Stolen Signs and Injuries (i.e. the MSU Complaint), Revisited

Submitted by Clarence Beeks on November 6th, 2023 at 6:30 PM

In the maelstrom of the past two weeks let's not forget that have Allen Haller saying this:

Haller worried about players potentially getting hurt because Michigan players, in theory, knew where they'd be going on plays," Thamel wrote.

https://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/michigan-state/spartans/2023…

We all kind of shrugged that off as complaining, right?  Ok, so why is that relevant?  Because, now we have this:

However, an Illinois staffer from last season where Ryan Walters was the defensive coordinator, has confirmed to The Wolverine that Walters and Illinois had stolen Michigan’s offensive signals last season.

https://gbmwolverine.com/2023/11/06/illinois-used-stolen-signals-agains…

I think we will all remember that Michigan lost someone pretty important in that game to a (basically) season ending injury that derailed a Heisman Trophy candidacy.  So, if the Haller argument is going to stick out there as something that gained (at least some) traction, I look forward to the media tracking down this path against Illinois and an ACTUAL injury from a game with an opponent who stole Michigan's signs (with collaboration from other Big Ten teams).

 

Eng1980

November 6th, 2023 at 7:31 PM ^

This hypothesis is not rational.  There is no relationship between knowing the play and an increased likelihood of injury.  Most likely the opposite.  If I know the play, then I can stop it without other unnecessary contact.   Someone wants to tie a helmet to the knee because they knew the play?

But then, again, my hypothesis is that all of the work by Conner Stalions yielded not a damn thing that presented Michigan with an advantage.  Harbaugh knew nothing of Stalions's work because it didn't present Jim with something he didn't already know.  Jim never had a reason to say, "hey, this is pretty good.  How did you do this?"

Please, make it stop.