OccaMsrazr

August 26th, 2018 at 5:21 PM ^

With the Tarik Black news, the ND game is firmly a 50/50 coin-flip imo. 

It also makes me wonder what this staff is doing regarding WR recruiting. 2 transfers and only 1 low rated WR in 2018 and 1 3 star in 2019. 

WR could easily be the next OT roster fiasco 

Unicycle Firefly

August 26th, 2018 at 5:40 PM ^

I am by no means a super optimistic fan, but even with Tarik out last year, Michigan had a legit to chance to win every game it lost except for one, and that’s with disastrous O Line and QB play. Can anyone dig up any posts last year where someone said “Man, if only we had Tarik Black everything would have worked out.”?

Wolverine91

August 26th, 2018 at 5:45 PM ^

Seriously? Tarik black is gonna be missed, no doubt. But to sit there and act like the world is cashing down on us is silly. DPJ, Collins, Martin, and perry is more than enough to carry us until Tarik returns. As far as wr recruiting, we're fine.   Relax 

ColeIsCorky

August 26th, 2018 at 5:51 PM ^

You can't compare season stats on WR's last year to get any significant data about how their performance will be this year. Shea Patterson at the very least will bring up the level of everyone's play. WR's cant catch balls that dont make it to their hands. 

Besides, every WR outside Grant Perry and Walk-Ons was a freshman last year. And they were all highly rated and have been raved upon in fall camp. We will be fine... This doesnt mean that Tarik Black isn't a loss. Those are not mutually exclusive.

karpodiem

August 26th, 2018 at 5:34 PM ^

Good Lord I hope I'm wrong, but I feel the people up-voting and discounting Tarik's injury are in for a somewhat rude awakening.

We could easily lose the ND game because we have no passing threat, they shut down Shea's ability to run because we have no passing threat, and our defense is on the field the entire game.

It would be great if we could see a passing game that was in the upper half of FBS statistics. We didn't have it for the 2nd half of 2016, all of 2017.

LabattsBleu

August 26th, 2018 at 5:44 PM ^

i feel the same about the people who keep saying fans who are trying to stay positive have their head in the sand.

yes, losing Black is a big blow to the team. No one is disputing that.

after that acknowledgement, people are trying more forward, not panicking, nor looking at 'what ifs'.

Black is out. There's a season of football to be played...

maybe people can let us know what the appropriate reaction ought to be so we aren't offending anyone...

karpodiem

August 26th, 2018 at 5:48 PM ^

None of the players you cited have put up numbers that are all that impressive. Neither were Tarik's but he passed a few names on your list to become what would have been a starting spot in our game at ND.The onus is on Shea to get the ball to them this year, and the line to have a decent pass pro.

Gucci Mane

August 27th, 2018 at 12:21 AM ^

DPJ could easily end up being better than Black. It is amazing what practice buzz did for Black's stock around here. Does losing him suck ? Of course. But if we were going to lose a starter on offense the best one would have been WR or maybe TE. Hopefully he can come back and work his way to 100% but the end of the year.

B-Nut-GoBlue

August 26th, 2018 at 5:30 PM ^

Eh skimming the article it makes sense. He's creating odd circumstances and trying to get his guys to learn how to adapt...when, as it does and will, shit hits the fan they're more prepared and comfortable

lhglrkwg

August 26th, 2018 at 5:39 PM ^

This definitely seems like something a team does right before they go 6-6 and everyone afterward is like “ah yeah that makes sense. They were practicing with soccer balls and strobe lights. I don’t know what we were expecting”

Ty Butterfield

August 26th, 2018 at 5:42 PM ^

ND is a road game at night. That is enough cause for concern even before Black’s season ending injury. Don’t have any confidence in Harbaugh to take this team on the road and get a huge win. 

Hold This L

August 26th, 2018 at 5:46 PM ^

Michigan was going to win with defense and establishing the run game. Having a stud wr is great, but it doesn’t make or break you as a team. If WRs won games, the lions would have been in the playoffs every year. You need solid guys, which we have even without black. I think the one position we could afford an injury was wr. Praying for a speedy recovery

DairyQueen

August 26th, 2018 at 5:54 PM ^

Of course the best way to improve at doing something well, is to deliberately practice doing that thing well.

But players really should be cross-training as much as possible.

Harbaugh's instinct for increased interest in multi-sport athletes is well-founded.

As adolescents, and now kids even, specialize more and more in their sport (and the "seasonal sport" turns into a "year-round" sport), repetitive stress becomes a real issue, compounded over years, with no rest period, it's extrememly taxing on the skeletal system and respective joints (nervous system as well). The prevalence of repetitive stress injuries in children have been going up and up for the last few decades (for a variety of reasons of course).

And some sports medicine theory as a whole wants to see "injury", itself, as repetitive stress-based (ACL injuries are a great example). Harbaugh's previous Performance Scientist Fergus Connolly (at both Michigan and the 49ers) was a proponent of that applied approach.

Think of a cyclist who's entire "athletic" performance takes place in a circular, motion, determined purely by the length of their crank-arms ~1 foot, millions of rotations, over the 30-40 years they compete (luckily they never reach joint-end-range-motion, which is why they can perform for so much longer than almost any pro sport). Wide-receivers, who's entire performance is spent quickly accelerating, and decelerating, and dead-legging, are definitely at particular risk. Pitchers, etc.

Cross-training from a purely injury prevention standpoint is ideal, let alone the skills transfer.

And it's been shown to prevent psychological burnout as well (from HS to the Pros)

It's win-win-win.

Saying this for those on the board that have kids or will, because a) it will keep the kids more fit/less injured, and b) sports are meant to be fun, let the kid select if they want to "be serious" about it, the more different ones they play the happier/healthier they'll be!

stephenrjking

August 27th, 2018 at 12:50 AM ^

TBH I think there could be some upside to a coach putting a team through difficult situations to simulate the mental stress that can come from road games where things go wrong.

I used to think that Lloyd Carr should do something unconventional in his practices to get his teams ready for road games (Michigan always underperformed on the road under Carr and there was at least one head-shaking loss every year after 1997, 2006 excepted). I was thinking more like holding practices on hockey-sized indoor soccer fields or something, but running normal looks.

A soccer ball doesn't sound scary to me at all. But there might be something to the idea that a road environment, with loud opposing fans and somewhat unfair reffing and the occasional earthquake moments, might be something that a coach can prepare for by trying to throw off their players and teaching their players to adapt to difficult moments.

Michigan could have used that in 2016, IMO. 

Don't get me wrong, I think our main problem on the road the last two years is that the team just wasn't as good as we wanted it to be, and it struggled in measurable areas of weakness. But there were moments where a touch more composure might have made a difference, and composure can be learned.