Snowflakes Thread: Defense Vs. Cincinnati

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

This will be the snowflake thread for the thoughts on our defense in the game versus Cincinnati.

lhglrkwg

September 9th, 2017 at 3:45 PM ^

but they were aided greatly by Cincinnati's passing game being awful. The number of open WRs the QB missed and then the number of WRs just dropping balls had to add up to like 50% or more of their pass attempts

Also surprised how little organic pressure the D-line was able to get. I don't think I heard Mo Hurst's name once

OwenGoBlue

September 9th, 2017 at 3:47 PM ^

If you're willing to spread out and get your QB absolutely destroyed 20+ times there will be some plays available. Particularly relevant for the Penn State game. Tunnel screens and some of the Viper/Rover stuff will get ironed out but are the risk of this D. Good to great performance overall.

Aziraphale

September 9th, 2017 at 3:47 PM ^

Not every DC would think to call the "pick-six" play, let alone twice a game.

In actuality, it was surprising that Cincinnati was able to run a little. Good overall performance, but tighter coverage needed.

getsome

September 9th, 2017 at 4:05 PM ^

glad to see them mixing in some more zone and trap schemes...even with dominant press man like last season its still nice to throw few changeups at offenses (even if you dont much need to).  INT's much more likely with defenders reacting in zone...doesnt need to be anything crazy, and still butter your bread with press man, but a handful of zone calls mix in nicely

LSAClassOf2000

September 9th, 2017 at 3:51 PM ^

As interesting as the offensive version of this thread is going to become, the defense quietly did some work this weekend:

 - Michigan gave up 200 yards overall across 70 plays, which is 2.86 yards per play

 - They held Moore to 8.8 yards per completion and only 3.3 yards per attempt

 - 2.27 yards per carry allowed is actually really good

 

MGoFunkadelic

September 9th, 2017 at 3:52 PM ^

this is a high aggression high risk defense.

sometimes being so aggressive on blitzing can leave those tunnel screens open but with some coaching and more game experience they will pick it up.

wish we had a couple more d linemen that were of the Taco Charlton/Rashan Gary caliber to platoon with the first string like last year.

OwenGoBlue

September 9th, 2017 at 4:02 PM ^

Long throws take time to develop. The D confuses the QB and then is in his face, so it's really hard to make the big plays compared to, say, quarters where your QB knows the slot go route will be there pre-snap. Run fits are coached exceptionally well to prevent busts once you break the line. Splitting hairs a bit here but I have some problems with the "high risk" assertion (as it's commonly used at least) since this isn't Randy Shannon blitzball.

SF Wolverine

September 9th, 2017 at 3:56 PM ^

Line was god, not dominant.  Had some coerage beats, onedropped and two overthrown that could have been TDs or close.  Cinci had a nice game plan -- good read of our Florida film.  Lotsa stuf for the D to work on this week.

bronxblue

September 9th, 2017 at 4:02 PM ^

Thought they played well enough.  I know people will point to some open WRs and lucky breaks, and tunnel screens definitely surprised them, but don't forget last year's team gave up 275 yards rushing to UCF, and that didn't really matter the rest of the year.  It's still a championship defense.

lhglrkwg

September 9th, 2017 at 4:03 PM ^

which will hurt us a lot against a good passing team that can take advantage of that. The question is- what teams we play can stretch us veritcally like that? Maybe Purdue and Indiana, probably Penn State, maybe OSU? We might be fortunate to not play many teams that can take advantage of our young secondary