head coach too.
September 24th, 2021 at 5:51 PM ^
If he builds a great D for us, it’s the kind of problem we can handle….?
September 24th, 2021 at 3:46 PM ^
Awesome name. Looks athletic, great jumping ability and good tackler on film. Come help make it a full house for every home game Deuce and Go Blue !
September 24th, 2021 at 5:53 PM ^
Seems like a plan c option, but if he is you might as well take one named Deuce Spurlock.
September 24th, 2021 at 6:28 PM ^
He's a plan A...we were the ones to reinitiate.
We need 2-3 ILBs in this class, depth wise, Hill-Green and Colston look like the future starters but we haven't see anyone outside of Mullings that looks like a 2-deep player.
Hood got in during the last game, but that's not saying much.
All of those VIPERs, Barrett, Solomon, Velazquez, etc. seem like men without a home at the moment.
September 24th, 2021 at 6:49 PM ^
Yes, Plan A after missing on Burnham, Barton, Patton, and Cheeks but I don't think that is how Plan A works.
September 24th, 2021 at 7:33 PM ^
^^^^ This.
September 24th, 2021 at 7:47 PM ^
No, not that at all.
September 24th, 2021 at 7:47 PM ^
I'm talking about Plan A today.
Not a year ago. You said "plan C option."
Those guys you just listed AREN'T OPTIONS!
He's a take.
September 24th, 2021 at 9:00 PM ^
Plan A after all of the other plans didn’t work out… yeah, we know what you’re saying. But that’s not how “Plan A” works. He’s a backup plan to the backup plans. The ones in front of him didn’t come. So we’re on to him now. That doesn’t make him plan A.
Doesn’t mean he’s a bad player or that he isn’t a take now. Simply that if Michigan had gotten the guys it wanted before, he wouldn’t even be on the radar. The only reason he IS on the radar, is because Michigan struck out on guys it wanted before. He’s not a plan A.
September 24th, 2021 at 6:24 PM ^
Aaaahh, we meet again, old friend.
September 24th, 2021 at 7:13 PM ^
Dude runs a 4.4! And w his size. Seems like a good prospect!
September 24th, 2021 at 9:15 PM ^
If he never sees the field as a LB, he could be a special teams demon. Fast and aggressive. Hey, you need those players too, right? Need to hit the position hard next year in recruitng, Mr. Helow. Losing Burnham hurt.
September 24th, 2021 at 9:18 PM ^
Look, I’m never one to worship Harbaugh, and I don’t deify our staff when they make blockhead decisions. That being said, Harbaugh and co have absolutely beat up on the recruiting sites as well as a lot of the other schools when it comes to talent evaluation, not once, but at least five years or so. So don’t take this as one of those “all our two stars are really five stars”, but right now, I’d recommend giving more credit to Harbaugh and his guys than to a web site. Unless you go to TMZ for all your other news.
I’ll also, just for the sake of it, reiterate what some others have referred to; during the lockdown year, the sites were especially weak, seeing far fewer players in person.
Last, and certainly least, in the few clips we got to see, he showed great potential. I don’t know if I’m going to say that he’s a great athlete or football player, but I’m personally drawn to the guys that play a physical game and try to knock people out of their cleats.
Maybe a Ross type, I really really hope. But the great thing is, we always get to find these things out, sooner or later.
Also, no need to whine about Velasquez or Barrett types. We had a DC who wanted those body types. He’s gone. But it’s certainly possible that if UM was more of a viper type D, those guys would be excelling in that role. But we’ll never know. Them’s the breaks.
September 24th, 2021 at 11:50 PM ^
That being said, Harbaugh and co have absolutely beat up on the recruiting sites as well as a lot of the other schools when it comes to talent evaluation, not once, but at least five years or so
Can you translate this for me please. I have no idea what this means
September 25th, 2021 at 10:44 AM ^
I will attempt. The staff has generally proven to be great talent evaluators and earned some level of trust in these matters.
I tend to agree but every year there seems to be a position or two where we lose out on most of our priority targets. Last year it was safety this year it is ILB and safety.
At LB we are taking some high upside prospect and we have Colson, Hill-Green, and Mullings so there is time.
Safety is feeling like a concern. Moten, Paige, and Moore look legit but three safeties is not enough. Missing out two years in a row is the type of error that kills us in the past.