Way OT: Jeremy Clarkson Fired From Top Gear

Submitted by Sports on

I apologize for the super OT content, but as this is the single most popular program on Earth, I figured it was worth a post. Jeremy Clarkson will be fired by the BBC tomorrow morning, brining Top Gear's 21.5 season run to a sad end. Rumors are that Netflix is courting him for a reboot though, which could be awesome for all parties. Less censorship for Clarkson and it basically ensures a massive viewership boost for Netflix.

Link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11493270/Jeremy-Clarkson-to-be-sacked-by-the-BBC.html

julesh

March 24th, 2015 at 10:51 PM ^

Prior to the actual firing, Mays and Hammond both said they would not do the show without him. I hope they stick to that and all do the exact same show for Netflix. They'll probably have to call it something else (Best Speed?) and rename/redesign The Stig, but I don't want to watch a show without the three of them. I am 100% certain Clarkson is a total asshole, who likely did deserve to be fired, but that doesn't make him any less entertaining. 

Sports

March 24th, 2015 at 11:03 PM ^

Pretty much my thoughts exactly. He deserves to be fired, but that doesn't make it suck any less. I'll miss the current incarnation of the show. Hopefully whatever comes next will retain some of its dynamism. I think the Netflix option is definitely the best route. 

ndscott50

March 24th, 2015 at 11:29 PM ^

You can be fired by the British for being too British? Screaming at someone for 30 minutes because they can't magically reopen the kitchen for you seems like normal behavior for an old British dude. What's next. Are they going to fire someone for yelling at some waiter in Paris for not speaking English?

Ricky from Sunnyvale

March 24th, 2015 at 11:32 PM ^

I am not a huge fan of the show, but when I do come across it on the BBC I usually watch about 3 episodes in a row. He is highly entertaining and makes the show very enjoyable(hence 3 episodes in a row) I don't even really like cars. Netflix will most likely pick him up for a similar show, which should probably be unrated. That being said he also seems like a world class turd as well. How do you continue to employ someone that disregards all your warnings? When someone has a Top 10 list of being an asshole, they usually are.

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/may/01/top-gear-jeremy-clarkson-t…

Grampy

March 25th, 2015 at 7:55 AM ^

Perhaps he is an asshole, but he never ceases to entertain.  In this way, he reminds me of some superstar athletes: self-absorbed, entitled, almost sociopathic. The please us (the consumer) in unique and extrordinary ways, but the press (and some of us) expect them to be unaffected by the adulation.  If I had his combination of success and (apparent) fun at my job, I'd probably be a dick, too.

Gallagher

March 24th, 2015 at 10:53 PM ^

On that bombshell... Man that's disappointing. Although he probably should be fired for punching a producer BBC is going to lose a ton of $$$ for this. I hope they reboot the series somewhere, it's too good to end right now.

turtleboy

March 25th, 2015 at 6:31 AM ^

His controversies are extremely tame, IMHO. If he were a stand up comedian, or saying those things in a movie, instead of on the BBC, nobody would bat an eye at them. Move the show to Netflix and there'll be no problem with his non-PC humor.

turtleboy

March 25th, 2015 at 2:18 PM ^

I didn't say anything about him getting fired. I addressed a long string of "controversies" the media blew out of proportion throughout the years. They likely served as an impetus for his firing, though. The assault seems to be the final straw.

imdwalrus

March 25th, 2015 at 7:45 PM ^

"Blew out of proportion" my ass. The guy's got a history of racist, sexist and homophobic comments going back years, the kind of statements where any one of those comments would have gotten you, me or anyone else fired instantly. Whether or not you personally were offended it shouldn't be that hard to see why a lot of people were upset when he, say, invokes Hitler when he's talking about Germans. I'm amazed at how many people online are passionately defending him today. The man is a bully and a jerk, and being entertaining on TV doesn't and shouldn't give him free reign. He's also an idiot, given that the BBC has publicly told him he'd be fired if he had one more incident after the last time around. He tested that, and here we are now. Mostly, I'm impressed that the BBC had the guts to do this even though it means likely killing one of their most popular shows.

UMChick77

March 25th, 2015 at 9:13 PM ^

So two wrongs make a right? Or only when it fits your narrative? Comparing Clarkson to those two is like apples to oranges.  Clarkson wasn't showing up in hole in the wall dives playing to niche audiences. He was on one of the most popular TV shows on a major network with a bigger and more diverse audience. Big difference there. Their network, their rules. 

 

mgoblue0970

March 26th, 2015 at 1:02 AM ^

Absolutely not; two wrongs don't make a right and nobody here has said that.  What was your verbal SAT score again?

If the two of you READ @turtleboy's post CAREFULLY before jumping to conclusions, you'd see that he was simply juxtaposing saying something in the movies or a comedy venue with saying the same thing on the BBC.

Furthermore, you're not practicing what you preach... you write, "Clarkson wasn't showing up in hole in the wall dives playing to niche audiences"... I find this extremely interesting that someone who suggests two wrongs don't make a right would imply that audience size matters.  Offensive behavior is offensive whether or not in front of 1 or 1 million.

UMChick77

March 26th, 2015 at 5:58 AM ^

Ahhh... the old resorting to personal attacks when one is made to feel butthurt just because someone doesn't agree with you. Classy and predictable. One finger pointing at me and three pointing right back at you in terms of reading comprehension. What was your score? I wasn't replying to turtle boy specifically...I was replying to YOUR comment. Go back and re-read what you said. The theme of your post was "it should be okay for Clarkson because this person and that person does it." 

You missed the point entirely which I'm not a bit surprised. Fitting your narrative...remember? Oh yeah. I forgot.. Reading score, right? ;) 

Movies and comedian specials are NOT the same as TG. They don't pay Clarkson to act like an asshole, to be rude/crude while they do actors and comedians.  Top Gear is popular for it's authentic feel of being cool, funny, laid back guys with cool cars and the situations they end up in. They are viewed as an extension of their show, mainly because of the show's format. It also appeals to a wider audience, which is apparent you have no concept. Wider or larger audience means a bigger demographic. Coupled with those two things it's quite clear why BBC did what it did---and they gave him several passes. For the job he was doing and hired for, his behavior was viewed overall as unacceptable. You can't compare him to movies and comedians because that wasn't what he was hired for. 

We also seem to be forgetting the final straw was the assault. That was the icing on the cake and what got him fired.  Again, apples to oranges and your logic if faulty at best.

 

 

mgoblue0970

March 26th, 2015 at 1:34 PM ^

You still don't get it. This has nothing to do with how I feel about it. Truth is, I don't care. I was just commenting that people were taking the OP something to be it was not. ...and in your rants, you continue to make my point. FURTHERMORE, you wrapped something in quotes and attributed that to me. I never said what you quoted. I said, that Clarkson hasn't said anything which already hasn't been said. The, ahem, "THEME" is something you inferred, and again makes my SAT verbal jab at you very applicable. I continue to be amazed at how you look at behavior based upon venue or income. If Chris Rock and Jeremey Clarkson say the same thing, then they are both assholes. Chris Rock doesn't get a free pass because he's on HBO and JC is on BBC. Troll on!

Optimism Attache

March 25th, 2015 at 7:14 AM ^

"Jeremy Clarkson is to be sacked as Top Gear presenter after a BBC investigation found he did assault a producer in a row over steak and chips."

At least he is going down over something worth fighting for...

M Fanfare

March 25th, 2015 at 9:38 AM ^

Elvis Costello said that every performer is playing a character and the ones who get in trouble are the ones who confuse the character for their real selves. That's how I've come to understand Clarkson.

Njia

March 25th, 2015 at 11:15 AM ^

BBC, like any TV network, is governed by the advertisers who are paying the bills. Clarkson is perfectly within his rights as a free citizen to say just about whatever he wants.

However, BBC are equally free to decide that he's got to go. Their business depends on those advertisers who, I am certain, want no part in a controversy that impacts their ability to sell products to the members of the public who may be offended by his comments.

The other network that would be perfect for someone like him is HBO. If they can have Bill Maher as a flamethrower, they can make room for Clarkson, too.

 

JeepinBen

March 25th, 2015 at 11:33 AM ^

It's a total no-win. Everybody loses out because of Jezza's behavior.

 

That said, Clarkson actually owns lots of the rights to Top Gear - it's i believe leased to the BBC. The BBC doesn't own the airfield, test track, etc. I think there might be very little to stop Clarkson (and May and Hammond) from continuing on if they so choose. The rumors are that Netflix will pony up the cash. I think HBO would be another suitor. It'll be interesting to see what comes of this, but yeah, talk about a hostile work environment. He had to be "sacked"